Developer’s deep understanding of the diverse patient needs is critical to patient engagement with digital health technology

Abstract

In recent years, patient engagement has emerged as a cornerstone in clinical decision-making, medical research, and health policy development, with its multifaceted value widely recognized by stakeholders across the healthcare continuum. However, digital health technologies, which are designed to enhance patient engagement, often fall short of their full potential due to developers’ limited understanding of patients’ needs and preferences. This perspective paper argues for adopting a patient-centered approach, emphasizing the critical importance of developers immersing themselves in patient communities to gain richer insights into patients’ lived experiences. Such an approach can lead to improved usability of digital health tools, enhanced user experience, and increased patient motivation, ultimately fostering more effective patient engagement in medical practice. Although challenges persist in the effective collection, analysis, and implementation of user feedback, prioritizing patient engagement remains crucial for optimizing health outcomes and enhancing the overall patient experience. By embracing this approach, developers can bridge the gap between technological innovation and patient needs, promoting more meaningful interactions and ultimately contributing to the advancement of healthcare systems and improved population health.

Keywords

Patient engagement / digital health tools / product development / patient-centeredness / patient experience

References

[1] Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32:223-31.

[2] Forbat L, Cayless S, Knighting K, Cornwell J, Kearney N. Engaging patients in health care: an empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and action. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 74:84-90.

[3] Zvonareva O. Patient engagement in drug development: configuring a new resource for generating innovation. Crit Public Health. 2003; 33:506-17.

[4] Papadopoulos K, Ammenwerth E, Lame G, Stahl N, Struckmann V, von Wyl V, et al. Understanding public trust in national electronic health record systems: A multi-national qualitative research study. Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076251333576.

[5] Arueyingho OV, Al-Taie A, McCallum C. Scoping review: Machine learning interventions in the management of healthcare systems. Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076221144095.

[6] Periáñez Á, Fernández Del Río A, Nazarov I, Jané E, Hassan M, Rastogi A, et al. The Digital Transformation in Health: How AI Can Improve the Performance of Health Systems. Health Syst Reform. 2024; 10:2387138.

[7] van Kessel R, Ranganathan S, Anderson M, McMillan B, Mossialos E. Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review. Int J Med Inform. 2024; 189:105513.

[8] European Union. Benchmarking deployment of eHealth among general practitioners (2018) - Final report [Internet].Publications Office of the European Union; c2018 [cited 2025 Mar 15]. Available from:https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/511610

[9] Bertelsen N, Dewulf L, Ferrè S, Vermeulen R, Schroeder K, Gatellier L, et al. Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: A Global Landscape Review. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024; 58:63-78.

[10] van Kessel R, Roman-Urrestarazu A, Anderson M, Kyriopoulos I, Field S, Monti G, et al. Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e48000.

[11] van Kessel R, Srivastava D, Kyriopoulos I, Monti G, Novillo-Ortiz D, Milman R, et al. Digital Health Reimbursement Strategies of 8 European Countries and Israel: Scoping Review and Policy Mapping. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023; 11:e49003.

[12] Rabinowitz Steele NZ. The Patient Resident. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386:1010-1.

[13] Javadizadeh E, Oudshoorn A, Letts L, Barbic S, Shanoff C, Marshall CA. Participatory Research with Persons who Experience Mental Illness in Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review. Can J Occup Ther. 2024; 91:203-21.

[14] Cormick A, Graham A, Stevenson T, Owen K, O’Donnell K, Kelly J. Co-designing a Health Journey Mapping resource for culturally safe health care with and for First Nations people. Aust J Prim Health. 2024; 30:PY23172.

[15] Moine S. Health professionals must be ethnographers. BMJ. 2016; 355:i6323.

[16] Greenwood KE, Gurnani M, Ward T, Vogel E, Vella C, McGourty A, et al. The service user experience of SlowMo therapy: A co-produced thematic analysis of service users’ subjective experience. Psychol Psychother. 2022; 95:680-700.

[17] Hardy A, Ward T, Emsley R, Greenwood K, Freeman D, Fowler D, et al. Bridging the Digital Divide in Psychological Therapies: Observational Study of Engagement With the SlowMo Mobile App for Paranoia in Psychosis. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022; 9:e29725.

[18] Hardy A, Taylor KM, Grant A, Christie L, Walsh L, Gant T, et al. Co-designing technology to improve psychological therapy for psychosis: SloMo, a blended digital therapy for fear of harm from others. Schizophr Res. 2024; 274:526-34.

[19] Zvonareva O, Craveț C, Richards DP. Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review. Res Involv Engagem. 2022; 8:29.