Response of alley cropping-grown sesame to lime and sulphur on yield and available nutrient status in an acidic soil of Eastern India

Ram Swaroop Meena , Sandeep Kumar , Jitendra Singh Bohra , Rattan Lal , Gulab Singh Yadav , Achyutanand Pandey

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 65 -74.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 65 -74. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-019-00113-w
Original Article

Response of alley cropping-grown sesame to lime and sulphur on yield and available nutrient status in an acidic soil of Eastern India

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Applications of lime (CaCO3) and elemental sulphur (S0–S) may be important to obtain high yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in an acidic soil. Thus, the overall goal of the present study was to assess the impact of lime and S application on sesame yield under acidic soils in the Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Sesame was grown in an alley cropping system, which integrated trees with grain crops. The impacts on sesame yields were assessed for different rates of lime (0, 100, 250 and 350 kg/ha) and S (0, 15, 30 and 45 kg/ha). The field experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design with three replications of 16 treatment combinations. Application of lime at 250 kg/ha produced the best results in terms of the sesame yield (286.1 kg/ha) and improvements in soil chemical properties. Liming at 250 kg/ha increased available nutrients reserves (NPKS: 206, 21.9, 26.9, 16.2 kg/ha, respectively), soil pH (4.95), electrical conductivity (0.039 dS/m) and organic carbon (0.32%) over those in plots without liming (control). Similarly, significant effects of S application were observed in terms of the sesame yield (282.8 kg/ha) and improvements in soil chemical properties, e.g. available nutrient reserves of NPKS (205.6, 21.5, 262.8, 16.0 kg/ha, respectively), soil pH (4.35), electrical conductivity (0.036 dS/m) and organic carbon (0.314%) over those under control, while the minimum soil pH (4.35) was recorded with the application of 45 kg S than that under control (4.89). The interaction effects were significant between the lime and S levels on seed (361 kg/ha), stalk (426 kg/ha) and biological yield (887 kg/ha) for the application of 350 kg lime and 45 kg S/ha. Considering S as an important component of oil and lime for neutralizing soil acidity, their conjoint application is beneficial for farmers to sustain crop productivity in acidic soil of Eastern India.

Keywords

Lime / pH / Sesame / Sulphur / Soil acidity / Yield

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ram Swaroop Meena, Sandeep Kumar, Jitendra Singh Bohra, Rattan Lal, Gulab Singh Yadav, Achyutanand Pandey. Response of alley cropping-grown sesame to lime and sulphur on yield and available nutrient status in an acidic soil of Eastern India. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2019, 4(2): 65-74 DOI:10.1007/s40974-019-00113-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahmad A, Khan I, Anjum NA, Diva I, Abdin MZ, Iqbal M. Effect of timing of sulfur fertilizer application on growth and yield of rapeseed. J Plant Nutr, 2005, 28(6): 1049-1059

[2]

Alleoni LRF, Cambri MA, Caires EF, Garbuio FJ. Acidity and aluminum speciation as affected by surface liming in tropical no-till soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2010, 74: 1010-1017

[3]

Ananthanarayana R, Rao B, Mithyantha MS. Implications of changes in pH of some acid soils of Karnataka in different electrolyte solutions. J Indian Soc Soil Sci, 1988, 36: 161-164

[4]

Anilakumar KR, Pal A, Khanum F, Bawa AS. Nutritional, medicinal and industrial uses of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seeds—an overview. Agric Conspec Sci, 2010, 75: 159-168

[5]

AOAC Official methods of analysis, 1960 18 Washington Association of Official Agriculture Chemists

[6]

AOAC Official methods of analysis, 1990 12 Washington DC Association of Analytical Chemists

[7]

ASTM Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. Method D 2974-00, 2000 West Conshohocken American Society for Testing and Materials

[8]

Basu M, Sanjib D, Mahapatra SC. Effect of integrated nutrient management on sabai grass-groundnut intercropping system under lateritic soils of South West Bengal. Environ Ecol, 2006, 24: 190-192

[9]

Bedigian D, Harlan JR. Evidence for cultivation of sesame in the ancient world. Econ Bot, 1986, 40: 137-154

[10]

Bekere W. Liming effects on yield and yield attributes of nitrogen fertilizer and brady rhizobia inoculated soybean (Glycine max L.) grown in acidic soil at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia. J Biol Agric Healthcare, 2013, 3: 139-143

[11]

Bhattacharya T. Soil series of Tripura, NBSS Publication No. 111, 2004 Nagpur National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning 115

[12]

Biswas H, Rattan RK, Datta SP, Singh AK. Adsorption and translocation of sulfur in some tropical acid soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2003, 166: 519-524

[13]

Bolan NS, Hedley MJ. Rengel Z. Role of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycles in soil acidification. Handbook of soil acidity, 2003 New York CRC Press 29-56

[14]

Chesnin L, Yein CH. Turbidmetric determination of available sulfur. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc, 1950, 15: 149-151

[15]

Chude VO, Jayeoba OJ, Oyebanyi OO. Hand book on soil acidity and use of agricultural lime in crop production, 2005 Nigeria NSPFS 7-24

[16]

Cifu M, Xiaonan L, Zhihong C, Zhengyi H, Wanzhu M. Long-term effects of lime application on soil acidity and crop yields on a red soil in Central Zhejiang. Plant Soil, 2004, 265(1–2): 101-109

[17]

DAC Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Guidelines for special programme on oilseeds, 2011 New Delhi DAC 29-36

[18]

Demessie A, Singh BR, Lal R Lal R Land degradation and soil carbon pool in different land uses and their implication for food security in Southern Ethiopia. Sustainable intensification to advance food security and enhance climate resilience in Africa, 2015 Dordrecht Springer 45-62

[19]

Doran JW, Parkin TB. Defining and assessing soil quality in defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, Doran JW et al (eds), 1994 Madison Soil Science Society of America Special Publication

[20]

Draper NR, Smith H. Applied regression analysis, 1998 3 New York Wiley

[21]

Fismes J, Vong PC, Gucke A, Frossard E. Influence of S on apparent N-use efficiency, yield and quality of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown on a calcareous soil. Eur J Agron, 2000, 12: 127-141

[22]

Fodor L, Kadlicsko B. Effect of NPK fertilization and liming on the growth of white mustard varieties. Cereal Res Commun, 2006, 34(11): 445-448

[23]

Fuller DQ. Further evidence on the prehistory of sesame. Asian Agrihist, 2003, 7: 127-137

[24]

GOI Government of India, Economic Survey of India, Ministry of Finance (Economic Division), 2015 New Delhi GOI 17-22

[25]

Grant CA, Clayton GW, Johnston AM. Sulphur fertilizer and tillage effects on canola seed quality in the black soil zone of Western Canada. Can J Plant Sci, 2003, 83: 745-758

[26]

Havlin JL, Beaton JD, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL. Soil fertility and fertilizers, an introduction to nutrient management, 2004 Singapore Pearson Education 34-39

[27]

Jan A, Ahmad G, Arif M, Jan MT, Marwat KB. Quality parameters of canola as affected by nitrogen and sulfur fertilization. J Plant Nutr, 2010, 33(3): 381-390

[28]

Kaitibie S, Epplin FM, Krenzer EG, Zhang H. Economics of lime and phosphorus application for dual-purpose winter wheat production in low pH soils. Agron J, 2002, 94: 1139-1145

[29]

Kebeney SJ, Too EJ, Kisinyo JA, Opile WR. Immediate and residual effects of lime and phosphorus fertilizer on soil acidity and maize production in western Kenya. Exp Agric, 2014, 50: 128-143

[30]

Kidd PS, Proctor J. Why plants grow poorly on very acid soils: are ecologists missing the obvious?. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52: 791-799

[31]

Krishna MP, Mohan M. Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: a review. Energy Ecol Environ, 2017, 2(4): 236-249

[32]

Kumar V, Kumar V. Effect of Azotobacter chroococum on Indian mustard grown in different soil environments. Crop Res, 1994, 7(3): 446-450

[33]

Kumar S, Meena RS, Yadav GS, Pandey A. Response of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) to sulphur and lime application under soil acidity. Int J Plant Soil Sci, 2017, 14(4): 1-9

[34]

Lakkineni KC, Abrol YP. S requirement of rapeseed-mustard, groundnut and wheat: a comparative assessment. J Agron Crop Sci, 1992, 169(4): 281-285

[35]

Lal R. Soil management in the developing countries. Soil Sci, 2000, 165: 57-72

[36]

Lal R. Chabay I, Frick M, Helgesen J. Tenents of soil and landscape restoration. Landscape restoration: reclaiming landscapes for sustainable future, 2015 Waltham Elsevier 79-96

[37]

Lal R. Nortcliff S. Soil erosion. Task force: soil matters, 2015 Ärmelgasse Catena Verlag 39-48

[38]

Lal R. Global food security and nexus thinking. J Soil Water Conserv, 2016, 71(4): 85A-90A

[39]

Lambridge CJ, Godwin ID. Kole C. Mungbean. Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants. Pulses, sugar, and tuber crops, 2007 Heidelberg Springer 69-90

[40]

Leustek T, Saito K. Sulfate transport and assimilation in plants. Plant Physiol, 1999, 120: 637-644

[41]

Lindemann WC, Aburto JJ, Haffner WM, Bono AA. Effect of sulfur source on sulfur oxidation. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1991, 55: 85-90

[42]

Mahapatra IC. Acid soil, 1996 New Delhi Publications and Information Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research 1-270

[43]

Maji AK, Obi Reddy GP, Meshram S (2008) Acid soil map of India. Annual report 2008. NBSS&LUP, Nagpur, India

[44]

Malhi SS, Gill KS. Interactive effects of N and S fertilizers on canola yield and seed quality on S-deficient Gray Luvisol soils in northeastern Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci, 2007, 87(2): 211-222

[45]

Matula J. Barley response to the soil reserve of S and ammonium sulphate in short-term experiments under controlled conditions of cultivation. Plant Soil Environ, 2004, 50: 235-242

[46]

McCullough BD, Wilson B. On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003. Comput Stat Data Anal, 2005, 49: 1244-1252

[47]

McGrath PJ, Nunes EV, Stewart JW, Goldman D, Agosti V, Ocepek-Welikson K, Quitkin FM. Imipramine treatment of alcoholics with primary depression: a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1996, 53: 232-240

[48]

McLean EQ. Miller RH, Keeney DR. Soil pH and lime requirement. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Agron. Monogr. No. 9, 1982 2 Madison SAS Abs SSA 199-234

[49]

Meena RS, Varma D. Mungbean yield and nutrient uptake performance in response of NPK and lime levels under acid soil in Vindhyan region, India. J Appl Nat Sci, 2016, 8(2): 860-863

[50]

Meena RS, Yadav RS, Reager ML, De N, Meena VS, Verma JP, Verma SK, Kansotia BC. Temperature use efficiency and yield of groundnut varieties in response to sowing dates and fertility levels in western dry zone of India. Am J Exp Agric, 2015, 7(3): 170-177

[51]

Moazzami AA, Kamal-Eldin A. Sesame seed is a rich source of dietary lignans. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2006, 8: 719-723

[52]

Mondal M, Badruddin M, Malek M, Hossain M, Puteh A. Optimization of S requirement to sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes using tracer techniques. Bangladesh J Bot, 2012, 41(1): 7-13

[53]

Nelson DW, Sommers LL. Total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant tissues. J Assoc Off Anal Chem, 1980, 63: 770-778

[54]

Olsen SR, Sommers LE Page AL Phosphorus. Method of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, 1982 2 Madison ASA SSSA 421-422

[55]

Pal DK, Srivastava P, Durge SL, Bhattacharyya T. Role of microtopography in the formation of sodic soils in the semi-arid part of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. CATENA, 2003, 51: 3-31

[56]

Pavani S, Rekha KB, Babu SNS, Moguloju M. Effect of nitrogen and S on growth, yield and quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Crop Res (Hisar), 2013, 45(1/3): 152-154

[57]

Prasad R. Textbook of field crops production—foodgrain crops, 2014 New Delhi Indian Council of Agricultural Research 189-192

[58]

Quaggio JA, Gallo PB, Owino-Gerroh C, Abreu MF, Cantarella H. Peanut response to lime and molybdenum application in low pH soils. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo, 2004, 28: 659-664

[59]

Quyet VM, Le QB, Vlek PLG. Socio-economic and biophysical determinants of land degradation in Vietnam: an integrated causal analysis at the national level. Land Use Policy, 2014, 36: 605-617

[60]

Raj M, Saich SN, Mehta SC. Growth and yield of mustard as affected by sources and time of S applications under dry land conditions. Ann Agric Biol Res, 1998, 3(1): 67-70

[61]

Saha JK, Singh AB, Ganeshamurthy AN, Samaresh K, Biswas AK. Sulfur accumulation in Vertisols due to continuous gypsum application for six years and its effect on yield and biochemical constituents of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2001, 164: 317-320

[62]

Salwa AIE, Mohsen MA, Behary SS. Amelioration productivity of sandy soil by using amino acid, S and micronutrients for sesame production. J Am Sci, 2010, 6: 250-257

[63]

Scherer HW. S in crop production—invited paper. Eur J Agron, 2001, 14: 81-111

[64]

Scherer HW. Sulfur in soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2009, 172: 326-335

[65]

Singh MV. Importance of S balanced fertilizer use in India. Fertil News, 2001, 46: 13-18

[66]

Singh S, Kumar P. Soil fertility status of vegetables growing areas of Varanasi and pulse growing areas of Mirzapur. J Indian Soc Soil Sci, 2012, 60: 233-236

[67]

Singh R, Singh GS. Traditional agriculture: a climate-smart approach for sustainable food production. Energy Ecol Environ, 2017, 2(5): 296-316

[68]

Singh AK, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS. Medical ethnobotany of the tribals of Sonaghati of Sonebhadra district, Uttar Pradesh, India. J Ethnopharmacol, 2002, 81: 31-41

[69]

Singh BP, Annette L, Cowie K, Yin C. Soil health and climate change. Soil biology, 2011 Berlin Springer

[70]

Srivastava P, Singh R, Tripathi S, Singh H, Raghubanshi AS. Soil carbon dynamics and climate change: current agro-environmental perspectives and future dimensions. Energy Ecol Environ, 2016, 1(5): 315-322

[71]

Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci, 1956, 25: 259-260

[72]

Tewatia RK, Choudhary RS, Kalwe SP (eds) (2007) Proceedings TSI-FAI-IFA symposium-cum-workshop-S in balanced fertilization, 4–5 October, 2006, New Delhi, The Fertilizer Association of India, New Delhi, p 223

[73]

Tiwari KN, Gupta BR. S for sustainable high yield agriculture in Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Fertil, 2006, 1: 37-52

[74]

Tiwari RC, Namdeo K, Girisha KN. Effect of nitrogen and S on growth, yield and quality of sesame varieties. Res Crops, 2000, 1: 163-167

[75]

Torquebiau E. A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. C R Acad Sci Life Sci, 2000, 323: 1009-1017

[76]

Van Reeuwijk LP. Procedures for soil analysis. Technical paper 9, 2002 6 Wageningen ISRIC

[77]

Velayutham M, Pal DK. Lal R. Classification, Indian. Encyclopedia of soil science, 2004 New York Marcel Dekker Inc 1-3

[78]

Walker K, Dawson C. S fertilizer recommendations. Fertil Fertil, 2003, 3: 71-89

[79]

Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci, 1934, 37(1): 29-38

[80]

White RE, Taylor AW. Effect of pH on phosphate adsorption and isotopic exchange in acid soils at low and high additions of soluble phosphate. J Soil Sci, 1977, 28: 48-61

[81]

Zhang CA, Zhang M, Zeng YC. Effects of sulfur on chemical properties of calcareous soil. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, 2007, 18(7): 1453-1458

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

146

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/