Influence of virtual reality restorative environments on psychological well-being in university students: an evidence-based experimental study

Chengcheng Yin , Tongyu Li , Binxia Xue , Zirui Zhao

Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 101155

PDF (17550KB)
Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :101155 DOI: 10.37349/edht.2025.101155
Original Article
research-article
Influence of virtual reality restorative environments on psychological well-being in university students: an evidence-based experimental study
Author information +
History +
PDF (17550KB)

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate virtual reality restorative environments (VRREs)’ impact on university students’ mental well-being, investigate factors affecting VRRE perception and psychological recovery, understand virtual environments’ healing mechanisms, and provide recommendations for university virtual healing spaces.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 participants to develop a VRRE perception evaluation system with five core and fourteen main categories. The system was then used to assess 13 virtual natural environments. Mental recovery effects were measured among 44 university students using the Schulte test (attention), Positive and Negative Affection Scale (mood), and physiological sensors (stress).

Results: VRREs demonstrated significant positive effects on participants’ psychological recovery. Different virtual environments showed varying impacts on attention, negative affect, and stress levels, while effects on positive affect were consistent across environments. Virtual extraterrestrial space environments yielded the strongest improvements in attention and stress reduction, whereas mixed forest settings were most effective in decreasing negative affects. Structural equation modeling revealed that participants’ VRRE perceptions significantly influenced psychological recovery through seven of fifteen pathways.

Conclusions: VRREs represent an effective intervention for supporting university students’ mental well-being. Different virtual environments offer distinct psychological benefits, with environment perception playing a crucial role in recovery outcomes. These findings provide valuable insights for designing targeted virtual healing spaces in university settings.

Keywords

Virtual reality / restorative environment / university students / psychological recovery / environmental perception

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chengcheng Yin, Tongyu Li, Binxia Xue, Zirui Zhao. Influence of virtual reality restorative environments on psychological well-being in university students: an evidence-based experimental study. Exploration of Digital Health Technologies, 2025, 3 (1) : 101155 DOI:10.37349/edht.2025.101155

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Mackenzie S, Wiegel JR, Mundt M, Brown D, Saewyc E, Heiligenstein E, et al. Depression and suicide ideation among students accessing campus health care. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011; 81:101-7.

[2]

Holland D. College Student Stress and Mental Health: Examination of Stigmatic Views on Mental Health Counseling. Mich Sociol Rev. 2016; 30:16-43.

[3]

Tung Y, Lo KKH, Ho RCM, Tam WSW. Prevalence of depression among nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2018; 63:119-29.

[4]

Cuttilan AN, Sayampanathan AA, Ho RC. Mental health issues amongst medical students in Asia: a systematic review [2000-2015]. Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4:72.

[5]

Lipson SK, Zhou S, Abelson S, Heinze J, Jirsa M, Morigney J, et al. Trends in college student mental health and help-seeking by race/ethnicity: Findings from the national healthy minds study, 2013-2021. J Affect Disord. 2022; 306:138-47.

[6]

Storrie K, Ahern K, Tuckett A. A systematic review: Students with mental health problems--a growing problem. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010; 16:1-6.

[7]

Weitzman ER. Poor mental health, depression, and associations with alcohol consumption, harm, and abuse in a national sample of young adults in college. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004; 192:269-77.

[8]

Angst J. Comorbidity of mood disorders: a longitudinal prospective study. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1996; 30:31-7.

[9]

Kessler RC, Walters EE, Forthofer MS. The social consequences of psychiatric disorders, III: probability of marital stability. Am J Psychiatry. 1998; 155:1092-6.

[10]

Wang PS, Simon GE, Avorn J, Azocar F, Ludman EJ, McCulloch J, et al. Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007; 298:1401-11.

[11]

Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science. 1984; 224:420-1.

[12]

Ulrich RS. Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landsc Res. 1979; 4:17-23.

[13]

Kaplan S, Talbot JF. Psychological Benefits of a Wilderness Experience. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editors. Behavior and the Natural Environment. Boston: Springer; 1983. pp. 163-203.

[14]

Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991; 11:201-30.

[15]

Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989.

[16]

Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 1995: 15:169-82.

[17]

Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW. Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environ Behav. 1991: 23:3-26.

[18]

Wright Wendel HE, Zarger RK, Mihelcic JR. Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landsc Urban Plan. 2012; 107:272-82.

[19]

Breuste JH. Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development. Landsc Urban Plan. 2004; 68:439-52.

[20]

Aguilera MA, González MG. Urban infrastructure expansion and artificial light pollution degrade coastal ecosystems, increasing natural-to-urban structural connectivity. Landsc Urban Plann. 2023; 229:104609.

[21]

White MP, Elliott LR, Taylor T, Wheeler BW, Spencer A, Bone A, et al. Recreational physical activity in natural environments and implications for health: A population based cross-sectional study in England. Prev Med. 2016; 91:383-8.

[22]

Calogiuri G, Patil GG, Aamodt G. Is Green Exercise for All? A Descriptive Study of Green Exercise Habits and Promoting Factors in Adult Norwegians. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13:1165.

[23]

Riva G, Bernardelli L, Browning MHEM, Castelnuovo G, Cavedoni S, Chirico A, et al. COVID Feel Good-An Easy Self-Help Virtual Reality Protocol to Overcome the Psychological Burden of Coronavirus. Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11:563319.

[24]

Kahn PH. The Human Relationship with Nature: Development and Culture. The MIT Press; 1999.

[25]

Valtchanov D, Barton KR, Ellard C. Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010; 13:503-12.

[26]

Yin J, Zhu S, MacNaughton P, Allen JG, Spengler JD. Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Build Environ. 2018; 132:255-62.

[27]

Baran PK, Tabrizian P, Zhai Y, Smith JW, Floyd MF. An exploratory study of perceived safety in a neighborhood park using immersive virtual environments. Urban For Urban Green. 2018; 35:72-81.

[28]

Li H, Du X, Ma H, Wang Z, Li Y, Wu J. The Effect of Virtual-Reality-Based Restorative Environments on Creativity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19:12083.

[29]

O’Meara A, Cassarino M, Bolger A, Setti A. Virtual Reality Nature Exposure and Test Anxiety. Multimodal Technol Interact. 2020; 4:75.

[30]

Stetz MC, Kaloi-Chen JY, Turner DD, Bouchard S, Riva G, Wiederhold BK. The effectiveness of technology-enhanced relaxation techniques for military medical warriors. Mil Med. 2011; 176:1065-70.

[31]

Van Kerrebroeck H, Brengman M, Willems K. Escaping the crowd: An experimental study on the impact of a Virtual Reality experience in a shopping mall. Comput Hum Behav. 2017; 77:437-50.

[32]

Yeom S, Kim H, Hong T. Psychological and physiological effects of a green wall on occupants: A cross-over study in virtual reality. Build Environ. 2021; 204:108134.

[33]

Jung D, Kim DI, Kim N. Bringing Nature into hospital architecture: Machine learning-based EEG analysis of the biophilia effect in virtual reality. J Environ Psychol. 2023; 89:102033.

[34]

Yeo NL, White MP, Alcock I, Garside R, Dean SG, Smalley AJ, et al. What is the best way of delivering virtual nature for improving mood? An experimental comparison of high definition TV, 360° video, and computer generated virtual reality. J Environ Psychol. 2020; 72:101500.

[35]

Theodorou A, Romano L, Bratman GN, Carbone GA, Rodelli R, Casagrande G, et al. Different types of virtual natural environments enhance subjective vitality through restorativeness. J Environ Psychol. 2023; 87:101981.

[36]

Furman E, Jasinevicius TR, Bissada NF, Victoroff KZ, Skillicorn R, Buchner M. Virtual reality distraction for pain control during periodontal scaling and root planing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140:1508-16.

[37]

Small C, Stone R, Pilsbury J, Bowden M, Bion J. Virtual restorative environment therapy as an adjunct to pain control during burn dressing changes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015; 16:329.

[38]

Pati D, Freier P, O’Boyle M, Amor C, Valipoor S. The Impact of Simulated Nature on Patient Outcomes: A Study of Photographic Sky Compositions. HERD. 2016; 9:36-51.

[39]

Nanda U, Zhu X, Jansen BH. Image and emotion: from outcomes to brain behavior. HERD. 2012; 5:40-59.

[40]

Pati D, Nanda U. Influence of positive distractions on children in two clinic waiting areas. HERD. 2011; 4:124-40.

[41]

Pearson M, Gaines K, Pati D, Colwell M, Motheral L, Adams NG. The Physiological Impact of Window Murals on Pediatric Patients. HERD. 2019; 12:116-29.

[42]

Gao C, Zhang S. The restorative quality of patient ward environment: Tests of six dominant design characteristics. Build Environ. 2020; 180:107039.

[43]

Johnson A, Thompson EM, Coventry KR. Human Perception, Virtual Reality and the Built Environment. 2010 14th International Conference Information Visualisation. London: IEEE; 2010.

[44]

Fisher JC, Irvine KN, Bicknell JE, Hayes WM, Fernandes D, Mistry J, et al. Perceived biodiversity, sound, naturalness and safety enhance the restorative quality and wellbeing benefits of green and blue space in a neotropical city. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 755:143095.

[45]

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996; 312:71-2.

[46]

Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Nurs Res. 1968; 17:364.

[47]

Niehorster DC, Li L, Lappe M. The Accuracy and Precision of Position and Orientation Tracking in the HTC Vive Virtual Reality System for Scientific Research. Iperception. 2017; 8:2041669517708205.

[48]

Assabumrungrat R, Sangnark S, Charoenpattarawut T, Polpakdee W, Sudhawiyangkul T, Boonchieng E. Ubiquitous Affective Computing: A Review. IEEE Sens J. 2022; 22:1867-81.

[49]

Eren E, Navruz TS. Stress Detection with Deep Learning Using BVP and EDA Signals. Proceedings of 2022 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA); 2022 Jun 09-11; Ankara, Turkey. IEEE; 2022.

[50]

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54:1063-70.

[51]

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39:175-91.

[52]

Graetz B. Multidimensional properties of the General Health Questionnaire. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991; 26:132-8.

[53]

Liang Y, Wang L, Yin X. The factor structure of the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) in young Chinese civil servants. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016; 14:136.

[54]

Memari S, Pazhouhanfar M, Grahn P. Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Green Areas: An Experimental Study on Stress Recovery. Sustainability. 2021; 13:5419.

[55]

Chen H, Qiu L, Gao T. Application of the eight perceived sensory dimensions as a tool for urban green space assessment and planning in China. Urban For Urban Green. 2019; 40:224-35.

[56]

Bell S, Mishra HS, Elliott LR, Shellock R, Vassiljev P, Porter M, et al. Urban Blue Acupuncture: A Protocol for Evaluating a Complex Landscape Design Intervention to Improve Health and Wellbeing in a Coastal Community. Sustainability. 2020; 12:4084.

[57]

Birenboim A, Dijst M, Ettema D, de Kruijf J, de Leeuw G, Dogterom N. The utilization of immersive virtual environments for the investigation of environmental preferences. Landsc Urban Plan. 2019; 189:129-38.

[58]

Kaplan R. The Nature of the View from Home: Psychological Benefits. Environ Behav. 2001; 33:507-42.

[59]

Yin J, Yuan J, Arfaei N, Catalano PJ, Allen JG, Spengler JD. Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environ Int. 2020; 136:105427.

[60]

Hinds J, Sparks P. The affective quality of human-natural environment relationships. Evol Psychol. 2011; 9:451-69.

[61]

Ulrich RS. Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editors. Human Behavior and Environment. Boston: Springer; 1983. pp. 85-125.

[62]

Kaplan S. Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition: Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective. Environ Behav. 1987; 19:3-32.

[63]

Appleton J. Prospects and Refuges Re-Visited. Landscape J. 1984; 3:91-103.

[64]

Dosen AS, Ostwald MJ. Evidence for prospect-refuge theory: a meta-analysis of the findings of environmental preference research. City Territ Archit. 2016; 3:4.

[65]

Pheasant R, Horoshenkov K, Watts G, Barrett B. The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places? J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123:1446-57.

[66]

White M, Smith A, Humphryes K, Pahl S, Snelling D, Depledge M. Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. J Environ Psychol. 2010; 30:482-93.

[67]

Völker S, Kistemann T. Developing the urban blue: Comparative health responses to blue and green urban open spaces in Germany. Health Place. 2015; 35:196-205.

[68]

Li J, Kizilcec R, Bailenson J, Ju W. Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction. Comput Human Behav. 2016; 55:1222-30.

[69]

Muhanna MA. Virtual reality and the CAVE: Taxonomy, interaction challenges and research directions. J King Saud Univ - Comput Inf Sci. 2015; 27:344-61.

[70]

Tanja-Dijkstra K, Pahl S, White MP, Auvray M, Stone RJ, Andrade J, et al. The Soothing Sea: A Virtual Coastal Walk Can Reduce Experienced and Recollected Pain. Environ Behav. 2018; 50:599-625.

[71]

Hartig T. Restoration in Nature: Beyond the Conventional Narrative. In: Schutte AR, Torquati JC, Stevens JR, editors. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Cham: Springer; 2021. pp. 89-151.

PDF (17550KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉