Evaluating a tinnitus device for reducing tinnitus symptoms and mental health difficulties in veterans: waitlist-controlled trial protocol

Phoebe Howlett , Dominic Murphy

Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 101165

PDF (575KB)
Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :101165 DOI: 10.37349/edht.2025.101165
Open Access Protocol
research-article
Evaluating a tinnitus device for reducing tinnitus symptoms and mental health difficulties in veterans: waitlist-controlled trial protocol
Author information +
History +
PDF (575KB)

Abstract

The prevalence of tinnitus in veterans is notably higher than in the general population and can significantly disrupt daily life. Given the impact of tinnitus, along with the lack of effective interventions, exploring new approaches is warranted. Wearable sound technologies offer a non-invasive and easily accessible approach. However, limited research has explored the effectiveness of sound therapy in UK veterans. A prior study supported the feasibility and acceptability of a non-invasive wearable device (i.e., TinniSoothe) in a sample of veterans. However, a waitlist-controlled trial is needed to investigate the effectiveness of the device. This waitlist-controlled trial aims to explore the effectiveness of a wearable device in reducing tinnitus symptoms in a sample of UK veterans. Veterans will be randomly allocated to one of two conditions: (1) the immediate intervention condition, which receives the device post-randomisation, or (2) the waitlist control group, which receives the device one-month post-randomisation. The trial will be conducted in veterans (n = 20) who have experienced tinnitus. Participants will be asked to use the device for one month. The immediate intervention group will be compared to the waitlist control group. The primary outcome is change in tinnitus severity (Tinnitus Functional Index, TFI) and mental health (General Health Questionnaire-12, GHQ-12) from baseline to one-month post-randomisation. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at all timepoints (baseline, one-month post-randomisation, and two-month post-randomisation), while predictor variables will only be assessed at baseline to reduce participant burden. Recruitment will begin in October 2025. The study is expected to take 12 months, with results published in 2027. This study explores whether a wearable device is efficacious in reducing self-reported symptoms of tinnitus in comparison to a waitlist control group. This innovative approach, if successful, could offer a practical option for reducing tinnitus distress. The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT06905158.

Keywords

sound device / tinnitus / veterans / wearable technology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Phoebe Howlett, Dominic Murphy. Evaluating a tinnitus device for reducing tinnitus symptoms and mental health difficulties in veterans: waitlist-controlled trial protocol. Exploration of Digital Health Technologies, 2025, 3 (1) : 101165 DOI:10.37349/edht.2025.101165

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Wang H, Tang D, Wu Y, Zhou L, Sun S. The state of the art of sound therapy for subjective tinnitus in adults. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020; 11: 2040622320956426.

[2]

Folmer RL, Theodoroff SM, Martin WH, Shi Y. Experimental, controversial, and futuristic treatments for chronic tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25:106-25.

[3]

MacGregor AJ, Joseph AR, Dougherty AL. Prevalence of Tinnitus and Association with Self-Rated Health among Military Personnel Injured on Combat Deployment. Mil Med. 2020; 185:e1608-14.

[4]

Baguley DM, Fagelson M, editors. Tinnitus: Clinical and research perspectives. In: Tinnitus in military and veteran populations. San Diego (CA): Plural Publishing, Inc.; 2016. pp. 75-88.

[5]

Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res. 1990; 8:221-54.

[6]

Veterans Benefits Administration : VBA annual benefits report, fiscal year 2018 [Internet].U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; [cited 2025 Aug 26]. Available from:https://www.benefits.va.gov/REPORTS/abr/docs/2018-abr.pdf

[7]

Folmer RL, McMillan GP, Austin DF, Henry JA. Audiometric thresholds and prevalence of tinnitus among male veterans in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2006. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48:503-16.

[8]

Reavis KM, Henry JA, Marshall LM, Carlson KF. Prevalence of self-reported depression symptoms and perceived anxiety among community-dwelling U.S. adults reporting tinnitus. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2020; 5:959-70.

[9]

Henry JA, Griest SE, Blankenship C, Thielman EJ, Theodoroff SM, Hammill T, et al. Impact of Tinnitus on Military Service Members. Mil Med. 2019; 184:604-14.

[10]

Musleh A, Alharthy AKH, Alzahrani MYM, Bin Maadhah SA, Al Zehefa IA, AlQahtani RY, et al. Psychological Impact and Quality of Life in Adults With Tinnitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2024; 16:e51976.

[11]

Carlson KF, Gilbert TA, O’Neil ME, Zaugg TL, Manning CA, Kaelin C, et al. Health Care Utilization and Mental Health Diagnoses Among Veterans With Tinnitus. Am J Audiol. 2019; 28:181-90.

[12]

McFerran DJ, Stockdale D, Holme R, Large CH, Baguley DM. Why Is There No Cure for Tinnitus? Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:802.

[13]

McFerran D, Hoare DJ, Carr S, Ray J, Stockdale D. Tinnitus services in the United Kingdom: a survey of patient experiences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18:110.

[14]

Lee HY, Jung DJ. Recent Updates on Tinnitus Management. J Audiol Otol. 2023; 27:181-92.

[15]

Liu H, Zhang J, Yang S, Wang X, Zhang W, Li J, et al. Efficacy of sound therapy interventions for tinnitus management: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100:e27509.

[16]

TinniSoothe [Internet].TinniSoothe; [cited 2025 Jun 2]. Available from:https://tinnisoothe.com/product

[17]

Deshpande AK, Bhatt I, Rojanaworarit C. Virtual reality for tinnitus management: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Audiol. 2022; 61:868-75.

[18]

Lelic D, Caporali S, Parker D, Nielsen J, Balling LW. Impact of a combination sound therapy on tinnitus distress: an exploratory one-year longitudinal study. Front Audiol Otol. 2024; 2:1322596.

[19]

Zhao W, Berger VW, Yu Z. The asymptotic maximal procedure for subject randomization in clinical trials. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018; 27:2142-53.

[20]

Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, et al. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012; 33:153-76.

[21]

Goldberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1988.

[22]

Morin CM, Belleville G, Bélanger L, Ivers H. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011; 34:601-8.

[23]

Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49:71-5.

[24]

Zuromski KL, Ustun B, Hwang I, Keane TM, Marx BP, Stein MB, et al. Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Depress Anxiety. 2019; 36:790-800.

[25]

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999; 282:1737-44.

[26]

Chandra N, Chang K, Lee A, Shekhawat GS, Searchfield GD. Psychometric Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Tinnitus Functional Index. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018; 29:609-25.

[27]

Henry JA, Griest S, Thielman E, McMillan G, Kaelin C, Carlson KF. Tinnitus Functional Index: Development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application. Hear Res. 2016; 334:58-64.

[28]

Wojujutari AK, Idemudia ES, Ugwu LE. The evaluation of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) reliability generalization: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024; 19:e0304182.

[29]

Picardi A, Abeni D, Pasquini P. Assessing psychological distress in patients with skin diseases: reliability, validity and factor structure of the GHQ-12. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001; 15:410-7.

[30]

Hybelius J, Kosic A, Salomonsson S, Wachtler C, Wallert J, Nordin S, et al. Measurement Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and Somatic Symptom Scale-8: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7:e2446603.

PDF (575KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉