Are companies using Twitter to greenwash and hide bad environmental performance?

Thomas F. Johnson , Matthew P. Greenwell

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3) : 213 -226.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3) : 213 -226. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-021-00237-y
Original Article

Are companies using Twitter to greenwash and hide bad environmental performance?

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Companies and related consumer behaviours contribute significantly to global carbon emissions. However, consumer behaviour is shifting, with the public now recognising the real and immediate impact of climate change. Many companies are aware and seemingly eager to align to consumer’s increasing environmental consciousness, yet there is a risk that some companies could be presenting themselves as environmentally friendly without implementing environmentally beneficial processes and products (i.e. greenwashing). Here, using longitudinal climate leadership, environmental messaging (Twitter) and stock price data, we explore how climate leadership (a relative climate change mitigation metric) and environmental messaging have changed for hundreds of UK companies. Using the environmental messaging, we also assess whether companies are simply greenwashing their true climate change performance. Finally, we explore how climate leadership and environmental messaging influence companies’ stock prices. We found that companies (on average) have increased their climate leadership (coef: 0.14, CI 0.12–0.16) and environmental messaging (coef: 0.35, CI 0.19–0.50) between 2010 and 2019. We also found an association where companies with more environmental messaging had a higher climate leadership (coef: 0.16, CI 0.07–0.26), suggesting messaging was proportionate to environmental performance, and so there was no clear pattern of using Twitter for greenwashing across UK companies. In fact, some companies may be under-advertising their pro-environmental performance. Finally, we found no evidence that climate leadership, environmental messaging or greenwashing impacts a company’s stock price.

Keywords

Climate change / Corporate social responsibility / Environment / Finance / Greenwashing / Sustainability

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Thomas F. Johnson, Matthew P. Greenwell. Are companies using Twitter to greenwash and hide bad environmental performance?. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2022, 7(3): 213-226 DOI:10.1007/s40974-021-00237-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aggarwal R, Dow S. Corporate governance and business strategies for climate change and environmental mitigation. J Finance Eur, 2012

[2]

Albarrak MS, Elnahass M, Salama A. The effect of carbon dissemination on cost of equity. Bus Strategy Environ, 2019, 28: 1179-1198

[3]

Allen MW, Craig CA. Rethinking corporate social responsibility in the age of climate change: a communication perspective. Int J Corp Soc Responsib, 2016

[4]

Alsaifi K, Elnahass M, Salama A. Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK environmental policy. Bus Strategy Environ, 2020, 29: 711-726

[5]

Bansal P, Roth K. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J, 2000, 43: 717-736

[6]

Begg K, van der Woerd F, Levy D (2018) The business of climate change: corporate responses to Kyoto, the business of climate change: corporate responses to Kyoto. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351281683

[7]

Bonini SMJ, Hintz G, Mendonca LT (2008) Addressing consumer concerns about climate change. McKinsey Q

[8]

Bosello F, Roson R, Tol RSJ. Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: human health. Ecol Econ, 2006, 58: 579-591

[9]

Brulle RJ, Aronczyk M, Carmichael J. Corporate promotion and climate change: an analysis of key variables affecting advertising spending by major oil corporations, 1986–2015. Clim Change, 2020

[10]

CDP (2020) Companies scores [WWW Document]. URL https://www.cdp.net/en/companies/companies-scores. Accessed 11 Feb 2020

[11]

Dawkins C, Fraas JW. Coming clean: the impact of environmental performance and visibility on corporate climate change disclosure. J Bus Ethics, 2011

[12]

de Freitas Netto SV, Sobral MFF, Ribeiro ARB, Soares GRdaL. Concepts and forms of greenwashing: a systematic review. Environ Sci Eur, 2020, 32: 19

[13]

European Commission (2021) Screening of websites [WWW Document]. Eur. Comm. url: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_269. Accessed 8 April 21

[14]

de Jong MDT, Huluba G, Beldad AD. Different shades of greenwashing: consumers’ reactions to environmental lies, half-lies, and organizations taking credit for following legal obligations. J Bus Tech Commun, 2020, 34: 38-76

[15]

Ekwurzel B, Boneham J, Dalton MW, Heede R, Mera RJ, Allen MR, Frumhoff PC. The rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers. Clim Change, 2017

[16]

El Zein SA, Consolacion-Segura C, Huertas-Garcia R. The role of sustainability in brand equity value in the financial sector. Sustain Switz, 2020

[17]

Ertz M, Huang R, Jo MS, Karakas F, Sarigöllü E. From single-use to multi-use: study of consumers’ behavior toward consumption of reusable containers. J Environ Manage, 2017

[18]

Fadul J, Maurer RA (2004) Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and firm value in the oil and gas industry. In: Proceedings—SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Doi:https://doi.org/10.2523/90701-ms

[19]

Feinerer I, Hornik K (2019) tm: Text mining Package

[20]

Gilmore AB, Fooks G, Drope J, Bialous SA, Jackson RR. Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 2015

[21]

Gov (2008) Consumer protection from unfair trading regulations

[22]

Guo T, Zha G, Lee CL, Tang Q. Does corporate green ranking reflect carbon-mitigation performance?. J Clean Prod, 2020, 277

[23]

Han H, Ahn SW. Youth mobilization to stop global climate change: narratives and impact. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 4127

[24]

Hoffman AJ. Carbon strategies: how leading companies are reducing their climate change footprint, 2007 New York University of Michigan Press

[25]

Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ. Climate change: the IPCC scientific assessment. Clim Change IPCC Sci Assess, 1990

[26]

Ihlen Ø. Business and climate change: the climate response of the world’s 30 largest corporations. Environ Commun, 2009

[27]

International Energy Agency (2019) Global EV Outlook 2019

[28]

IPBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

[29]

IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate Change, IPCC

[30]

Johnson TF, Isaac NJB, Paviolo A, González-Suárez M. Handling missing values in trait data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2021

[31]

Johnson TF, Kent H, Hill BM, Dunn G, Dommett L, Penwill N, Francis T, González-Suárez M. classecol: Classifiers to understand public opinions of nature. Methods Ecol Evol, 2021, 12: 1329-1334

[32]

Kearney MW (2017) rtweet: collecting twitter data

[33]

Kronthal-Sacco R, Whelan T (2021) Sustainable Market Share IndexTM 38

[34]

Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Rosenthal S, Cutler M, Kotcher J (2018) Climate change in the American mind: March 2018, Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CT

[35]

Leitao J, Ferreira J, Santibanez-Gonzalez E. Green bonds, sustainable development and environmental policy in the European Union carbon market. Bus Strategy Environ, 2021, 30: 2077-2090

[36]

Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data, statistical analysis with missing data, 2002 2nd edn Hoboken Wiley

[37]

Luo L, Tang Q. Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance?. J Contemp Account Econ, 2014, 10: 191-205

[38]

Perlin M (2020) BatchGetSymbols: downloads and organizes financial data for multiple tickers

[39]

Pew Research Center (2020) As economic concerns recede, environmental protection rises on the public’s Policy Agend

[40]

Ren21 (2019) Renewables 2019 Global Status Report

[41]

Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Galetti M, Alamgir M, Crist E, Mahmoud MI, Laurance WF. World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice. Bioscience, 2017, 67: 1026-1028

[42]

Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, Van Der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 2009

[43]

Stern PC. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues, 2000, 56: 407-424

[44]

Sussman FG, Freed JR (2008) Adapting to climate change: a business approach. Environment

[45]

United Nations (2018) Sustainable Development Goals | UNDP

[46]

Wagner M, Schaltegger S. The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. Eur Manag J, 2004

[47]

Wedari LK, Jubb C, Moradi-Motlagh A. Corporate climate-related voluntary disclosures: Does potential greenwash exist among Australian high emitters reports?. Bus Strategy Environ, 2021

[48]

White K, Habib R, Hardisty DJ. How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework. J Mark, 2019, 83: 22-49

[49]

Zhang D, Rong Z, Ji Q. Green innovation and firm performance: evidence from listed companies in China. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2019, 144: 48-55

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council(NE/P012345/1)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

350

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/