Effect of a smartphone-based educational toolkit on behavioural outcomes in personal care product use: a randomized controlled trial

Graziella De Michino , Caroline Barakat

Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 101163

PDF (1279KB)
Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :101163 DOI: 10.37349/edht.2025.101163
Original Article
research-article
Effect of a smartphone-based educational toolkit on behavioural outcomes in personal care product use: a randomized controlled trial
Author information +
History +
PDF (1279KB)

Abstract

Aim: In 2023, the average woman used 13 different personal care products (PCPs) daily, exposing them to 114 different chemical toxins, including carcinogens, synthetic preservatives, and fragrances. Parabens, commonly used as preservatives and fragrance ingredients, are found in household and PCPs, such as cosmetics and hair products. Exposure to parabens has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and endocrine disorders. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the “Paraben-Free & Me” educational toolkit (OSF Registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WXU34) by exploring whether it influences changes of 3.5 points (10%) in paraben-free behaviour in women aged 18–35 years old when compared to the control group.

Methods: This study consists of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the educational toolkit among 101 female students aged 18 to 35 years old following a four-week intervention period. Baseline and follow-up questionnaires were used to assess participants’ knowledge and access to information, risk perception, health beliefs, and paraben-free behaviour by providing composite scores for each construct.

Results: The change in the knowledge and access to information score was significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (+3.96, 95% CI [1.95, 5.96]). There were slight differences between groups in relation to health beliefs (+0.63, 95% CI [–1.02, 2.27]), risk perception (+0.96, 95% CI [–0.61, 2.54]), and paraben-free behaviour (–0.16, 95% CI [–2.88, 2.57]); however, these were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: This study suggests that while the “Paraben-Free & Me” educational toolkit was unsuccessful in promoting greater paraben-free behaviour in the intervention group, it can increase women’s knowledge and access to information related to parabens in their PCPs. Future studies can focus on evaluating paraben-free behaviour and the effectiveness of the educational toolkit by exploring biological measures, such as urinary concentrations of parabens, and air pollutant concentrations.

Keywords

parabens / exposure / educational toolkit / behaviour

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Graziella De Michino, Caroline Barakat. Effect of a smartphone-based educational toolkit on behavioural outcomes in personal care product use: a randomized controlled trial. Exploration of Digital Health Technologies, 2025, 3 (1) : 101163 DOI:10.37349/edht.2025.101163

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Survey finds use of personal care products up since 2004-what that means for your health [Internet].EWG, Environmental Working Group; c2025 [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Available from:https://www.ewg.org/research/survey-finds-use-personal-care-products-2004-what-means-your-health

[2]

Błędzka D, Gromadzińska J, Wąsowicz W. Parabens. From environmental studies to human health. Environ Int. 2014; 67:27-42.

[3]

Johnson PI, Favela K, Jarin J, Le AM, Clark PY, Fu L, et al. Chemicals of concern in personal care products used by women of color in three communities of California. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022; 32:864-76.

[4]

What Are Parabens, and Why Don’t They Belong in Cosmetics? [Internet].EWG, Environmental Working Group; c2025 [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Available from:https://www.ewg.org/what-are-parabens

[5]

Chatterjee S, Adhikary S, Bhattacharya S, Chakraborty A, Dutta S, Roy D, et al. Parabens as the double-edged sword: Understanding the benefits and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 954:176547.

[6]

Soni MG, Carabin IG, Burdock GA. Safety assessment of esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (parabens). Food Chem Toxicol. 2005; 43:985-1015.

[7]

Wan MLY, Co VA, El-Nezami H. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and breast cancer: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022; 62:6549-76.

[8]

Bräuner EV, Uldbjerg CS, Lim YH, Gregersen LS, Krause M, Frederiksen H, et al. Presence of parabens, phenols and phthalates in paired maternal serum, urine and amniotic fluid. Environ Int. 2022; 158:106987.

[9]

Park NY, Cho YH, Choi K, Lee EH, Kim YJ, Kim JH, et al. Parabens in breast milk and possible sources of exposure among lactating women in Korea. Environ Pollut. 2019; 255:113142.

[10]

Cherian P, Zhu J, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, et al. Amended Safety Assessment of Parabens as Used in Cosmetics. Int J Toxicol. 2020; 39:5S-97S.

[11]

Huang K, Zhang X, Wang B, Wang X, You Y, Tang H, et al. Accurate assessment of parabens exposure in healthy Chinese female adults: Findings from a multi-pathway exposure assessment coupled with intervention study. Environ Res. 2021; 193:110540.

[12]

Janjua NR, Frederiksen H, Skakkebaek NE, Wulf HC, Andersson AM. Urinary excretion of phthalates and paraben after repeated whole-body topical application in humans. Int J Androl. 2008; 31:118-30.

[13]

Amending Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (Text with EEA relevance) [Internet].Commission Regulation (EU); [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Available from:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2014/1004/2020-01-31

[14]

Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). OPINION on Methylparaben (CAS No. 99-76-3, EC No. 202-785-7). SCCS/1652/23. The European Commission; 2023.

[15]

Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist: Prohibited and Restricted Ingredients [Internet].Government of Canada; [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Available from:https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/consumer-product-safety/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredient-hotlist-prohibited-restricted-ingredients.html

[16]

Risk management scope for Parabens group [Internet]. Government of Canada; [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Available from:https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/evaluating-existing-substances/risk-management-scope-for-parabens-group-methylparaben-propylparaben-butylparaben-iso-butylparaben.html

[17]

Parabens [Internet].Government of Canada; [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Available from:https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/chemicals-product-safety/parabens.html

[18]

Buchmüller K, Bearth A, Siegrist M. Consumers’ perceptions of chemical household products and the associated risks. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020; 143:111511.

[19]

Llanos AAM, Rockson A, Getz K, Greenberg P, Portillo E, McDonald JA, et al. Assessment of personal care product use and perceptions of use in a sample of US adults affiliated with a university in the Northeast. Environ Res. 2023; 236:116719.

[20]

Trifunovski A, Rotondi NK, Abbass-Dick J, Barakat C. Analysis of Women’s Knowledge, Health Risk Perceptions, Beliefs and Avoidance Behaviour in Relation to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Personal Care and Household Products. Toxics. 2025; 13:414.

[21]

Cummings KM, Jette AM, Rosenstock IM. Construct validation of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr. 1978; 6:394-405.

[22]

Health belief model [Internet]. Wikipedia; [cited 2025 May 16]. Available from:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_belief_model

[23]

Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 46:81-95.

[24]

Trifunovski A, Rotondi NK, Abbass-Dick J, Al Ghali R, Barakat C. The Development and Reliability Testing of a Tool to Assess Women’s Perceptions and Avoidance of Endocrine Disruptors in Personal and Household Products. Environments. 2025; 12:138.

[25]

Zhong B. How to calculate sample size in randomized controlled trial? J Thorac Dis. 2009; 1:51-4.

[26]

Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, et al. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:92.

[27]

Kim JH, Kwak JM, Kang H. Web-based behavioral intervention to reduce exposure to phthalate metabolites, bisphenol A, triclosan, and parabens in mothers with young children: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021; 236:113798.

[28]

Hagobian T, Delli-Bovi Z, Mercado A, Bird A, Guy M, Phelan S. Development and feasibility of randomized trial to reduce urinary bisphenols in women with obesity. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021; 7:24.

[29]

Harley KG, Kogut K, Madrigal DS, Cardenas M, Vera IA, Meza-Alfaro G, et al. Reducing Phthalate, Paraben, and Phenol Exposure from Personal Care Products in Adolescent Girls: Findings from the HERMOSA Intervention Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2016; 124:1600-7.

[30]

Amico KR. Percent total attrition: a poor metric for study rigor in hosted intervention designs. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99:1567-75.

[31]

Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Sweet SN, Lamontagne M, Ginis KAM, Jeske S, Routhier F, et al. A randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of the SCI Get Fit Toolkit on leisure-time physical activity behaviour and social-cognitive processes in adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017; 3:17044.

[32]

Phillips LA, More KR. Evaluating behavior change factors over time for a simple vs. complex health behavior. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:962150.

PDF (1279KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉