Would narrowing the income gap help mitigate the greenhouse effect? Fresh insights from spatial and mediating effects analysis

Jun Zhao , Kangyin Dong , Xiaohang Ren

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 241 -255.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 241 -255. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-023-00315-3
Original Article

Would narrowing the income gap help mitigate the greenhouse effect? Fresh insights from spatial and mediating effects analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Fully considering income inequality (ICIE) and its potential environmental effects can help achieve the goal of reducing carbon emissions. Based on this, to effectively explore the nexus between ICIE and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, we first deduce the theoretical framework and then empirically check the spatial impact of ICIE on greenhouse effect based on a global dataset from 1995 to 2016. In addition, this study also conducts the regional heterogeneous analysis and further detects the causal mediating route (i.e., indirect route) between variables. The findings suggest that: (i) Rising ICIE affects CO2 emissions positively; in other words, narrowing income gap can effectively mitigate greenhouse effect across the globe; (ii) In countries with high gross domestic product (GDP) level, expanded ICIE will exacerbate the greenhouse effect, while in low-GDP countries, ICIE is negatively correlated with CO2 emissions; and (iii) ICIE can indirectly influence greenhouse effect through substantial economic and technical routes, while the composition route is insignificant. Finally, this paper highlights policy suggestions for carbon reduction by adjusting income distribution, formulating targeted strategies in various countries, and promoting technical innovation.

Keywords

Income inequality / CO2 emissions / Spatial effect / Mediating effect / Globe analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jun Zhao, Kangyin Dong, Xiaohang Ren. Would narrowing the income gap help mitigate the greenhouse effect? Fresh insights from spatial and mediating effects analysis. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2024, 9(3): 241-255 DOI:10.1007/s40974-023-00315-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I. Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic, 2016, 70: 466-479

[2]

Baek J, Gweisah G. Does income inequality harm the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Energ Policy, 2013, 62: 1434-1437

[3]

Baloch MA, Danish The nexus between renewable energy, income inequality, and consumption-based CO2 emissions: an empirical investigation. Sustain Dev, 2022, 30: 1268-1277

[4]

Baloch MA, Khan SUD, Ulucak , Ahmad A. Analyzing the relationship between poverty, income inequality, and CO2 emission in Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 740: 139867

[5]

Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1986, 51: 1173

[6]

Boyce JK. Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol Econ, 1994, 11: 169-178

[7]

BP (2020) BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2020. http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/downloads.html.

[8]

Chen J, Xian Q, Zhou J, Li D. Impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions in G20 countries. J Environ Manage, 2020, 271: 110987

[9]

Chen L, Ma M, Xiang X. Decarbonizing or illusion? How carbon emissions of commercial building operations change worldwide. Sustain Cities Soc, 2023, 96: 104654

[10]

Chen X, Rahaman MA, Hossain MA, Chen S. Is growth of the financial sector relevant for mitigating CO2 emissions in Bangladesh? The moderation role of the financial sector within the EKC model. Environ Dev Sustain, 2023, 25: 9567-9588

[11]

Cheng C, Ren X, Dong K, Dong X, Wang Z. How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. J Environ Manage, 2021, 280: 111818

[12]

Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K, Smyth R. The environmental Kuznets curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energ Econ, 2018, 75: 389-399

[13]

Copeland BR, Taylor MS. North-South trade and the environment. Q J Econ, 1994, 109: 755-787

[14]

Dietz T, Rosa EA. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. P Natl Acad Sci, 1997, 94: 175-179

[15]

Dollar D, Kraay A. Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth, 2002, 7: 195-225

[16]

Dong J, Dou Y, Jiang Q, Zhao J. Can financial inclusion facilitate carbon neutrality in China? The role of energy efficiency. Energy, 2022, 251: 123922

[17]

Dong K, Shahbaz M, Zhao J. How do pollution fees affect environmental quality in China?. Energ Policy, 2022, 160: 112695

[18]

Dong K, Wang B, Zhao J, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Mitigating carbon emissions by accelerating green growth in China. Econ Anal Policy, 2022, 75: 226-243

[19]

Dong K, Zhao J, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Toward China’s green growth through boosting energy transition: the role of energy efficiency. Energ Effic, 2023, 16: 43

[20]

Dou Y, Zhao J, Dong X, Dong K. Quantifying the impacts of energy inequality on carbon emissions in China: a household-level analysis. Energ Econ, 2021, 102: 105502

[21]

Drabo A. Impact of income inequality on health: does environment quality matter?. Environ Plann A, 2011, 43: 146-165

[22]

Duan K, Ren X, Shi Y, Mishra T, Yan C. The marginal impacts of energy prices on carbon price variations: Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile approach. Energ Econ, 2021, 95: 105131

[23]

Duan X, Xiao Y, Ren X, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Duan K. Dynamic spillover between traditional energy markets and emerging green markets: implications for sustainable development. Resour Policy, 2023, 82: 103483

[24]

Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F. Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecol Econ, 2006, 57: 152-163

[25]

Grossman GM, Krueger AB. Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ, 1995, 110: 353-377

[26]

Grunewald N, Klasen S, Martínez-Zarzoso I, Muris C. The trade-off between income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions. Ecol Econ, 2017, 142: 249-256

[27]

Hao Y, Chen H, Zhang Q. Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Ecol Indic, 2016, 67: 533-542

[28]

He J, Richard P. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecol Econ, 2010, 69: 1083-1093

[29]

Heerink N, Mulatu A, Bulte E. Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ, 2001, 38: 359-367

[30]

Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T. Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Stat Sci, 2010, 25: 51-71

[31]

Iwata H, Okada K, Samreth S. Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energ Policy, 2010, 38: 4057-4063

[32]

Jahanger A. Impact of globalization on CO2 emissions based on EKC hypothesis in developing world: the moderating role of human capital. Environ Sci Pollut R, 2022, 29: 20731-20751

[33]

Jorgenson A, Schor J, Huang X. Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: a state-level analysis, 1997–2012. Ecol Econ, 2017, 134: 40-48

[34]

Kang YQ, Zhao T, Yang YY. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in China: a spatial panel data approach. Ecol Indic, 2016, 63: 231-239

[35]

Kelejian HH, Prucha IR. Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. J Econometrics, 2010, 157: 53-67

[36]

Kennedy T, Smyth R, Valadkhani A, Chen G. Does income inequality hinder economic growth? New evidence using Australian taxation statistics. Econ Model, 2017, 65: 119-128

[37]

Khan AQ, Saleem N, Fatima ST. Financial development, income inequality, and CO2 emissions in Asian countries using STIRPAT model. Environ Sci Pollut R, 2018, 25: 6308-6319

[38]

Khan Z, Ali S, Dong K, Li RYM. How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital. Energ Econ, 2021, 94: 105060

[39]

Khan Z, Murshed M, Dong K, Yang S. The roles of export diversification and composite country risks in carbon emissions abatement: evidence from the signatories of the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement. Appl Econ, 2021, 53: 4769-4787

[40]

Kuznets S. Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev, 1955, 45: 1-28

[41]

LeSage J, Pace RK. Introduction to spatial econometrics, 2009 Boca Raton Chapman and Hall/CRC

[42]

Li Y, Yan C, Ren X. Do uncertainties affect clean energy markets? Comparisons from a multi-frequency and multi-quantile framework. Energ Econ, 2023, 121: 106679

[43]

Lin S, Wang S, Marinova D, Zhao D, Hong J. Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO2 emissions in non-high income countries: empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. J Clean Prod, 2017, 166: 952-966

[44]

Liu C, Jiang Y, Xie R. Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission reduction in the US?. J Clean Prod, 2019, 217: 380-387

[45]

Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W, Li J, Kong Y. Examining the effects of income inequality on CO2 emissions: Evidence from non-spatial and spatial perspectives. Appl Energ, 2019, 236: 163-171

[46]

Magnani E. The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecol Econ, 2000, 32: 431-443

[47]

Meng L, Guo J, Chai J, Zhang Z. China’s regional CO2 emissions: characteristics, inter-regional transfer and emission reduction policies. Energ Policy, 2011, 39: 6136-6144

[48]

Meschi E, Vivarelli M. Trade and income inequality in developing countries. World Dev, 2009, 37: 287-302

[49]

Mikayilov JI, Galeotti M, Hasanov FJ. The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. J Clean Prod, 2018, 197: 1558-1572

[50]

Moran PAP. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 1950, 37: 17-23

[51]

Ozturk S, Cetin M, Demir H. Income inequality and CO2 emissions: nonlinear evidence from Turkey. Environ Dev Sustain, 2022, 24: 11911-11928

[52]

Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods, 2008, 40: 879-891

[53]

Ren X, Xia X, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Uncertainty of uncertainty and corporate green innovation—Evidence from China. Econ Anal Policy, 2023, 78: 634-647

[54]

Ren X, Zeng G, Dong K, Wang K. How does high-speed rail affect tourism development? The case of the Sichuan-Chongqing Economic Circle. Transport Res A-Pol, 2023, 169: 103588

[55]

Ren X, Zeng G, Zhao Y. Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Pac-Basin Financ J, 2023, 79: 102019

[56]

Rubin A, Segal D. The effects of economic growth on income inequality in the US. J Macroecon, 2015, 45: 258-273

[57]

Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S. Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energ Policy, 2012, 51: 184-191

[58]

Safar W. Income inequality and CO2 emissions in France: does income inequality indicator matter?. J Clean Prod, 2022, 370: 133457

[59]

Sarkodie SA, Strezov V. Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 646: 862-871

[60]

Scruggs LA. Political and economic inequality and the environment. Ecol Econ, 1998, 26: 259-275

[61]

Song C, Liu Q, Gu S, Wang Q. The impact of China's urbanization on economic growth and pollutant emissions: an empirical study based on input-output analysis. J Clean Prod, 2018, 198: 1289-1301

[62]

Sulemana I, Kpienbaareh D. An empirical examination of the relationship between income inequality and corruption in Africa. Econ Anal Policy, 2018, 60: 27-42

[63]

Uddin MM, Mishra V, Smyth R. Income inequality and CO2 emissions in the G7, 1870–2014: evidence from non-parametric modelling. Energ Econ, 2020, 88: 104780

[64]

Uzar U, Eyuboglu K. The nexus between income inequality and CO2 emissions in Turkey. J Clean Prod, 2019, 227: 149-157

[65]

Vona F, Patriarca F. Income inequality and the development of environmental technologies. Ecol Econ, 2011, 70: 2201-2213

[66]

Wan G, Wang C, Wang J, Zhang X. The income inequality-CO2 emissions nexus: transmission mechanisms. Ecol Econ, 2022, 195: 107360

[67]

Wang B, Zhao J, Dong K, Jiang Q. High-quality energy development in China: comprehensive assessment and its impact on CO2 emissions. Energ Econ, 2022, 110: 106027

[68]

World Bank (2017) World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators/preview/on

[69]

Wu R, Xie Z. Identifying the impacts of income inequality on CO2 emissions: empirical evidences from OECD countries and non-OECD countries. J Clean Prod, 2020, 277: 123858

[70]

Xiang X, Zhou N, Ma M, Feng W, Yan R. Global transition of operational carbon in residential buildings since the millennium. Adv Appl Energy, 2023, 11: 100145

[71]

Yan R, Chen M, Xiang X, Feng W, Ma M. Heterogeneity or illusion? Track the carbon Kuznets curve of global residential building operations. Appl Energ, 2023, 347: 121441

[72]

Yang X, Lou F, Sun M, Wang R, Wang Y. Study of the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the economic growth of Russia based on the environmental Kuznets Curve. Appl Energ, 2017, 193: 162-173

[73]

Yang B, Ali M, Hashmi SH, Jahanger A. Do income inequality and institutional quality affect CO2 emissions in developing economies?. Environ Sci Pollut R, 2022, 29: 42720-42741

[74]

Zhang C, Zhao W. Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Appl Energ, 2014, 136: 382-392

[75]

Zhang S, Zhou N, Feng W, Ma M, Xiang X, You K. Pathway for decarbonizing residential building operations in the US and China beyond the mid-century. Appl Energ, 2023, 342: 121164

[76]

Zhao J, Dong K. Is environmental regulation a powerful weapon to mitigate China’s PM2.5 emissions? The role of human capital. J Asian Econ, 2023, 87: 101634

[77]

Zhao J, Jiang Q, Dong K. Income inequality and natural gas consumption in China: do heterogeneous and threshold effects exist?. Aust Econ Pap, 2020, 60: 630-650

[78]

Zhao J, Jiang Q, Dong X, Dong K. Assessing energy poverty and its effect on CO2 emissions: the case of China. Energ Econ, 2021, 97: 105191

[79]

Zhao J, Dong K, Dong X, Shahbaz M, Kyriakou I. Is green growth affected by financial risks? New global evidence from asymmetric and heterogeneous analysis. Energ Econ, 2022, 113: 106234

[80]

Zhao J, Dong K, Dong X. How does energy poverty eradication affect global carbon neutrality?. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2024, 191: 114104

[81]

Zhou X, Zhang J, Li J. Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energ Policy, 2013, 57: 43-51

[82]

Zhu H, Xia H, Guo Y, Peng C. The heterogeneous effects of urbanization and income inequality on CO2 emissions in BRICS economies: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut R, 2018, 25: 17176-17193

[83]

Zou C, Ma M, Zhou N, Feng W, You K, Zhang S. Toward carbon free by 2060: a decarbonization roadmap of operational residential buildings in China. Energy, 2023, 277: 127689

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China(20VGQ003)

Natural Science Fund of Hunan Province(2022JJ40647)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

124

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/