RETRACTED ARTICLE: Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer mortar incorporating waste marble powder
Parmender Gill , Vijaya Sarathy Rathanasalam , Parveen Jangra , Thong M. Pham , Deepankar Kumar Ashish
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 159 -174.
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer mortar incorporating waste marble powder
The marble processing industry produces a large volume of unmanaged waste in the form of microfine marble particles, usually referred as waste marble powder (WMP). Unregulated and open disposal of WMP has adverse effects on the environment. Marble is usually rich in calcium content, which can be used in geopolymer technology, thereby enhancing its recycling value. This research sought to determine the viability of WMP as a supplementary binder and polymerisation potential of its high calcium content (55.96%). For this purpose, WMP was used as fly ash replacement by weight (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20%) in geopolymer mortar (GPM) while other mix proportions are kept the same. The results indicated that WMP substitution adversely affected the water absorption (WA), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive and flexural strengths of engineered GPM. The mechanical strength trends were supported by, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy tests, which revealed that the calcium content of WMP showed poor alkali activation. Marble particles remained unreacted in the GPM matrix and failed to form additional geopolymeric compounds as Ca/Si ratio was found to consistently decrease with higher WMP substitution. Accordingly, WMP can be used in geopolymers in combination with siliceous binder (fly ash) without significantly reducing the mortar mechanical properties and thus the resulting GPM can find broad applications in practice.
Waste marble powder / Geopolymer mortar / UPV / SEM / EDS / XRD / FTIR
| [1] |
Alam J, Akhtar MN (2014) Fly ash utilization in different sectors in Indian scenario. Int J Emerg Trends Eng Dev 1:1–14 |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
ASTM C348 (2002) Flexural strength of hydraulic-cement mortars. American Society for Testing and Material 04:1–6 |
| [8] |
ASTM C597 (2016) Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0597-16 |
| [9] |
ASTM E1252 (2013) Standard Practice for General Techniques for Obtaining Infrared Spectra for Qualitative Analysis. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 03(Reapproved 2013), pp 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1520/E1252-98R13 |
| [10] |
ASTMC127 (2009) Standard Test Method for Density , Relative Density ( Specific Gravity ), and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, pp 1–7 |
| [11] |
ASTMC29/C29M (1997) Standard Test Method for Bulk Density and Voids in Aggregate, pp 1–4 |
| [12] |
ASTMC535 (2009) Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Large-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine, pp 14–16 |
| [13] |
BS812-110 (1990) Methods for determination of aggregate crushing value (ACV). British Standard Institution |
| [14] |
BS812-112 (2015) Determination of Aggregate Impact Value. (iv), pp 1–6 |
| [15] |
Chatterjee AK (2010) Indian fly ashes, their characteristics, and potential for mechano-chemical activation for enhanced usability. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, pp 41–51 |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Ferdous MW, Kayali O, Khennane A (2013) A detailed procedure of mix design for fly ash based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures, APFIS 2013, Dec, pp 11–13 |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Gill P, Jangra P, Ashish DK (2023) Non-destructive prediction of strength of geopolymer concrete employing lightweight recycled aggregates and copper slag. Energy Ecol Environ 8:1–14 |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Lloyd NA, Rangan BV (2010) Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, vol 7, pp 1493–1504 |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Ushaa TG, Anuradha R, Venkatasubramani GS (2015) Performance of self-compacting geopolymer concrete containing different mineral admixtures. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 22:473–481 |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |