Pyrolysis kinetics and physicochemical characteristics of skin, husk, and shell from green coconut wastes

Abstract

The green coconut (Cocus nucifera) is widely consumed in the world; however, its processing generates a large amount of waste, which presents a high energetic potential. The coconut waste is composed of skin, husk, and shell, where each part can be showing different physicochemical and thermal characteristics. Thus, this study presents the physicochemical and thermal characteristics of skin, husk, and shell of green coconut waste. The physicochemical behavior was evaluated by proximate analysis and ultimate analysis, while the thermal behavior was evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis under five different heating rates (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 °C min⁻¹). In addition, from the thermogravimetric data was evaluated the activation energy (E _a) by using Friedman and Ozawa–Flynn–Wall (OFW) methods. The physicochemical and thermal characteristics presented by each part of the coconut indicate that the material can be used completely due to the great similarity between the heating value of each part of the coconut (HHV_skin = 18.98 MJ kg⁻¹, HHV_husk = 18.15 MJ kg⁻¹, and HHV_shell = 18.64 MJ kg⁻¹), although they different contents of moisture and ash. A different thermal behavior of each part of the coconut was also observed, being associated with the possibility of different components in its structures, which directly influences the E _a value. Based on the E _a values, the husk shows a better applicability for pyrolysis process, due to lower energy required per mol of biomass.

Keywords

Kinetics / Coconut / Pyrolysis / Thermogravimetric analysis

References

[1] Alves JLF, Da Silva JCG, Costa RL Investigation of the bioenergy potential of microalgae Scenedesmus acuminatus by physicochemical characterization and kinetic analysis of pyrolysis. J Therm Anal Calorim, 2019, 135: 3269-3280

[2] Alves JLF, Da Silva JCG, da Silva Filho VF Determination of the bioenergy potential of brazilian pine-fruit shell via pyrolysis kinetics, thermodynamic study, and evolved gas analysis. BioEnergy Res, 2019

[3] ASTM D5373–08: standard test methods for instrumental determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in laboratory samples of coal, 2002 West Conshohocken ASTM International

[4] ASTM E1131–08: standard test method for compositional analysis by thermogravimetry, 2014 West Conshohocken ASTM International

[5] Channiwala SA, Parikh PP. A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel, 2002, 81: 1051-1063

[6] Collard F-X, Blin J. A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2014, 38: 594-608

[7] da Silva JCG, Alves JLF, de Araujo Galdino WV Pyrolysis kinetic evaluation by single-step for waste wood from reforestation. Waste Manag, 2018, 72: 265-273

[8] Dutta PP, Pandey V, Das AR Down draft gasification modelling and experimentation of some indigenous biomass for thermal applications. Energy Procedia, 2014, 54: 21-34

[9] Frau C, Ferrara F, Orsini A, Pettinau A. Characterization of several kinds of coal and biomass for pyrolysis and gasification. Fuel, 2015, 152: 138-145

[10] García R, Pizarro C, Lavín AG, Bueno JL. Spanish biofuels heating value estimation. Part II Proximate Analysis Data Fuel, 2014, 117: 1139-1147

[11] Hu M, Chen Z, Wang S Thermogravimetric kinetics of lignocellulosic biomass slow pyrolysis using distributed activation energy model, Fraser-Suzuki deconvolution, and iso-conversional method. Energy Convers Manag, 2016, 118: 1-11

[12] IBGE (2015) Systematic survey of agricultural production: monthly survey of forecast and monitoring of agricultural crops in the calendar year (In Portuguese). 114

[13] IEA World Energy Outlook 2018, 2018 Paris IEA

[14] Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2016, 57: 1126-1140

[15] Malik R, Dahiya S, Lata S. An experimental and quantum chemical study of removal of utmostly quantified heavy metals in wastewater using coconut husk: a novel approach to mechanism. Int J Biol Macromol, 2017, 98: 139-149

[16] Nanda S, Mohammad J, Reddy SN Pathways of lignocellulosic biomass conversion to renewable fuels. Biomass Convers Biorefinery, 2014, 4: 157-191

[17] Naresh K, Kumar A, Korobeinichev O Downward flame spread along a single pine needle: numerical modelling. Combust Flame, 2018, 197: 161-181

[18] Park WC, Atreya A, Baum HR. Experimental and theoretical investigation of heat and mass transfer processes during wood pyrolysis. Combust Flame, 2010, 157: 481-494

[19] Richter F, Atreya A, Kotsovinos P, Rein G. The effect of chemical composition on the charring of wood across scales. Proc Combust Inst, 2019, 37: 4053-4061

[20] Saldarriaga JF, Aguado R, Pablos A Fast characterization of biomass fuels by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Fuel, 2015, 140: 744-751

[21] Sansaniwal SK, Rosen MA, Tyagi SK. Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 80: 23-43

[22] Sharma A, Pareek V, Zhang D. Biomass pyrolysis - A review of modelling, process parameters and catalytic studies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2015, 50: 1081-1096

[23] Soria-Verdugo A, Goos E, García-Hernando N. Effect of the number of TGA curves employed on the biomass pyrolysis kinetics results obtained using the distributed activation energy model. Fuel Process Technol, 2015, 134: 360-371

[24] Starink M. The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments: a comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods. Thermochim Acta, 2003, 404: 163-176

[25] van Dam JE, van den Oever MJ, Teunissen W Process for production of high density/high performance binderless boards from whole coconut husk. Ind Crops Prod, 2004, 19: 207-216

[26] Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK An overview of the organic and inorganic phase composition of biomass. Fuel, 2012, 94: 1-33

[27] Vo TK, Ly HV, Lee OK Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of microalgal Aurantiochytrium sp. KRS101. Energy, 2017, 118: 369-376

[28] Vyazovkin S. Isoconversional kinetics of thermally stimulated processes, 2015 1 Cham Springer International Publishing

[29] Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM Thermochimica acta ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta, 2011, 520: 1-19

[30] Werner K, Pommer L, Broström M. Thermal decomposition of hemicelluloses. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2014, 110: 130-137

[31] White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL. Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2011, 91: 1-33

[32] Yao F, Wu Q, Lei Y Thermal decomposition kinetics of natural fibers: activation energy with dynamic thermogravimetric analysis. Polym Degrad Stab, 2008, 93: 90-98