Agroforestry mapping and characterization in four districts of Garhwal Himalaya

Abstract

Farmers in the Indian Himalayan region have been practicing agroforestry since time immoral. Agroforestry practice complements hill farming and forms the backbone of subsistence agriculture. The present study was carried out in four districts of Garhwal Himalaya. Agroforestry area was demarcated using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System techniques. The information regarding agriculture and tree crop pattern was collected through questionnaire survey and direct observations. The agri-horti-silviculture is very common practice of this region. As compared to geographical area the net sown area is very low with wide variations within study area. A small portion of the net sown area has been utilized for the agroforestry purpose. Topographical factors play a crucial role in utilization of the land for agroforestry purpose. Highest agroforestry area, as well the highest agroforestry land as percentage of total geographical area, was estimated as 2.13 % in one of the district of study area. Within 300–7100 m a.s.l. of study area, maximum agroforestry was found in 1201–1600 m a.s.l. altitudinal zone and in 21°–30° slope. Cropping pattern is dominated by the traditional and low productivity crops, providing basic livelihood for a vast majority of the population. Many farmers in the Garhwal Himalayan areas are struggling to make a livelihood due to lack of other avenues of employment and small land holdings, leading to migration of mountain people toward plains. It is presumed that the rate of migration can be reduced once the agroforestry potential of this area is harnessed at an optimum level.

Keywords

Agroforestry / Altitude / Slope / GIS / Garhwal Himalaya

References

[1] Bagwari HK, Todaria NP. Resource use pattern and agroecosystem functioning in Rawanganga micro watershed in Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop, 2011, 112(2): 101-112

[2] Bahuguna P, Belwal OK. Regression model approach for out-migration on demographic aspects of rural areas of Pauri Garhwal. Int J Manag Soc Sci Res, 2013, 2(8): 175-182

[3] Dhyani SK. National Agroforestry policy 2014 and the need for area estimation under agroforestry. Curr Sci, 2014, 107(1): 9-10

[4] Dhyani SK, Sharda VN. Agroforestry systems as rural development options for the Indian Himalayas. J Tree Sci, 2005, 24(1): 1-19

[5] Dhyani SK, Kareemulla KA, Handa AK. Agroforestry potential and scope for development across agro-climatic zones in India. Indian J For, 2009, 32(2): 181-190

[6] Gilmour DA, Nurse MC. Farmer initiatives in increasing tree cover in central Nepal. Mt Res Dev, 1991, 11: 329-337

[7] Handa SK, Uma AK. Area under agroforestry in India: an assessment for present status and future perspective. Indian J Agrofor, 2013, 15(1): 1-11

[8] ICAR Handbook of Agriculture, 2006 5 New Delhi Indian Council of Agricultural Research

[9] Kothari A (1994) Reviving diversity in India’s agriculture. Seedling 14:1–4. http://www.grain.org/seedling/index.cfm?id=393. Accessed 23 July 2009

[10] Kumar S. Know your state Uttarakhand, 2010 Meerut Arihant Publication (i) Pvt. Ltd 208

[11] Maikhuri RK, Rawat LS, Phondani PC, Negi VS, Farooquee NA, Negi C. Hill agriculture of Uttarakhand: policy, governance, research issues and development priorities for sustainability. India Econ Rev, 2009, 6: 116-123

[12] Montagnini F, Nair PKR. Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst, 2004, 61: 281-295

[13] Negi AK, Todaria NP. Studies on the impact of local folk on forests of Garhwal Himalaya. Biomass Bioenergy, 1993, 4(6): 447-454

[14] NRCAF, Vision 2050 (2013) National Research Centre for Agroforestry, Jhansi, p 30

[15] Ralhan PK, Negi GCS, Singh SP. Structure and function of the agroforestry system in the Pithoragarh district of Central Himalaya: an ecological viewpoint. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 1991, 35: 283-296

[16] Semwal RL, Maikhuri RK. Structure and functioning of traditional hill agroecosystems of Garhwal Himalaya. Biol Agric Hortic, 1996, 13: 267-289

[17] Sharma R, Sharma E, Purohit AN. Dry matter production and nutrient cycling in agroforestry systems of mandarin grown in association with Albizia and mixed tree species. Agrofor Syst, 1995, 29: 165-179

[18] Shepherd KD, Ohlsson E, Okalebo JR, Ndufa JK. Potential impact of agroforestry on soil nutrient balances at the farm scale in the East African Highlands. Fertil Res, 1996, 44(2): 87-99

[19] Shiva V. Towards a biodiversity based productivity framework. ILEIA Newsl, 1996, 12: 22-24

[20] Shiva V, Vanaja RP (1993) Cultivating diversity: biodiversity conservation and seed politics. Research foundation for Science Technology and Natural Resource Policy. Natraj Publishers, Dehradun, p 130

[21] Singh V and Jardhari V (2001) Landrace renaissance in the mountains: Experiences of the Beej Bachao Andolan in the Garhwal Himalayan region, India. In: Proceedings international symposium on participatory plant breeding and participatory plant genetic resources enhancement, Cali, Columbia, IDRC, pp 87–96

[22] Singh GS, Rao KS, Saxena KG. Energy and economic efficiency of the mountain farming system: a case study in the north-western Himalaya. J Sustain Agric, 1997, 9: 25-49

[23] Sundriyal RC, Rai SC, Sharma E, Rai YK. Hill agroforestry systems in south Sikkim, India. Agrofor Syst, 1994, 26: 215-235

[24] Thapa GB, Sinclair FL, Walker DH. Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestry development. Part 2: case study on the impact of explicit representation of farmers’ knowledge. Agrofor Syst, 1995, 30: 249-261

[25] Toky OP, Kumar P, Khosla PK. Structure and function of traditional agroforestry systems in the western Himalaya. I. Biomass and productivity. Agrofor Syst, 1989, 9: 47-70

[26] Toledo VM, Ortiz-Espejal B, Cortes L, De Jesus Ordonez M. The multiple use of tropical forests by indigenous peoples in Mexico: a case of adaptive management. Conserv Ecol, 2003, 7: 9-12

[27] Tsunehiro O (2010) Estimating agroforestry’s effect on productivity in Kenya: an application of a treatment effects model. OSIPP discussion paper: DP-2010-E-001

[28] Uniyal AK, Todaria NP. Rooting characteristics of Populus ciliata Wall. Ex Royle as influenced by source, season and parental stock in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Ann For, 2003, 11(2): 233-244

[29] Uniyal AK, Todaria NP. Provenance—progeny trial for domestication of Populus ciliata clones. J Trop For Sci, 2006, 18(4): 269-273

[30] Uttarakhand Forest Statistics (2012) Forest Department of Uttarakhand