Longitudinal study of changes in ecosystem services in a city of lakes, Bhopal, India

Sonali Sharma , M. M. Anees , Mani Sharma , P. K. Joshi

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5) : 408 -424.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5) : 408 -424. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-020-00199-7
Original Article

Longitudinal study of changes in ecosystem services in a city of lakes, Bhopal, India

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Urban landscapes are now the most inhabited places by the majority of global population. The rapid and large-scale land use land cover (LULC) changes induced by urbanization are declining the ecosystem services (ESs) provisioning capacity of natural and semi-natural ecosystems of urban landscapes. The main aim of the study was to assess the ecological changes caused by LULC change in the urbanized capital of the Central India, Bhopal. This study relied on satellite images (from 1988 to 2018) for generation of spatio-temporal LULC database and direct benefit transfer ecosystem service valuation scheme for quantifying the ecosystem service value (ESV). The results showed decline in total ESs by US $ 2.00 million. Though water body covers least area out of 5 LULC types of the city, it remains the top contributor to total ESV in each reference year. The ecosystem service function analysis aided in identifying, regulating and provisioning services as the key contributors. In addition, assessment of ESs under two alternate future urban growth scenarios highlights the importance of conservation of natural ecosystems within the urban area. The results of this study can provide insights to the urban planners in effective decision making about how the ecosystems and their ecosystem service functions can be sustainably managed and strategically developed for the overall well-being of the growing urban population.

Keywords

Bhopal / Ecosystem services / LULC change / Urban ecosystem / Urban growth scenario

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sonali Sharma, M. M. Anees, Mani Sharma, P. K. Joshi. Longitudinal study of changes in ecosystem services in a city of lakes, Bhopal, India. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2021, 6(5): 408-424 DOI:10.1007/s40974-020-00199-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alberti M. Modeling the urban ecosystem: a conceptual framework. Environ Plan B Plan Des, 1999, 26(4): 605-629

[2]

Alberti M. The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int Reg Sci Rev, 2005, 28(2): 168-192

[3]

Arbault D, Rivière M, Rugani B, Benetto E, Tiruta-Barna L. Integrated earth system dynamic modeling for life cycle impact assessment of ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ, 2014, 472: 262-272

[4]

Aschonitis VG, Gaglio M, Castaldelli G, Fano EA. Criticism on elasticity-sensitivity coefficient for assessing the robustness and sensitivity of ecosystem services values. Ecosyst Serv, 2016, 20: 66-68

[5]

Athanassopoulos S, Kaklamanis C, Kalfoutzos G, Papaioannou E (2012) Cellular automata: simulations using matlab. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on digital society (ICDS), pp 63–68.

[6]

Avtar R, Kumar P, Oono A, Sarawat C, Dorji S, Hlaing Z. Potential application of remote sensing in monitoring ecosystem services of forests, mangroves and urban areas. Geocarto Int, 2017, 32(8): 874-885

[7]

Bharath AH, Vinay S, Ramachandra TV. Agent based modelling Urban dynamics of Bhopal, India. J Settl Spat Plan, 2016, 7(1): 1

[8]

Boyd J, Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ, 2007, 63(2–3): 616-626

[9]

Carson RM, Bergstrom JC (2003) A review of ecosystem valuation techniques (No. 1607–2016–134549).

[10]

Census of India (2011). Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs. New Delhi: Government of India. Accessed 4 Feb 2019

[11]

Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 1998, 12(7): 699-714

[12]

Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, Oneill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253

[13]

Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou EG, MartinLopez B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K, Alkemade R, Egoh B, Dunbar MB, Maes J. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv, 2013, 4: 4-14

[14]

Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ, 2009, 7(1): 21-28

[15]

Das M, Das A. Dynamics of urbanization and its impact on urban ecosystem services (UESs): a study of a medium size town of West Bengal, Eastern India. J Urban Manag, 2019

[16]

Deb S. City systems in South Asian Urbanization and Growth. City, 2017, 30: 10

[17]

De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RM. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ, 2002, 41(3): 393-408

[18]

Deng X, Li Z, Gibson J. A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. J Geogr Sci, 2016, 26(7): 953-968

[19]

District ground water information booklet (2013) North central region, central ground water board (CGWB), Ministry of Water Resources. Accesses on 25 Dec 2019 https://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/MP/Bhopal.pdf

[20]

Eigenbrod F, Bell VA, Davies HN, Heinemeyer A, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ. The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 2011, 278(1722): 3201-3208

[21]

Fu P, Weng Q. A time series analysis of urbanization induced land use and land cover change and its impact on land surface temperature with Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 2016, 175: 205-214

[22]

Han J, Hayashi Y, Cao X, Imura H. Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: a case study of Shanghai, China. Landsc Urban Plan, 2009, 91(3): 133-141

[23]

Hashim M, Mohd N, Marghany M. Modeling sprawl of unauthorized development using geospatial technology: case study in Kuantan district, Malaysia. Int J Digit Earth, 2011, 4(3): 223-238

[24]

He C, Zhao Y, Tia J, Shi P. Modeling the urban landscape dynamics in a megalopolitan cluster area by incorporating a gravitational field model with cellular automata. Landsc Urban Plan, 2013, 113: 78-89

[25]

Hu H, Liu W, Cao M. Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environ Monit Assess, 2008, 146(1–3): 147-156

[26]

IPBES Scholes R, Montanarella L, Brainich A, Barger N, ten Brink B, Cantele M, Erasmus B, Fisher J, Gardner T, Holland TG, Kohler F, Kotiaho JS, Von Maltitz G, Nangendo G, Pandit R, Parrotta J, Potts MD, Prince S, Sankaran M, Willemen L. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, 2018 STYERS, Germany Bonn 44

[27]

Kindu M, Schneider T, Teketay D, Knoke T. Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa-Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 547: 137-147

[28]

Kreuter UP, Harris HG, Matlock MD, Lacey RE. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecol Econ, 2001, 39(3): 333-346

[29]

Larson LR, Keith SJ, Fernandez M, Hallo JC, Shafer CS, Jennings V. Ecosystem services and urban greenways: what's the public's perspective?. Ecosyst Serv, 2016, 22: 111-116

[30]

Li B, Chen D, Wu S, Zhou S, Wang T, Chen H. Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: case study of Nanjing City, China. Ecol Indic, 2016, 71: 416-427

[31]

Li X, Zhang X, Yeh A, Liu X. Parallel cellular automata for large-scale urban simulation using load-balancing techniques. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 2010, 24(6): 803-820

[32]

Li X, Gong P. Urban growth models: progress and perspective. Sci Bull, 2016, 61(21): 1637-1650

[33]

Le Maitre DC, Milton SJ, Jarmain C, Colvin CA, Saayman I, Vlok JH. Linking ecosystem services and water resources: landscape-scale hydrology of the Little Karoo. Front Ecol Environ, 2007, 5(5): 261-270

[34]

Mexia T, Vieira J, Príncipe A, Anjos A, Silva P, Lopes N, Freitas C, Santo-Reis M, Correia O, Branquinho C, Pinho P. Ecosystem services: urban parks under a magnifying glass. Environ Res, 2018, 160: 469-478

[35]

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis, 2005 Washington, DC Island Press

[36]

Mitsova D, Shuster W, Wang X. A cellular automata model of land cover change to integrate urban growth with open space conservation. Landsc Urban Plan, 2011, 99(2): 141-153

[37]

Musa SI, Hashim M, Reba MNM. A review of geospatial-based urban growth models and modelling initiatives. Geocarto Int, 2017, 32(8): 813-833

[38]

Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan Kai MA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw M. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ, 2009, 7(1): 4-11

[39]

Poelmans L, Van Rompaey A. Complexity and performance of urban expansion models. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 2010, 34(1): 17-27

[40]

Power AG. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 2010, 365(1554): 2959-2971

[41]

Quintas-Soriano C, Castro AJ, Castro H, García-Llorente M. Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy, 2016, 54: 534-548

[42]

Rai R, Zhang Y, Paudel B, Acharya B, Basnet L. Land use and land cover dynamics and assessing the ecosystem service values in the trans-boundary Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 3052

[43]

Ramachandra TV, Aithal BH, Sanna DD. Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 2012, 18: 329-343

[44]

Rebele F. Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett, 1994, 4(6): 173-187

[45]

Ridd MK. Exploring a VIS (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities. Int J Remote Sens, 1995, 16(12): 2165-2185

[46]

Rimal B, Rijal S, Kunwar R. Comparing support vector machines and maximum likelihood classifiers for mapping of urbanization. J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 2019, 48: 1-9

[47]

Rimal B, Sharma R, Kunwar R, Keshtkar H, Stork NE. Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal. Ecosyst Serv, 2019, 38: 100963

[48]

Ritchie H (2018) "Urbanization". Published online at OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization [Online Resource]

[49]

Sannigrahi S, Chakraborti S, Joshi PK, Keesstra S, Sen S, Paul SK, Kreuter U, Sutton P, Jha S, Dang KB. Ecosystem service value assessment of a natural reserve region for strengthening protection and conservation. J Environ Manag, 2019, 244: 208-227

[50]

Santé I, García AM, Miranda D, Crecente R. Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis. Landsc Urban Plan, 2010, 96(2): 108-122

[51]

Schwarz N, Bauer A, Haase D. Assessing climate impacts of planning policies-an estimation for the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Environ Impact Assess Rev, 2011, 31(2): 97-111

[52]

Seto KC, Fragkias M, Güneralp B, Reilly MK. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(8): e23777

[53]

Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2012, 109(40): 16083-16088

[54]

Sharma R, Rimal B, Baral H, Nehren U, Paudyal K. Impact of land cover change on ecosystem services in a tropical forested landscape. Resources, 2019, 8(18): 1-13

[55]

Song W, Deng X. Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Sci Total Environ, 2017, 576: 705-719

[56]

Sun X, Crittenden JC, Li F, Lu Z, Dou X. Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 622: 974-987

[57]

Sutherland WJ, Gardner T, Bogich TL, Bradbury RB, Clothier B, Jonsson M, Kapos V, Lane SN, Möller I, Schroeder M, Spalding M, Spencer T, White PCL, Dicks LV (2014) Solution scanning as a key policy tool: identifying management interventions to help maintain and enhance regulating ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 19(2).

[58]

Swerts E, Denis E, Mukhopadhyay P. Rozenblat C, Pumain D, Velasquez E. Diffuse urbanization and mega-urban regions in India: between reluctant and restrictive urbanism?. International and transnational perspectives on urban systems: advances in geographical and environmental sciences, 2018 Singapore Springer 237-262

[59]

Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ, 2007, 64(2): 245-252

[60]

Tolessa T, Senbeta F, Kidane M. The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv, 2017, 23: 47-54

[61]

Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan, 2007, 81(3): 167-178

[62]

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420)

[63]

Vaz E, Arsanjani JJ. Predicting urban growth of the greater toronto area-coupling a markov cellular automata with document meta-analysis. J Environ Inform, 2015, 25(2): 71-80

[64]

Verma M, Negandhi D. Valuing ecosystem services of wetlands: a tool for effective policy formulation and poverty alleviation. Hydrol Sci J, 2011, 56(8): 1622-1639

[65]

Wallace KJ. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv, 2007, 139(3–4): 235-246

[66]

Wilkerson ML, Mitchell MG, Shanahan D, Wilson KA, Ives CD, Lovelock CE, Rhodes JR. The role of socio-economic factors in planning and managing urban ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv, 2018, 31: 102-110

[67]

Wray C, Cheruiyot K. Key challenges and potential urban modelling opportunities in South Africa, with specific reference to the Gauteng City-region. S Afr J Geomat, 2015, 4(1): 14-35

[68]

Zang S, Wu C, Liu H, Na X. Impact of urbanization on natural ecosystem service values: a comparative study. Environ Monit Assess, 2011, 179(1–4): 575-588

[69]

Zank B, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Villa F. Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: a case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Landsc Urban Plan, 2016, 149: 31-42

[70]

Zhao B, Kreuter U, Li B, Ma Z, Chen J, Nakagoshi N. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(2): 139-148

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

136

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/