Biocapacity, human capital, and ecological footprint in G7 countries: the moderating role of urbanization and necessary lessons for emerging economies

Abstract

Decreasing biocapacity, accompanied by increasing ecological footprint (EF) and urbanization, is the core environmental challenge that the G7 countries have to contend with, despite enjoying tremendous growth for decades. As such, this study scrutinizes the influence of biocapacity, human capital, and urbanization on the EF with an advance technique that addresses core panel data issues with the ability to show country-specific results. The findings suggest that biocapacity, economic growth, and urbanization increase the EF, while human capital reduces it. Also, the coefficient of the interaction between urbanization and economic growth turns out negative inferring that as economic growth persists, urbanization attains the desired level required to decrease the EF. Biocapacity increases the EF in all the countries except in Canada. Further findings showed that urbanization is not particularly harmful in Canada, Japan, and the UK; however, its impact remains devastating in the USA, Germany, Italy, and France. A feedback causality exists between human capital, EF, urbanization, and economic growth. Relevant policy recommendations, directions for future research, limitations of the study, as well as potential lessons for emerging economies, are discussed.

Keywords

Biocapacity / Human capital / Urbanization / Moderating effect / Ecological footprint / AMG

References

[1] Ahmed Z, Wang Z. Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2019, 26(26): 26782-26796

[2] Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K. Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy, 2020, 67: 101677

[3] Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S. Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc, 2020, 55: 102064

[4] Altıntaş H, Kassouri Y. Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO₂ emissions?. Ecol Ind, 2020, 113: 106187

[5] Ansari MA, Haider S, Khan NA. Environmental Kuznets curve revisited: an analysis using ecological and material footprint. Ecol Ind, 2020, 115: 106416

[6] Ari I, Şentürk H. The relationship between GDP and methane emissions from solid waste: a panel data analysis for the G7. Sustain Prod Consum, 2020, 23: 282

[7] Aziz N, Sharif A, Raza A, Rong K. Revisiting the role of forestry, agriculture, and renewable energy in testing environment Kuznets curve in Pakistan: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-14

[8] Baz K, Xu D, Ali H, Ali I, Khan I, Khan MM, Cheng J. Asymmetric impact of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: using asymmetric and nonlinear approach. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 718: 137364

[9] Bond S, Eberhardt M. Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in panel time series models, 2013 Oxford University of Oxford

[10] Brown L, McFarlane A, Campbell K, Das A. Remittances and CO₂ emissions in Jamaica: an asymmetric modified environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Asymmetries, 2020, 22: e00166

[11] Chudik A, Pesaran MH. Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom, 2015, 188(2): 393-420

[12] Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, Raissi M (2016) Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. In: Essays in Honor of man Ullah, Advances in Econometrics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol 36 pp 85–135

[13] Coderoni S, Esposti R. Is there a long-term relationship between agricultural GHG emissions and productivity growth? A dynamic panel data approach. Environ Resour Econ, 2014, 58(2): 273-302

[14] Danish UR, Khan SU. Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc, 2020, 54: 101996

[15] Danish, Wang Z. Investigation of the ecological footprint’s driving factors: what we learn from the experience of emerging economies. Sustain Cities Soc, 2019, 49: 101626

[16] Danish BMA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW. Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO₂ emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 678: 632-638

[17] Destek MA, Sinha A. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod, 2020, 242: 118537

[18] Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK. Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ, 2019, 30(6): 1065-1086

[19] Dogan E, Ulucak R, Kocak E, Isik C. The use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 723: 138063

[20] Galli A, Iha K, Pires SM, Mancini MS, Alves Zokai G, Wackernagel M. Assessing the ecological footprint and biocapacity of Portuguese cities: critical results for environmental awareness and local management. Cities, 2020, 96: 102442

[21] GFN (2019b) Ecological footprint per person of country’s population (in global hectares). https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/Accessed 1 May 2019

[22] Global Footprint Network (2019a) Advancing the science of sustainability. http://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.128662604.1393481519.1589555821-401373056.1547219594#/countryTrends?type=BCtot,EFCtot&cn=351

[23] Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research

[24] Guan J, Kirikkaleli D, Bibi A, Zhang W. Natural resources rents nexus with financial development in the presence of globalization: is the “resource curse” exist or myth?. Resour Policy, 2020, 66: 101641

[25] Han JS, Lee JW. Demographic change, human capital, and economic growth in Korea. Jpn World Econ, 2020, 53: 100984

[26] Hassan ST, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang J. Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc, 2019, 47: 101516

[27] Khan M. CO₂ emissions and sustainable economic development: new evidence on the role of human capital. Sustain Dev, 2020, 28: 1-10

[28] Kongbuamai N, Bui Q, Yousaf HM, Liu Y. The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-14

[29] Li Q, Wu Y. Intangible capital, ICT and sector growth in China. Telecommun Policy, 2020, 44(1): 101854

[30] Li Y, Naqvi B, Caglar E, Chu CC. N-11 countries: are the new victims of resource-curse?. Resour Policy, 2020, 67: 101697

[31] Li Z, Song Y, Zhou A, Liu J, Pang J, Zhang M. Study on the pollution emission efficiency of China’s provincial regions: the perspective of environmental Kuznets curve. J Clean Prod, 2020, 263: 121497

[32] Malik MY, Latif K, Khan Z, Butt HD, Hussain M, Nadeem MA. Symmetric and asymmetric impact of oil price, FDI and economic growth on carbon emission in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL and non-linear ARDL approach. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 726: 138421

[33] Marti L, Puertas R. Analysis of the efficiency of African countries through their Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 722: 137504

[34] Murshed M. LPG consumption and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in South Asia: a time-series ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020

[35] Murshed M. An empirical analysis of the non-linear impacts of ICT-trade openness on renewable energy transition, energy efficiency, clean cooking fuel access and environmental sustainability in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 36254-36281

[36] Murshed M, Dao NTT. Revisiting the CO₂ emission-induced EKC hypothesis in South Asia: the role of Export Quality Improvement. GeoJournal, 2020

[37] Murshed M, Ali SR, Banerjee S. Consumption of liquefied petroleum gas and the EKC hypothesis in South Asia: evidence from cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel data with structural breaks. Energy Ecol Environ, 2020

[38] Murshed M, Nurmakhanova M, Elheddad M, Ahmed R. Value addition in the services sector and its heterogeneous impacts on CO₂ emissions: revisiting the EKC hypothesis for the OPEC using panel spatial estimation techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 38951-38973

[39] Murshed M, Ferdaus J, Rashid S, Tanha MM, Islam MJ. The Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for deforestation in Bangladesh: an ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks. Energ Ecol Environ, 2020

[40] Nathaniel SP. Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal, 2020, 299: 1-14

[41] Nathaniel SP, Bekun FV. Electricity consumption, urbanization, and economic growth in Nigeria: new insights from combined cointegration amidst structural breaks. J Public Aff, 2020, 28: e2102

[42] Nathaniel SP, Bekun FV. Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: the Nigerian experience. J Public Aff, 2020, 20(2): e2037

[43] Nathaniel SP, Khan SAR. The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod, 2020, 272: 122709

[44] Nathaniel SP, Aguegboh E, Iheonu C, Sharma G, Shah M. Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-14

[45] Nathaniel SP, Anyanwu O, Shah M. Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 468: 1-13

[46] Nathaniel SP, Nwodo O, Sharma G, Shah M. Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint linkage in CIVETS. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-14

[47] Nathaniel SP, Nwulu N, Bekun F. Natural resource, globalization, urbanization, human capital, and environmental degradation in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 25: 1-15

[48] Ng CF, Choong CK, Lau LS. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: asymmetry analysis and robust estimation under cross-section dependence. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-14

[49] Omoke PC, Nwani C, Effiong EL, Evbuomwan OO, Emenekwe CC. The impact of financial development on carbon, non-carbon, and total ecological footprint in Nigeria: new evidence from asymmetric dynamic analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-19

[50] Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (No. 992927783402676). International Labour Organization

[51] Pandey S, Dogan E, Taskin D. Production-based and consumption-based approaches for the energy-growth-environment nexus: evidence from Asian countries. Sustain Prod Consum, 2020, 23: 274

[52] Pesaran MH. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom, 2007, 22: 265-312

[53] Pham NM, Huynh TLD, Nasir MA. Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: a Malthusian view. J Environ Manage, 2020, 260: 110143

[54] Sarkodie SA, Ozturk I. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Kenya: a multivariate analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2020, 117: 109481

[55] Shah SH, Ameer W, Delpachitra S. OFDI impact on private investment in the gulf economies. Sustainability, 2020, 12(11): 4492

[56] Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G, Ozturk I, Sinha A. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc, 2020, 57: 102138

[57] Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P. Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-13

[58] Suki NM, Sharif A, Afshan S, Suki NM. Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Malaysia: the role of globalization in sustainable environment. J Clean Prod, 2020, 264: 121669

[59] Sun Y, Ak A, Serener B, Xiong D. Natural resource abundance and financial development: a case study of emerging seven (E − 7) economies. Resour Policy, 2020, 67: 101660

[60] Uddin MMM. What are the dynamic links between agriculture and manufacturing growth and environmental degradation? Evidence from different panel income countries. Environ Sustain Indic, 2020, 7: 100041

[61] Udemba EN. A sustainable study of economic growth and development amidst ecological footprint: new insight from Nigerian Perspective. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 732: 139270

[62] Ulucak R, Bilgili F. A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod, 2018, 188: 144-157

[63] Ulucak R, Khan SUD. Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc, 2020, 54: 101996

[64] Usman O, Iortile IB, Ike GN. Enhancing sustainable electricity consumption in a large ecological reserve–based country: the role of democracy, ecological footprint, economic growth, and globalisation in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 1-14

[65] Ward B, Dubos R. Only one earth. The care and maintenance of a small planet, 1972 Harmondsworth Penguin Books Ltd

[66] Westerlund J. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat, 2007, 69(6): 709-748

[67] World Development Indicator (WDI) (2019) World Bank Development Indicators database (online). Available at https://data.worldbank.org/ Accessed 24 Oct 2019

[68] WWF Living Planet Report 2018: Aiming higher, 2018 Gland, Switzerland WWF

[69] Xu Y, Li A. The relationship between innovative human capital and interprovincial economic growth based on panel data model and spatial econometrics. J Comput Appl Math, 2020, 365: 112381

[70] Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA. The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resour Policy, 2019, 63: 101428

[71] Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Sinha A, Sengupta T, Qin Q. How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries. J Clean Prod, 2020, 268: 122149

[72] Zafeiriou E, Sofios S, Partalidou X. Environmental Kuznets curve for EU agriculture: empirical evidence from new entrant EU countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2017, 24(18): 15510-15520

[73] Zhang S, Zhu D, Zhang J, Li L. Which influencing factors could reduce ecological consumption? Evidence from 90 countries for the time period 1996–2015. Appl Sci, 2020, 10(2): 678