Who is the most effective stakeholder to incent in the waste cooking oil supply chain? A case study of Beijing, China

Tingting Liu , Yaru Liu , Enhua Luo , Yufeng Wu , Yong Li , Shangyun Wu

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 116 -124.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 116 -124. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-019-00118-5
Original Article

Who is the most effective stakeholder to incent in the waste cooking oil supply chain? A case study of Beijing, China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Waste cooking oil (WCO) is one of the most promising feedstocks for biodiesel production as it is environment friendly, has energy supply potential, impacts edible oil safety, and enables competitive recycling costs. However, one central roadblock to the development of WCO-based biodiesel in China is its fairly low collection rate in the formal WCO supply chain. Most waste cooking oil is still collected by informal collectors with some flowing back to “table.” The aim of our paper is to identify the most effective incentive conditions and targets in the WCO supply chain to offer recommendations that address this WCO roadblock. Accordingly, we designed a Stackelberg game model among restaurants, recyclers, and biodiesel production enterprises. The results show that restaurants are the best targets for incentives in this WCO supply chain. With a certain amount of monetary incentives, the WCO supply for biofuel production can be improved significantly. If the restaurant subsidy is 4000 yuan/ton, the amount of WCO recycled would increase by 47%, which is far more efficient than incenting recyclers or biofuel producers. We also set up four scenarios and found that compared with a single policy approach (mandatory only or economic incentive only), a combined policy (mandatory with economic incentive) would be the most effective means to incent restaurants to submit WCO for biofuel. There was also a correlation between policy incentive effectiveness and restaurant sensitivity to WCO submission profits. When the price sensitivity was larger than 17.98, the best policy for the government would be to offer economic incentives to restaurants. To guarantee the effectiveness of such policy incentives, supporting laws, policy guidelines, and routine supervision should be provided as well.

Keywords

Waste cooking oil (WCO) / Biodiesel / Economic incentive / Stackelberg game simulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tingting Liu, Yaru Liu, Enhua Luo, Yufeng Wu, Yong Li, Shangyun Wu. Who is the most effective stakeholder to incent in the waste cooking oil supply chain? A case study of Beijing, China. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2019, 4(3): 116-124 DOI:10.1007/s40974-019-00118-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alibaba (2018) https://www.1688.com/chanpin/-B7CFC6FAD3CDD6AC.html

[2]

Avinash A, Sasikumar P, Murugesan A. Understanding the interaction among the barriers of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in India-an interpretive structural modeling approach. Renew Energy, 2018, 127: 678-684

[3]

Balat M, Balat HA. Critical review of bio-diesel as a vehicular fuel. Energy Convers Manag, 2008, 49: 27-41

[4]

Bhuiya MMK, Rasul MG, Khan MMK, Ashwath N, Azad AK, Hazrata MA. Second generation biodiesel: potential alternative to-edible oil-derived biodiesel. Energy Procedia, 2016, 61: 1969-1972

[5]

Chen G, Liu J, Yao JA, Qi Y, Yan BB. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in a magnetically fluidized bed reactor using whole-cell biocatalysts. Energy Convers Manag, 2017, 138: 556-564

[6]

Cho S, Kim J, Park HC, Heo E. Incentives for waste cooking oil collection in South Korea: a contingent valuation approach. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2015, 99: 63-71

[7]

Demirbas A. Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels. Energy Convers Manag, 2009, 50: 14-34

[8]

Du E, Cai L, Huang K, Tang H, Xu X, Tao R. Reducing viscosity to promote biodiesel for energy security and improve combustion efficiency. Fuel, 2018, 211: 194-196

[9]

Elisa DSAC, Belarmino LC, Padula AD. Feedstock diversification for biodiesel production in Brazil: using the policy analysis matrix (PAM) to evaluate the impact of the PNPB and the economic competitiveness of alternative oilseeds. Energy Policy, 2017, 109: 297-309

[10]

Fierro J, Martínez EJ, Morán A, Gómez X. Valorisation of used cooking oil sludge by codigestion with swine manure. Waste Manag, 2014, 34(8): 1537-1545

[11]

Gebremariam SN, Marchetti JM. Economics of biodiesel production: review. Energy Convers Manag, 2018, 168: 74-84

[12]

Hua M, Lai IKW, Tang H. Analysis of advertising and a points-exchange incentive in a reverse supply chain for unwanted medications in households based on Game Theory. Int J Prod Econ, 2019

[13]

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2016) World energy statistics and balances. https://www.iea.org/Sankey/

[14]

Jafari H, Hejazi SR, Rasti-Barzoki M. Sustainable development by waste recycling under a three-echelon supply chain: a game-theoretic approach. J Clean Prod, 2017, 142: 2252-2261

[15]

Joshi S, Gogate PR, Moreira PF Jr, Giudici R. Intensification of biodiesel production from soybean oil and waste cooking oil in the presence of heterogeneous catalyst using high speed homogenizer. Ultrason Sonochem, 2017, 39: 645-653

[16]

Kalam MA, Masjuki HH, Jayed MH, Liaquat AM. Emission and performance characteristics of an indirect ignition diesel engine fuelled with waste cooking oil. Energy, 2011, 36(1): 397-402

[17]

Korus RA, Barn DSHN, Peterson CL, Drown DC. Transesterification process to manufacture ethyl ester of rape oil. Energy Environ Agric Ind, 1994, 2: 815-826

[18]

Kumaran P, Mazlini N, Hussein I, Nazrain M, Khairul M. Technical feasibility studies for Langkawi WCO (waste cooking oil) derived-biodiesel. Energy, 2011, 36(3): 1386-1393

[19]

Laffont JJ, Martimort D. The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model, 2002 Princeton Princeton University Press

[20]

Leopoldwildburger U, Mietek A. Bonus or flat wage? An experiment into the principal-agent problem. Appl Math Comput, 2010, 217(3): 1141-1149

[21]

Liang S, Liu Z, Xu M, Zhang TZ. Waste oil derived biofuels in China bring brightness for global GHG mitigation. Biores Technol, 2013, 131: 139-145

[22]

Liu TT, Liu YR, Wu SY, Xue J, Wu YF, Li YM, Kang XW. Restaurants’ behaviour, awareness, and willingness to submit waste cooking oil for biofuel production in Beijing. Clean Prod, 2018, 204: 636-642

[23]

Lu L. Research on life cycle cost and pricing of WCO used for biodiesel in China, 2013 Master Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

[24]

Mehrasbi MR, Mohammadi J, Peyda M, Mohammadi M. Covalent immobilization of Candida antarctica lipase on core-shell magnetic nanoparticles for production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil. Renew Energy, 2017, 101: 593-602

[25]

Moecke EHS, Feller R, Santos HAD, Machado MDM, Cubas ALV, Dutra ARDA, Santos LLV, Soares SR. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil for use as fuel in artisanal fishing boats: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. Clean Prod, 2016, 135: 679-688

[26]

Nasiri F, Zaccour G. An exploratory game-theoretic analysis of biomass electricity generation supply chain. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(11): 4514-4522

[27]

Qin B, Zhu B, Liu GY. The problems in the process of recycling waste oil. J Zunyi Normal College, 2016, 18(2): 112-114

[28]

Sepahi CA, Arshadi KA, Naderi B. An optimization model of three-player payoff based on fuzzy game theory in green supply chain. Comput Ind Eng, 2019, 128: 782-794

[29]

Shanghai Municipal Peoples Government. http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2319/nw12344/u26aw56127.html

[30]

SOHU.com. http://www.sohu.com/a/223361075_252291

[31]

Song H, Gao X. Green supply chain game model and analysis under revenue-sharing contract. J Clean Prod, 2018, 170: 183-192

[32]

Sun J, Lin J, Qian Y. Game-theoretic analysis of competitive agri-biomass supply chain. J Clean Prod, 2013, 43(43): 174-181

[33]

Yacob MR, Kabir I, Radam A. Households willingness to accept collection and recycling of waste cooking oil for biodiesel input in Petaling District, Selangor, Malaysia. Procedia Environ Sci, 2015, 30: 332-337

[34]

Zhang SY, Gong HT. Waste oil predicament of energy conversion of restaurant garbage in cities in China: literature review and research prospect. J Xinjiang Univ Finance Econ, 2013, 1: 44-51

[35]

Zhang Y, Dubé MA, McLean DD, Kates M. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1 Process design and technological assessment. Bioresour Technol, 2003, 89(1): 1-16

[36]

Zhang H, Wang Q, Mortimer SR. Waste cooking oil as an energy resource: review of Chinese policies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2012, 16(7): 5225-5231

[37]

Zhang H, Aytun OU, Wang Q, Zhao Z. Biodiesel produced by waste cooking oil: review of recycling modes in China, the US and Japan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2014, 38: 677-685

[38]

Zhang Y, Zhang M, Liu Y, Nie R. Enterprise investment, local government intervention and coal overcapacity: the case of China. Energy Policy, 2017, 101: 162-169

[39]

Zhang H, Xu Z, Zhou D, Cao J. Waste cooking oil-to-energy under incomplete information: identifying policy options through an evolutionary game. Appl Energy, 2017, 185: 547-555

[40]

Zhao YB, Gao PP, Yang WD, Ni HG. Vehicle exhaust: an overstated cause of haze in China. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 612: 490-491

Funding

National key research and development program(2018YFC1902703)

National Social Science Foundation(18CGL027)

Beijing Social Science Foundation(16YJC042)

2018 International Clean Energy Talent Program(201802180071)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

157

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/