Towards the future of personalized medicine: digital twin technology

Abstract

Digital twin technology is emerging as a transformative paradigm in healthcare, shifting practice from provider-centered models toward more personalized forms of medicine. As dynamic virtual representations of the human body, digital twins integrate biometric data, lifestyle patterns, and clinical records to simulate, monitor, and predict health trajectories in real time. Their growing use raises not only technical possibilities but also important questions about how patients relate to these data-driven counterparts, particularly when twins inform everyday health decisions in chronic care, such as diabetes or oncology. This perspective examines these relational dynamics and their ethical, cultural, and experiential implications for autonomy, decision-making, and the lived experience of being represented in data. To guide this analysis, we introduce a scale framework with three intersecting lenses: time, distinguishing asynchronous from synchronous updating; twining, ranging from close mirroring to more augmentative forms of representation; and control, spanning human-led to twin-driven decision authority. Using this framework, we position four common types of digital twins: mirror, shadow, intelligent, and simulacra as an evolution from basic representation to transformative modeling. We argue that future healthcare and public health policy must go beyond technical innovation to address patients’ lived experiences, ensuring that digital twins enhance rather than diminish autonomy, trust, and equity. This perspective thus calls for a patient-centered approach in designing and implementing digital twin technologies.

Keywords

digital twin / artificial intelligence / personalized medicine

References

[1] Katsoulakis E, Wang Q, Wu H, Shahriyari L, Fletcher R, Liu J, et al. Digital twins for health: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7:77.

[2] Sun T, He X, Li Z. Digital twin in healthcare: Recent updates and challenges. Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076221149651.

[3] Gkouskou K, Vlastos I, Karkalousos P, Chaniotis D, Sanoudou D, Eliopoulos AG. The “Virtual Digital Twins” Concept in Precision Nutrition. Adv Nutr. 2020; 11:1405-13.

[4] Stahlberg EA, Abdel-Rahman M, Aguilar B, Asadpoure A, Beckman RA, Borkon LL, et al. Exploring approaches for predictive cancer patient digital twins: Opportunities for collaboration and innovation. Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:1007784.

[5] Chen J, Yi C, Okegbile SD, Cai J, Shen X. Networking Architecture and Key Supporting Technologies for Human Digital Twin in Personalized Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. 2024; 26:706-46.

[6] Chen J, Yi C, Du H, Niyato D, Kang J, Cai J, et al. A Revolution of Personalized Healthcare: Enabling Human Digital Twin with Mobile AIGC. IEEE Netw. 2024; 38:234-42.

[7] Yang Y, Shi Y, Yi C, Cai J, Kang J, Niyato D, et al. Dynamic Human Digital Twin Deployment at the Edge for Task Execution: A Two-Timescale Accuracy-Aware Online Optimization. IEEE Trans Mob Comput. 2024; 23:12262-79.

[8] Rubeis G. Hyperreal Patients: Digital Twins as Simulacra and their impact on clinical heuristics. In: Loh J, Grote T, editors.Medizin - Technik - Ethik. Techno: Phil - Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Technikphilosophie. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2023. pp. 193-207.

[9] Nyholm S. Should a medical digital twin be viewed as an extension of the patient’s body? J Med Ethics. 2021; 47:401-2.

[10] Tretter M. Perspectives on digital twins and the (im)possibilities of control. J Med Ethics. 2021; 47:410-1.

[11] Vaportzis E, Clausen MG, Gow AJ. Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1687.

[12] Coorey G, Figtree GA, Fletcher DF, Redfern J. The health digital twin: advancing precision cardiovascular medicine. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021; 18:803-4.