Turbulence at Twitter with leadership change: implications for health research and science communication

Abstract

Twitter has been an invaluable social media platform for scientists to share research and host discourse among academics and the public. The change of ownership at Twitter has changed how scientists interact with the platform and has led some to worry about its future. This article discusses the current changes at Twitter and what implications these may have for future health research and communication.

Keywords

Twitter / social media / science communication / mastodon / misinformation / leadership

References

[1] Breu AC. From tweetstorm to tweetorials: threaded tweets as a tool for medical education and knowledge dissemination. Semin Nephrol. 2020; 40:273-8.

[2] Shiffman DS. Twitter as a tool for conservation education and outreach: what scientific conferences can do to promote live-tweeting. J Environ Stud Sci. 2012; 2:257-62.

[3] Stokel-Walker C. Twitter changed science - what happens now it’s in turmoil? Nature. 2023; 613:19-21.

[4] Number of Twitter users worldwide from 2019 to 2024 (in millions) [Internet].Statista; c2023 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Available from:https://www.statista.com/statistics/303681/twitter-users-worldwide/

[5] Van Noorden R. Online collaboration: scientists and the social network. Nature. 2014; 512:126-9. Erratum in: Nature. 2014; 512:243.

[6] Bastian H. Mapping the Mastodon migration: is it a one-way trip or an each-way bet for science Twitter? 2022 Nov 13 [cited 2022 Dec 28]. In:PLOS. Absolutely Maybe [Internet]. Available from:https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2022/11/13/mapping-the-mastodon-migration-is-it-a-one-way-trip-or-an-each-way-bet-for-science-twitter/

[7] Mondal H, Parvanov ED, Singla RK, Rayan RA, Nawaz FA, Ritschl V, et al. Twitter-based crowdsourcing: what kind of measures can help to end the COVID-19 pandemic faster? Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:961360.

[8] Gonçalves B, Sánchez D. Crowdsourcing dialect characterization through Twitter. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e112074.

[9] Alvaro N, Conway M, Doan S, Lofi C, Overington J, Collier N. Crowdsourcing Twitter annotations to identify first-hand experiences of prescription drug use. J Biomed Inform. 2015; 58:280-7.

[10] Eibensteiner F, Ritschl V, Nawaz FA, Fazel SS, Tsagkaris C, Kulnik ST, et al. People’s willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 despite their safety concerns: Twitter poll analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23:e28973.

[11] Mazumdar S, Thakker D. Citizen science on Twitter: using data analytics to understand conversations and networks. Future Internet. 2020; 12:210.

[12] Daume S, Galaz V. “Anyone know what species this is?” - Twitter conversations as embryonic citizen science communities. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0151387.

[13] Klar S, Krupnikov Y, Ryan JB, Searles K, Shmargad Y. Using social media to promote academic research: identifying the benefits of Twitter for sharing academic work. PLoS One. 2020; 15:e0229446.

[14] Loeb S, Taylor J, Butaney M, Byrne NK, Gao L, Soule HR, et al. Twitter-based prostate cancer journal club (#ProstateJC) promotes multidisciplinary global scientific discussion and research dissemination. Eur Urol. 2019; 75:881-2.

[15] Carpenter JP, Krutka DG. How and why educators use Twitter: a survey of the field. J Res Technol Educ. 2014; 46:414-34.

[16] Rufai SR, Bunce C. World leaders’ usage of Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2020; 42:510-6.

[17] Graham SS. Misinformation inoculation and literacy support tweetorials on COVID-19. J Bus Tech Commun. 2021; 35:7-14.

[18] Rosenberg H, Syed S, Rezaie S. The Twitter pandemic: the critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. CJEM. 2020; 22:418-21.

[19] Yang KC, Pierri F, Hui PM, Axelrod D, Torres-Lugo C, Bryden J, et al. The COVID-19 infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook. Big Data Soc. 2021; 8:20539517211013861.

[20] Cervi L, García F, Marín-Lladó C. Populism, Twitter, and COVID-19: narrative, fantasies, and desires. Soc Sci. 2021; 10:294.

[21] Rao A, Morstatter F, Hu M, Chen E, Burghardt K, Ferrara E, et al. Political partisanship and antiscience attitudes in online discussions about COVID-19: Twitter content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23:e26692.

[22] Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e19467.

[23] McNeill A, Harris PR, Briggs P. Twitter influence on UK vaccination and antiviral uptake during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Front Public Health. 2016; 4:26.

[24] Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e14118.

[25] Stringer A, Hatmaker T. A complete timeline of the Elon Musk-Twitter saga [Internet].Yahoo; 2023 [cited 2022 Dec 20]. Available from:https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/24/elon-musk-twitter-offer-timeline/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHQko9XzAIu2CXFMhlzlP4TgSmdU_9gtdHaRV4OquohnJMDNmqrnRUZOo5LJJFAXZ5WHmzfQMHSukSnHWvcVruutHzr5GR-4uvFPDV0uXuLvlH5j1Dtb5s_ddMibYtVax87iDd13tD8URrreQDUTLVnO8OFCxyCIOXb9CmLw_yfu

[26] Conger K, Hirsch L. Elon Musk completes $44 billion deal to own Twitter [Internet].The New York Times Company; 2023 [cited 2022 Dec 28]. Available from:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/27/technology/elon-musk-twitter-deal-complete.html

[27] Musk monitor: under Musk, hate speech is rising [Internet]. Medford: Tufts University; c2023 [cited 2022 Dec 28]. Available from:https://sites.tufts.edu/digitalplanet/musk-monitor-under-musk-hate-speech-is-rising/

[28] Lee BY. After Elon Musk acquisition, will #ScienceTwitter #MedTwitter move to Mastodon, other platforms? [Internet].Forbes Media LCC.; 2023 [cited 2022 Dec 28]. Available from:https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2022/11/06/after-elon-musk-acquisition-will-sciencetwitter-medtwitter-move-to-mastodon-other-platforms/?sh=d6f09873e317

[29] Saric I. Lawmakers react to Musk’s call to prosecute Fauci [Internet]. Arlington:VAS Media Inc.; 2016 [cited 2022 Dec 28]. Available from:https://www.axios.com/2022/12/11/lawmakers-ract-musk-prosecute-fauci

[30] Musk E. [@elonmusk] (2022 Dec 28) Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH - the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically - is his wife [Twitter]. [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from:https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1607989683077758977

[31] Alba D, Wagner K. Twitter cuts more staff overseeing global content moderation [Internet].TIME USA, LLC.; 2023 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Available from:https://time.com/6245440/twitter-content-moderation-cuts/

[32] Waldman S. Climate misinformation spreads on Musk’s Twitter [Internet].POLITICO, LLC; [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Available from:https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-misinformation-spreads-on-musks-twitter/

[33] COVID-19 misinformation [Internet]. X Corp.; c2023 [cited2023 Mar 27]. Available from:https://transparency.twitter.com/en/reports/covid19.html#2021-jul-dec

[34] Kupferschmidt K. As Musk reshapes Twitter, academics ponder taking flight. Science. 2022; 378:583-4.

[35] Network Contagion Research Institute. [@ncri_io] (2022 Oct 28) Evidence suggests that bad actors are trying to test the limits on @Twitter. Several posts on 4chan encourage users to amplify derogatory slurs. For example, over the last 12 hours, the use of the n-word has increased nearly 500% from the previous average [Twitter]. [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from:https://twitter.com/ncri_io/status/1586007698910646272?s=20

[36] Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107:e1-8.

[37] Broniatowski DA, Jamison AM, Qi S, AlKulaib L, Chen T, Benton A, et al. Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108:1378-84.

[38] Legacy verification policy [Internet]. X Corp.; c2023 [cited2023 Jan 8]. Available from:https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/legacy-verification-policy

[39] Irving K. What’s the future of science Twitter? [Internet].The Scientist; 1986-2023 [cited 2023 Jan 8]. Available from:https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/what-s-the-future-of-science-twitter-70749

[40] Lerman R, Zakrzewski C. Elon Musk’s first big Twitter product paused after fake accounts spread [Internet].The Washington Post; 1996-2023 [cited 2023 Jan 8]. Available from:https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/11/11/twitter-fake-verified-accounts/

[41] Shahi GK, Dirkson A, Majchrzak TA. An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Online Soc Netw Media. 2021; 22:100104.

[42] Only verified accounts can vote in Twitter polls from April 15, says Musk [Internet].Reuters; c2023 [cited 2023 Mar 27]. Available from:https://www.reuters.com/technology/only-verified-accounts-can-vote-twitter-polls-april-15-says-musk-2023-03-28/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=twitter

[43] Musk E. [@elonmusk] (2022 Dec 19) Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll [Twitter]. [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from:https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1604617643973124097?s=20&t=5_NVB56QJSJOzOSkyh-PKg

[44] Musk E. [@elonmusk] (2022 Dec 29) New Twitter policy is to follow the science, which necessarily includes reasoned questioning of the science [Twitter]. [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from:https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1608175680407191552?s=20&t=5_NVB56QJSJOzOSkyh-PKg

[45] Cerullo M. Linda Yaccarino to replace Elon Musk as Twitter CEO. Here’s who she is [Internet].CBS Interactive Inc.; 2023 [cited 2023 May 17]. Available from:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/linda-yaccarino-twitter-new-ceo-elon-musk/

[46] Kletecka-Pulker M, Mondal H, Wang D, Parra RG, Maigoro AY, Lee S, et al. Impacts of biomedical hashtag-based Twitter campaign: #DHPSP utilization for promotion of open innovation in digital health, patient safety, and personalized medicine. Curr Res Biotechnol. 2021; 3:146-53.

[47] Bump P. How to turn a tweet into viable evidence of a war crime [Internet].The Washington Post; 1996-2023 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Available from:https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/10/how-turn-tweet-into-viable-evidence-war-crime/

[48] Wang Z, Lam NSN, Obradovich N, Ye X. Are vulnerable communities digitally left behind in social responses to natural disasters? An evidence from Hurricane Sandy with Twitter data. Appl Geogr. 2019; 108:1-8.

[49] De Longueville B, Smith RS, Luraschi G. “OMG, from here, I can see the flames!”: a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks. GIS ’09: 17th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems; 2009 Nov 3; Seattle, USA. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2009. pp. 73-80.

[50] Zamarreño-Aramendia G, Cristòfol FJ, de-San-Eugenio-Vela J, Ginesta X. Social-media analysis for disaster prevention: forest fire in Artenara and Valleseco, Canary Islands. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2020; 6:169.

[51] Susarla A. What we lose with demise of Twitter: a trove of important data [Internet].United Press International, Inc.; 2023 [cited 2022 Jan 17]. Available from:https://www.upi.com/Voices/2022/11/21/what-we-lose-Twitter-data-eyewitness-accounts/7161669036354/

[52] Abbass Z, Ali Z, Ali M, Akbar B, Saleem A. A framework to predict social crime through Twitter tweets by using machine learning. In: 2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC). 2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC); 2020 Feb 3-5; San Diego, USA. IEEE; 2020. pp. 363-8.