Gas loss prediction in underground hydrogen storage using an improved capacitance–resistance model for carbon neutrality of China

Zhengguang Liu , Liu Lu , Lin Ma , Haizhi Luo , Xiaohu Yang , Masoud Babaei

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 492 -505.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 492 -505. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-025-00356-w
Original Article
research-article

Gas loss prediction in underground hydrogen storage using an improved capacitance–resistance model for carbon neutrality of China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Hydrogen plays an increasingly important role in the world’s carbon neutrality, but due to the high cost of storage, underground hydrogen storage (UHS) especially in depleted natural gas fields is considered. An important factor for UHS is the ability to predict gas loss during the cycles of injection and production. The use of reservoir simulation can be computationally exhaustive. Alternatively, we can use semi-analytical data-tuned methods such as the hybrid capacitance resistance model and long short-term memory model. We apply this model for the first time to UHS. The hybrid model closely aligns with actual data, reducing the maximum error rate from 4.32% to 2.37% and increasing computational time from 3.5 s to over 4.5 s. The study also highlights the unique challenges of storing hydrogen, which has a lower density than methane and a smaller molecular size with risks of escaping or leakage. In 2030, hydrogen production is set to rise significantly, with three key areas of strategic development expected to contribute over 70% of the national output in China, emphasizing the role of three key areas in bolstering global energy sustainability. Predictions indicate substantial potential hydrogen loss rates, particularly in these key areas, with projections showing losses exceeding 0.4 million tons/year in one of the key areas alone.

Keywords

Geothermal energy / Hydrogen / Capacitance resistance model / Machine learning optimisation / Long short-term memory

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhengguang Liu, Liu Lu, Lin Ma, Haizhi Luo, Xiaohu Yang, Masoud Babaei. Gas loss prediction in underground hydrogen storage using an improved capacitance–resistance model for carbon neutrality of China. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2025, 10(4): 492-505 DOI:10.1007/s40974-025-00356-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AbbasimehrH, ShabaniM, YousefiM. An optimized model using LSTM network for demand forecasting. Comput Ind Eng, 2020, 143106435

[2]

AhmedN, AssadiM, ZhangQ, ŚliwaT. Data-driven insights for improved heating and cooling predictions: impact of input parameters on multivariate deep learning algorithms using geothermal borehole field data. Appl Therm Eng, 2024, 245122870

[3]

AttarMR, MohammadiM, TaheriA, HosseinpourS, Passandideh-FardM, Haddad SabzevarM, DavoodiA. Heat transfer enhancement of conventional aluminum heat sinks with an innovative, cost-effective, and simple chemical roughening method. Therm Sci Eng Prog, 2020, 20100742

[4]

BarbierE. Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2002, 6(1): 3-65

[5]

BruceW. An electrical device for analyzing oil-reservoir behavior. Transactions of the AIME, 1943, 151(01): 112-124

[6]

ChoK, KimY. Improving streamflow prediction in the WRF-hydro model with LSTM networks. J Hydrol, 2022, 605127297

[7]

GhasemiM, OmraniS, MahmoodpourS, ZhouT. Molecular dynamics simulation of hydrogen diffusion in water-saturated clay minerals; implications for underground hydrogen storage (UHS). Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 47(59): 24871-24885

[8]

GhasemiM, TatarA, ShafieiA, IvakhnenkoOP. Prediction of asphaltene adsorption capacity of clay minerals using machine learning. Can J Chem Eng, 2023, 101(5): 2579-2597.

[9]

GraetzJ. New approaches to hydrogen storage. Chem Soc Rev, 2009, 38(1): 73-82

[10]

Hassan IM, El-Saady G, Ibrahim E, Abdelshafy AM (2022) Optimal sizing of battery/hydrogen renewable energy system with genetic algorithm based on irradiance forecasting with LSTM neural network, In: 2022 23rd international middle east power systems conference (MEPCON), pp 01–08

[11]

HassanI, RamadanHS, SalehMA, HisselD. Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: review, analysis and perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 149111311

[12]

HeinemannN, AlcaldeJ, MiocicJM, HangxSJT, KallmeyerJ, Ostertag-HenningC, HassanpouryouzbandA, ThaysenEM, StrobelGJ, Schmidt-HattenbergerC, EdlmannK, WilkinsonM, BenthamM, Stuart HaszeldineR, CarbonellR, RudloffA. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media - the scientific challenges. Energy Environ Sci, 2021, 14: 853-864.

[13]

HochreiterS, SchmidhuberJ. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780.

[14]

HongA, BratvoldR, NævdalG. Robust production optimization with capacitance–resistance model as precursor. Comput Geosci, 2017, 21(5): 1423-1442

[15]

JiangA, QinZ, FaulderD, CladouhosTT, JafarpourB. Recurrent neural networks for short-term and long-term prediction of geothermal reservoirs. Geothermics, 2022, 104102439

[16]

JiangA, QinZ, FaulderD, CladouhosTT, JafarpourB. A multiscale recurrent neural network model for predicting energy production from geothermal reservoirs. Geothermics, 2023, 110102643

[17]

LiT, LiuQ, GaoX, MengN, KongX. Thermodynamic, economic, and environmental performance comparison of typical geothermal power generation systems driven by hot dry rock. Energy Rep, 2022, 8: 2762-2777

[18]

LiY, HuangX, HuangX, GaoX, HuR, YangX, HeY-L. Machine learning and multilayer perceptron enhanced CFD approach for improving design on latent heat storage tank. Appl Energy, 2023, 347121458

[19]

LinJ, MaJ, ZhuJ, CuiY. Short-term load forecasting based on LSTM networks considering attention mechanism. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 2022, 137107818

[20]

LinJ, MouD. Analysis of the optimal spatial distribution of natural gas under ‘transition from coal to gas’ in china. Resour Energy Econ, 2021, 66101259

[21]

LiuH, AmpahJD, AfraneS, AdunH, JinC, YaoM. Deployment of hydrogen in hard-to-abate transport sectors under limited carbon dioxide removal (CDR): implications on global energy-land-water system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2023, 184113578

[22]

LiuZ, ChenY, YangX, YanJ. Power to heat: opportunity of flexibility services provided by building energy systems. Adv Appl Energy, 2023, 11100149

[23]

LiuZ, DuY, SongC, YangX, YanJ. Effect of soil moisture content on thermal performance of ground source heat exchangers: an electromagnetism topology-based analysis. Energy Rep, 2023, 10: 3914-3928

[24]

LiuZ, LuoH, ZhangY, LuoT, YangX. A review of simulation software for energy systems: design, functionality, and applications. Therm Sci Eng Prog, 2024, 53102760

[25]

Liu Z, Shi M, Mohammadi MH, Luo H, Yang X, Babaei M (2024) ‘An improved capacitance–resistance model for analysing hydrogen production with geothermal energy utilisation’, Int J Hydrog Energy . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319924033639

[26]

LiuZ, WangW, ChenY, WangL, GuoZ, YangX, YanJ. Solar harvest: enhancing carbon sequestration and energy efficiency in solar greenhouses with PVT and GSHP systems. Renew Energy, 2023, 211: 112-125

[27]

MamghaderiA, PourafsharyP. Water flooding performance prediction in layered reservoirs using improved capacitance-resistive model. J Petrol Sci Eng, 2013, 108: 107-117

[28]

MorenoGA, LakeLW. On the uncertainty of interwell connectivity estimations from the capacitance–resistance model. Pet Sci, 2014, 11: 265-271

[29]

MuskatM. The flow of homogeneous fluids through porous media. Soil Sci, 1938, 462169

[30]

NazirH, MuthuswamyN, LouisC, JoseS, PrakashJ, BuanME, FloxC, ChavanS, ShiX, KauranenP, KallioT, MaiaG, TammeveskiK, LymperopoulosN, CarcadeaE, VezirogluE, IranzoA, KannanAM. Is the H2 economy realizable in the foreseeable future? Part II: H2 storage, transportation, and distribution. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 45(41): 20693-20708

[31]

NgCSW, Jahanbani GhahfarokhiA. Adaptive proxy-based robust production optimization with multilayer perceptron. Appl Comput Geosci, 2022, 16100103

[32]

NiazS, ManzoorT, PandithAH. Hydrogen storage: materials, methods and perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2015, 50: 457-469

[33]

OberkirschL, GrobbelJ, Maldonado QuintoD, SchwarzbözlP, HoffschmidtB. Controlling a solar receiver with multiple thermochemical reactors for hydrogen production by an LSTM neural network based cascade controller. Solar Energy, 2022, 243: 483-493

[34]

RazaA, ArifM, GlatzG, MahmoudM, Al KobaisiM, AlafnanS, IglauerS. A holistic overview of underground hydrogen storage: influencing factors, current understanding, and outlook. Fuel, 2022, 330125636

[35]

SayarpourM, ZuluagaE, KabirC, LakeLW. The use of capacitance–resistance models for rapid estimation of waterflood performance and optimization. J Petrol Sci Eng, 2009, 69(3): 227-238

[36]

SongC, LiuZ, BabaeiM, LiuR, HouG. Mitigating low-temperature corrosion in flue-gas heat exchangers for improving thermal storage efficiency in geothermal power plants. Therm Sci Eng Prog, 2024, 52102673

[37]

TarkowskiR, Uliasz-MisiakB. Towards underground hydrogen storage: a review of barriers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 162112451

[38]

ThiyagarajanSR, EmadiH, HussainA, PatangeP, WatsonM. A comprehensive review of the mechanisms and efficiency of underground hydrogen storage. J Energy Storage, 2022, 51104490

[39]

UsmanMR. Hydrogen storage methods: review and current status. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 167112743

[40]

Vo ThanhH, ZhangH, DaiZ, ZhangT, TangparitkulS, MinB. Data-driven machine learning models for the prediction of hydrogen solubility in aqueous systems of varying salinity: implications for underground hydrogen storage. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2024, 55: 1422-1433

[41]

Wanderley de HolandaR, GildinE, JensenJL. A generalized framework for capacitance resistance models and a comparison with streamline allocation factors. J Pet Sci Eng, 2018, 162: 260-282

[42]

YousefAA, GentilP, JensenJL, LakeLW. A capacitance model to infer interwell connectivity from production-and injection-rate fluctuations. SPE Reserv Eval Eng, 2006, 9(06): 630-646

[43]

ZhangX, LiH, SekarM, ElgendiM, KrishnamoorthyN, XiaC, Priya MatharasiD. Machine learning algorithms for a diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel blends and hydrogen using LSTM networks. Fuel, 2023, 333126292

[44]

ZhangZ, LiH, ZhangD. Water flooding performance prediction by multi-layer capacitance-resistive models combined with the ensemble kalman filter. J Petrol Sci Eng, 2015, 127: 1-19

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

157

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/