Identifying children’s environmental health risks, needs, misconceptions, and opportunities for research translation using social media

Andrew Larkin , Megan MacDonald , Dixie Jackson , Molly L. Kile , Perry Hystad

Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) : 59 -66.

PDF (1170KB)
Exploration of Digital Health Technologies ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) :59 -66. DOI: 10.37349/edht.2024.00011
Commentary
research-article
Identifying children’s environmental health risks, needs, misconceptions, and opportunities for research translation using social media
Author information +
History +
PDF (1170KB)

Abstract

As part of the Advancing Science, Practice, Programming, and Policy in Research Translation for Children’s Environmental Health (ASP3IRE) center, machine learning, geographic information systems (GIS), and natural language processing to analyze more than 650 million posts related to children’s environmental health are being used. Using preliminary analyses as examples, this commentary discusses the potential opportunities, benefits, challenges, and limitations of children’s health social media analytics. Social media contains large volumes of contextually rich data that describe children’s health risks and needs, characteristics of homes and childcare locations important to environmental exposures, and parent and childcare provider perceptions, awareness of, and misconceptions about children’s environmental health. Twenty five million unique conversations mentioning children, with likes, views, and replies from more than 33 million X (formerly Twitter) users were identified. Many of these posts can be linked to traditional environmental and health data. However, social media analytics have several challenges and limitations. Challenges include a need for interdisciplinary collaborations, selectivity and sensitivity of analytical methods, the dynamic, evolving communication methods and platform preferences of social media users, and operational policies. Limitations include data availability, generalizability, and self-report bias. Social media analytics has significant potential to contribute to children’s environmental health research and translation.

Keywords

Social media / environment / children / health

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Andrew Larkin, Megan MacDonald, Dixie Jackson, Molly L. Kile, Perry Hystad. Identifying children’s environmental health risks, needs, misconceptions, and opportunities for research translation using social media. Exploration of Digital Health Technologies, 2024, 2 (2) : 59-66 DOI:10.37349/edht.2024.00011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Landrigan PJ, Schechter CB, Lipton JM, Fahs MC, Schwartz J. Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: estimates of morbidity, mortality, and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110:721-8.

[2]

Lanphear BP, Dietrich K, Auinger P, Cox C. Cognitive deficits associated with blood lead concentrations <10 microg/dL in US children and adolescents. Public Health Rep. 2000; 115:521-9.

[3]

Deryugina T, Heutel G, Miller NH, Molitor D, Reif J. The mortality and medical costs of air pollution: evidence from changes in wind direction. Am Econ Rev. 2019; 109:4178-219.

[4]

Zhang Y, Ni H, Bai L, Cheng Q, Zhang H, Wang S, et al. The short-term association between air pollution and childhood asthma hospital admissions in urban areas of Hefei city in China: a time-series study. Environ Res. 2019; 169:510-6.

[5]

Casey R, Oppert JM, Weber C, Charreire H, Salze P, Badariotti D, et al. Determinants of childhood obesity: What can we learn from built environment studies? Food Qual Prefer. 2014; 31:164-72.

[6]

Malacarne D, Handakas E, Robinson O, Pineda E, Saez M, Chatzi L, et al. The built environment as determinant of childhood obesity: a systematic literature review. Obes Rev. 2022; 23:e13385.

[7]

Cohen Hubal EA, Moya J, Selevan SG. A lifestage approach to assessing children’s exposure. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2008; 83:522-9.

[8]

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Exposure dose guidance for body weight [Internet]. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;2023 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from:https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pha-guidance/resources/ATSDR-EDG-Body-Weight-508.pdf

[9]

Snell TL, Lam JCS, Lau WWY, Lee I, Maloney EM, Mulholland N, et al. Contact with nature in childhood and adult depression. Child Youth Environ. 2016; 26:111-24.

[10]

Boekelheide K, Blumberg B, Chapin RE, Cote I, Graziano JH, Janesick A, et al. Predicting later-life outcomes of early-life exposures. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 120:1353-61.

[11]

Gehring U, Wijga AH, Koppelman GH, Vonk JM, Smit HA, Brunekreef B. Air pollution and the development of asthma from birth until young adulthood. Eur Respir J. 2020; 56:2000147.

[12]

Newman N, Fletcher R, Schulz A, Andı S, Nielsen RS. Reuters institute digital news report 2020. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism; 2020 Jun.

[13]

Newman N, Fletcher R, Schulz A, Andi S, Robertson CT, Nielsen RK. Reuters institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism; 2021 Jun.

[14]

U.S. adults under 30 now trust information from social media almost as much as from national news outlets [Internet].Pew Research Center; c2024 [cited 2023 Jun 13]. Available from:https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/10/27/u-s-adults-under-30-now-trust-information-from-social-media-almost-as-much-as-from-national-news-outlets/

[15]

Kovács G, Alonso P, Saini R. Challenges of hate speech detection in social media. SN Comput Sci. 2021; 2:95.

[16]

Lanius C, Weber R, MacKenzie WI Jr. Use of bot and content flags to limit the spread of misinformation among social networks: a behavior and attitude survey. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2021; 11:32.

[17]

Procentese F, Gatti F, Di Napoli I. Families and social media use: the role of parents’ perceptions about social media impact on family systems in the relationship between family collective efficacy and open communication. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16:5006.

[18]

Fowler C, Green J, Elliott D, Petty J, Whiting L. The forgotten mothers of extremely preterm babies: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2019; 28:2124-34.

[19]

Orben A. Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020; 55:407-14.

[20]

Saha K, Kim SC, Reddy MD, Carter AJ, Sharma E, Haimson OL, et al. The language of LGBTQ+ minority stress experiences on social media. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2019; 3:89.

[21]

Gavrila V, Garrity A, Hirschfeld E, Edwards B, Lee JM. Peer support through a diabetes social media community. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019; 13:493-7.

[22]

Burki T. Vaccine misinformation and social media. Lancet Digit Health. 2019; 1:e258-9.

[23]

Bok K, Noh Y, Lim J, Yoo J. Hot topic prediction considering influence and expertise in social media. Electron Commer Res. 2021; 21:671-87.

[24]

Zhu Z, Liang J, Li D, Yu H, Liu G. Hot topic detection based on a refined TF-IDF algorithm. IEEE Access. 2019; 7:26996-7007.

[25]

Zhao H, Shi J, Qi X, Wang X, Jia J. Pyramid scene parsing network. arXiv:1612.01105v2 [Preprint].2017 [cited 2023 Jun 26]. Available from:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.01105

[26]

Cao J, Li Y, Zhang Z. Partially shared multi-task convolutional neural network with local constraint for face attribute learning. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR); 2018 Jun 18-23; Salt Lake City, UT, USA. IEEE; 2018. pp. 4290-9.

[27]

Larkin A, Gu X, Chen L, Hystad P. Predicting perceptions of the built environment using GIS, satellite and street view image approaches. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021; 216:104257.

[28]

Larkin A, Hystad P. Integrating geospatial data and social media in bidirectional long-short term memory models to capture human nature interactions. Comput J. 2022; 65:667-8.

[29]

Auxier B, Anderson M. Social media use in 2021 [Internet].Pew Research Center; 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 26]. Available from:https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2021/04/PI_2021.04.07_Social-Media-Use_FINAL.pdf

[30]

Perriam J, Birkbak A, Freeman A. Digital methods in a post-API environment. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2020; 23:277-90.

[31]

Chapekis A, Smith A. How U.S. adults on Twitter use the site in the Elon Musk era [Internet].Coherent Digital, LLC; [cited 2023 Jun 26]. Available from:https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3834920/how-us/4640766/

[32]

Hampton KN, Shin I. Disconnection more problematic for adolescent self-esteem than heavy social media use: evidence from access inequalities and restrictive media parenting in rural America. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2023; 41:626-47.

[33]

Heaslip V, Richer S, Simkhada B, Dogan H, Green S. Use of technology to promote health and wellbeing of people who are homeless: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:6845.

[34]

Duffy BE, Chan NK. “You never really know who’s looking”: imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media Soc. 2019; 21:119-38.

[35]

Verrastro V, Fontanesi L, Liga F, Cuzzocrea F, Gugliandolo MC. Fear the Instagram: beauty stereotypes, body image and Instagram use in a sample of male and female adolescents. QWERTY. 2020; 15:31-49.

[36]

Sherlock M, Wagstaff DL. Exploring the relationship between frequency of Instagram use, exposure to idealized images, and psychological well-being in women. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2019; 8:482-90.

[37]

Lutkenhaus RO, McLarnon-Silk C, Walker F. Norms-shifting on social media: a review of strategies to shift norms among adolescents and young adults online. Rev Commun Res. 2023; 11:127-49.

PDF (1170KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉