Sustainable life span prediction of shelters constructed in refugee camps in Turkey

Adem Atmaca

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 5 -12.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 5 -12. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-017-0053-z
Original Article

Sustainable life span prediction of shelters constructed in refugee camps in Turkey

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The building sector consumes about 30% of primary energy worldwide. Life span is an important variable in life cycle assessment (LCA) of buildings. The aim of this study is to make the LCA of containers constructed in a refugee camp in Turkey and to investigate the relationship between life span and consumed energy with CO2 emission values. The proposed model in the study focused on the construction phase of the containers to find energy consumption and emissions for different life span years. Life span years are chosen between 5 and 40 years. Energy and CO2 release factors are defined per square meter. Total life cycle construction and operational energy demand of the post-disaster housing is calculated to be 24.7 GJ/m2. The CO2 intensity of the housing is calculated to be 20.39 kg CO2/m2-year. It is found that energy and emission values are decreasing with the increase of life span of container-type houses constructed in refugee camps in Turkey.

Keywords

Life cycle assessment / Life span / Energy and CO2 consumption / Containers

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Adem Atmaca. Sustainable life span prediction of shelters constructed in refugee camps in Turkey. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2018, 3(1): 5-12 DOI:10.1007/s40974-017-0053-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adalberth K. Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: a method. Build Environ, 1997, 32(4): 317-320

[2]

AFAD (2012) Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency 2013–2017 Strategic Plan AFAD Publication from https://www.afad.gov.tr/upload/Node/2584/files/Afad_Strtjk_web_en_son.pdf

[3]

Arslan H. Re-design, re-use and recycle of temporary houses. Build Environ, 2007, 42: 400-406

[4]

Arslan H, Cosgun N. Reuse and recycle potentials of the temporary houses after occupancy: example of Duzce Turkey. Build Environ, 2008, 43: 702-709

[5]

Atmaca A. Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of residential buildings in South East of Turkey: Part 1—review and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2016, 21(6): 831-846

[6]

Atmaca A. Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of residential buildings in South East of Turkey: Part 2—a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2016, 2(7): 925-942

[7]

Atmaca N. Life cycle assessment of post-disaster temporary housings in Turkey. Build Res Inf, 2016

[8]

Atmaca A, Atmaca N. Life cycle energy (LCEA) and carbon dioxide emissions (LCCO2A) assessment of two residential buildings in Gaziantep, Turkey. Energy Build, 2015, 102: 417-431

[9]

Atmaca A, Atmaca N. Comparative life cycle energy and cost analysis of post-disaster temporary housings. Appl Energy, 2016, 171: 429-443

[10]

Bastos J, Batterman SA, Freire F. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of three building types in a residential area in Lisbon. Energy Build, 2014, 69: 344-353

[11]

Beccali M, Cellura M, Fontana M, Longo S, Mistretta M. Energy retrofit of a single-family house: life cycle net energy saving and environmental benefits. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2013, 27: 283-293

[12]

Buyle M, Braet J, Audenaert A. Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2013, 26: 379-388

[13]

Fay R, Treloar G, Iyer-Raniga U. Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study. Build Res Inf, 2000, 28(1): 31-41

[14]

Hammond G, Jones C (2008) Inventory of Carbon and Energy, Version 1.6 Sustainable Energy Research Team (SERT), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, UK

[15]

Hammond G, Jones C (2011). Inventory of Carbon and Energy, Version 2.0 Sustainable Energy Research Team (SERT), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, UK

[16]

Johnston C. Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat Int, 2007, 31: 36-52

[17]

Keoleian G, Blanchard S, Reppe P. Life-cycle energy, costs, and strategies for improving a single-family house. J Ind Ecol, 2001, 4(2): 135-156

[18]

Scheuer C, Keoleian GA, Reppe P. Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications. Energy Build, 2003, 35: 1049-1064

[19]

UNHCR (2017) The UN Refugee Agency Reports. https://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/country.php?id=224

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

176

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/