Macroeconomic impacts and co-benefits of deep-decarbonization in Thailand

Abstract

The updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) in 2022 of Thailand includes an aggressive GHG emission reduction target of 40% in 2030 from its baseline emissions. However, the macroeconomic impacts and co-benefits associated with reducing GHG emissions are not addressed. This study analyzes the macroeconomic implications and co-benefits of GHG emission reduction in Thailand to achieve the NDC and net zero emission (NZE) targets by 2050 using the AIM/Hub-Thailand model. This paper provides co-benefits for Thailand on ambitious long-term GHG emission reduction targets. Considering the co-benefit analysis in the policy documents will provide holistic insights on the positive impacts of GHG mitigation. Results show that Thailand would have to bear a GDP loss of 7.7% in 2050 compared to the BAU level if the net zero emissions need to be achieved. Fuel switching from fossil fuel to electricity in the demand side and improvement of technologies in the power sector also reduces air pollutant emissions. The increasing dependence on domestic energy supply in the NZE scenario will make the country less vulnerable to the fluctuating prices in the international energy market. In terms of trade-offs, the land use for sustainable biomass in both the NDC and NZE scenarios will be larger than in the BAU scenario. Results show better land use for biomass production and higher yields in agricultural production. Moreover, the achievement of NZE pathway will require effective usage of land area and better use of energy resources, thereby making the country more energy secure.

Keywords

AIM/Hub model / Net zero emissions / Macroeconomic impacts / Co-benefits of GHG mitigation / Thailand

References

[1] Armington PS. Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según El Lugar De producción. Staff Papers, 1969, 16(1): 159-178

[2] Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2013) Prospects for carbon capture and storage in Southeast Asia. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/31122/carbon-capture-storage-southeast-asia.pdf

[3] Avetisyan M, Baldos UL, Hertel T (2011) Development of the GTAP 7 land Use Data Base. https://doi.org/10.21642/GTAP.RM19. Issue 19)

[4] Boonpanya T, Masui T. Assessing the economic and environmental impact of freight transport sectors in Thailand using computable general equilibrium model. J Clean Prod, 2021, 280: 124271

[5] Chaichaloempreecha A, Chunark P, Hanaoka T, Limmeechokchai B. Thailand’s mid-century greenhouse gas emission pathways to achieve the 2 degrees celsius target. Energy Sustain Soc, 2022, 12(1): 22

[6] Chunark P, Limmeechokchai B, Fujimori S, Masui T. Renewable energy achievements in CO2 mitigation in Thailand’s NDCs. Renewable Energy, 2017, 114: 1294-1305

[7] Dai H, Xie X, Xie Y, Liu J, Masui T. Green growth: the economic impacts of large-scale renewable energy development in China. Appl Energy, 2016, 162: 435-449

[8] Deng H-M, Liang Q-M, Liu L-J, Anadon LD. Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography. Environ Res Lett, 2017, 12(12): 123001

[9] Dimaranan BV, E (2006) Global Trade, assistance, and production: the GTAP 6 data base. Center for Global Trade Analysis. Purdue University

[10] Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO) (2020) Thailand’s power development plan 2018–2037 (PDP2018) rev.1

[11] Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO) (2019) Power Development Plan 2561–2580 (PDP2018)

[12] Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO) (2015) Thailand Power Development Plan 2015–2036 (PDP2015)

[13] Farrow A, Anhäuser A, Moun-Ob A, Chen YJ, Newport E, Thailand G (2022) The Burden of Air Pollution in Thailand 2021 The Burden of Air Pollution in Thailand 2021 Contributors. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-southeastasia-stateless/2022/06/67375e28-the-burden-of-air-pollution-in-thailand_2021.pdf

[14] Fujimori S, Su X, Liu J-Y, Hasegawa T, Takahashi K, Masui T, Takimi M. Implication of Paris Agreement in the context of long-term climate mitigation goals. SpringerPlus, 2016, 5(1): 1620

[15] Fujimori S, Masui T, Matsuoka Y (2017) AIM/CGE V2.0 Model Formula. In S. Fujimori, M. Kainuma, & T. Masui (Eds.), Post-2020 Climate Action: Global and Asian Perspectives (pp. 201–303). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3869-3_12

[16] Fujimori S, Siagian UWR, Hasegawa T, Yuwono BB, Boer R, Immanuel G, Masui T (2017b) An Assessment of Indonesia’s Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. In S. Fujimori, M. Kainuma, & T. Masui (Eds.), Post-2020 Climate Action: Global and Asian Perspectives (pp. 125–142). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3869-3_8

[17] Fujimori S, Krey V, van Vuuren D, Oshiro K, Sugiyama M, Chunark P, Limmeechokchai B, Mittal S, Nishiura O, Park C, Rajbhandari S, Silva Herran D, Tu TT, Zhao S, Ochi Y, Shukla PR, Masui T, Nguyen PVH, Cabardos A-M, Riahi K. A framework for national scenarios with varying emission reductions. Nat Clim Change, 2021, 11(6): 472-480

[18] Holmes KJ, Zeitler E, Kerxhalli-Kleinfield M, DeBoer R (2021) Scaling Deep Decarbonization technologies. Earth’s Future 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002399. e2021EF002399

[19] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf

[20] Joint Global Change Research Institute (JGCRI), P. N. N. L. & U. O. M (2018) Overview of the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM). https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/CSE/PATHWAYS/2019/ws_Consult_14_15.May.2019/supp_doc/PNNL-GCAM_model.PDF

[21] Kimura S, Shinchi K, Kawagishi S (2021) Study on the Potential for the Promotion of Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilisation, and Storage in ASEAN Countries. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/Research-Project-Report/RPR-2020-21/Study-on-the-Potential-for-the-Promotion-of-Carbon-Dioxide_rev.pdf

[22] Korkmaz P, Gardumi F, Avgerinopoulos G, Blesl M, Fahl U. A comparison of three transformation pathways towards a sustainable European society - an integrated analysis from an energy system perspective. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2020, 28: 100461

[23] Lau HC. Decarbonization of ASEAN’s power sector: a holistic approach. Energy Rep, 2023, 9: 676-702

[24] Limmeechokchai B, Chunark P, Fujimori S, Masui T (2017) Asian INDC Assessments: The Case of Thailand. In S. Fujimori, M. Kainuma, & T. Masui (Eds.), Post-2020 Climate Action: Global and Asian Perspectives (pp. 157–178). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3869-3_10

[25] Limmeechokchai B, Rajbhandari S, Pradhan BB, Chunark P, Chaichaloempreecha A, Fujimori S, Oshiro K, Ochi Y. Scaling up climate ambition post-2030: a long-term GHG mitigation analysis for Thailand. Clim Policy, 2023, 23(2): 168-183

[26] Matsumoto K. Energy Structure and Energy Security under Climate mitigation scenarios in China. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(12): e0144884

[27] Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) (2022a) Long-term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategy (Revised version). https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Thailand%20LT-LEDS%20%28Revised%20Version%29_08Nov2022.pdf

[28] Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) (2022b) Thailand’s Fourth Biennial Update Report. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Thailand_BUR4_final_28122022.pdf

[29] Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) (2018) 20-Year Strategic Plan for the Ministry of Natural resources and Environment. (B E 2560–2579). https://www.mnre.go.th/en/about/content/1065

[30] Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) Mid-century, 2021 Long-term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategy Thailand

[31] Mittal S, Dai H, Fujimori S, Masui T. Bridging greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy deployment target: comparative assessment of China and India. Appl Energy, 2016, 166: 301-313

[32] Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC) (2019) Population Projections for Thailand 2010–20140 (Revised version). https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_w3c/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=9812

[33] Oshiro K, Masui T, Kainuma M (2017) Quantitative Analysis of Japan’s 2030 Target Based on AIM/CGE and AIM/Enduse. In S. Fujimori, M. Kainuma, & T. Masui (Eds.), Post-2020 Climate Action: Global and Asian Perspectives (pp. 143–156). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3869-3_9

[34] Pradhan BB, Chaichaloempreecha A, Limmeechokchai B. GHG mitigation in Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector in Thailand. Carbon Balance Manag, 2019, 14(1): 3

[35] Pradhan BB, Chaichaloempreecha A, Chunark P, Rajbhandari S, Pita P, Limmeechokchai B. Energy system transformation for attainability of net zero emissions in Thailand. Int J Sustainable Energy Plann Manage, 2022, 35: 27-44

[36] Qi T, Weng Y. Economic impacts of an international carbon market in achieving the INDC targets. Energy, 2016, 109: 886-893

[37] Rajbhandari S, Limmeechokchai B. Assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation pathways for Thailand towards achievement of the 2°C and 1.5°C Paris Agreement targets. Clim Policy, 2021, 21(4): 492-513

[38] Rajbhandari S, Limmeechokchai B, Masui T. The impact of different GHG reduction scenarios on the economy and social welfare of Thailand using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Energy Sustain Soc, 2019, 9(1): 19

[39] Schwanitz VJ, Longden T, Knopf B, Capros P. The implications of initiating immediate climate change mitigation — a potential for co-benefits?. Technol Forecast Soc Chang, 2015, 90: 166-177

[40] Shakya SR, Nakarmi AM, Prajapati A, Pradhan BB, Rajbhandari US, Rupakheti M, Lawrence MG. Environmental, energy security, and energy equity (3E) benefits of net-zero emission strategy in a developing country: a case study of Nepal. Energy Rep, 2023, 9: 2359-2371

[41] Shakya Raj S. Economy-wide implications of Low Carbon Electricity Based Mass Transport in Nepal. J Inst Eng, 2014, 9(1): 142-165

[42] Shukla PR, Mittal S, Liu J-Y, Fujimori S, Dai H, Zhang R (2017) India INDC Assessment: Emission Gap Between Pledged Target and 2°C Target. In S. Fujimori, M. Kainuma, & T. Masui (Eds.), Post-2020 Climate Action: Global and Asian Perspectives (pp. 113–124). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3869-3_7

[43] Sovacool BK, Axsen J, Kempton W (2017) The Future Promise of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Integration: A Sociotechnical Review and Research Agenda. In Annual Review of Environment and Resources (Vol. 42, pp. 377–406). Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-030117-020220

[44] Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI) (2021), September 8 Air pollution continues to kill: does Thailand’s National Energy Plan offer hope? https://tdri.or.th/en/2021/09/fixing-thailands-killer-air-pollution/

[45] Thepkhun P, Limmeechokchai B, Fujimori S, Masui T, Shrestha RM. Thailand’s Low-Carbon Scenario 2050 2013

[46] Tran T, Fujimori S, Masui T. Realizing the intended nationally determined contribution: the role of renewable energies in Vietnam. Energies, 2016, 9(8): 587

[47] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2021) Full NDC Synthesis Report: Some Progress, but Still a Big Concern. https://unfccc.int/news/full-ndc-synthesis-report-some-progress-but-still-a-big-concern

[48] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2022) Thailand’s 2 nd Updated Nationally Determined Contribution. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-11/Thailand%202nd%20Updated%20NDC.pdf

[49] West J, ~J., Smith S, Silva R, ~A., Adelman Z, Fry M, ~M., Anenberg S, Horowitz L, ~W., Naik V, Lamarque J, Emmons L, ~K (2011) Co-benefits of Global Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for Air Quality and Human Health via Two Mechanisms. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2011, A11F-0148