Effects of biomass types on the co-pyrolysis behaviour of a sub-bituminous high-sulphur coal

Monikankana Saikia , Asadulla Asraf Ali , Ramesh Chandra Borah , Maitreyee S Bezbarua , Binoy K Saikia , Nabajyoti Saikia

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (5) : 251 -265.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (5) : 251 -265. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-018-0097-8
Original Research Article

Effects of biomass types on the co-pyrolysis behaviour of a sub-bituminous high-sulphur coal

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This communication reports the thermo-kinetic behaviours of three different types of biomass samples and their blends with a sub-bituminous high-sulphur coal. Physicochemical properties were evaluated by various fuel characterization methodologies as well as instrumental methods such as thermal (TG/DTG) analysis, Fourier transforms infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometry, scanning electron microscopic (SEM) technique. Thermo-kinetic parameters of various samples were also evaluated by using Coats and Redfern method. Results indicate that the pyrolytic thermal decomposition behaviours of woody biomass samples are quite different from plant leaf-based biomass sample due to the differences in the chemical compositions. Similarly, thermo-kinetic behaviours of coal-biomass blends are significantly different from the pure coal and pure biomass samples. The lowering of reaction order and activation energy of coal decomposition with increasing biomass contents in the blend can be related with the increasing biomass-based volatile matter content in the blends as well as the catalytic effect of biomass-based alkali and alkaline metal enriched biochar. On the other hand, catalytic effect of coal on the pyrolytic biomass decomposition is only observed at higher biomass replacement level. Analyses of the results obtained from calorific value and apparent activation energy reveal the presence of synergistic effects during the combustion of coal-biomass blend in calorimeter as well as the thermal decomposition of blend under nitrogen atmosphere.

Keywords

Co-pyrolysis / Biomass / High-sulphur coal / Characterization / Thermo-kinetics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Monikankana Saikia, Asadulla Asraf Ali, Ramesh Chandra Borah, Maitreyee S Bezbarua, Binoy K Saikia, Nabajyoti Saikia. Effects of biomass types on the co-pyrolysis behaviour of a sub-bituminous high-sulphur coal. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2018, 3(5): 251-265 DOI:10.1007/s40974-018-0097-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aboyade AO, Görgens JF, Carrier M, Meyer EL, Knoetze JH. Thermogravimetric study of the pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of coal blends with corn and sugarcane residues. Fuel Process Technol, 2013, 106: 310-320

[2]

Barooah PK, Baruah MK. Sulfur in Assam coal. Fuel Process Technol, 1996, 46: 83-97

[3]

Berndes G, Abt B, Asikainen A, et al (2016) Forest biomass, carbon neutrality and climate change mitigation, from science to policy 3, European Forest Institute, ISBN 9789525980288, pp 16–17 (www.efi.int. Accessed 26 April 2018)

[4]

Biagini E, Lippi F, Petarca L, Tognotti L. Devolatilization rate of biomasses and coal-biomass blends: an experimental investigation. Fuel, 2002, 81: 1041-1050

[5]

Brage C, Yu Q, Chen G, Sjostrom K. Tar evolution profiles obtained from gasification of biomass and coal. Biomass Bioenergy, 2000, 18: 87-91

[6]

Cetin E, Moghtaderi B, Gupta R, Wall TF. Influence of pyrolysis conditions on the structure and gasification reactivity of biomass chars. Fuel, 2004, 83(16): 2139-2150

[7]

Chabukdhara M, Singh OP. Coal mining in northeast India: an overview of environmental issues and treatment approaches. Int J Coal Sci Technol, 2016, 3(2): 87-96

[8]

Clarke LB, Sloss LL (1992) Trace elements emission from coal combustion and gasification. IEA Coal Res 111

[9]

Clery DS, Mason PE, Rayner CM, Jones JM. The effects of an additive on the release of potassium in biomass combustion. Fuel, 2018, 2: 647-655

[10]

Coats AW, Redfern JP. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature, 1964, 201(491): 68-69

[11]

Dizaji HB, Dizazi FF, Bidabadi M. Determining thermo-kinetic constants using thermogravimetric analysis in order to classify explosivity of foodstuffs. Combust Explos Shock Waves, 2014, 50(4): 454-462

[12]

Gil MV, Casal D, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F. Thermal behaviour and kinetics of coal/biomass blends during co-combustion. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101(14): 5601-5608

[13]

Gravalos I, Xyradakis P, Kateris D, Gialamas T, Bartzialis D, Giannoulis K. An experimental determination of gross calorific value of different agroforestry species and bio-based industry residues. Nat Resour, 2016, 7: 57-68

[14]

Haykiri-Acma H, Yaman S. Synergy in devolatilization characteristics of lignite and hazelnut shell during co-pyrolysis. Fuel, 2007, 86: 373-380

[15]

Heinzel T, Siegle V, Spliethoff H, Hein KRG. Investigation of slagging in pulverized fuel co-combustion of biomass and coal at a pilot-scale test facility. Fuel Process Technol, 1998, 54(1–3): 109-125

[16]

Jahirul MI, Rasul MG, Chowdhury AA, Ashwath N. Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis—A technological review. Energies, 2012, 5: 4952-5001

[17]

Kojima T (1998) The carbon dioxide problem: integrated energy and environmental policies for the 21st century. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, United States, ISBN 10: 9056991272

[18]

Krerkkaiwan S, Fushimi C, Tsutsumi A, Kuchonthara P. Synergetic effect during co-pyrolosis/gasification of biomass and sub-bituminous coal. Fuel Process Technol, 2013, 115: 11-18

[19]

Lacovidou E, Hahladakis J, Deans I, Costas V, Purnell P. Technical properties of biomass and solid recovered fuel (SRF) co-fired with coal: impact on multi-dimensional resource recovery value. Waste Manage, 2018, 73: 535-545

[20]

Li W. Preface for the special issue on utilization of low-rank coal. Fuel Process Technol, 2016, 147: 1

[21]

Livingston WR (2006) Biomass ash deposition, erosion and corrosion process. In: Thermalnet workshop, September, Glasgow

[22]

Lu C, Song W, Lin W. Kinetics of biomass catalytic pyrolysis. Biotechnol Adv, 2009, 27: 583-587

[23]

Mahadevan R, Adhikari S, Shakya R, Wang K, Dayton D, Lehrich M, Taylor SE. Effect of alkali and alkaline earth metals on in situ catalytic fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: a microreactor study. Energy Fuels, 2016, 30(4): 3045-3056

[24]

Mangut V, Sabio E, Ganan J Thermogravimetric study of the pyrolysis of biomass residues from tomato processing industry. Fuel Process Technol, 2006, 87(2): 109-115

[25]

Mao AA, Hynniewta TM, Sanjappa M. Plant wealth of Northeast India with reference to ethnobotany. Indian J Tradit Knowl, 2009, 8(1): 96-103

[26]

McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part I): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol, 2002, 83: 37-46

[27]

Moghtaderi B, Meesri C, Wall TF. Pyrolytic characteristics of blended coal and woody biomass. Fuel, 2004, 83: 745-750

[28]

Mostafavi SA, Salavati S, Dizaji HB, Bidabadi M. Pyrolysis and combustion kinetics lycopodium particles in thermogravimetric analysis. J Cent South Univ, 2015, 22: 3409-3417

[29]

Mullick D, Mahanta P, Moholkar VS. Co-gasification of coal and biomass blends: chemistry and engineering. Fuel, 2017, 204(5): 106-128

[30]

Munir S, Daood SS, Nimmo W, Cunliffe AM, Gibbs BM. Thermal analysis and devolatilization kinetics of cotton stalk, sugar cane bagasse and shea meal under nitrogen and air atmospheres. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100: 1413-1418

[31]

Musa NS, Nuruddin AA. Calorific value of leaves of selected dipterocarp trees species in Piah Forest Reserve. Perak J Trop Resour Sustain Sci, 2015, 3: 132-134

[32]

Naik S, Goud VV, Rout PK, Jacobson K, Dalai AK. Characterization of Canadian biomass for alternative renewable biofuel. Renew Energy, 2010, 35(8): 1624-1631

[33]

Oktaviananda C, Rahmawati RF, Prasetya A et al (2017) Effect of temperature and biomass-water ratio to yield and product characteristics of hydrothermal treatment of biomass. In: International conference on chemistry, chemical process and engineering, (IC3PE), AIP conference proceedings, AIP conference proceedings, 1823, 020029, pp 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978102

[34]

Oluoti K, Richards T, Doddapaneni TRK, Kanagasabapathi D. Evaluation of the pyrolysis and gasification kinetics of tropical woof biomass. BioResources, 2014, 9(2): 2179-2190

[35]

Purkayastha Jubilee. Bioprospecting of Indigenous Bioresources of North-East India, 2016 Singapore Springer Singapore

[36]

Quan C, Gao N. Copyrolysis of biomass and coal: a review of effects of copyrolysis parameters, product properties, and synergistic mechanisms. Biomed Res Int, 2016 Open Access)

[37]

Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science, 2006, 311(5760): 484-489

[38]

Ramesh R, Somasundaran P. SEM/EDX studies on association of mineral matter in coal. Coal Prep, 1990, 8: 93-99

[39]

Saenger M, Hartge EU, Werther J, Ogada T, Siagi Z. Combustion of coffee husks. Renew Energy, 2001, 23(1): 103-121

[40]

Sahu SK, Beig G, Sharma C. Decadal growth of black carbon emissions in India. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35(2): 2008

[41]

Saikia BK, Boruah RK, Gogoi PK. FTIR and XRD analysis of coal from Makum coalfield of Assam. J Earth Sys Sci, 2007, 116: 575-579

[42]

Sami M, Annamalai K, Wooldridge M. Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2001, 27: 171-214

[43]

Sannigrahi P, Ragauskas AJ. Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: a review of compositional characteristics. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin, 2010, 4(2): 209-226

[44]

Sharma N, Rowe R. Managing the world’s forests. Finance Dev, 1992, 29: 31

[45]

Silverstein RM, Webster FX, Kiemle DJ, Bryce DL. Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, 2015 Eigth New Delhi Wiley India Pvt. Ltd. 71-125

[46]

Solantausta Y, Oasmaa A, Sipila K, Linfors C, Lehto J, Autio J, Jokela P, Alin J, Heiskanan J. Bio-oil production from biomass: steps toward demonstration. Energy Fuels, 2012, 26(1): 233-240

[47]

Sonobe T, Worasuwannarak N, Pipatmanomai S. Synergies in co-pyrolysis of Thai lignite and corncob. Fuel Process Technol, 2008, 89: 1371-1378

[48]

Sun Z, Jin BS, Zhang MY, Liu RP. Cotton stalk combustion in a circulating fluidized bed. Chem Eng Technol, 2008, 31(11): 1605-1614

[49]

Tanger P, Field JL, Jahn CE, DeFront MW, Leach JE. Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges. Front Plant Sci, 2013, 4(218): 1-20

[50]

Tchapda AH, Pisupati SV. A review of thermal co-conversion of coal and biomass/waste. Energies, 2014, 7: 1098-1148

[51]

Ulloa CA, Gordon AL, García XA. Thermogravimetric study of interactions in the pyrolysis of blends of coal with radiata pine sawdust. Fuel Process Technol, 2009, 90: 583-590

[52]

Vamvuka D, Pasadakis N, Kastanak E, Grammelis P, Kakaras E. Kinetic modeling of coal/agricultural by-product blends. Energy Fuel, 2003, 17: 549-558

[53]

Vasilev SV, Baxler D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG. An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel, 2010, 89(5): 913-933

[54]

Vhathvarothai N, Ness J, Yu QJ. An investigation of thermal behaviour of biomass and coal during copyrolysis using thermogravimetric analysis. Int J Energy Res, 2013, 38(9): 1145-1154

[55]

Wardle P (2011) The selective heating of pyrite in coal using microwave energy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Notinghum, UK

[56]

Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 2007, 86: 1781-1788

[57]

Yangali P, Celaya AM, Goldfarb JL. Co-pyrolysis reaction rates and activation energies of West Virginia coal and cherry pit blends. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2014, 108: 203-211

[58]

Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhu M, Cheng F, Zhang D. Interactions of coal gangue and pine sawdust during combustion of their blends studied using differential thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 214: 394-403

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

142

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/