Effect of supplementing commercially available and locally prepared carbon materials in anaerobic digestion: focusing on enhanced performance and potential mechanisms
Tinku Casper D’Silva , Noémi N. Horváth-Gönczi , Ottó Ribár , Sameer Ahmad Khan , Ram Chandra , Virendra Kumar Vijay , Zoltán Bagi , Kornél L. Kovács , Bhushan P. Gandhi , Kirk T. Semple
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (6) : 758 -788.
Effect of supplementing commercially available and locally prepared carbon materials in anaerobic digestion: focusing on enhanced performance and potential mechanisms
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a potential approach to treat organic wastes for energy and resource recovery. Adding various carbon materials in AD is being studied owing to its positive effects on the overall governing mechanisms. This study investigated the effect of adding seven different carbon materials in AD reactors in two sets of experiments. In the first set, five commercially available carbon materials were added to the batch assay, treating α-cellulose under anaerobic and oxygen-stressed conditions. The activated carbon amended reactor steadily provided methane yield even under oxygen-stressed conditions. In the second set, locally prepared hydrochar (HC) and pyrochar (PC) derived from biogas slurry were added to the anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. The reactor amended with HC, and its process water (PW) provided 478 mL/g·VSinput of biomethane yield while the PC-amended reactor achieved 411 mL/g·VSinput. This enhancement was attributed to functional groups in HC, volatile acids in PW, and PC’s pH buffering properties. Further, the grey relational analysis revealed that the HC and PW amendment is the best route for improved AD process efficiency. In short, from the two sets of experiments, these findings suggest that activated carbon, PC, and HC (with PW) have potential for improving AD efficiency. However, further research is needed to evaluate their long-term effectiveness and scalability.
Anaerobic digestion / Carbon materials / Enhanced biomethane yield / Pyrochar / Hydrochar
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater 2012. |
| [6] |
ASTM D3173/D3173M-17a (2017) Standard Test Method for Moisture in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke. |
| [7] |
ASTM D3175-20 (2020) Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke. |
| [8] |
ASTM E1755-01(2020) (2020) Standard Test Method for Ash in Biomass. |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Chynoweth DP, Mah RA (1971) Volatile acid formation in sludge digestion, pp 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/ba-1971-0105.ch004. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses (AFOLU) (2023) Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, p. 747–860. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.009. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Isha A, Jha B, D’Silva TC, Kumar S, Khan SA, Kumar D, et al. (2023) Role of additives on anaerobic digestion, biomethane generation, and stabilization of process parameters. Biofuel extraction techniques, Wiley. p. 101–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119829522.ch4. |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
van Langerak EPA, Lettinga G (1998) Control of calcium carbonate precipitation in anaerobic reactors. |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Liu Y, Li X, Wu S, Tan Z, Yang C (2021) Enhancing anaerobic digestion process with addition of conductive materials. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130449 |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
Streekstra H, Livingston A (2020) Acrylamide in bread and baked products. Breadmaking, Elsevier. pp 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102519-2.00010-4. |
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
Wang K, Wu Y, Li W, Wu C, Chen Z (2018b) Insight into effects of mature compost recycling on N2O emission and denitrification genes in sludge composting. Biores Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.077 |
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |