Science communication on X (formerly Twitter): A picture is worth a thousand characters?

Abstract

X (formerly Twitter), a microblogging social media platform, is being used by scientists and researchers to disseminate their research findings and promote the visibility of their work to the public. Tweets can be posted with text messages, images, hyperlinks, or a combination of these features. Importantly, for the majority of users, the text must be limited to 280 characters. In this perspective, this study aimed to observe if adding an image is able to increase outreach for scientific communication on X. Therefore, the characteristics of tweets posted with the hashtag #SciComm (short for science communication) for a period of one year (28 May 2020 to 28 May 2021) were analyzed with the X analytics tool Symplur Signals. The conducted analysis revealed that when a science communication (#SciComm-containing) tweet is accompanied by an image added by the user, there is on average a 529% increase in the number of retweets, and adding a hyperlink is similarly effective in increasing the number of retweets. However, combining both an image and hyperlink in the same tweet did not yield an additive effect. Hence, for increased visibility, researchers may consider adding images or hyperlinks (e.g., to research publications or popular science articles) while communicating science to the public on X.

Keywords

Social media / science communication / social media research

References

[1] Collins K, Shiffman D, Rock J. How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0162680.

[2] Lordan R, Devkota HP. Turbulence at Twitter with leadership change: implications for health research and science communication. Explor Digit Health Technol. 2023; 1:4-10.

[3] Soragni A, Maitra A. Of scientists and tweets. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019; 19:479-80.

[4] Klar S, Krupnikov Y, Ryan JB, Searles K, Shmargad Y. Using social media to promote academic research: identifying the benefits of twitter for sharing academic work. PLoS One. 2020; 15:e0229446.

[5] Singla RK, De R, Efferth T, Mezzetti B, Sahab Uddin M, Sanusi, et al. The International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce (INPST) and the power of Twitter networking exemplified through #INPST hashtag analysis. Phytomedicine. 2023; 108:154520.

[6] Mondal H, Parvanov ED, Singla RK, Rayan RA, Nawaz FA, Ritschl V, et al. Twitter-based crowdsourcing: What kind of measures can help to end the COVID-19 pandemic faster? Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:961360.

[7] Eibensteiner F, Ritschl V, Nawaz FA, Fazel SS, Tsagkaris C, Kulnik ST, et al. People’s willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 despite their safety concerns: twitter poll analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23:e28973.

[8] Erskine N, Hendricks S. The use of Twitter by medical journals: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23:e26378.

[9] Sills J. SciComm speaks. Science. 2018; 360:163.

[10] Luc JGY, Archer MA, Arora RC, Bender EM, Blitz A, Cooke DT, et al. Does tweeting improve citations? One-year results from the TSSMN prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021; 111:296-300.

[11] Sörensen I, Fürst S, Vogler D, Schäfer MS. Higher education institutions on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter: comparing Swiss universities’ social media communication. Media Commun. 2023; 11:264-77.

[12] What fuels a Tweet’s engagement? [Internet].X Corp; c2023 [cited 2023 Jan 14]. Available from:https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/a/2014/what-fuels-a-tweets-engagement.html

[13] Li Y, Xie Y. Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. J Mark Res. 2020; 57:1-19.

[14] Fähnrich B, Vogelgesang J, Scharkow M. Evaluating universities’ strategic online communication: How do Shanghai Ranking’s top 50 universities grow stakeholder engagement with Facebook posts? J Commun Manage. 2020; 24:265-83.

[15] Rauchfleisch A, Kao J, Tseng T, Ho C, Li L. Maximizing science outreach on Facebook: an analysis of scientists’ communication strategies in Taiwan. Media Commun. 2023; 11:228-39.

[16] Feliciano JT, Salmi L, Blotner C, Hayden A, Nduom EK, Kwan BM, et al. Brain tumor discussions on Twitter (#BTSM): social network analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22:e22005.

[17] Pascarella G, Strumia A, Piliego C, Bruno F, Del Buono R, Costa F, et al. COVID-19 diagnosis and management: a comprehensive review. J Intern Med. 2020; 288:192-206.

[18] Petersen K, Gerken JM. #Covid-19: an exploratory investigation of hashtag usage on Twitter. Health Policy. 2021; 125:541-7.

[19] Cruickshank IJ, Carley KM. Characterizing communities of hashtag usage on twitter during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic by multi-view clustering. Appl Netw Sci. 2020; 5:66.

[20] Norvig P. English letter frequency counts: Mayzner revisited or ETAOIN SRHLDCU [Internet]. [cited2023 Apr 27]. Available from:http://norvig.com/mayzner.html