Synergizing sustainability: a critical review on harnessing agroforestry for biomass, carbon sequestration, and water-food-energy nexus
Anamika Barman , Suman Dutta , Anurag Bera , Priyanka Saha , Jyotirmay Roy , Malini Roy Choudhury , Mahadev Bera , Sumanta Das
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› : 1 -35.
Synergizing sustainability: a critical review on harnessing agroforestry for biomass, carbon sequestration, and water-food-energy nexus
To address the multifaceted challenge of sustainability posed by human interventions and climate change, the urgent need to harness agroforestry for biomass production, carbon sequestration, and the integration of the water-food-energy nexus has been recognized. This approach has not only provided innovative solutions but also highlighted the complexities and difficulties inherent in achieving sustainable development. This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of research spanning 24 years, elucidating the role of agroforestry in mitigating climate change impacts, enhancing biomass provision, carbon sequestration, and optimizing the water-food-energy nexus. Various forms of agroforestry systems exhibit differing capacities to supply biomass and sequester carbon. In a study of a poplar-based agroforestry system, the dry biomass yield of poplar ranged from 69.90 to 207.98 Mg ha−1 aboveground and 13.46 to 36.69 Mg ha−1 belowground across five different planting geometries. The total carbon storage, encompassing both above and belowground biomass, varied among spacing configurations, with values of 112.48, 101.80, 84.87, 77.28, and 38.84 Mg C ha−1, respectively. Further, agroforestry (sapota-cowpea-castor) decreased soil loss and runoff by 37.7 and 19.1%, respectively, compared to sole crop cultivation. Similarly in another study, the Karanda (Carissa sp.) based agroforestry system with a mung bean-potato system achieved the highest net return (3529.1 US$ ha−1) and water use efficiency (33.0 kg ha-mm−1). The review synthesizes findings from diverse studies highlighting the multifunctional benefits of agroforestry systems across various geographical regions and agroecological contexts. Key themes explored include biomass production, carbon sequestration potential, and the intricate linkages between water, food, and energy security within agroforestry landscapes. Through a synthesis of empirical evidence, the review underscores the capacity of agroforestry to enhance ecosystem resilience, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, and foster sustainable livelihoods for rural communities. Moreover, it examines the synergies and trade-offs inherent in agroforestry interventions, considering factors such as species selection, management practices, and socio-economic considerations. The review also identifies gaps in current knowledge and areas requiring further research attention, such as the scaling up of agroforestry practices, socio-economic impacts on local communities, and policy frameworks for mainstreaming agroforestry into national and international climate and development agendas. Overall, this review underscores the pivotal role of agroforestry as a holistic approach to achieving multiple SDGs, particularly in the face of climate change. By integrating biomass provision, carbon sequestration, and optimizing resource use through the water-food-energy nexus, agroforestry offers a sustainable pathway toward resilient and equitable development.
Agroforestry / Biomass provision / Carbon sequestration / Water-Food-Energy nexus / Sustainable development goals / Land use management
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Campana PE, Lawford R (2022) Renewable energies in the context of the water–food–energy nexus. In: Jurasz J, Beluco A. (Eds.) Complementarity of Variable Renewable Energy Sources, Elsevier, p. 571–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85527-3.00010-8 |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Campana, P. E., & Lawford, R. (2022). Chapter 24 -Renewable energies in the context of the water–food–energy nexus. In Jurasz, J. & Beluco, A. (Eds.) Complementarity of Variable Renewable Energy Sources, Elsevier, p. 571–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85527-3.00010-8 |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Dhakal A, Maraseni TN, Timsina J (2022) Assessing the potential of agroforestry in nepal: Socio-economic and environmental perspectives. In: Timsina J, Maraseni TN, Gauchan D, Adhikari, J., Ojha, H. (eds) Agriculture, Natural Resources and Food Security. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. pp 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09555-9_21 |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
FAO (2013) Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda: A guide for decision-makers, by G. Buttoud, in collaboration with O. Ajayi, G. Detlefsen, F. Place & E. Torquebiau. Agroforestry working paper no. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome. 37 pp |
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
Gupta SR, Dagar JC, Teketay D (2020) Agroforestry for Rehabilitation of Degraded Landscapes: Achieving Livelihood and Environmental Security. In: Dagar JC, Gupta SR, Teketay D (eds) Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes. Springer, 23–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_2 |
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
Hachaichi M, Egieya J (2023) Water-Food-Energy Nexus in Global Cities: Addressing Complex Urban Interdependencies. Water Resour Manage 37:1811–1825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03455-7 |
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
Hombegowda HC, Adhikary PP, Jakhar P, Madhu M (2022). Alley Cropping Agroforestry System for Improvement of Soil Health. In: Shit, P.K., Adhikary, P.P., Bhunia, G.S., Sengupta, D. (eds) Soil Health and Environmental Sustainability. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. pp 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09270-1_23 |
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
IPCC |
| [88] |
IPCC (2019) IPCC special report on climate change, desertifcation, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems; intergovernmental panel on climate change: Geneva, Switzerland |
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
Kittur BH, Upadhyay AP, Jhariya MK, Raj A, Banerjee A (2024). Agroforestry for resource diversification and sustainable development. In: Jhariya MK, Meena RS, Banerjee A, Kumar S, Raj A (Eds.) Agroforestry for Carbon and Ecosystem Management, Academic Press, pp 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95393-1.00028-2. |
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
Krause T (2019) Agroforestry needs to take another look at biodiversity, and not just the plants. Swedish international agricultural network initiative. https://www.siani.se/news-story/agroforestry-needs-to-take-another-look-at-biodiversity-and-not-just-the-plants/. Accessed 10 Dec 2023 |
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
Kumar S, Singh R, Shukla AK (2015) Sustaining productivity in aonla based horti-pasture system through in-situ soil moisture conservation in semi-arid region of India. In: Proceedings of the XXIII international grassland congress, November 24, New Delhi, India |
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
Li Y, Li M, Li C, Liu Z (2020) Forest aboveground biomass estimation using Landsat 8 and Sentinel-1A data with machine learning algorithms. Sci Rep 10:9952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67024-3 |
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
| [143] |
|
| [144] |
|
| [145] |
|
| [146] |
|
| [147] |
|
| [148] |
|
| [149] |
|
| [150] |
|
| [151] |
Montagnini F, Metzel R (2017) The Contribution of Agroforestry to Sustainable Development Goal 2: End Hunger, Achieve Food Security and Improved Nutrition, and Promote Sustainable Agriculture. In: Montagnini, F. (eds) Integrating Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69371-2_2 |
| [152] |
|
| [153] |
|
| [154] |
Muschler RG (2016) Agroforestry: Essential for Sustainable and Climate-Smart Land Use?. In: Pancel, L., Köhl, M. (eds) Tropical Forestry Handbook. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 2013–2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3_300 |
| [155] |
|
| [156] |
|
| [157] |
|
| [158] |
|
| [159] |
|
| [160] |
|
| [161] |
Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2021). Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation. In: An Introduction to Agroforestry. Springer, Cham, pp 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_21 |
| [162] |
Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2021) Global Distribution of Agroforestry Systems. In: An Introduction to Agroforestry. Springer, Cham, pp 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_4 |
| [163] |
Nair PKR (2011) Methodological Challenges in Estimating Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. In: Kumar B, Nair P (eds) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_1 |
| [164] |
|
| [165] |
|
| [166] |
|
| [167] |
|
| [168] |
|
| [169] |
|
| [170] |
|
| [171] |
Noordwijk MV (2020) Agroforestry as nexus of sustainable development goals. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, IOP Publishing, vol 449(1), p 012001 |
| [172] |
|
| [173] |
|
| [174] |
Nyambati R, Kioko S (2018) Production and utilization of fruit, fodder and bio-energy trees. In: Kenya’s water towers protection and climate change mitigation and adaptation (water) programme, pp. 1-42. https://kefri.org/WaterTowers/PDF/Report%20_%20production%20and%20utilization%20of%20fodder%20and%20bioenergy%20trees%205%20feb%20201%20FF.pdf |
| [175] |
|
| [176] |
|
| [177] |
|
| [178] |
|
| [179] |
|
| [180] |
|
| [181] |
|
| [182] |
|
| [183] |
|
| [184] |
|
| [185] |
|
| [186] |
|
| [187] |
|
| [188] |
|
| [189] |
|
| [190] |
|
| [191] |
|
| [192] |
Raj A, Jhariya MK (2023) Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry and Horticulture Based Farming Systems: Mitigating Climate Change and Advancing Food and Nutrition Security. In: Ghosh, S., Kumari Panda, A., Jung, C., Singh Bisht, S. (eds) Emerging Solutions in Sustainable Food and Nutrition Security. Springer, Cham, pp 143–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40908-0_7 |
| [193] |
Raj A, Jhariya MK, Yadav DK, Banerjee A, Toppo P (2020) Agroforestry for climate change mitigation, natural resource management, and livelihood security. In: Raj A, Jhariya MK, Yadav DK, Banerjee A (eds) Climate change and agroforestry systems, Apple Academic Press, New York, pp 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429286759 |
| [194] |
|
| [195] |
|
| [196] |
|
| [197] |
|
| [198] |
|
| [199] |
|
| [200] |
|
| [201] |
|
| [202] |
|
| [203] |
|
| [204] |
|
| [205] |
Sauer TJ, Dold C, Ashworth AJ, Nieman CC, Hernandez-Ramirez G, Philipp D, et al. (2021) Agroforestry practices for soil conservation and resilient agriculture. In: Agroforestry and ecosystem services, pp 19–48 |
| [206] |
|
| [207] |
|
| [208] |
|
| [209] |
|
| [210] |
|
| [211] |
|
| [212] |
|
| [213] |
|
| [214] |
|
| [215] |
|
| [216] |
|
| [217] |
Sileshi GW, Dagar JC, Nath AJ, Kuntashula E (2023) Agroforestry as a Climate-Smart Agriculture: Strategic Interventions, Current Practices and Policies. In: Dagar JC, Gupta SR, Sileshi GW. (eds) Agroforestry for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa. Sustainability Sciences in Asia and Africa. Springer, Singapore, pp 589–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4602-8_18 |
| [218] |
|
| [219] |
|
| [220] |
|
| [221] |
|
| [222] |
Sivaranjani S, Panwar VP (2023) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. In: Meena SK, Oliveira Ferreira AD, Meena VS, Rakshit, A, Shrestha RP, Rao CS, Siddique, KHM (eds) Agricultural soil sustainability and carbon management, Academic Press, pp 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95911-7.00010-4 |
| [223] |
|
| [224] |
|
| [225] |
Sudomo A, Nugroho AW (2023) Water, energy, and food nexus with agroforestry system for sustainable development goals. J Plant Sci Phytopathol 7:017-019. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001100 |
| [226] |
Sudomo A, Hani A, Agus C, Nugroho AW, Utomo MMB, Indrajaya Y (2022) Intensification of Agroforestry Systems in Community Forests to Increase Land Productivity and Sustainable Food Sovereignty. In: Leal Filho W, Kovaleva M, Popkova, E. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham, pp 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98617-9_11 |
| [227] |
|
| [228] |
|
| [229] |
|
| [230] |
|
| [231] |
|
| [232] |
|
| [233] |
|
| [234] |
|
| [235] |
|
| [236] |
Thapa B, Lovell S, Wilson J (2023) Remote sensing and machine learning applications for aboveground biomass estimation in agroforestry systems: a review. Agroforest Syst 97:1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00850-2 |
| [237] |
|
| [238] |
|
| [239] |
|
| [240] |
Tomar JMS, Ahmed A, Bhat JA, Kaushal R, Shukla G, Kumar R (2021) Potential and opportunities of agroforestry practices in combating land degradation. In: Agroforestry-small landholder’s tool for climate change resiliency and mitigation |
| [241] |
|
| [242] |
|
| [243] |
|
| [244] |
Udawatta RP, Garrett HE, Jose S, Lovell ST (2021) Water Quality and Quantity Benefits of Agroforestry and Processes: Long-Term Case Studies from Missouri, USA. In: Udawatta RP, Jose S (eds) Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham, pp 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80060-4_6 |
| [245] |
UNFCCC (2007) Report on the second workshop on reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries. Subsidiary body for scientific and technological advice. Item 5 of the provisional agenda: Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries. Twenty-sixth session, Bonn, 7–18 May 2007, p 18 |
| [246] |
|
| [247] |
|
| [248] |
|
| [249] |
|
| [250] |
|
| [251] |
Vourdoubas J, Skoulou VK, GR73133 C (2017) Possibilities of upgrading solid underutilized lingo-cellulosic feedstock (carob pods) to liquid bio-fuel: bio-ethanol production and electricity generation in fuel cells-a critical appraisal of the required processes. Stud Eng Technol, 4(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.11114/set.v4i1.2170 |
| [252] |
van Noordwijk M, Mbow C, Minang P (2015a) Trees as nexus for Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’s): agroforestry for integrated options. ASB Policy Brief 50, ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi. http://www.asb.cgiar.org |
| [253] |
van Noordwijk M, Minang PA, Dewi S, Duguma L, Bernard F (2015b) Transforming REDD+ and achieving the SDGs through support for adaptation-mitigation synergy. ASB Policy Brief 46. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, 4 pp, http://www.asb.cgiar.org |
| [254] |
|
| [255] |
|
| [256] |
|
| [257] |
|
| [258] |
|
| [259] |
|
| [260] |
|
| [261] |
|
| [262] |
|
| [263] |
|
| [264] |
|
| [265] |
|
| [266] |
|
| [267] |
|
| [268] |
|
| [269] |
|
| [270] |
|
| [271] |
|
| [272] |
|
| [273] |
|
| [274] |
|
| [275] |
|
| [276] |
|
| [277] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |