The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on urban energy transition: an analysis of multiple mediating effects based on “government–enterprise–resident”

Xiuli Liu , Xinchi Jia , Ke Lyu , Pibin Guo , Jun Shen

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 419 -438.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 419 -438. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-024-00316-w
Original Article

The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on urban energy transition: an analysis of multiple mediating effects based on “government–enterprise–resident”

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The global energy transition is crucial for all nations due to increasing concerns about energy security and climate change. The low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy is an essential project in the energy transition process, but its impact on urban energy transition (ET) and the underlying mechanisms remains unclear. To address this, we use a multi-temporal difference-in-difference (DID) model, analyzing panel data from 277 Chinese cities spanning 2006–2020, to examine the effects of the LCCP policy on urban energy transition. The findings show that the LCCP policy greatly influences urban energy transition, and the findings can withstand a number of robustness tests, particularly the decomposed effects of staggered DID. Moreover, we construct a multiple mediation effect model to identify three pathways through which the policy facilitates energy transition: “LCCP → Government Intervention → ET,” “LCCP → Enterprise Technology Innovation → ET,” and “LCCP → Residents’ Green Consumption Awareness Enhancement → ET.” Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that first- and second-tier cities, resource-based cities, and eastern cities experience more substantial impacts. Our findings hold vital implications for promoting low-carbon cities and achieving sustainable energy systems.

Keywords

Low-carbon city pilot policy / Urban energy transition / Multi-temporal difference-in-difference model / Multiple mediating effect model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiuli Liu, Xinchi Jia, Ke Lyu, Pibin Guo, Jun Shen. The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on urban energy transition: an analysis of multiple mediating effects based on “government–enterprise–resident”. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2024, 9(4): 419-438 DOI:10.1007/s40974-024-00316-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M. Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ardl. Ecol Indic, 2021, 121: 107060

[2]

Andrade JCS, Dameno A, Pérez J, de Andrés Almeida JM, Lumbreras J. Implementing city-level carbon accounting: a comparison between madrid and london. J Clean Prod, 2018, 172: 795-804

[3]

Cao L, Wu Y, Li L. The driving effect of energy efficiency change: from the perspective of collaborative innovation development pattern. Environ Impact Asses, 2023, 99: 107011

[4]

Cao X, Liu C, Wu M, Li Z, Wang Y, Wen Z. Heterogeneity and connection in the spatial–temporal evolution trend of china’s energy consumption at provincial level. Appl Energ, 2023, 336: 120842

[5]

Chen L, Wang K. The spatial spillover effect of low-carbon city pilot scheme on green efficiency in china's cities: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Energ Econ, 2022, 110: 106018

[6]

Chen Y, Yao Z, Zhong K. Do environmental regulations of carbon emissions and air pollution foster green technology innovation: evidence from china's prefecture-level cities. J Clean Prod, 2022, 350: 131537

[7]

Chen J, Luo W, Ren X, Liu T. The local-neighborhood effects of low-carbon city pilots program on pm2.5 in china: a spatial difference-in-differences analysis. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 857: 159511

[8]

Chen P, Jiang R, Chen Z. Global household energy consumption structure: direct versus embodied perspective from 2000 to 2014. Energy Ecol Environ, 2023

[9]

Cui L, Mu Y, Shen Z, Wang W. Energy transition, trade and green productivity in advanced economies. J Clean Prod, 2022, 361: 132288

[10]

Dou X, Deng Z, Sun T Global and local carbon footprints of city of Hong Kong and Macao from 2000 to 2015. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2021, 164: 105167

[11]

Du M, Feng R, Chen Z. Blue sky defense in low-carbon pilot cities: a spatial spillover perspective of carbon emission efficiency. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 846: 157509

[12]

Feng T, Lin Z, Du H, Qiu Y, Zuo J. Does low-carbon pilot city program reduce carbon intensity? Evidence from chinese cities. Res Int Bus Financ, 2021, 58: 101450

[13]

Goodman-Bacon A, Goldring T, Nichols A (2022) Bacondecomp: stata module to perform a bacon decomposition of difference-in-differences estimation. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s458676

[14]

Goyal N, Taeihagh A, Howlett M. Whither policy innovation? Mapping conceptual engagement with public policy in energy transitions research. Energy Res Soc Sci, 2022, 89: 102632

[15]

Guilhot L. An analysis of china's energy policy from 1981 to 2020: transitioning towards to a diversified and low-carbon energy system. Energ Policy, 2022, 162: 112806

[16]

Harichandan S, Kar SK, Bansal R, Mishra SK, Balathanigaimani MS, Dash M. Energy transition research: a bibliometric mapping of current findings and direction for future research. Cleaner Production Letters, 2022, 3: 100026

[17]

Hong JH, Kim J, Son W Long-term energy strategy scenarios for south korea: transition to a sustainable energy system. Energ Policy, 2019, 127: 425-437

[18]

Huang S. The effect of natural resources and economic factors on energy transition: new evidence from china. Resour Policy, 2022, 76: 102620

[19]

Huang H, Yi M. Impacts and mechanisms of heterogeneous environmental regulations on carbon emissions: an empirical research based on did method. Environ Impact Asses, 2023, 99: 107039

[20]

Huo W, Qi J, Yang T, Liu J, Liu M, Zhou Z. Effects of china's pilot low-carbon city policy on carbon emission reduction: a quasi-natural experiment based on satellite data. Technol Forecast Soc, 2022, 175: 121422

[21]

Huovila A, Siikavirta H, Antuña Rozado C Carbon-neutral cities: critical review of theory and practice. J Clean Prod, 2022, 341: 130912

[22]

Khan I, Zakari A, Ahmad M, Irfan M, Hou F. Linking energy transitions, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability in OECD countries. Gondwana Res, 2022, 103: 445-457

[23]

Kong L, Mu X, Hu G, Tu C. Will energy efficiency improvements reduce energy consumption? Perspective of rebound effect and evidence from beijing. Energy, 2023, 263: 125665

[24]

Kou J, Xu X. Does internet infrastructure improve or reduce carbon emission performance?—A dual perspective based on local government intervention and market segmentation. J Clean Prod, 2022, 379: 134789

[25]

Lee C, Feng Y, Peng D. A green path towards sustainable development: the impact of low-carbon city pilot on energy transition. Energ Econ, 2022, 115: 106343

[26]

Leonhardt R, Noble B, Poelzer G, Fitzpatrick P, Belcher K, Holdmann G. Advancing local energy transitions: a global review of government instruments supporting community energy. Energy Res Soc Sci, 2022, 83: 102350

[27]

Li K, Tan X, Yan Y, Jiang D, Qi S. Directing energy transition toward decarbonization: the China story. Energy, 2022, 261: 124934

[28]

Li H, Luo F, Hao J, Li J, Guo L. How does fintech affect energy transition: evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Environ Impact Asses, 2023, 102: 107181

[29]

Li CS, Wang CB, Lei ZM (2022) A study on the suitability of regional energy transition basis and transition performance in China. Regional Economic Review, 132–44 (in Chinese)

[30]

Lin B, Xie J. Does environmental regulation promote industrial structure optimization in china? A perspective of technical and capital barriers. Environ Impact Asses, 2023, 98: 106971

[31]

Lin X, Tang Z, Long H. Spatial and temporal research on ecological total factor energy efficiency in china: based on “ecology-economy-geography” heterogeneity framework. J Clean Prod, 2022, 377: 134143

[32]

Liu SS, Ling WS. The multiple mediator model and its application. Psychol Sci, 2009, 32: 433-435 in Chinese

[33]

Liu X, Xu H. Does low-carbon pilot city policy induce low-carbon choices in residents' living: holistic and single dual perspective. J Environ Manage, 2022, 324: 116353

[34]

Liu X, Li Y, Chen X, Liu J. Evaluation of low carbon city pilot policy effect on carbon abatement in china: an empirical evidence based on time-varying did model. Cities, 2022, 123: 103582

[35]

Luo C, Qiang W, Lee HF. Does the low-carbon city pilot policy work in china? A company-level analysis based on the psm-did model. J Environ Manage, 2023, 337: 117725

[36]

Lyu J, Liu T, Cai B, Qi Y, Zhang X. Heterogeneous effects of china’s low-carbon city pilots policy. J Environ Manage, 2023, 344: 118329

[37]

Nie Y, Zhang G, Duan H Trends in energy policy coordination research on supporting low-carbon energy development. Environ Impact Asses, 2022, 97: 106903

[38]

Pan A, Zhang W, Shi X, Dai L. Climate policy and low-carbon innovation: evidence from low-carbon city pilots in china. Energ Econ, 2022, 112: 106129

[39]

Qi X, Guo Y, Guo P, Yao X, Liu X. Do subsidies and R&D investment boost energy transition performance? Evidence from chinese renewable energy firms. Energ Policy, 2022, 164: 112909

[40]

Qiu S, Wang Z, Liu S. The policy outcomes of low-carbon city construction on urban green development: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment conducted in china. Sustain Cities Soc, 2021, 66: 102699

[41]

Qu F, Xu L, He C. Leverage effect or crowding out effect? Evidence from low-carbon city pilot and energy technology innovation in china. Sustain Cities Soc, 2023, 91: 104423

[42]

Ren S, Li X, Yuan B, Li D, Chen X. The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: a cross-region analysis in china. J Clean Prod, 2018, 173: 245-255

[43]

Shah WUH, Hao G, Yan H, Yasmeen R, Jie Y. The role of energy policy transition, regional energy efficiency, and technological advancement in the improvement of china’s environmental quality. Energy Rep, 2022, 8: 9846-9857

[44]

Shahbaz M, Wang J, Dong K, Zhao J. The impact of digital economy on energy transition across the globe: the mediating role of government governance. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 166: 112620

[45]

Shen Y, Shi X, Zhao Z, Sun Y, Shan Y. Measuring the low-carbon energy transition in chinese cities. iScience, 2023, 26: 105803

[46]

Thomas M, Decillia B, Santos JB, Thorlakson L. Great expectations: public opinion about energy transition. Energ Policy, 2022, 162: 112777

[47]

Tian Y, Feng C. The internal-structural effects of different types of environmental regulations on china's green total-factor productivity. Energ Econ, 2022, 113: 106246

[48]

Tian Y, Song W, Liu M. Assessment of how environmental policy affects urban innovation: evidence from china’s low-carbon pilot cities program. Econ Anal Policy, 2021, 71: 41-56

[49]

Tian J, Yu L, Xue R, Zhuang S, Shan Y. Global low-carbon energy transition in the post-covid-19 era. Appl Energ, 2022, 307: 118205

[50]

Tie M, Zhu M. Interpreting low-carbon transition at the subnational level: evidence from china using a natural language processing approach. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2022, 187: 106636

[51]

Vogel RK, Ryan R, Lawrie A Global city sydney. Prog Plann, 2020, 136: 100426

[52]

Wan Y, Sheng N, Wei X, Su H. Study on the spatial spillover effect and path mechanism of green finance development on China's energy structure transformation. J Clean Prod, 2023, 415: 137820

[53]

Wang Y, Deng X, Zhang H, Liu Y, Yue T, Liu G. Energy endowment, environmental regulation, and energy efficiency: evidence from china. Technol Forecast Soc, 2022, 177: 121528

[54]

Wang L, Shao J, Ma Y. Does china's low-carbon city pilot policy improve energy efficiency?. Energy, 2023, 283: 129048

[55]

Wang Y, Jeong S, Hang Y, Wang Q. Determinants of net energy-related Co2 emissions in china: a source-to-sink decomposition analysis. Environ Impact Asses, 2023, 98: 106979

[56]

Wei X, Jiang F, Yang L. Does digital dividend matter in china's green low-carbon development: environmental impact assessment of the big data comprehensive pilot zones policy. Environ Impact Asses, 2023, 101: 107143

[57]

Wen S, Jia Z, Chen X. Can low-carbon city pilot policies significantly improve carbon emission efficiency? Empirical evidence from china. J Clean Prod, 2022, 346: 131131

[58]

Wu S, Hu S, Frazier AE, Hu Z. China's urban and rural residential carbon emissions: past and future scenarios. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2023, 190: 106802

[59]

Xu B, Xu R. Assessing the role of environmental regulations in improving energy efficiency and reducing Co2 emissions: evidence from the logistics industry. Environ Impact Asses, 2022, 96: 106831

[60]

Yang S, Jahanger A, Hossain MR. How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from chinese industrial enterprises. Energ Econ, 2023, 118: 106523

[61]

Yu X, Wang P. Economic effects analysis of environmental regulation policy in the process of industrial structure upgrading: evidence from chinese provincial panel data. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 753: 142004

[62]

Zhang G. Regulatory-driven corporate greenwashing: evidence from “low-carbon city” pilot policy in china. Pac-Basin Financ J, 2023, 78: 101951

[63]

Zhang J, Zheng T. Can dual pilot policy of innovative city and low carbon city promote green lifestyle transformation of residents?. J Clean Prod, 2023, 405: 136711

[64]

Zhang M, Guo S, Bai C, Wang W. Study on the impact of haze pollution on residents' green consumption behavior: the case of shandong province. J Clean Prod, 2019, 219: 11-19

[65]

Zhang H, Feng C, Zhou X. Going carbon-neutral in china: does the low-carbon city pilot policy improve carbon emission efficiency?. Sustain Prod Consump, 2022, 33: 312-329

[66]

Zhao C, Dong K, Wang K, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. How can chinese cities escape from carbon lock-in? The role of low-carbon city policy. Urban Climate, 2023, 51: 101629

[67]

Zhao S, Zhang L, An H, Peng L, Zhou H, Hu F. Has china's low-carbon strategy pushed forward the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises? Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy. Environ Impact Asses, 2023, 102: 107184

[68]

Zheng J, Shao X, Liu W, Kong J, Zuo G. The impact of the pilot program on industrial structure upgrading in low-carbon cities. J Clean Prod, 2021, 290: 125868

[69]

Zhou Z, Xu G, Wang C, Wu J. Modeling undesirable output with a dea approach based on an exponential transformation: an application to measure the energy efficiency of chinese industry. J Clean Prod, 2019, 236: 117717

[70]

Zhou D, Yuan S, Xie D. Voluntary environmental regulation and urban innovation: evidence from low-carbon pilot cities program in china. Technol Forecast Soc, 2022, 175: 121388

[71]

Zhou Q, Cui X, Ni H, Gong L. The impact of environmental regulation policy on firms' energy-saving behavior: a quasi-natural experiment based on china's low-carbon pilot city policy. Resour Policy, 2022, 76: 102538

[72]

Zhu C, Lee C. The effects of low-carbon pilot policy on technological innovation: evidence from prefecture-level data in china. Technol Forecast Soc, 2022, 183: 121955

[73]

Zhu X, Zuo X, Li H. The dual effects of heterogeneous environmental regulation on the technological innovation of chinese steel enterprises—based on a high-dimensional fixed effects model. Ecol Econ, 2021, 188: 107113

[74]

Zou C, Huang Y, Wu S, Hu S. Does “low-carbon city” accelerate urban innovation? Evidence from China. Sustain Cities Soc, 2022, 83: 103954

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42001257)

Research on Philosophy and Social Sciences in Shanxi Province's Colleges and Universities(20210115)

Graduate Student Innovation Program in Shanxi Province(2023KY510)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

546

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/