The value of social media tool for monitoring and evaluating environment policy communication: a case study of the ‘Zero-waste City’ initiative in China

Abstract

The construction of a ‘zero-waste city’ is a flagship policy to accelerate the development of a green, low-carbon circular economy system in China. Enhancing social participation is an important dimension to evaluate the effect of ‘zero-waste city’ policy construction and an effective way to promote the full achievement of correct waste classification, management, and supervision of solid waste. Based on policy communication theory, this paper aims to take advantage of social media to quantitatively measure the environment policy communication effect and provide a comprehensive panoramic measurement from dynamic characteristics and trend, communication scope, attributes of communicators, and contents dimensions. Based on post data related to ‘zero-waste city’ on Weibo platforms from June 2018 to November 2020, this paper innovatively constructs a measurement system of environmental policy communication that combines social media data with social network analysis and text topic analysis. Results show that from the angle of communication trend, a ‘zero-waste city’ public environment policy is continuously promoted on social media with an increasingly growing volume and is a subject of wide concern for the public. This study confirms the value of social media data in assessing environment policy communication effect and presents several policy implications: Government departments should strengthen environmental policy communication by using Weibo and other social media tools to improve the public’s attention toward the policy and increase their participation in environmental governance; focus on people’s livelihood interest in policy communication content; strengthen the interaction of the public with the content of policies by using a popular and understandable public discourse system and encourage multiple social subjects to participate in policy communication and strengthen the communication of the ‘zero-waste’ cultural concept.

Keywords

Zero-waste city / Solid waste / Social media / Policy communication / Public perception / Studies in Human Society / Policy and Administration

References

[1] AliC, PuppisM. When the watchdog neither barks nor bites: communication as a power resource in media policy and regulation. Commun Theory, 2018, 28: 270-291.

[2] BleiDM, LaffertyJD. A correlated topic model of science. Ann Appl Stat, 2007, 1: 17-35.

[3] BorgattiSP, EverettMG, JohnsonJCAnalyzing social networks, 2018Sage

[4] CamachoD, Panizo-LLedotÁ, Bello-OrgazG, et al. . The four dimensions of social network analysis: an overview of research methods, applications, and software tools. Inf Fusion, 2020, 63: 88-120.

[5] CamilleriMA. European environment policy for the circular economy: implications for business and industry stakeholders. Sustain Dev, 2020, 28: 1804-1812.

[6] CanaryHE, TaylorJL. Policy communication engaging multiplicity. The handbook of applied communication research, 20201Wiley675-691.

[7] China Internet Network Information Center (2021) The 47th China Statistical Report on Internet Development. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202102/P020210203334633480104.pdf

[8] Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N (2014) Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. 5:411–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.269

[9] CriadoJI, Sandoval-AlmazanR, Gil-GarciaJR. Government innovation through social media. Gov Inf Q, 2013, 30: 319-326.

[10] EnliG. Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. Eur J Commun, 2017, 32: 50-61.

[11] Environmental Protection Agency (2017) Advancing sustainable materials managemet:2019 fact sheet. In: United States. https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/advancing-sustainable-materials-management

[12] GaoL, WangS, LiJ, LiH. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual ’ s energy saving behavior in workplaces. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2017, 127: 107-113.

[13] GarnettK, CooperT. Effective dialogue: Enhanced public engagement as a legitimising tool for municipal waste management decision-making. Waste Manag, 2014, 34: 2709-2726.

[14] HonmaS, HuJ-L. Cost efficiency of recycling and waste disposal in Japan. J Clean Prod, 2021, 284. 125274

[15] HouJ, JinY, ChenF. Should waste separation be mandatory? A study on public’s response to the policies in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17: 1-17.

[16] KalaK, BoliaNB, Sushil. Waste management communication policy for effective citizen awareness. J Policy Model, 2020, 42: 661-678.

[17] LindeS. Political communication and public support for climate mitigation policies: a country-comparative perspective. Clim Policy, 2018, 18: 543-555.

[18] Liu X, Jiang L, Ge Q, et al (2021) A Macro-study on the Pilot Construction of No-Waste Cities During the 14th Five-Year Plan. 49:37–41. https://doi.org/10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2021.01.008 (in Chinese)

[19] MahDNY, HillsP, TaoJ. Risk perception, trust and public engagement in nuclear decision-making in Hong Kong. Energy Policy, 2014, 73: 368-390.

[20] MahataD, FriedrichsJ, ShahRR, JiangJ. Detecting personal intake of medicine from twitter. IEEE Intell Syst, 2018, 33: 87-95.

[21] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (2019) Letter on the issuance of the “Guidelines for the Preparation of Pilot Implementation Plans for the Construction of ‘Waste-free Cities’” and the “Indices System for the Construction of ‘Waste Free Cities’ (Trial).” http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/201905/t20190513_702598.html

[22] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (2020) 2020 Annual Report on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Waste in Large and Medium Cities. http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/gtfwwrfz/

[23] PanJ, ZhangY. Evolution and transformation of China’s climate change strategy: from preventing‘Black Swan’disasters to reducing‘Gray Rhino’risks. China Popul Environ, 2018, 28: 1-8

[24] PanagiotopoulosP, BigdeliAZ, SamsS. Citizen-government collaboration on social media: the case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Gov Inf Q, 2014, 31: 349-357.

[25] PiaoG, BreslinJG. Inferring user interests in microblogging social networks: a survey. User Model User-Adapt Interact, 2018, 28: 277-329.

[26] RobinT-W. Going for zero: a comparative critical analysis of zero waste events in Southern New South Wales. Australas J Environ Manag, 2013.

[27] RomanoG, RapposelliA, MarrucciL. Improving waste production and recycling through zero-waste strategy and privatization: an empirical investigation. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2019, 146: 256-263.

[28] SimonofskiA, FinkJ, BurnayC. Supporting policy-making with social media and e-participation platforms data: a policy analytics framework. Gov Inf Q, 2021, 38: 1-13.

[29] SongQ, LiJ, ZengX. Minimizing the increasing solid waste through zero waste strategy. J Clean Prod, 2015, 104: 199-210.

[30] SunQ, WangN, ZhouY, LuoZ. Identification of influential online social network users based on multi-features. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell, 2016, 30: 1-15.

[31] The State Council of The People’s Republic of China (2019) Notice of the general office of the state council on printing and distributing the pilot work plan for the construction of “Waste Free City.” http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-01/21/content_5359620.htm

[32] WeiY, GongP, ZhangJ, WangL. Exploring public opinions on climate change policy in “Big Data Era”—a case study of the European Union Emission Trading System (EU-ETS) based on Twitter. Energy Policy, 2021, 158. 112559

[33] Weng J, Lim EP, Jiang J, He Q (2010) TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In: WSDM 2010—Proc 3rd ACM Int Conf Web Search Data Min 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718487.1718520

[34] WuZ, ZhangY, ChenQ, WangH. Attitude of Chinese public towards municipal solid waste sorting policy: a text mining study. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 756. 142674

[35] XiangA, ShenY. Research on the heterogeneous communication of public policy from the perspective of RP repeater—a case study of garbage classification policy. J Intell, 2021, 40: 131-137(in Chinese)

[36] XiaoL, LiuJ, GeJ. Dynamic game in agriculture and industry cross-sectoral water pollution governance in developing countries. Agric Water Manag, 2021, 243. 106417

[37] YangS. The impact and risk of new media on public policy making—based on the perspective of “Technology and Civilization”. J Nanchang Univ, 2019, 50: 64-71

[38] YangQ, RaoY, XieH, et al. . Segment-level joint topic-sentiment model for online review analysis. IEEE Intell Syst, 2019, 34: 43-50.

[39] ZamanAU. A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: lessons learned and guidelines. J Clean Prod, 2015, 91: 12-25.

[40] ZarrinkalamF, KahaniM, BagheriE. Mining user interests over active topics on social networks. Inf Process Manag, 2018, 54: 339-357.

[41] Zhang T (2018) The effect of public participation on environmental governance in the perspective of new media—an empirical analysis based on panel data of provincial pollutants in China. Chin Publ Adm 79–85 (in Chinese)

[42] ZhaoY, DuB. Change and development of environmental culture transmission in perspective of new media. China Popul Environ, 2013, 23: 119-121(in Chinese)

[43] ZhouX, ChenD. Rethinking and reconstructing public participation in climate change response. China Popul Environ, 2019, 29: 115-123(in Chinese)

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(72174020)

Beijing Social Science Fund(20GLC054)

the MOE( Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences(18YJC840041)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University