RETRACTED ARTICLE: Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer mortar incorporating waste marble powder

Parmender Gill , Vijaya Sarathy Rathanasalam , Parveen Jangra , Thong M. Pham , Deepankar Kumar Ashish

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 159 -174.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 159 -174. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-023-00296-3
Original Article

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer mortar incorporating waste marble powder

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The marble processing industry produces a large volume of unmanaged waste in the form of microfine marble particles, usually referred as waste marble powder (WMP). Unregulated and open disposal of WMP has adverse effects on the environment. Marble is usually rich in calcium content, which can be used in geopolymer technology, thereby enhancing its recycling value. This research sought to determine the viability of WMP as a supplementary binder and polymerisation potential of its high calcium content (55.96%). For this purpose, WMP was used as fly ash replacement by weight (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20%) in geopolymer mortar (GPM) while other mix proportions are kept the same. The results indicated that WMP substitution adversely affected the water absorption (WA), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive and flexural strengths of engineered GPM. The mechanical strength trends were supported by, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy tests, which revealed that the calcium content of WMP showed poor alkali activation. Marble particles remained unreacted in the GPM matrix and failed to form additional geopolymeric compounds as Ca/Si ratio was found to consistently decrease with higher WMP substitution. Accordingly, WMP can be used in geopolymers in combination with siliceous binder (fly ash) without significantly reducing the mortar mechanical properties and thus the resulting GPM can find broad applications in practice.

Keywords

Waste marble powder / Geopolymer mortar / UPV / SEM / EDS / XRD / FTIR

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Parmender Gill, Vijaya Sarathy Rathanasalam, Parveen Jangra, Thong M. Pham, Deepankar Kumar Ashish. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer mortar incorporating waste marble powder. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2023, 9(2): 159-174 DOI:10.1007/s40974-023-00296-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alam J, Akhtar MN (2014) Fly ash utilization in different sectors in Indian scenario. Int J Emerg Trends Eng Dev 1:1–14

[2]

AliabdoAA, Abd ElmoatyAEM, AudaEM. Re-use of waste marble dust in the production of cement and concrete. Constr Build Mater, 2014, 50: 28-41.

[3]

AnuradhaR, SreevidyaV, VenkatasubramaniR, RanganBV. Modified guidelines for geopolymer concrete mix design using Indian standard. Asian J Civ Eng, 2012, 133353-364

[4]

ArelHS. Recyclability of waste marble in concrete production. J Clean Prod, 2016, 131: 179-188.

[5]

AshishDK. Feasibility of waste marble powder in concrete as partial substitution of cement and sand amalgam for sustainable growth. J Build Eng, 2018, 15: 236-242.

[6]

AshishDK. Concrete made with waste marble powder and supplementary cementitious material for sustainable development. J Clean Prod, 2019, 211: 716-729.

[7]

ASTM C348 (2002) Flexural strength of hydraulic-cement mortars. American Society for Testing and Material 04:1–6

[8]

ASTM C597 (2016) Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0597-16

[9]

ASTM E1252 (2013) Standard Practice for General Techniques for Obtaining Infrared Spectra for Qualitative Analysis. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 03(Reapproved 2013), pp 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1520/E1252-98R13

[10]

ASTMC127 (2009) Standard Test Method for Density , Relative Density ( Specific Gravity ), and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, pp 1–7

[11]

ASTMC29/C29M (1997) Standard Test Method for Bulk Density and Voids in Aggregate, pp 1–4

[12]

ASTMC535 (2009) Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Large-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine, pp 14–16

[13]

BS812-110 (1990) Methods for determination of aggregate crushing value (ACV). British Standard Institution

[14]

BS812-112 (2015) Determination of Aggregate Impact Value. (iv), pp 1–6

[15]

Chatterjee AK (2010) Indian fly ashes, their characteristics, and potential for mechano-chemical activation for enhanced usability. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, pp 41–51

[16]

DuxsonP, Fernández-JiménezA, ProvisJL, LukeyGC, PalomoA, Van DeventerJSJ. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci, 2007, 4292917-2933.

[17]

DuxsonP, MallicoatSW, LukeyGC, KrivenWM, van DeventerJSJ. The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Colloids Surf, A, 2007, 29218-20.

[18]

DwivediA, JainM. Fly ash – waste management and overview: a review. Recent Res Sci Technol, 2014, 6130-35

[19]

Ferdous MW, Kayali O, Khennane A (2013) A detailed procedure of mix design for fly ash based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures, APFIS 2013, Dec, pp 11–13

[20]

GhaniA, AliZ, KhanFA, ShahSR, KhanSW, RashidM. Experimental study on the behavior of waste marble powder as partial replacement of sand in concrete. SN Appl Sci, 2020, 291-13.

[21]

GillP, JangraP, RoychandR, SaberianM, LiJ. Effects of various additives on the crumb rubber integrated geopolymer concrete. Clean Mater, 2023, 8: 100181.

[22]

Gill P, Jangra P, Ashish DK (2023) Non-destructive prediction of strength of geopolymer concrete employing lightweight recycled aggregates and copper slag. Energy Ecol Environ 8:1–14

[23]

HadiMNS, Al-azzawiM, YuT. Effects of fly ash characteristics and alkaline activator components on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater, 2018, 175: 41-54.

[24]

HardjitoD, WallahSE, SumajouwDMJ, RanganBV. Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Civ Eng, 2004, 6288-93

[25]

HebhoubH, AounH, BelachiaM, HouariH, GhorbelE. Use of waste marble aggregates in concrete. Constr Build Mater, 2011.

[26]

HouY, WangD, ZhouW, LuH, WangL. Effect of activator and curing mode on fly ash-based geopolymers. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Edit, 2009, 245711-715.

[27]

JindalBB, ParveenS, GoyalA. Predicting relationship between mechanical properties of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Trans Indian Ceram Soc, 2017, 764258-265.

[28]

JunaidMT, KayaliO, KhennaneA, BlackJ. A mix design procedure for low calcium alkali activated fly ash-based concretes. Constr Build Mater, 2015, 79: 301-310.

[29]

KabeerKIS, VyasA. Evaluation of strength and durability of lean concrete mixes containing marble waste as fine aggregate. Eur J Environ Civ Eng, 2018.

[30]

KamseuE, AkonoAT, RosaR, MarianiA, LeonelliC. Valorization of marble powder wastes using rice husk ash to yield enhanced-performance inorganic polymer cements: phase evolution, microstructure, and micromechanics analyses. Clean Eng Technol, 2022, 8: 100461.

[31]

KayaM, KöksalF, BayramM, NodehiM, GencelO, OzbakkalogluT. The effect of marble powder on physico-mechanical and microstructural properties of kaolin-based geopolymer pastes. Struct Concr, 2022.

[32]

KhanMA, KhanB, ShahzadaK, KhanSW, WahabN, AhmadMI. Conversion of waste marble powder into a binding material. Civ Eng J (iran), 2020, 63431-445.

[33]

KimW, SuhCY, ChoSW, RohKM, KwonH, SongK, ShonIJ. A new method for the identification and quantification of magnetite–maghemite mixture using conventional X-ray diffraction technique. Talanta, 2012, 94: 348-352.

[34]

KomnitsasK, SoultanaA, BartzasG. Marble waste valorization through alkali activation. Minerals, 2021, 1111-16.

[35]

KumarV, SinglaS, GargR. Strength and microstructure correlation of binary cement blends in presence of waste marble powder. Mater Today: Proc, 2020.

[36]

LeeWH, LinKL, ChangTH, DingYC, ChengTW. Sustainable development and performance evaluation of marble-waste-based geopolymer concrete. Polymers, 2020.

[37]

LezzeriniM, LutiL, AquinoA, GallelloG. Effect of marble waste powder as a binder replacement on the mechanical resistance of cement mortars. Appl Sci (switzerland), 2022, 1294481

[38]

Lloyd NA, Rangan BV (2010) Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, vol 7, pp 1493–1504

[39]

MehtaA, SiddiqueR. Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash. Constr Build Mater, 2017, 150: 792-807.

[40]

MehtaA, SiddiqueR. Sustainable geopolymer concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash: strength and permeability properties. J Clean Prod, 2018, 205: 49-57.

[41]

NathP, SarkerPK. Use of OPC to improve setting and early strength properties of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. Cem Concr Compos, 2015, 55: 205-214.

[42]

NathP, SarkerPK, RanganVB. Early age properties of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete suitable for ambient curing. Proc Eng, 2015, 125: 601-607.

[43]

Nikvar-HassaniA, ManjarrezL, ZhangL. Rheology, setting time, and compressive strength of class F fly ash-based geopolymer binder containing ordinary Portland cement. J Mater Civ Eng, 2022, 3414021375.

[44]

PalomoA, GrutzeckMW, BlancoMT. Alkali-activated fly ashes: a cement for the future. Cem Concr Res, 1999, 2981323-1329.

[45]

PappuA, ThakurVK, PatidarR, AsolekarSR, SaxenaM. Recycling marble wastes and Jarosite wastes into sustainable hybrid composite materials and validation through Response Surface Methodology. J Clean Prod, 2019, 240: 118249.

[46]

RanganB. Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Geopolym Cem Concr, 2014, 7982: 68-106

[47]

SalomaA, HanafiahA, MawarniA. Geopolymer mortar with fly ash. MATEC Web Conf, 2016, 78: 1-6.

[48]

SaloniP, LimYY, PhamTM, KumarK. Sustainable alkali activated concrete with fly ash and waste marble aggregates: strength and durability studies. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 283: 122795.

[49]

SeghirNT, BenaimecheO, KrzywínskiK, SadowskiL. Ultrasonic evaluation of cement-based building materials modified using marble powder sourced from industrial wastes. Buildings, 2020.

[50]

SinghM, ChoudharyK, SrivastavaA, Singh SangwanK, BhuniaD. A study on environmental and economic impacts of using waste marble powder in concrete. J Build Eng, 2017, 13: 87-95.

[51]

SinsiriT, ChindaprasirtP, JaturapitakkulC. Influence of fly ash fineness and shape on the porosity and permeability of blended cement pastes. Int J Min Metallur Mater, 2010, 176683-690.

[52]

Surabhi. . Fly ash in India: generation vis-à-vis Utilization and Global perspective. Int J Appl Chem, 2017, 13129-52

[53]

TemuujinJ, RiessenAV, MackenzieKJD. Preparation and characterisation of fly ash based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater, 2010, 24101906-1910.

[54]

Ushaa TG, Anuradha R, Venkatasubramani GS (2015) Performance of self-compacting geopolymer concrete containing different mineral admixtures. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 22:473–481

[55]

VardhanK, GoyalS, SiddiqueR, SinghM. Mechanical properties and microstructural analysis of cement mortar incorporating marble powder as partial replacement of cement. Constr Build Mater, 2015, 96: 615-621.

[56]

VardhanK, SiddiqueR, GoyalS. Influence of marble waste as partial replacement of fine aggregates on strength and drying shrinkage of concrete. Constr Build Mater, 2019, 228. 116730

[57]

WangQ, DingZY, DaJ, RanK, SuiZT. Factors influencing bonding strength of geopolymer-aggregate interfacial transition zone. Adv Mater Res, 2011, 224: 1-7.

[58]

WangY, LiuX, ZhangW, LiZ, ZhangY, LiY, RenY. Effects of Si/Al ratio on the efflorescence and properties of fly ash based geopolymer. J Clean Product, 2020.

[59]

WangJ, MaB, TanH, DuC, ChuZ, LuoZ, WangP. Hydration and mechanical properties of cement-marble powder system incorporating triisopropanolamine. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 266. 121068

[60]

YamanelK, DurakU, IlkentaparS, AtabeyII, KarahanO, AtişCD. Influence of waste marble powder as a replacement of cement on the properties of mortar. Revista De La Construccion, 2019, 182290-300.

[61]

YousufA, ManzoorSO, YoussoufM. Fly ash: production and utilization in India - an overview. J Mater Environ Science, 2020, 116911-921

[62]

ZhaoJ, TongL, LiB, ChenT, WangC, YangG, ZhengY. Eco-friendly geopolymer materials: a review of performance improvement, potential application and sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod, 2021, 307: 127085.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

394

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/