Multi-criteria analysis to select sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass in Costa Rica Northern region

Abstract

Residual biomass from the agro-forestry industry has become an attractive bioenergy resource for developing countries in tropical regions due to its ease and adaptability in the short and medium term. However, these projects must be comprehensively analyzed to select the best alternative that adapts to each location with minimal risk to investors, the government, and the benefited communities. Therefore, this work used a multi-criterial analysis (MCA) to compare and select the best alternative energy source power plant capacity to produce energy in northern Costa Rica. The study compared eight alternatives based on residual biomass (proceeding of four agro-forestry crops) and diesel (current option) sources in four power plant capacities (5, 15, 30, and 50 MW). The MCA considered spatial–technological, economic, and environmental criteria; then, the top three were used in the uncertainty analysis (Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity test) to recommend the best alternative. The results suggested that bioenergy from residual biomass would be sustainable compared to diesel due to lower supply logistics, affecting a value of energy generation between 10 and 26% lower and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions between 11 and 21%. The power plant capacity at 15 MW was the most attractive alternative because it had better MCA and uncertainty analysis results. Finally, our results support the possibility of bioenergy based on residual biomass as an alternative to non-renewable energy for tropical regions that allow greater energy security and efficient use of local resources.

Keywords

Bioenergy / Energy decarbonization / Energy sustainability / Tropic

References

[1] Ahmed O, Husni M, Noor AA, Hanafi M. The removal and burning of pineapple residue in pineapple cultivation on tropical peat: an economic viability comparison. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci, 2002, 25(1): 129-137

[2] Akhtari S, Sowlati T. Hybrid optimization-simulation for integrated planning of bioenergy and biofuel supply chains. Appl Energy, 2020, 259

[3] Amigues JP, Moreaux M. Competing land uses and fossil fuel and optimal energy conversion rates during the transition toward a green economy under a pollution stock constraint. J Environ Econ Manag, 2019, 97: 92-115

[4] Amin M, Shah HH, Fareed AG, Khan WU, Chung E, Zia A, Farooqi Z, Lee C. Hydrogen production through renewable and non-renewable energy processes and their impact on climate change. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 47(77): 33112-33134

[5] Arias-Aguilar D, Valverde JC, Campos R. Effect of planting density and tree species selection on forest bioenergy systems: tree growth nutrient storage and wood chemical properties. Greenh Gas Sci Technol, 2020, 10(6): 1165-1175

[6] Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S, Patel A, Juneja A, Singh RP, Yan B, Awasthi SK, Jain A, Liu T, Duan Y. Refining biomass residues for sustainable energy and bio-products: an assessment of technology its importance and strategic applications in circular bio-economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2020, 127

[7] Beringer T, Lucht W, Schaphoff S. Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. GCB Bioenergy, 2011, 3(4): 299-312

[8] Brenes-Peralta LP, Jiménez-Morales MF, Arias-Aguilar D, Valverde-Otárola JC, Masís-Jiménez M, Valverde-Rodríguez D, Campos-Rodríguez R. Methodological proposal for energy biomass market characterization the case of the Costa Rican rice. Tecnol Marcha, 2022, 35(7): 79-93

[9] Broekhuizen H, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, van Til JA, Hummel JM, IJzerman MJ. A review and classification of approaches for dealing with uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis for healthcare decisions. Pharmacoecon, 2015, 33: 445-455

[10] Chaves M, Chavarría E (2019) ¿Cómo se distribuye y donde se cultiva territorialmente la caña destinada a la fabricación de azúcar en Costa Rica?. XIX Congreso de la Asociación de Técnicos Azucareros de Centroamérica (ATACA). 6p

[11] Creutzig F, Ravindranath NH, Berndes G, Bolwig S, Bright R, Cherubini F, Chum H, Corbera E, Delucchi M, Faaij A. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB Bioenergy, 2015, 7(5): 916-944

[12] Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe R. Valorizing biomass to engineered biochar and its impact on soil plant water and microbial dynamics: a review. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2020, 12: 4138-4199

[13] Daugavietis JE, Soloha R, Dace E, Ziemele J. A comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis methods for sustainability assessment of district heating systems. Energies, 2022, 15(7): 2411

[14] Dean M (2020) Multi-criteria analysis. In: Advances in transport policy and planning. Elsevier, vol. 6 pp. 165–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.07.001

[15] Deshmukh S. Preference ranking organization method of enrichment evaluation (promethee). Int J Eng Sci Invent, 2013, 2(11): 28-34

[16] Durbach IN, Stewart TJ. Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res, 2012, 223(1): 1-14

[17] Faaij A. Modern biomass conversion technologies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang, 2006, 11(2): 343-375

[18] Famoso F, Prestipino M, Brusca S, Galvagno A (2020) Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators. Applied Energy 274:115315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115315

[19] Fuss R, Hueppi R, Pedersen AR (2015) Package ‘gasfluxes’

[20] Gonzalez AO, Karali B, Wetzstein ME. A public policy aid for bioenergy investment: case study of failed plants. Energy Policy, 2012, 51: 465-473

[21] González J, Roldán C, Arias D, Valverde JC, Camacho D. Evaluación financiera de generación eléctrica de 2 MW a partir de biomasa forestal en Costa Rica. Kuru, 2018, 15: 37-44

[22] Guevara G, Arias D, Valverde JC, Campos R. Factibilidad técnica y financiera del cultivo de Pennisetum purpureum (Schumach) para la producción de biomasa con el fin de generación eléctrica. Kuru, 2018, 15: 7-15

[23] Henningsen A, Hamann JD, Henningsen MA, Sur UR, Squares T (2019) Package ‘systemfit’

[24] IRENA (2021) World energy transitions outlook: 1.5°C pathway. In: International renewable energy agency, Abu Dhabi, p 312

[25] Izquierdo-Vázquez C. Mercados laborales disparidades socioeconómicas regionales y pobreza en Costa Rica 2010–2017. Diálogos Rev Elec Hist, 2023, 24(1): 1-35

[26] Jackson RB, Le Quéré C, Andrew R, Canadell JG, Korsbakken JI, Liu Z, Peters GP, Zheng B. Global energy growth is outpacing decarbonization. Environ Res Lett, 2018, 13 12

[27] Jain A, Sarsaiya S, Awasthi MK, Singh R, Rajput R, Mishra UC, Chen J, Shi J. Bioenergy and bio-products from bio-waste and its associated modern circular economy: current research trends challenges and future outlooks. Fuel, 2022, 307

[28] Jayarathna L, Kent G, O'Hara I. Spatial optimization of multiple biomass utilization for large-scale bioelectricity generation. J Clean Prod, 2021, 319

[29] Jayarathna L, Kent G, O'Hara I, Hobson P. A geographical information system based framework to identify optimal location and size of biomass energy plants using single or multiple biomass types. Appl Energy, 2020, 275

[30] Jelokhani-Niaraki M, Moradi-Pour S, Samany NN, Mohammadkhan S. A multiple models-multiple users group GIS-based decision support system for land use problems. Land Use Policy, 2023, 134

[31] Karlsson I, Rootzén J, Toktarova A, Odenberger M, Johnsson F, Göransson L. Roadmap for decarbonization of the building and construction industry—a supply chain analysis including primary production of steel and cement. Energies, 2020, 13(16): 4136

[32] Khadivi M, Sowlati T (2022) Biomass gasification investment: a multi-criteria decision considering uncertain conditions. Biomass Convers Biorefin 15:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02700-0

[33] Khurshid A, Khan K, Cifuentes-Faura J. 2030 Agenda of sustainable transport: Can current progress lead towards carbon neutrality?. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2023, 122

[34] Lozano-García DF, Santibañez-Aguilar JE, Lozano FJ, Flores-Tlacuahuac A. GIS-based modeling of residual biomass availability for energy and production in Mexico. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2020, 120

[35] Mukisa N, Zamora R, Lie TT. Multi criteria analysis of alternative energy technologies based on their predicted impact on community sustainable livelihoods capitals: a case of Uganda. Renew Energy, 2022, 182: 1103-1125

[36] Mutascu M. Is biomass energy really sustainable in the United States?. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2023, 181

[37] Ortiz-Malavasi E (2014) Atlas de Costa Rica 2014

[38] Pang S, Mujumdar A. Drying of woody biomass for bioenergy: drying technologies and optimization for an integrated bioenergy plant. Dry Technol, 2010, 28(5): 690-701

[39] Panichelli L, Gnansounou E. GIS-based approach for defining bioenergy facilities location: a case study in Northern Spain based on marginal delivery costs and resources competition between facilities. Biomass Bioenergy, 2008, 32(4): 289-300

[40] Papadis E, Tsatsaronis G. Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy, 2020, 205

[41] Pérez-Cedeño RO, Ramírez-Pisco R, Vásquez-Stanescu CL, Suárez-Matarrita L, Gaitán-Ángulo M, Gómez-Caicedo M. Estimation of methane emissions from reservoirs for hydroelectric generation in Costa Rica. Rev Fac Ing Univ Antioq, 2023, 12: 1-12

[42] Perpiña C, Martínez-Llario JC, Pérez-Navarro Á. Multicriteria assessment in GIS environments for siting biomass plants. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31: 326-335

[43] PRIAS (2019) Distribución espacial de Cultivo de Piña en Costa Rica. Reporte Técnico. 33p

[44] QGISteam (2021) QGIS geographic information system. In In: Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project

[45] Recanatesi F, Tolli M, Lord R. Multi criteria analysis to evaluate the best location of plants for renewable energy by forest biomass: a case study in Central Italy. Appl Math Sci, 2014, 8(129): 6447-6458

[46] Rezaei H, Macioszek E, Derakhshesh P, Houshyar H, Ghabouli E, Bakhshi Lomer AR, Ghanbari R, Esmailzadeh A. A spatial decision support system for modeling urban resilience to natural hazards. Sustainability, 2023, 15(11): 8777

[47] Roy D. Performance evaluation of a novel biomass-based hybrid energy system employing optimisation and multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 2020, 42

[48] Rozakis S, Soldatos PG, Kallivroussis L, Nicolaou I. Multiple criteria analysis of bio-energy projects: evaluation of bio-electricity production in Farsala Plain Greece. J Geogr Inf Decis Anal, 2001, 5(1): 49-64

[49] Sayadi MK, Heydari M, Shahanaghi K. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Appl Math Model, 2009, 33(5): 2257-2262

[50] Scheiterle L, Ulmer A, Birner R, Pyka A. From commodity-based value chains to biomass-based value webs: the case of sugarcane in Brazil’s bioeconomy. J Clean Prod, 2018, 172: 3851-3863

[51] Sen S, Ganguly S. Opportunities barriers and issues with renewable energy development–A discussion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 69: 1170-1181

[52] Sepehri A, Sarrafzadeh MH. Effect of nitrifiers community on fouling mitigation and nitrification efficiency in a membrane bioreactor. Chem Eng Proces Intensif, 2018, 128: 10-18

[53] Sherwood J. The significance of biomass in a circular economy. Bioresour Technol, 2020, 300

[54] Shorabeh SN, Firozjaei HK, Firozjaei MK, Jelokhani-Niaraki M, Homaee M, Nematollahi O. The site selection of wind energy power plant using GIS-multi-criteria evaluation from economic perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 168

[55] Siciliano G, Wallbott L, Urban F, Dang AN, Lederer M. Low-carbon energy sustainable development and justice: towards a just energy transition for the society and the environment. Sustain Dev, 2021, 29(6): 1049-1061

[56] Team R (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In R. F. f. S. Computing (Ed.) Viena

[57] Trømborg E, Bolkesjø TF, Solberg B. Biomass market and trade in Norway: status and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy, 2008, 32(8): 660-671

[58] Tsalis TA, Terzaki M, Koulouriotis D, Tsagarakis KP, Nikolaou IE. The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports. Sustain Dev, 2023, 31(2): 784-796

[59] Ulloa A, Camacho D, Arias D, Valverde JC. Análisis del mercado de biomasa forestal con fines energéticos en la zona de Guanacaste. Kuru, 2018, 15: 45-52

[60] Valverde JC, Arias D, Campos R, Jiménez MF, Brenes L. Análisis perceptual del mercado energético basado en biomasa lignocelulósica de origen arbóreo en Costa Rica. Madera Bosques, 2020, 26(3): 1-15

[61] Valverde JC, Arias D, Campos R, Jiménez MF, Brenes L. Forest and agro-industrial residues and bioeconomy: perception of use in the energy market in Costa Rica. Energy Ecol Environ, 2021, 6(3): 232-243

[62] Valverde JC, Arias D, Campos R, Masís C, Jiménez MF, Brenes L. Determination of the optimal size and location of an electricity generation plant that uses lignocellulosic residues from Costa Rican Northern. Bioenergy Res, 2022, 15(3): 1491-1500

[63] Varma J, Varma MJ (2016) Package ‘jrvFinance’

[64] Vega-Quezada C, Blanco M, Romero H. Synergies between agriculture and bioenergy in Latin American countries: a circular economy strategy for bioenergy production in Ecuador. New Biotechnol, 2017, 39: 81-89

[65] Zhu W, Park C, Zhu MW (2015) Package ‘edcc’