Saccharification of biopretreated paddy straw with indigenous holocellulase and fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae LN1 under optimized conditions

Shweta Priya , Rameshwar Tiwari , Sarika Rana , Mohanram Saritha , Surender Singh , Anju Arora , Lata Nain

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2016, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (6) : 419 -429.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2016, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (6) : 419 -429. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-016-0021-z
Research Article

Saccharification of biopretreated paddy straw with indigenous holocellulase and fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae LN1 under optimized conditions

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The current study was aimed at optimizing the fermentation conditions for efficient ethanol production from biologically pretreated paddy straw. The yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae LN1 showed highest fermentation efficiency at pH 5.0 and temperature 30 °C. Paddy straw pretreated with fungus Myrothecium roridum LG7 was saccharified with indigenous holocellulase from Aspergillus niger SH3 producing total sugar yield of 26.14 mg/ml with 19.23 mg/ml of glucose. Enzymatic hydrolysate was then fermented using S. cerevisiae LN1 to observe the effect of nutrient supplementation (yeast extract, MgSO4·7H2O and (NH4)2SO4) on ethanol production. Higher ethanol was produced from saccharified material fermented without supplementation of any nutrient source. With the scale-up of ethanol production under optimized conditions in 7L bioreactor, 4.46 g/l of ethanol was produced with fermentation efficiency of 47.2 %. TLC of enzymatic hydrolysate confirmed the presence of p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, vanillic acid, gallic acid and many other aromatic compounds and inhibitors in the saccharified material which limit fermentation efficiency of yeast strain. Thus, optimization of fermentation conditions can lead to development of a cost-effective process for efficient ethanol production, exploitation of which also requires removal of aromatic compounds and inhibitors which may hinder the ethanol production efficiency.

Keywords

Bioethanol / Optimization / Fermentation efficiency / Paddy straw / Saccharomyces cerevisiae LN1

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shweta Priya, Rameshwar Tiwari, Sarika Rana, Mohanram Saritha, Surender Singh, Anju Arora, Lata Nain. Saccharification of biopretreated paddy straw with indigenous holocellulase and fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae LN1 under optimized conditions. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2016, 1(6): 419-429 DOI:10.1007/s40974-016-0021-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Akao S, Nagare H, Maeda M, Kondo K, Fujiwara T. Combined use of sugars and nutrients derived from young maize plants for thermophilic l-lactic acid fermentation. Ind Crops Prod, 2015, 69: 440-446

[2]

Anonymous (2015) Ministry of Commerce and Industry. India’s foreign trade (merchandise) F.No. 1(11)/2014-EPL

[3]

Antil P, Gupta R, Kuhad R. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated sugarcane bagasse to ethanol using a new thermotolerant yeast. Ann Microbiol, 2015, 65: 423-429

[4]

Balat M, Balat H, Öz C. Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2008, 34: 551-573

[5]

Bray H, Thorpe W. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods Biochem Anal, 1954, 1: 27-52

[6]

Brown L, Torget R (1996) Enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass, chemical analysis and testing task laboratory analytical procedures (LAP 009). NREL Biomass Program

[7]

Castro A, Roberto IC. Effect of nutrient supplementation on ethanol production in different strategies of saccharification and fermentation from acid pretreated rice straw. Biomass Bioenergy, 2015, 78: 156-163

[8]

Dürre P. Biobutanol: an attractive biofuel. Biotechnol J, 2007, 2: 1525-1534

[9]

Fernandes S, Murray PG. Metabolic engineering for improved microbial pentose fermentation. Bioeng Bugs, 2010, 1: 424-428

[10]

FICCI (2013) Forging ties securing energy supply for a stronger economy. https://www.pwc.in/en_IN/in/assets/pdfs/publications/2013/forging-ties-Securing-energy-supply-for-a-stronger-economy.pdf

[11]

Ghose TK. Measurements of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem, 1987, 59: 257-268

[12]

Ghose T, Bisaria VS. Measurement of hemicellulase activities: part I Xylanases. Pure Appl Chem, 1987, 59: 1739-1751

[13]

Hart M. A turbidimetric method for determining elemental sulphur. Analyst, 1961, 86: 472-475

[14]

Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis, 1967 New Delhi Prentice Hall of India

[15]

Jönsson L, Palmqvist E, Nilvebrant N-O, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1998, 49: 691-697

[16]

Júnior MM, Batistote M, Cilli EM, Ernandes JR. Sucrose fermentation by Brazilian ethanol production yeasts in media containing structurally complex nitrogen sources. J Inst Brew, 2009, 115: 191-197

[17]

Kim Y, Kreke T, Hendrickson R, Parenti J, Ladisch MR. Fractionation of cellulase and fermentation inhibitors from steam pretreated mixed hardwood. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 135: 30-38

[18]

Ko JK, Um Y, Park Y-C, Seo J-H, Kim KH. Compounds inhibiting the bioconversion of hydrothermally pretreated lignocellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2015, 99: 4201-4212

[19]

Kordowska-Wiater M, Targoński Z. Ethanol fermentation on glucose/xylose mixture by co-cultivation of restricted glucose catabolite repressed mutants of Pichia stipitis with respiratory deficient mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Microbiol Pol, 2001, 51: 345-352

[20]

Lee SY, Park JH, Jang SH, Nielsen LK, Kim J, Jung KS. Fermentative butanol production by Clostridia. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2008, 101: 209-228

[21]

Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1978, 42: 421-428

[22]

Miller G. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Ann Chem, 1959, 31: 426-428

[23]

Murata Y Ethanol fermentation by the thermotolerant yeast, Kluyveromyces marxianus TISTR5925, of extracted sap from old oil palm trunk. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3: 201-213

[24]

Pandiyan K Optimization of enzymatic saccharification of alkali pretreated Parthenium sp. using response surface methodology. Enzyme, 2014

[25]

Reed G. Production of fermentation alcohol as a fuel source. Industrial microbiology, 1982 Westport The AVI Publishing company Inc. 835-860

[26]

Reese E, Mandels M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and its derivatives. Methods Carbohydr Chem, 1963, 3: 139-142

[27]

Saha BC. Hemicellulose bioconversion. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol, 2003, 30: 279-291

[28]

Saritha M, Arora A, Nain L. Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic substrates for enhanced delignification and enzymatic digestibility Indian. J Microbiol, 2012, 52: 122-130

[29]

Sedha R, Verma G. Ethanol fermentation from molasses using cell recycling of S. cerevisiae. J Ferment Technol, 2002

[30]

Sindhu R, Kuttiraja M, Binod P, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A. Bioethanol production from dilute acid pretreated Indian bamboo variety (Dendrocalamus sp.) by separate hydrolysis and fermentation. Ind Crops Prod, 2014, 52: 169-176

[31]

Singh S, Nain L. Microorganisms in the conversion of agricultural wastes to compost. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad, 2014, 80: 473-481

[32]

Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Acid-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. Bioresources, 2007, 2: 472-499

[33]

Thangavelu SK, Ahmed AS, Ani FN. Review on bioethanol as alternative fuel for spark ignition engines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2016, 56: 820-835

[34]

Tiwari R Biological delignification of paddy straw and Parthenium sp using a novel micromycete Myrothecium roridum LG7 for enhanced saccharification. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 135: 7-11

[35]

Tiwari R Cold active holocellulase cocktail from Aspergillus niger SH3: process optimization for production and biomass hydrolysis. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng, 2015, 56: 57-66

[36]

Wanderley MCdA, Martín C, Rocha GJdM, Gouveia ER. Increase in ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse based on combined pretreatments and fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 128: 448-453

[37]

Wood TM, Bhat KM. Willis A, Wood STK. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods in enzymology, 1988 Cambridge Academic Press 87-112

Funding

ICAR-NFBSFARA(NFBSFARA/AE2006/2010-11)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

161

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/