The intensity of human-induced impacts on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates and water quality of Gbako River, North Central, Nigeria

Abstract

The intensity of human-induced impacts on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates and water quality of Gbako River, North Central, Nigeria, was evaluated monthly for 6 months using modified kick sampling techniques. Four study stations were selected along the river course (upper reaches of less human impacts through mid-reaches with relative high human impacts to lower reaches of less human impacts), designated as Stations 1, 2, 3, and 4. Water temperature (23.10–30.00 °C), flow velocity (0.10–2.40 m/s), pH, conductivity (32.00–110.00 µS/cm), and alkalinity (7.50–10.50 mg/L) were similar in all the stations sampled. However, BOD (2.20–6.00 mg/L) and nitrates (0.50–1.67 mg/L) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Station 3. A total of 676 individuals from 41 invertebrate taxa in 27 families from nine orders were collected from the four stations during the study. Aquatic insects represented 85.4 % of the taxa and 76.6 % of all individuals collected. The rest of the fauna was composed of Mollusca, Crustacea, and Gastropoda. Ten macroinvertebrate taxa, Philaccolus, Pseudocloeon, Bugilliesia, Calopteryx, Coenagrion, Brachythemis leucostica, Gomphus, Hydrometra, Sphaerudx, and Potadoma species, were found in all the four sampled stations. The overall abundance of benthic invertebrates was not significantly different (P > 0.05) among the sampling stations. Stations 2 and 3 with higher human disturbance recorded lower richness when compared with the less disturbed stations (1 and 4). Furthermore, the marginally high nutrient levels (phosphate and nitrate) obtained at these stations are an indication that the water body is becoming stressed with organic input and increasing levels of anthropogenic activities. The CCA ordination revealed strong relationships between species abundances and measured environmental variables. The low relative abundance of Ephemeroptera–Plecoptera–Tricoptera (EPT) taxa indicated that the environmental conditions were relatively stressed, along the whole stations. However, the abundance of mayflies (Ephemeroptera), Coleoptera (Gyrinus, Dytiscus), and Anisoptera in all the sites studied is an indication that the sites are relatively free from gross pollution, especially at the upper reaches. Overall, relatively less human impacts in some of the study stations and the heterogeneous nature of the stations served as suitable habitat for a more diverse benthic fauna. This could be responsible for the high abundance (number of individuals) and diversity of benthic invertebrates that was recorded in this study. This study revealed that macroinvertebrate communities responded to changes in disturbance as well as water quality along the river stations.

Keywords

Macroinvertebrates / Water quality / Anthropogenic activities / Gbako River / Nigeria

References

[1] Adakole JA, Annune PA. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of environmental quality of an urban stream, Zaria, northern Nigeria. J Aquat Sci, 2003, 18(2): 85-92

[2] Ajao EA, Fagade SO. The benthic macro-fauna of Lagos Lagoon. Zoologist, 2002, 1: 1-15

[3] Akaahan TJA. Studies on Benthic fauna as bioindicators of pollution in river Benue at Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Int Res J Environ Sci, 2014, 3(7): 33-38

[4] Andem AB, Okorafor KA, Eyo VO, Ekpo PB. Ecological impact assessment and limnological characterization in the intertidal region of Calabar River using benthic macroinvertebrates as bioindicator organisms. Int J Fish Aquat Stud, 2014, 1(2): 8-14

[5] APHA (American Public Health Association) (1998) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water and Environment Federation, Washington, DC. http://www.aphawaterwaste.com. Retrieved on 24th July 2014

[6] Arimoro FO, Ikomi RB. Response of macroinvertebrate communities to abattoir wastes and other anthropogenic activities in a municipal stream in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Environmentalist, 2008, 28: 85-98

[7] Arimoro FO, James HM. Preliminary pictorial guide to the macroinvertebrates of Delta State Rivers, southern Nigeria, 2008 Grahamstown Albany Museum

[8] Arimoro FO, Muller WJ. Mayfly (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) community structure as an indicator of the ecological status of a stream in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess, 2010, 166: 581-594

[9] Arimoro FO, Ikomi RB, Iwegbue CMA. Water quality changes in relation to diptera community patterns and diversity measured at organic effluent impacted stream in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Ecol Ind, 2007, 7: 541-552

[10] Arimoro FO, Odume NO, Uhunoma SI, Edegbene AO. Anthropogenic impact on water chemistry and benthic macroinvertebrate associated changes in a southern Nigeria stream. Environ Monit Assess, 2015, 187: 1-14

[11] Azrina MZ, Yap CK, Ismail AR, Ismail A, Tan SG. Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of Langat River, Peninsular Malaysia. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2006, 64: 337-347

[12] Barbour MT, Gerrison J, Synder BD, Sribling JB (1999) Rapid assessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macro invertebrates and fish, 2nd edn. United States Environmental protection Agency, Washington, DC

[13] Bauernfeind E, Moog O. Mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) and the assessment of ecological integrity: a methodological approach. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 135: 155-165

[14] Chirhart J. Development of a macroinvertebrate index of biological integrity for rivers and streams of the St. Croix River Basin in Minnesota. Biol Monit J, 2003, 3: 23-36

[15] Day JA, Harrison AD, de Moor IJ (2002) Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of Southern Africa, vol 9. Diptera TT 201/02 Pretoria: Water Research Commission

[16] de Moor IJ, Day JA, de Moor FC (2003) Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of Southern Africa, vol 7. Insecta I (Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera) TT Pretoria: Water Research Commission

[17] de Villiers S, Thiart C. The nutrient status of South African rivers: concentrations, trends and fluxes from the 1970s to 2005. S Afr J Sci, 2007, 103: 343-349

[18] Dickens CWS, Graham PM. The South Africa Scoring System (SASS) version 5 rapid bioassessment method for rivers. Afr J Aquat Sci, 2002, 27: 1-10

[19] Dobson M, Magana A, Mathooko JM, Ndegwa FK. Detritivores in Kenya highland streams: more evidence for the paucity of shredders in the tropics?. Freshw Biol, 2002, 47: 909-919

[20] Edema CU, Ayeni JO, Aruoture A. Some observations on the zooplankton and macrobenthos of Okhuo River, Nigeria. J Aquat Sci, 2002, 17(2): 145-149

[21] Edokpayi CA, Okenyi JC, Ogbeibu AE, Osimen EC. The effects of human activities on the macrobenthic invertebrates of Ibiekuma stream, Ekpoma, Nigeria. Biosci Res Commun, 2000, 12(1): 79-87

[22] Emere MC, Nasiru CE. Macroinvertebrates as indicators of the water quality of an urbanized stream, Kaduna Nigeria. Nat Sci, 2009, 7(1): 1-7

[23] Gichana Z, Njiru M, Raburu PO, Masese FO. Effects of human activities on benthic macroinvertebrate community composition and water quality in the upper catchment of the Mara River Basin, Kenya. Lakes Reserv Res Manag, 2015, 20(2): 128-137

[24] Gómez N, Sierra MV, Cortelezzi A, Capítulo AR. Effects of discharges from the textile industry on the biotic integrity of benthic assemblages. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2008, 69: 472-479

[25] Gordon ND, Mc Mahon TA, Finlayson BL. Stream hydrology, an introduction for ecologists, 1994 New York Wiley

[26] Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electr, 2001, 4(1): 9

[27] Ikomi RB, Arimoro FO, Odihirin OK. Composition, distribution, and abundance of macroinvertebrates of the upper reaches of river Ethiope, Delta State, Nigeria. Zoologist, 2005, 3: 68-81

[28] Imoobe TOT. Variation in benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in Ologe Lagoon, Nigeria. Afr J Aquat Sci, 2008, 33: 45-50

[29] Jckel K. Finite sample properties and asymptotic efficiency of Monte Carlo tests. J Appl Econom, 1986, 14: 85-118

[30] Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing, 1988 New York Wiley/Interscience 862

[31] Marques MJ, Martinez-Conde E, Rovira JV. Effects of zinc and lead mining on the benthic macroinvertebrate fauna of a fluvial ecosystem. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2003, 148: 363-388

[32] Masese FO, Muchiri M, Raburu PO. Macroinvertebrate assemblages as biological indicators of water quality in the Moiben River, Kenya. Afr J Aquat Sci, 2009, 34(1): 15-26

[33] Merritt RW, Cummins KW. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 1996 3 Dubuque Kendall-Hunt

[34] Miserendino ML, Pizzolon LA. Distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the Azual-Quemquemtreu river basin, Patagonia, Argentina, New Zealand. J Mar Freshw Resour, 2003, 36: 525-539

[35] Mwedzi T, Bere T, Mangadze T. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in agricultural, mining, and urban tropical streams: implications for conservation and management. Environmental Sci Pollut Res, 2016

[36] Nelson SM, Roline RA. Effects of multiple stressors on the hyporheic invertebrates in a lotic system. Ecol Ind, 2003, 3: 65-79

[37] Nyenje PM, Foppen JW, Uhlenbrook S, Kulabako R, Muwanga A. Eutrophication and nutrient release in urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa—a review. Sci Total Environ, 2010, 408: 447-455

[38] Odume ON, Muller WJ, Arimoro FO, Palmer CG. The impact of water quality deterioration on macroinvertebrate communities in Swartkops River, South Africa: a multimetric approach. Afr J Aquat Sci, 2012, 37(2): 191-200

[39] PACN—(Pan African Chemistry Network) (2010). Africa’s water quality—a chemical science perspective. http://www.rsc.org/images/RSC_PACN_Water_Report_tcm18-176914.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2012

[40] Reuda J, Camacho A, Mezquita F, Hernanadez R, Roca JR. Effect of episodic and regular sewage discharge on water chemistry and macroinvertebrate fauna of a Mediterranean stream. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2002, 140: 425-444

[41] ter Braak CJK, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and Canoco draw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York

[42] Walsh CJ. Urban impacts on the ecology of receiving waters: a framework for assessment, conservation and restoration. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 431: 107-114

[43] Walsh CJ, Gooderham MR, Grace S, Sdraulig MI, Rosyidi A, Lelono A. The relative influence of diffuse and point-source disturbances on a small upland stream in East Java Indonesia: a preliminary investigation. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 487: 183-192

[44] Ward JV. Aquatic insect ecology, 1992 New York Wiley 438

[45] Yagow G, Wilson B, Srivastava P, Obrofta CC. Use of biological indicators in total maximum daily load (Tmdl), assessment and biological implementation. Am Soc Agric Eng J, 2006, 2351: 1023-1032