Swimming characteristics of gyrotactic microorganisms in low-Reynolds-number flow: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Abstract

The swimming characteristics of gyrotactic microorganisms are significant to understand the ecological activities in lakes, rivers and oceans. The swimming velocity of a typical motile microorganism, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, was measured for both still water and low-Reynolds-number flow, based on a microfluidic system. Results show that the swimming speed is subject to Gaussian distribution for the still water, and corresponding mean swimming speed is 41 μm/s. The streamwise mean swimming velocity, 35 μm/s, in the moving water is slightly less than that in the still water. It is also shown that the swimming direction in the horizontal plane is dominated by cell randomness for the still water, and 80% of the cells are aligned with the ambient flow when the flow velocity exceeds 333 μm/s. The standard deviation of swimming direction and the percent of swimming direction in the streamwise direction can reach a stable status with the increase of the flow velocity.

Keywords

Gyrotactic microorganisms / Low-Reynolds-number flow / Motile cells / Swimming velocity

References

[1] Bearon RN, Grünbaum D. From individual behaviour to population models: a case study using swimming algae. J Theor Biol, 2008, 251(4): 679-697

[2] Croze OA, Sardina G, Ahmed M, Bees MA, Brandt L. Dispersion of swimming algae in laminar and turbulent channel flows: consequences for photobioreactors. J R Soc Interface, 2013, 10(81): 20121041

[3] Drescher K, Leptos KC, Tuval I, Ishikawa T, Pedley TJ, Goldstein RE. Dancing volvox: hydrodynamic bound states of swimming algae. Phys Rev Lett, 2009, 102(16): 468101

[4] Durham WM, Stocker R. Thin phytoplankton layers: characteristics, mechanisms, and consequences. Annu Rev Mar Sci, 2012, 4(1): 177-207

[5] Durham WM, Kessler JO, Stocker R. Disruption of vertical motility by shear triggers formation of thin phytoplankton layers. Science, 2009, 323(5917): 1067-1070

[6] Durham WM, Climent E, Stocker R. Gyrotaxis in a steady vortical flow. Phys Rev Lett, 2011, 106(23): 238102

[7] Durham WM, Climent E, Barry M, Lillo FD, Boffetta G, Cencini M, Stocker R. Turbulence drives microscale patches of motile phytoplankton. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 2148

[8] Goldstein RE. Green algae as model organisms for biological fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2015, 47(1): 343-375

[9] Häder DP, Lebert M. Real time computer-controlled tracking of motile microorganisms. Photochem Photobiol, 1985, 42(5): 509-514

[10] Heisler J, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM, Anderson DM, Cochlan W, Dennison WC, Dortch Q, Gobler CJ, Heil CA, Humphries E, Lewitus A, Magnien R, Marshall HG, Sellner K, Stockwell DA, Stoecker DK, Suddleson M. Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus. Harmful Algae, 2008, 8(1): 3-13

[11] Hill NA, Häder DP. A biased random walk model for the trajectories of swimming micro-organisms. J Theor Biol, 1997, 186(4): 503-526

[12] Hwang Y, Pedley TJ. Bioconvection under uniform shear: linear stability analysis. J Fluid Mech, 2014, 738(1): 522-562

[13] Hwang Y, Pedley TJ. Stability of downflowing gyrotactic microorganism suspensions in a two-dimensional vertical channel. J Fluid Mech, 2014, 749: 750-777

[14] Kessler JO. Hydrodynamic focusing of motile algal cells. Nature, 1985, 313: 218-220

[15] Leptos KC, Guasto JS, Gollub JP, Pesci AI, Goldstein RE. Dynamics of enhanced tracer diffusion in suspensions of swimming eukaryotic microorganisms. Phys Rev Lett, 2009, 103(19): 198103

[16] Lillo FD, Cencini M, Durham WM, Barry M, Stocker R, Climent E, Boffetta G. Turbulent fluid acceleration generates clusters of gyrotactic microorganisms. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 112(4): 044502

[17] Marcos, Stocker R. Microorganisms in vortices: a microfluidic setup. Limnol Oceanogr Methods, 2006, 4(10): 392-398

[18] Martin M, Barzyk A, Bertin E, Peyla P, Rafai S. Photofocusing: light and flow of phototactic microswimmer suspension. Phys Rev E, 2016, 93(5): 051101

[19] Pedley TJ, Kessler JO. A new continuum model for suspensions of gyrotactic micro-organisms. J Fluid Mech, 1990, 212: 155-182

[20] Pedley TJ, Hill NA, Kessler JO. The growth of bioconvection patterns in a uniform suspension of gyrotactic micro-organisms. J Fluid Mech, 1988, 195: 223-237

[21] Rusconi R, Guasto JS, Stocker R. Bacterial transport suppressed by fluid shear. Nat Phys, 2014, 10(3): 212-217

[22] Sengupta A, Carrara F, Stocker R. Phytoplankton can actively diversify their migration strategy in response to turbulent cues. Nature, 2017, 543(7646): 555-558

[23] Shah RK, London AL. Laminar flow forced convection in ducts, 1978 New York Academic Press

[24] Sineshchekov O, Lebert M, Häder DP. Effects of light on gravitaxis and velocity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Plant Physiol, 2000, 157(3): 247-254

[25] Son K, Brumley DR, Stocker R. Live from under the lens: exploring microbial motility with dynamic imaging and microfluidics. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2015, 13(12): 761-775

[26] Vladimirov VA, Denissenko PV, Pedley TJ, Wu M, Moskalev IS. Algal motility measured by a laser-based tracking method. Mar Freshw Res, 2000, 51(6): 589-600

[27] Vladimirov VA, Wu MSC, Pedley TJ, Denissenko PV, Zakhidova SG. Measurement of cell velocity distributions in populations of motile algae. J Exp Biol, 2004, 207(Pt7): 1203-1216

[28] White FM. Viscous fluid flow, 2005 3 Singapore McGraw-Hill

Funding

IWHR Research & Development Support Program(HY0145B402016)

IWHR Research & Development Support Program(HY0145B682017)

Independent Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin(2015RC01)