The comparative analysis of birth defects rates in regions of nuclear power-plants location

Nataliya S Demikova; Elena K Khandogina; Ludmila M Vorobyeva; Nataliya A Fedotova; Boris A Kobrinsky

doi:10.17816/ecogen8229-34

Ecological Genetics ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 29 -34. DOI: 10.17816/ecogen8229-34

Articles

research-article

The comparative analysis of birth defects rates in regions of nuclear power-plants location

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

The analysis of birth defects (BD) rates in regions of nuclear power-plants locations in comparison with control regions have been performed using BD monitoring database for 2000–2007 years. It has been shown that the BD rates in these regions don’t differ from BD rates in control regions, Russia Federation on the whole and some other countries. Receiving results indicate that the working of nuclear power-plants doesn’t lead to increasing of BD frequencies in these regions.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Nataliya S Demikova, Elena K Khandogina, Ludmila M Vorobyeva, Nataliya A Fedotova, Boris A Kobrinsky. The comparative analysis of birth defects rates in regions of nuclear power-plants location. Ecological Genetics, 2010, 8(2): 29-34 DOI:10.17816/ecogen8229-34

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Бочков Н. П., 2008. Современный взгляд на мутационный процесс у человека // Приложение 2 Вестника Российской военно-медицинской академии Т. 3б № 23. С. 6.

[2]	Кобринский Б. А., Демикова Н. С., 2001. Принципы организации мониторинга врожденных пороков развития и его реализация в Российской Федерации // Российский Вестник перинатологии и педиатрии. Т. 46, № 4. - С. 56-60.

[3]	Дубинин Н. П., 1976. Общая генетика. Москва: Наука, 572 с.

[4]	Ежегодные отчеты по мониторингу ВПР. www. medmonitor.ru.

[5]	Annual Report of International Clearinghouse for birth defects monitoring systems // ICBD, Italy. 2002. 215 p.

[6]	Annual Report of ICBDSR, 2007. P. 103-123.

[7]	Dolk H., Nichols R. 2000. Evaluation of the impact of Chernobyl on the prevalence of congenital anomalies in 16 regions of Europe // Int. J. Epidemiol. Vol. 29, N 3, P. 596-599.

[8]	Dolk H. et al., 2004. A review of environmental risk factors for congenital anomalies // EUROCAT special report. P. 89-92.

[9]	EUROCAT reports.www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk .

[10]	Neel J. V., Schull W. J., 1956. The effect of exposure to the atomic bombs on pregnancy termination in Hiroshima and Nagasaki // Washington, National Acad of Science.

[11]	Yamazaki J. N., Schull W. J., 1990. Perinatal loss and neurological abnormalities among children of the atomic bomb //JAMA. Vol. 264, N 5. P. 605-609.