Global carbon inequality

Abstract

Global climate change and inequality are inescapably linked both in terms of who contributes climate change and who suffers the consequences. This fact is also partly reflected in two United Nations (UN) processes: on the one hand, the Paris Agreement of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change under which countries agreed to hold the increase in the global average temperature to below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and, on the other hand, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals aiming to end poverty. These agreements are seen as important foundation to put the world nations on a sustainable pathway. However, how these agreements can be achieved or whether they are even mutually compatible is less clear. We explore the global carbon inequality between and within countries and the carbon implications of poverty alleviation by combining detailed consumer expenditure surveys for different income categories for a wide range of countries with an environmentally extended multi-regional input–output approach to estimate carbon footprints of different household groups, globally, and assess the carbon implications of moving the poorest people out of poverty. Given the current context, increasing income leads to increasing carbon footprints and makes global targets for mitigating greenhouse gases more difficult to achieve given the pace of technological progress and current levels of fossil fuel dependence. We conclude that the huge level of carbon inequality requires a critical discussion of undifferentiated income growth. Current carbon-intensive lifestyles and consumption patterns need to enter the climate discourse to a larger extent.

Keywords

Poverty / Input–output analysis / Greenhouse gases / Mitigation / Lifestyles / Consumption patterns / Climate change

References

[1] Baer P, Harte J, Haya B, Herzog AV, Holdren J, Hultman NE, Kammen DM, Norgaard RB, Raymond L. Climate change: equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science, 2000, 289(5488): 2287

[2] Baumert KA, Herzog T, Pershing J. Navigating the numbers: greenhouse gas data and international climate policy, 2005 Washington World Resources Institute

[3] Davis S, Peters G, Caldeira K. The supply chain of CO₂ emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2011, 108(45): 18554-18559

[4] Eurostat Structure of consumption expenditure by income quintile, 2016 Luxembourg Statistical Office of the European Communities

[5] Feng KA, Chapagain S, Pfister S, Hubacek K. Comparison of bottom-up and top-down approaches to calculating the water footprints of nations. Econ Syst Res, 2011, 23(4): 371-385

[6] Friedlingstein P, Andrew RM, Rogelj J, Peters GP, Canadell JG, Knutti R, Luderer G, Raupach MR, Schaeffer M, van Vuuren DP, Le Quere C. Persistent growth of CO₂ emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. Nat Geosci, 2014, 7(10): 709-715

[7] Hardoon D. Wealth: having it all and wanting more, 2015 Oxford Oxfam Wealth

[8] Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Padwardhan A (2017) Poverty eradication in a carbon constrained world. Nat Commun (in press)

[9] Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 2012, 486(7401): 109-112

[10] Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D, Geschke A. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46(15): 8374-8381

[11] Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Geschke A. Buiding Eora: a global multi-regional input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Econ Syst Res, 2013, 25(1): 20-49

[12] Liddle B. What are the carbon emissions elasticities for income and population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates. Glob Environ Change, 2015, 31: 62-73

[13] Motesharrei S, Rivas J, Kalnay E, Asrar G, Busalacchi A, Cahalan R, Cane MA, Colwell R, Feng K, Franklin R, Hubacek K, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Miyoshi T, Ruth M, Sagdeev R, Shirmohammadi A, Shukla J, Srebric J, Yakovenko V, Zeng N. Population, inequality, and resource-use: modeling sustainability requires bidirectional coupling of the earth and human systems. Natl Sci Rev, 2016, 3: 470-494

[14] Peters GP, Andrew R, Lennox J. Constructing an environmentally extended multi-regional input–output table using the GTAP database. Econ Syst Res, 2011, 23(2): 131-152

[15] Prell C, Feng K. The evolution of global trade and impacts on countries’ carbon trade imbalances. Soc Netw, 2016, 46: 87-100

[16] Prell C, Feng K, Sun L, Geores M, Hubacek K. The economic gains and environmental losses of US consumption: a world-systems and input–output approach. Soc Forces, 2014, 93(1): 405-428

[17] Raupach MR, Davis SJ, Peters GP, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, Jotzo F, van Vuuren DP, Le Quéré C. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nat Clim Change, 2014, 4: 873-879

[18] Steckel JC, Brecha RJ, Jakob M, Strefler J, Luderer G. Development without energy? Assessing future scenarios of energy consumption in developing countries. Ecol Econ, 2013, 90: 53-67

[19] The Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2014) Agenda for sustainable development. Report for the UN Secretary General. Paris, France and New York, USA. http://unsdsn.org/resources

[20] The World Bank (2015) Global consumption database. The World Bank, Washington. http://datatopics.worldbank.org/consumption/. Accessed 23, Feb 2017

[21] UNFCCC Historic Paris Agreement on Climate Change—195 nations set path to keep temperature rise well below 2 degrees Celsius, 2015 Bonn United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

[22] United Nations (1972) Report of the United Nations conference on the human environment, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972 (A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1)

[23] United Nations (1992) Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, vol 1, Resolutions adopted by the conference (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.93.I.8 and corrigendum)

[24] United Nations (2002) Report of the world summit on sustainable development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August–4 September 2002. (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.03.II.A.1 and corrigendum)

[25] United Nations (2012) Future we want. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 27 July 2012. A/RES/66/288. Annex

[26] United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 September 2015. A/RES/70/1

[27] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer expenditure survey, 2012 Washington U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

[28] Weinzettel J, Hertwich EG, Peters GP, Steen-Olsen K, Galli A. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Glob Environ Change, 2013, 23(2): 433-438

[29] Wiedmann T. A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ, 2009, 69(2): 211-222

[30] World Commission on Environment and Development Our common future, 1987 Oxford Oxford University Press

[31] Yu Y, Hubacek K, Feng K. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Glob Environ Change, 2013, 23(5): 1178-1186

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(71628301)