Incorporating innovative water management science and technology into water management policy

Abstract

Water is a unique and limited resource. An ample supply of good quality water is a concern, and the potential for water shortages exist. Such shortages of good quality water are real and would likely have significant impacts on the economy and the environment. In the USA, the public expects water management science and technology to be incorporated into effective polices to help minimize or offset adverse impacts on water. Such integration takes time and challenges exist. Challenges to such integration include the need to educate decision makers, lack of needed incentives, limited benefit quantification methods, uncertainty in measurement or estimation of technology performance, the need for comprehensive guiding principles such as sustainability, and lack of broad-scale application of techniques such as adaptive management and environmental management systems. There is a compelling need to continuously make advances in the water management science and technology arena to meet these challenges; however, there is a commensurate need to educate decision makers and stakeholders about the potential benefits derived by the application of such advances. Such educational efforts are needed to better integrate science, technology and water policy in order to make better use of available water.

Keywords

Water quality management / Water science and technology / System integration

References

[1] Council on Environmental Quality (1997) The National environmental policy act: a study of its effectiveness after twenty-five years. Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C

[2] Council on Environmental Quality (2003) Modernizing NEPA implementation. Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C

[3] General Accounting Office Freshwater supply: states? View of how federal agencies could help them meet the challenges of expected shortages, 2003 Washington, D.C General Accounting Office

[4] International Standard Organisation (1996) ISO 14001:1996 environmental management systems. International Standard Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland

[5] Office of Water (2002) Committing the EPA? Office of water to advance the watershed approach, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

[6] Office of Water (2003) Watershed-based npdes permitting policy statement. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

[7] Office of Water (2004) Watershed-based national pollution discharge elimination system (NPDES) permitting implementing guidance. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

[8] Panel on Adaptive Management for Resource Stewardship (2004) Adaptive management for water resources project planning. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C

[9] Ribaudo M, Gollehon N, Aillery M, Kaplan J, Johansson R, Agapoff J, Christensen L, Breneman V, Peters M. Manure management for water quality: costs to animal feeding operations of applying manure nutrients to land, 2003 Washington, D.C., USA United States Department of Agriculture

[10] U.S Government Publishing Office (GPO) (2000) Executive Order 13148? Greening the government through leadership in environmental management, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, D.C

[11] United States Department of Agriculture (2001) Food and Agriculture policy: taking stock for the new century. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C

[12] United States Department of Agriculture (2003) Conservation effects assessment project. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C

[13] United States Department of Agriculture (2003) Manure management for water quality: costs to animal feeding operations of applying manure nutrients to land. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C

[14] United States Department of Agriculture (2011) Natural resources credit trading reference. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C

[15] United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Clean water action plan: restoring and protecting America’s waters. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

[16] United States Environmental Protection Agency (2002) National water quality inventory: 2000 report to congress. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

[17] United States Environmental Protection Agency (2003) EPA Releases Innovative Approach to Cleaner Water: 11 Pilots Receiving More than $ \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\,\$\,$$\end{document}800,000 in Funding, Newsroom, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/b1ab9f485b098972852562e7004dc686/7f1b0616de4dc2a285256cad006a60a7?OpenDocument

[18] United States Environmental Protection Agency (2003) History of the clean water act. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

[19] United States Environmental Protection Agency (2008) EPA water quality trading evaluation. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

[20] United States Geological Survey (1999) The quality of our Nations? Waters nutrients and pesticides. United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C

[21] United States Geological Survey (2015) National water-quality assessment (NAWQA) program. United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C

[22] Woodward R. The structure and practice of water-quality trading markets. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002, 38: 967-979