Community-based digital health platforms in preventive health care for underserved areas

Faseeh Iqbal , Sami Iqbal , Umar Farooq , Sadia Nawaz , Muhammad Hammad , Khadija Shakoor , Fatima Noreen

Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 101187

PDF (591KB)
Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :101187 DOI: 10.37349/edht.2026.101187
Original Article
research-article
Community-based digital health platforms in preventive health care for underserved areas
Author information +
History +
PDF (591KB)

Abstract

Aim: To assess healthcare professionals’ awareness, attitudes, and utilization of community-based digital health platforms for preventive care in underserved districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, and to identify key barriers associated with routine use.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between December 2024 and February 2025 among 400 healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, and allied health practitioners) working in primary, secondary, and tertiary facilities in Swabi and Mardan. Participants were recruited using purposive, stratified (quota-based) sampling. The questionnaire captured knowledge/awareness, attitudes, self-reported utilization, and perceived barriers (infrastructure, training, and privacy). Descriptive statistics were produced, and multivariable regression was used to examine factors associated with utilization.

Results: Among the 400 respondents, 332 (83.0%) reported awareness of digital health platforms and 312 (78.0%) reported positive attitudes toward their use. Overall, 297 (74.3%) reported using digital health platforms in practice. The most frequently reported barriers were lack of infrastructure (n = 309, 77.3%), limited training (n = 297, 74.3%), and data privacy concerns (n = 295, 73.8%). In the adjusted logistic regression model, greater knowledge of digital health platforms was associated with higher odds of routine use (aOR = 10.56, 95% CI: 2.36–47.35; p = 0.002), whereas attitude and infrastructure barriers were not significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals in Swabi and Mardan reported high awareness and favorable attitudes toward community-based digital health platforms, but infrastructure gaps, limited training, and data privacy concerns were common barriers. Greater platform knowledge predicted routine use. Strengthening facility readiness, workflow-based training, and practical safeguards to address data privacy concerns may enable safer, more equitable scale-up; findings are context-specific due to non-probability sampling.

Keywords

preventive health care / underserved districts / infrastructure / training / data privacy concerns / awareness / attitudes / Pakistan

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Faseeh Iqbal, Sami Iqbal, Umar Farooq, Sadia Nawaz, Muhammad Hammad, Khadija Shakoor, Fatima Noreen. Community-based digital health platforms in preventive health care for underserved areas. Exploration of Digital Health Technologies, 2026, 4 (1) : 101187 DOI:10.37349/edht.2026.101187

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Akhtar MH, Ramkumar J. Primary Health Center: Can it be made mobile for efficient healthcare services for hard to reach population? A state-of-the-art review. Discov Health Syst. 2023; 2:3.

[2]

Healthcare Access in Rural Communities [Internet]. Grand Forks (ND):Rural Health Information Hub; c2002-2026 [cited 2025 Nov 11]. Available from:https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/topics/healthcare-access

[3]

Maita KC, Maniaci MJ, Haider CR, Avila FR, Torres-Guzman RA, Borna S, et al. The Impact of Digital Health Solutions on Bridging the Health Care Gap in Rural Areas: A Scoping Review. Perm J. 2024; 28:130-43.

[4]

Asif M, Gaur P. The Impact of Digital Health Technologies on Chronic Disease Management. Telehealth Med Today. 2025; 10:556.

[5]

Chaturvedi U, Chauhan SB, Singh I. The impact of artificial intelligence on remote healthcare: Enhancing patient engagement, connectivity, and overcoming challenges. Intel Pharm. 2025; 3:323-9.

[6]

Balasubramanian GV, Beaney P, Chambers R. Digital personal assistants are smart ways for assistive technology to aid the health and wellbeing of patients and carers. BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21:643.

[7]

Dixon D, Sattar H, Moros N, Kesireddy SR, Ahsan H, Lakkimsetti M, et al. Unveiling the Influence of AI Predictive Analytics on Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Cureus. 2024; 16:e59954.

[8]

Munir MM, Ahmed N. Using Social Media Platforms to Raise Health Awareness and Increase Health Education in Pakistan: Structural Equation Modeling Analysis and Questionnaire Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12:e65745.

[9]

Raihan MMH, Subroto S, Chowdhury N, Koch K, Ruttan E, Turin TC. Dimensions and barriers for digital (in)equity and digital divide: a systematic integrative review. Digit Transform Soc. 2025; 4:111-27.

[10]

Mantena S, Celi LA, Keshavjee S, Beratarrechea A. Improving community health-care screenings with smartphone-based AI technologies. Lancet Digit Health. 2021; 3:e280-2.

[11]

D’Ambruoso L, Abruquah NA, Mabetha D, van der Merwe M, Goosen G, Sigudla J, et al. ; Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR)/Wits/Mpumalanga Department of Health Learning Platform.Expanding Community Health Worker decision space: learning from a Participatory Action Research training intervention in a rural South African district. Hum Resour Health. 2023; 21:66.

[12]

Ahmed S, Chase LE, Wagnild J, Akhter N, Sturridge S, Clarke A, et al. Community health workers and health equity in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and recommendations for policy and practice. Int J Equity Health. 2022; 21:49.

[13]

Ibeneme S, Ukor N, Ongom M, Dasa T, Muneene D, Okeibunor J. Strengthening capacities among digital health leaders for the development and implementation of national digital health programs in Nigeria. BMC Proc. 2020; 14:9.

[14]

Phuong J, Ordóñez P, Cao J, Moukheiber M, Moukheiber L, Caspi A, et al. Telehealth and digital health innovations: A mixed landscape of access. PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 2:e0000401.

[15]

Vicente AM, Ballensiefen W, Jönsson J. How personalised medicine will transform healthcare by 2030: the ICPerMed vision. J Transl Med. 2020; 18:180.

[16]

Marikyan D, Papagiannidis S. Technology Acceptance Model: A review. In: Papagiannidis S, editor. Theory Hub Book. Newcastle University; 2024.

[17]

Giebel GD, Speckemeier C, Abels C, Plescher F, Börchers K, Wasem J, et al. Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of Digital Health Applications: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e43808.

[18]

Blut M, Chong AYL, Tsigna Z, Venkatesh V. Meta-analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Challenging its validity and charting a research agenda in the Red Ocean. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2022; 23:13-95.

[19]

Alghamdi A. Simultaneous mobility of gateways and nodes in LoRaWAN. Front Commun Netw. 2025; 6:1621431.

[20]

Government of Pakistan Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination. National Digital Health Framework 2022-2030. Government of Pakistan; 2022.

[21]

Ministry of Information Technology & Telecommunication (MoITT), Government of Pakistan. Draft Personal Data Protection Bill. Government of Pakistan; 2023.

PDF (591KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉