Economic analysis of blue and green hydrogen production in Oman: comparison of various energy sources mix

Tartil Al-Abri , Mingjie Chen , Mohammad Reza Nikoo , Sulaiman Al-Hashmi , Amer Al-Hinai

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 225 -242.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 225 -242. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-024-00341-9
Original Article

Economic analysis of blue and green hydrogen production in Oman: comparison of various energy sources mix

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Hydrogen (H2) is critical in transitioning from fossil fuel energy systems. It can be produced via different technological processes and sources. One such method for producing green H2 is water electrolysis. Research indicates that utilizing Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources (HRESs) to power electrolysis can lead to over 80% reduction in emissions compared to the fossil-powered process. This study aims to conduct an economic evaluation of four schemes of green H2 production powered by HRESs and blue H2 production by Steaming Methane Reforming (SMR) with byproduct CO2 captured and sequestered underground in Oman, based on the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) and H2 (LCOH). The four analyzed schemes are: (1) stand-alone PV-WT (Solar Photovoltaic and Wind Turbines) connected to 1MW-1GW PEM electrolyzer, (2) grid-connected PV-WT to 1MW-1GW PEM electrolyzer, (3) grid-connected PV-WT-CPG (CO2 Plume Geothermal) to 100MW electrolyzer, and (4) extended scheme #3 integrated with a SMR unit, producing blue H2. The economic analysis was conducted using the GETEM Excel® spreadsheet model. The outcomes reveal that, at 100MW electrolyzer capacity, scheme #3 has the lowest LCOH of 4 $/kg and an LCOE of 0.2 $/kW (capEx ~ $400M), while scheme#1 comes with the highest LCOH and LCOE of 8 $/kg and 0.8 $/kW, respectively (capEx ~ $21.5M). Whereas scheme #2 achieved an LCOE of 0.3 $/kWh and an LCOH of 6 $/kg. In contrast, scheme#4 has the lowest LCOH of 2 $/kg compared to the three green H2 productions. The results suggest that including geothermal energy, fed into a grid, can reduce green H2 production costs and align with SDG7: Affordable and Clean Energy. More importantly, using natural gas and HRESs in Oman for hybrid blue and green H2 production is the most feasible approach, particularly in the next few decades of the transition from a fossil to a carbon-free energy system.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Hydrogen production / Renewable energy / Water electrolysis / Steam methane reforming / Carbon sequestration / Engineering / Environmental Engineering

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tartil Al-Abri, Mingjie Chen, Mohammad Reza Nikoo, Sulaiman Al-Hashmi, Amer Al-Hinai. Economic analysis of blue and green hydrogen production in Oman: comparison of various energy sources mix. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2024, 10(2): 225-242 DOI:10.1007/s40974-024-00341-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AbdinZ, MéridaW. Hybrid energy systems for off-grid power supply and hydrogen production based on renewable energy: a techno-economic analysis. Energy Convers Manag, 2019, 196: 1068-1079.

[2]

AdamsBM, KuehnTH, BielickiJM, RandolphJB, SaarMO. A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions. Appl Energy, 2015, 140: 365-377.

[3]

AdebayoTS, ÖzkanO. Investigating the influence of socioeconomic conditions, renewable energy and eco-innovation on environmental degradation in the United States: a wavelet quantile-based analysis. J Clean Prod, 2024, 434. 140321

[4]

AhmadM, KhattakA, Kashif JanjuaA, AlahmadiAA, Salman KhanM, UllahNTechno-economic feasibility analyses of grid- connected solar photovoltaic power plants for small scale industries of Punjab, 2022PakistanFrontiers in Energy Research.

[5]

AhshanR. Potential and economic analysis of solar-to-hydrogen production in the sultanate of Oman. Sustainability, 2021, 13179516.

[6]

AjanovicA, SayerM, HaasR. The economics and the environmental benignity of different colors of hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 475724136-24154.

[7]

AlbadiMH, El-SaadanyEF, AlbadiHA. Wind to power a new city in Oman. Energy, 2009, 34101579-1586.

[8]

Albadi, M (2010) On techno-economic evaluation of wind-based DG. PhD thesis

[9]

Albadi MH, Al-Badi, AH, Al-Lawati AM, Malik AS (2011) Cost of PV electricity in Oman. 2011 IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC) [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeegcc.2011.5752548.

[10]

Al-BadiA, Al WahaibiA, AhshanR, MalikA. Techno-economic feasibility of a solar-wind-fuel cell energy system in Duqm. Oman Energies, 2022, 15155379.

[11]

Al-OrabiAM, OsmanMG, SedhomBE. Evaluation of green hydrogen production using solar, wind, and hybrid technologies under various technical and financial scenarios for multi-sites in Egypt. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2023, 489838535-38556.

[12]

Al-YahyaiS, TanCS, AL-HatmiY, Al-BadiA. Wind resource assessment over al duqm industrial area in Oman. Arab J Geosci, 2016.

[13]

ArcosJM, SantosDM. The hydrogen color spectrum: techno-economic analysis of the available technologies for hydrogen production. Gases, 2023, 3125-46.

[14]

BaiM, SongK, SunY, HeM, LiY, SunJ. An overview of hydrogen underground storage technology and prospects in China. J Petrol Sci Eng, 2014, 124: 132-136.

[15]

BaltaMT, DincerI, HepbasliA. Potential methods for geothermal-based hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2010, 35104949-4961.

[16]

BarhoumiEM, OkonkwoPC, Ben BelgacemI, ZghaibehM, TliliI. Optimal sizing of photovoltaic systems based green hydrogen refueling stations case study Oman. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 477531964-31973.

[17]

Bhoye H, Sharma G (2014) International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation EngineeringIe at: http://www.ijareeie.com/upload/2014/january/45_An%20Analysis.pdf.

[18]

BreyJJ, CarazoAF, BreyR. Exploring the marketability of fuel cell electric vehicles in terms of infrastructure and hydrogen costs in Spain. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2018, 82: 2893-2899.

[19]

Caslin B (2020) Battery Storage. Teagasc—the Agriculture and Food Development Authority. Available at: https://www.teagasc.ie/rural-economy/rural-development/diversification/battery-storage/.

[20]

CeylanC, DevrimY. Green hydrogen based off-grid and on-grid hybrid energy systems. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2023, 489939084-39096.

[21]

ChenM, Al-MaktoumiA, IzadyA. Assessment of integrated CO2 geologic storage and geothermal harvest in a semi-closed Thin Reservoir. Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 2022, 49. 101773

[22]

ChenM, Al-MaktoumiA, IzadyA, CaiJ, DongY. Use closed reservoirs for CO2 storage and heat recovery: a two-stage brine-extraction and CO2-Circulation Strategy. Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 2022, 52. 102346

[23]

ChenM, Al-SubhiK, Al-RajhiA, Al-MaktoumiA, IzadyA, Al-HinaiA. Numerical evaluation of hydrogen production by steam reforming of natural gas. Adv Geo-Energy Res, 2022, 73141-151.

[24]

COP28 (2023) COP28 declaration of intent—hydrogen. cop28. https://www.cop28.com/en/cop28-uae-declaration-on-hydrogen-and-derivatives

[25]

DawoodF, AndaM, ShafiullahGM. Hydrogen production for energy: an overview. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 4573847-3869.

[26]

EllersdorferP, OmarA, TaylorRA, DaiyanR, LeslieG. Multi-effect distillation: a sustainable option to large-scale green hydrogen production using solar energy. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2023, 488131491-31505.

[27]

El-NasharAM, SamadM. The solar desalination plant in Abu Dhabi: 13 years of performance and operation history. Renew Energy, 1998, 141–4263-274.

[28]

EL-Shimy M (2017) The Panel Generation Factor (PGF) of photovoltaic plants—proof. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5662021.v1

[29]

Energy gov (2023) At COP28, countries launch declaration of intent on Clean Hydrogen | Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/articles/cop28-countries-launch-declaration-intent-clean-hydrogen

[30]

FrancoA, GiovanniniC. Recent and future advances in water electrolysis for green hydrogen generation: Critical Analysis and Perspectives. Sustainability, 2023, 152416917.

[31]

FranzmannD, HeinrichsH, LippkauF, AddankiT, WinklerC, BuchenbergP, StoltenD. Green hydrogen cost-potentials for global trade. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2023, 488533062-33076.

[32]

GETEM (2024) Geothermal electricity technology evaluation model. Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved online on Jan 08, 2024 from https://www.energy.gov/eere/geothermal/geothermal-electricity-technology-evaluation-model

[33]

GinsbergMJ, VenkatramanM, EspositoDV, FthenakisVM. Minimizing the cost of hydrogen production through dynamic polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer operation. Cell Rep Phys Sci, 2022, 36. 100935

[34]

GunawanTA, MonaghanRFD. Techno-econo-environmental comparisons of zero- and low-emission heavy-duty trucks. Appl Energy, 2022, 308. 118327

[35]

HanckeR, HolmT, UllebergØ. The case for high-pressure PEM water electrolysis. Energy Convers Manag, 2022, 261. 115642

[36]

HassanQ, AbdulrahmanIS, SalmanHM, OlapadeOT, JaszczurM. Techno-economic assessment of green hydrogen production by an off-grid photovoltaic energy system. Energies, 2023, 162744.

[37]

HassanQ, TabarVS, SameenAZ, SalmanHM, JaszczurM. A review of green hydrogen production based on solar energy; techniques and methods. Energy Harvest Syst, 2023.

[38]

HosseinalizadehR, et al. . Economic sizing of a hybrid (PV–WT–FC) renewable energy system (HRES) for stand-alone usages by an optimization-simulation model: case study of Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2016, 54: 139-150.

[39]

HuangJ, BalcombeP, FengZ. Technical and economic analysis of different colours of producing hydrogen in China. Fuel, 2023, 337: 127227.

[40]

IRENA (2020) Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.5°C Climate Goal. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi

[41]

JanssenJLLCC, WeedaM, DetzRJ, van der ZwaanB. Country-specific cost projections for renewable hydrogen production through off-grid electricity systems. Appl Energy, 2022, 309. 118398

[42]

JungY, HeoY, ChoH, KangYT, KimY, LeeH. A plan to build a net zero energy building in hydrogen and electricity-based energy scenario in South Korea. J Clean Prod, 2023, 397. 136537

[43]

KatebahM, Al-RawashdehM, LinkeP. Analysis of hydrogen production costs in steam-methane reforming considering integration with electrolysis and CO2 Capture. Clean Eng Technol, 2022, 10. 100552

[44]

KhouyaA. Hydrogen production costs of a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis powered by a renewable hybrid system. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2021, 462714005-14023.

[45]

KillerM, FarrokhsereshtM, PaterakisNG. Implementation of large-scale Li-ion battery energy storage systems within the EMEA region. Appl Energy, 2020, 260. 114166

[46]

Kroposki B, Levene J, Harrison K, Sen PK, Novachek F (2006) Electrolysis: Information and opportunities for Electric Power Utilities. National Renewable Energy Laboratory [Preprint] https://doi.org/10.2172/892998

[47]

MagazzinoC, ElliottC. The relationship between real GDP, CO2 emissions, and energy use in the GCC countries: a time series approach. Cogent Econ Financ, 2016, 411-20.

[48]

Mahdi RajabiM, ChenM, JavaranMRH, Al-MaktoumiA, IzadyA, DongY. Probabilistic net present value analysis for designing techno-economically optimal sequential CO2 sequestration and geothermal energy extraction. J Hydrol, 2022, 612. 128237

[49]

MatarA, FareedZ, MagazzinoC, Al-RdaydehM, SchneiderN. Assessing the co-movements between electricity use and carbon emissions in the GCC area: evidence from a wavelet coherence method. Environ Model Assess, 2023, 28: 407-428.

[50]

MuradovN. Low to near-zero CO2 production of hydrogen from fossil fuels: status and perspectives. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2017, 422014058-14088.

[51]

NematollahiB, ChenM, NikooMR, Al-MaktoumiA. Impact of spatially correlated heterogeneity and boundary on techno-economic performance of CO2-circulated geothermal harvest. Gas Sci Eng, 2023, 116. 205046

[52]

NicitaA, MaggioG, AndaloroAPF, SquadritoG. Green hydrogen as feedstock: financial analysis of a photovoltaic-powered electrolysis plant. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 452011395-11408.

[53]

NikolaidisP, PoullikkasA. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 67: 597-611.

[54]

Ocenic E (2024) “Green” Hydrogen Products and Their Economic End-Uses: A Statistical Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1197–1211. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0102

[55]

OkonkwoPC, BarhoumiEM, MansirIB, EmoriW, UzomaPC. Techno-economic analysis and optimization of solar and wind energy systems for hydrogen production: a case study. Energy Sour, Part : Recover, Util, Environ Effects, 2022, 4449119-9134.

[56]

OlabiAG, AbdelghafarAA, BaroutajiA, SayedET, AlamiAH, RezkH, AbdelkareemMA. Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: current status and future directions. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2021, 464523498-23528.

[57]

OliveiraAM, BeswickRR, YanY. A green hydrogen economy for a renewable energy society. Curr Opin Chem Eng, 2021, 33. 100701

[58]

OniAO, AnayaK, GiwaT, Di LulloG, KumarA. Comparative assessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions. Energy Convers Manag, 2022, 254. 115245

[59]

OsmanAI, MehtaN, ElgarahyAM, HefnyM, Al-HinaiA, Al-MuhtasebAH, RooneyDW. Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review. Environ Chem Lett, 2021, 201153-188.

[60]

PalenzuelaP, Alarcón-PadillaD-C, ZaragozaG. Large-scale solar desalination by combination with CSP: Techno-economic analysis of different options for the Mediterranean Sea and the Arabian Gulf. Desalination, 2015, 366: 130-138.

[61]

PanchenkoVA, DausYuV, KovalevAA, YudaevIV, LittiYuV. Prospects for the production of green hydrogen: review of countries with high potential. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2023, 48124551-4571.

[62]

PrajapatiM, ShahM. Geothermal-solar hybrid systems for hydrogen production: a systematic review. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2024.

[63]

RahmanifardH, PlaksinaT. Hybrid compressed air energy storage, wind and geothermal energy systems in Alberta: feasibility simulation and economic assessment. Renew Energy, 2019, 143: 453-470.

[64]

RezaeiM, AkimovA, GrayEM. Economics of solar-based hydrogen production: sensitivity to financial and technical factors. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 476527930-27943.

[65]

Ridha F, Al Subhi M, Al Riyami S (2023) Techno-economic analysis of green hydrogen production using renewable energy sources in the Sultanate of Oman [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4462348.

[66]

Sarkar A, Behera DK, (2012) Wind Turbine Blade Efficiency and Power Calculation with Electrical Analogy. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(2). Available at: https://www.ijsrp.org/research_paper_feb2012/ijsrp-feb-2012-06.pdf.

[67]

SchnuelleC, WassermannT, FuhrlaenderD, ZondervanE. Dynamic hydrogen production from PV & wind direct electricity supply—modeling and techno-economic assessment. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 455529938-29952.

[68]

ShahSAR, ZhangQ, Balsalobre-LorenteD, PilařL. Technology, urbanization and natural gas supply matter for carbon neutrality: a new evidence of environmental sustainability under the prism of COP26. Resour Policy, 2023, 82: 103465 .

[69]

Shiva KumarS, LimH. An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Rep, 2022, 8: 13793-13813.

[70]

SorrentiI, RasmussenTBH, XydisG, EnevoldsenP, YouS. Correlations between component size green hydrogen demand and breakeven price for energy islands. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2023, 183. 113439

[71]

SpataruC, BouffaronP. Off-grid energy storage. Storing Energy, 2022.

[72]

SuW, ZhengW, LiQ, YuZ, HanY, BaiZ. Capacity configuration optimization for green hydrogen generation driven by solar-wind hybrid power based on comprehensive performance criteria. Front Energy Res, 2023.

[73]

TangO, RehmeJ, CerinP. Levelized cost of hydrogen for refueling stations with solar PV and wind in Sweden: on-grid or off-grid?. Energy, 2022, 241: 122906.

[74]

TaoM, AzzoliniJA, StechelEB, AyersKE, ValdezTI. Review—engineering challenges in green hydrogen production systems. J Electrochem Soc, 2022, 1695. 054503

[75]

TarkowskiR. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2019, 105: 86-94.

[76]

Ueckerdt F, Verpoort P, Anantharaman R, Bauer C, Beck F, Longden T, Roussanaly S (2023) On the cost competitiveness of blue and Green Hydrogen. SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4501786

[77]

Vaziri RadMA, KasaeianA, NiuX, ZhangK, MahianO. Excess electricity problem in off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems: a comprehensive review from challenges to prevalent solutions. Renewable Energy, 2023, 212: 538-560.

[78]

WilliamsLOVeziroğluTN. Electrolysis of Sea Water. Hydrogen Energy, 1975Boston, MASpringer.

[79]

XuP, AdebayoTS, Ahmad KhanK, ÖzkanO, Khajimuratov ShukurullaevichN. United states’ 2050 carbon neutrality: myth or reality? evaluating the impact of high-tech industries and green electricity. J Clean Prod, 2024, 440. 140855

[80]

Yilmaz C, Kanoglu M (2017) International Advanced Researches And Engineering Journal 1(1). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/403086

[81]

ZainalBS, KerPJ, MohamedH, OngHC, FattahIMR, RahmanSMA, NghiemLD, MahliaTM. Recent advancement and assessment of green hydrogen production technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2024, 189. 113941

[82]

ZainalBS, KerPJ, MohamedH, OngHC, FattahIMR, RahmanSA, MahliaTI. Recent advancement and assessment of green hydrogen production technologies. Renew Susta Energy Rev, 2024, 189. 113941

[83]

ZghaibehM, BarhoumiEM, OkonkwoPC, Ben BelgacemI, BeitelmalWH, MansirIB. Analytical model for a techno-economic assessment of green hydrogen production in photovoltaic power station case study Salalah city-Oman. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 473114171-14179.

[84]

ZhengY, HatzellKB. Technoeconomic analysis of solar thermal desalination. Desalination, 2020, 474. 114168

[85]

ZieglerMS, MuellerJM, PereiraGD, SongJ, FerraraM, ChiangY-M, TrancikJE. Storage requirements and costs of shaping renewable energy toward grid decarbonization. Joule, 2019, 392134-2153.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation(RC/RG-DVC/WRC/21/02)

Sultan Qaboos University(CL/SQU-IGGCAS/WRC/23/01)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

182

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/