Quantifying and mapping population response to the COVID-19 pandemic in different countries for the period 2020–2022

Aleksander K Cherkashin , Natalia E Krasnoshtanova

Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 101168

PDF (3172KB)
Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :101168 DOI: 10.37349/edht.2025.101168
Original Article
research-article
Quantifying and mapping population response to the COVID-19 pandemic in different countries for the period 2020–2022
Author information +
History +
PDF (3172KB)

Abstract

Aim: This study analyses the time series of daily increases in the number of diagnosed COVID-19 cases in Russia and countries from different continents. The aim of the study is to identify the specifics of the population response of different countries to the spread of the pandemic and anti-epidemic measures of public authorities to determine the most effective model to describe this process. This is a problematic, synoptic, and pilot study.

Methods: To evaluate this response strategy, models and methods from reliability theory are used to describe the probability of health protection, the probability density function of an increasing number of cases, the integrated risk of infection, the risk of morbidity, the acceptable risk, and the manageability of the epidemic situation. To approximate infection curves, various daily incidence rate functions are used and compared, and their coefficients are calculated for various pandemic waves.

Results: The results demonstrate that the Fréchet distribution function is the best model for the epidemic process. Indicators of variability in acceptable risk were identified during the first stage of pandemic development, showing the varying controllability of the situation by health systems. Through meta-analysis, country distributions were shown to appear as a single pattern, abstracted from local conditions. Estimated coefficients of reliability functions allow the construction of cartograms that reflect the peculiarities of state epidemic regulation and the stages of global pandemic deployment.

Conclusions: The findings confirm the effectiveness of the selected model in terms of reliability theory and identify directions for model improvement, taking into account the dynamic nature of the pandemic and its specific characteristics in different countries. The study is based on the methodological approach of function stratification (geometric fiber bundle). It allows for a deeper understanding of the identified patterns within a broader knowledge system.

Keywords

COVID-19 epidemic model / population response / reliability / mathematical modeling / hazard and risk of infection / Fréchet distribution / meta-analysis of data series / thematic mapping

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aleksander K Cherkashin, Natalia E Krasnoshtanova. Quantifying and mapping population response to the COVID-19 pandemic in different countries for the period 2020–2022. Exploration of Digital Health Technologies, 2025, 3 (1) : 101168 DOI:10.37349/edht.2025.101168

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

COVID-19 [Internet]. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.; [cited2024 May 1]. Available from:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19#

[2]

Global Health Security Index [Internet].Nuclear Threat Initiative; c2019 [cited 2020 Mar 16]. Available from:https://www.ghsindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Global-Health-Security-Index.pdf

[3]

Gendon YZ. Influenza Pandemics: Past and Future. Nature. 2008; 5:3-9. Russian.

[4]

Katkova IP. Russian Healthcare in the Context of Achieving Universal Access to Health Services by 2030. Population. 2020; 23:135-47. Russian.

[5]

Budilova EV, Lagutin MB, Migranova LA. Impact of the demographic and socio-economic factors on the population health. Population. 2019; 3:80-92. Russian.

[6]

Aaltola M. COVID-19 - a trigger for global transformation? Political distancing, global decoupling and growing distrust in health governance. FIIA Work Pap. 2020; 113:4-14.

[7]

Javed B, Sarwer A, Soto EB, Mashwani ZU. The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic’s impact on mental health. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020; 35:993-6.

[8]

Zhou C, Su F, Pei T, Zhang A, Du Y, Luo B, et al. COVID-19: Challenges to GIS with Big Data. Geogr Sustainability. 2020; 1:77-87.

[9]

Grishina EE. Epidemiological crisis of 2020: financial situation of the population and social support. Population. 2021; l:15-23. Russian.

[10]

Kecojevic A, Basch CH, Sullivan M, Davi NK. The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on mental health of undergraduate students in New Jersey, cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020; 15:e0239696.

[11]

Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 287:112934.

[12]

Alzueta E, Perrin P, Baker FC, Caffarra S, Ramos-Usuga D, Yuksel D, et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic has changed our lives: A study of psychological correlates across 59 countries. J Clin Psychol. 2021; 77:556-70.

[13]

Aboalyem MS, Ismail MT. Mapping the Pandemic: A Review of GIS-based Spatial Modeling of COVID-19. J Public Health Afr. 2023; 14:15.

[14]

Gaidai O, Yan P, Xing Y, Xu J, Wu Y. Gaidai reliability method for long-term coronavirus modelling. F1000 Res. 2023; 11:1282.

[15]

Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics--III. Further studies of the problem of endemicity. 1933. Bull Math Biol. 1991; 53:89-118.

[16]

Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS. Reliability Theory of Aging and Longevity. In: Handbook of the Biology of Aging. 6th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2006. pp. 3-42.

[17]

Cherkashin AK. Hierarchical Epidemic Risk Modeling of Spreading New COVID-19 Coronavirus. Issues Risk Anal. 2020; 4:10-21.

[18]

Cherkashin AK. National characteristics of changes in the hazard of development of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic: mathematical modeling and statistical analysis. Population. 2020; 23:83-95.

[19]

Cherkashin AK, Lesnykh SI, Krasnoshtanova NE. Geoinformation monitoring and mathematical modeling of the COVID-19 pandemic development. Inf Math Technol Sci Manage. 2021; 21:17-35. Russian.

[20]

Cherkashin AK, Krasnoshtanova NE. Meta-analysis of the demographic response of populations in different countries to the spread of COVID-19 coronavirus. Population. 2022; 25:141-54. Russian.

[21]

Krasnoshtanova NE, Cherkashin AK. Mapping the heterogeneity of population response in different countries to the spread of COVID-19. Geod Cartogr. 2024; 4:20-8. Russian.

[22]

COVID-19 Dashboard by Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University [Internet].Johns Hopkins University & Medicine; c2025 [cited 2024 Jan 15]. Available from:https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

[23]

WHO COVID-19 dashboard [Internet].WHO; c2024 [cited 2024 Jan 15]. Available from:https://covid19.who.int/

[24]

COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic [Internet].Worldometers.info; [cited 2023 Oct 15]. Available from:https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

[25]

Official information on coronavirus in Russia [Internet]. ANO “National Priorities”; c2022-2025 [cited 2024 Jan 15]. Available from:https://объясняем.рф/stopkoronavirus/

[26]

Cherkashin AK. Metatheoretische Grundlage der Atlaskartographierung. In: Wolodtschenko A, editor. Diskussionsbeiträge zur Kartosemiotik und zur Theorie der Kartographie Intern. Dresden: Selbstverlag der Technischen Universität Dresden; 2022. pp. 5-20.

[27]

COVID-19 Excess Mortality Collaborators. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020-21. Lancet. 2022; 399:1513-36.

[28]

Moein S, Nickaeen N, Roointan A, Borhani N, Heidary Z, Javanmard SH, et al. Inefficiency of SIR models in forecasting COVID-19 epidemic: a case study of Isfahan. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:4725.

[29]

Gurevitch J, Curtis PS, Jones MH. Meta-analysis in Ecology. Adv Ecol Res. 2001; 32:199-247.

[30]

Belov YV, Salagaev GI, Lysenko AV, Lednev PV. Meta-analysis in medical practice. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2018; 3:4-15. Russian.

[31]

Rebrova OY, Fedjaeva VK. Meta-analyses and Assessment of Their Methodological Quality. Russian Version of AMSTAR Questionnaire. Med Technol Assess choice. 2016; 1:10-6.

[32]

Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer; 2000.

[33]

Vlasenkova TA, Panchenko TM, Tsypin AP. Indicator Method as an Instrument to Ensure Financial Security of an Economic Entity. Izv Sarat Univ Ser Econ Manag Law. 2020; 20:271-83.

[34]

Chen X, Zhang S, Xu J. A modelling approach to characterise the interaction between behavioral response and epidemics: A study based on COVID-19. Infect Dis Model. 2024; 10:477-92.

[35]

Abolmaali S, Shirzaei S. A comparative study of SIR Model, Linear Regression, Logistic Function and ARIMA Model for forecasting COVID-19 cases. AIMS Public Health. 2021; 8:598-613.

[36]

Popova AY, Zaitseva NV, Alekseev VB, Letyushev AN, Kiryanov DA, Kleyn SV, et al. Heterogeneity of parameters of the modified SIR wave model of the COVID-19 epidemic process in the Russian Federation. Hyg Sanit. 2023; 102:740-9.

[37]

Nguyen NMT, Nguyen TMN, Le Q, Lam HH, Hoang TL, Tran TN. Analyzing The Spread of The COVID-19 Pandemic Using The SIR Model. In: Tran TN, Le Q K, Truong TT, Nguyen TN, Huynh HN, editors. Proceedings of International Symposium on Applied Science 2022; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. EasyChair; 2023. pp. 91-8.

[38]

Seki T, Sakurai T, Miyata S, Chujo K, Murata T, Inoue H, et al. Prediction of COVID19 cases using SIR and AR models: Tokyo-specific and nationwide application. Artif Life Rob. 2024; 29:449-58.

[39]

Lu M, Zheng X, Jia W, Tian C. Analysis and prediction of improved SEIR transmission dynamics model: taking the second outbreak of COVID-19 in Italy as an example. Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1223039.

[40]

Zheng P, Li J, Cui Z, Alharbi A, Tolba A. An Improved SEIR Dynamics Model for Actual Infection Scale Estimation of COVID-19. J Circuits Syst Comp. 2024; 33:2550003.

[41]

Al-Marzouki S, Jamal F, Chesneau C, Elgarhy M. Topp-Leone Odd Fréchet Generated Family of Distributions with Applications to COVID-19 Data Sets. Comput. Model Eng Sci. 2020; 125:437-58.

[42]

Bashiru SO. Modeling COVID-19 Datasets with Three-Parameter Fréchet Distribution. Proceedings of 2024 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Driving Sustainable Development Goals (SEB4SDG); 2024 Apr 2-4; Omu-Aran, Nigeria. IEEE;2024. pp. 1-7.

[43]

Diao Y, Kodera S, Anzai D, Gomez-Tames J, Rashed EA, Hirata A. Influence of population density, temperature, and absolute humidity on spread and decay durations of COVID-19: A comparative study of scenarios in China, England, Germany, and Japan. One Health. 2020; 12:100203.

[44]

Coccia M. Preparedness of countries to face COVID-19 pandemic crisis: Strategic positioning and factors supporting effective strategies of prevention of pandemic threats. Environ Res. 2022; 203:111678.

[45]

Coccia M. COVID-19 pandemic over 2020 (withlockdowns) and 2021 (with vaccinations): similar effects for seasonality and environmental factors. Environ Res. 2022; 208:112711.

[46]

Krasnoshtanova NE. Assessing the influence of geographical factors and conditions on development risks of the oil and gas extraction industry in Irkutsk oblast. Geogr Nat Resour. 2014; 35:106-13.

[47]

Krasnoshtanova NE, Cherkashin AK. Valuation mapping of hazards of the crisis natural and economic situations. Geod Cartogr. 2017; 78:40-9.

[48]

Cherkashin AK, Frolov AA. Cosmic and terrestrial landscapes: intertheoretical similarity and geoimaging. Geod Cartogr. 2025; 86:13-22. Russian.

[49]

Cherkashin AK, Frolov AA. Comparative geographical analysis of the altitudinal distribution of geomes in different physico-geographical regions. Bull Irkutsk State Univ Earth Sci Ser. 2025; 51:107-24. Russian.

[50]

M’Kendrick AG. Applications of mathematics to medical problems. Proc Edinburgh Math Soc. 1925; 44:98-130.

[51]

Keyfitz BL, Keyfitz N. The McKendrick partial differential equation and its uses in epidemiology and population study. Math Comput Model. 1997; 26:1-9.

[52]

Sedov LI. Radok JRM. A course in continuum mechanics, Vol. 1: Basic equations and analytical techniques. Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing; 1971. p. 281.

[53]

Ismail-Zadeh A, Teckley P. Computational Methods for Geodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 313.

[54]

Krasnoshtanova NE, Cherkashin AK. Risk assessment and mapping in natural-technical and socio-economic systems. In: Moskvichev VV, editor. Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic and scientific-technical aspects. Thematic block “Regional security problems”. Section II. Territorial risks of Siberian regions. Kuzbass. Yenisei Siberia. Baikal. Moscow: MGOF “Znanie”; 2024. pp. 300-13. Russian.

[55]

Bukhovets AG. On one approach to the problem of classification. Sociol:4M. 2004;No.18:82-105. Russian.

[56]

Cherkashin AK. Quantum Geography: Problems of Typification, Classification and Zoning. Bull Irkutsk State Univ Earth Sci Ser. 2024; 47:90-116. Russian.

[57]

Cherkashin AK, Frolov AA. Discrete analysis of spatial and temporal variability of geosystems of Baikal Siberia. Izv Russ Geogr Obshch. 2024; 156:205-12. Russian.

PDF (3172KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉