Trend analysis and change point techniques: a survey

Shilpy Sharma , David A. Swayne , Charlie Obimbo

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2016, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3) : 123 -130.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2016, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3) : 123 -130. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-016-0011-1
Short Communications

Trend analysis and change point techniques: a survey

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Trend analysis and change point detection in a time series are frequent analysis tools. Change point detection is the identification of abrupt variation in the process behavior due to distributional or structural changes, whereas trend can be defined as estimation of gradual departure from past norms. We examine four different change point detection methods which, by virtue of current literature, appear to be the most widely used and the newest algorithms. They are Wild Binary Segmentation, E-Agglomerative algorithm for change point, Iterative Robust Detection method and Bayesian Analysis of Change Points. We measure the power and accuracy of these current methods using simulated data. We draw comparisons on the functionality and usefulness of each method. We also analyze the data in the presence of trend, using Mann–Kendall and Cox–Stuart methods together with the change point algorithms, in order to evaluate whether presence of trend affects change point or vice versa.

Keywords

Change point analysis / Trend analysis / LO(W)ESS

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shilpy Sharma, David A. Swayne, Charlie Obimbo. Trend analysis and change point techniques: a survey. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2016, 1(3): 123-130 DOI:10.1007/s40974-016-0011-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adams RP, MacKay DJ. Bayesian online changepoint detection, 2007 UK University of Cambridge

[2]

Baranowski R, Fryzlewicz P (2014) wbs: wild binary segmentation for multiple change-point detection. R package version 1.1

[3]

Erdman C, Emerson JW. bcp: an R package for performing a Bayesian analysis of change point problems. J Stat Softw, 2007, 23(3): 1-13

[4]

Fryzlewicz P. Wild binary segmentation for multiple change-point detection, 2013 London Department of Statistics, London School of Economics

[5]

Gerard-Merchant PG, Stooksbury DE, Seymour L. Methods for starting the detection of undocumented multiple changepoints. J Clim, 2008, 21: 4887-4899

[6]

Hamed KH. Trend detection in hydrologic data: the Mann Kendall trend test under the scaling hypothesis. J Hydrol, 2008, 349: 350-363

[7]

Hessa A, Iyera H, Malm W. Linear trend analysis: a comparison of methods. Atmos Environ, 2001, 35: 5211-5222

[8]

James NA, Matteson DS (2013) ecp: an R package for nonparametric multiple change point analysis of multivariate data. ArXiv e-prints

[9]

Liu S, Yamada M, Collier N, Sugiyama M. Change-point detection in time-series data by relative density-ratio estimation. Neural Netw, 2013, 43: 72-83

[10]

Matteson DS, James NA. A nonparametric approach for multiple change point analysis of multivariate data. J Am Stat Assoc, 2013, 109(505): 334-345

[11]

Partal T, Kahya E. Trend analysis in Turkish precipitation data. Hydrol Process, 2006, 20: 2011-2026

[12]

Reeves J, Chen J, Wang XL, Lund R, Lu Q. A review and comparison of changepoint detection techniques for climate data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 2007, 46(6): 900-915

[13]

Xiong L, Guo S. Trend test and change-point detection for the annual discharge series of the yangtze river at the Yichang hydrological station. Hydrol Sci J, 2004, 49(1): 99-112

[14]

Yue S, Pilon P, Cavadias G. Power of the Mann–Kendall and Spearman’s rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological series. J Hydrol, 2002, 259: 254-271

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

140

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/