Drivers and Socio-Ecological Consequences of Human-Wildlife Conflict in Uttarakhand, India

Vishwambhar Prasad Sati

Ecol. Divers. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 10012

PDF (1780KB)
Ecol. Divers. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) :10012 DOI: 10.70322/ecoldivers.2026.10012
Article
research-article
Drivers and Socio-Ecological Consequences of Human-Wildlife Conflict in Uttarakhand, India
Author information +
History +
PDF (1780KB)

Abstract

This paper examines the factors that affect human–wildlife conflict and its socio-ecological consequences, including impacts on the daily lives of rural people, farming activities, children’s schooling, and livestock rearing. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were employed. Data were collected from secondary sources, primarily the Uttarakhand State Forest Department and the Forest Survey of India, covering 25 years (2000–2025). Information on wildlife species, their populations, and the number of people killed or injured by wildlife was obtained. The author visited some affected areas of human–wildlife conflict in July 2024 and January 2025. A perception study was conducted in which 212 people from five villages were interviewed. A map of human–wildlife conflict hotspots was also prepared. Three districts of Uttarakhand-Pauri, Almora, and Tehri-were identified as human-wildlife conflict hotspots. This study reveals that elephants dominate the plains-namely the Doon Valley and the Tarai region-whereas leopards and bears dominate the middle Himalayan region in terms of human–wildlife conflict. Wild boars and langurs are also found in the same region. Snow leopards are confined to the Greater Himalayan region. Every day, one or more people are killed by wildlife, and the number of injured people is considerably high. Fatalities from leopard attacks are highest, followed by bear attacks, mainly in the middle Himalayan region. The study suggests that both the Forest Department and local communities can play significant roles in managing wildlife through awareness programmes and improved forest management.

Keywords

Human-wildlife conflict / Divers / Socio-ecological consequences / Uttarakhand

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Vishwambhar Prasad Sati. Drivers and Socio-Ecological Consequences of Human-Wildlife Conflict in Uttarakhand, India. Ecol. Divers., 2026, 3 (3) : 10012 DOI:10.70322/ecoldivers.2026.10012

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).Human-Wildlife Conflict. 2023. Available online: https://www.fao.org/wildlife-protected-areas/main-themes/human-wildlife-conflict/en (accessed on 11 August 2026).

[2]

Gaynor KM, Green JR . Human-wildlife conflict. Curr. Biol. 2026, 36, R240-R244. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2026.02.013

[3]

Mekonen S.Coexistence between human and wildlife: The nature, causes and mitigations of human wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park, Southeast Ethiopia. BMC Ecol. 2020, 20, 51. DOI: 10.1186/s12898-020-00319-1

[4]

Seoraj-Pillai N, Pillay N . A Meta-Analysis of Human-Wildlife Conflict: South African and Global Perspectives. Sustainability 2016, 9, 34. DOI: 10.3390/su9010034

[5]

UNEP, WWF.Human-Wildlife Conflict One of the Greatest Threats to Wildlife Species; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya; WWF: Gland, Switzerland, 2021

[6]

WWF, UNEP.A Future for All: The Need for Human-Wildlife Coexistence; World Wide Fund for Nature: Gland, Switzerland; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2021.

[7]

World Wildlife Fund.Human-Wildlife Conflict: Global Status and Conservation Implications. 2025. Available online: https://www.worldwildlife.org/our-work/wildlife/wildlife-crime/human-wildlife-conflict/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 August 2026).

[8]

World Bank.Human-Wildlife Conflict: Global Policy and Perception Insights. 2025. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/global-wildlife-program/brief/human-wildlife-conflict-global-policy-and-perception-insights?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 August 2026).

[9]

CITES. Human-Wildlife Conflict: The Cost and the Need to Foster Coexistence. 2023. https://cites.org/sites/default/files/documents/E-AC32-Inf-7_0.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 August 2026).

[10]

Gubbi, S., Poornesha, H.C. and Madhusudan, M.D. Impact of vehicular traffic on the use of highway edges by large mammals in a South Indian wildlife reserve. Curr. Sci. 2012, 102, 1047-1051.

[11]

Roy K, Pandey RK, Athira NG, Dutta A, Mittal D, Nigam P, et al. Long-term trends in human fatalities from human-elephant conflict in Chhattisgarh, India. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 27360. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-13005-3

[12]

The Print. Human-Animal Conflict: Data Shows Decline in Fatalities in Kerala. 2024. Available online: https://theprint.in/india/human-animal-conflict-data-shows-decline-in-fatalities-in-kerala/1978103/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 August 2026).

[13]

Media India Group. Human-Animal Conflict Rises in India as Forest Land Diversion Hits Decade High. 2023. Available online: https://mediaindia.eu/environment/human-animal-conflict-rises-in-india-as-forest-land-diversion-hits-decade-high/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 August 2026).

[14]

Times of India.Human-Wildlife Conflict Worsening in India; Crops and Livelihoods at Risk. 2024. Available online: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/humanwildlife-conflict-worsening-in-maharashtra-mp-medha-seeks-urgent-measures-crops-worth-rs-10000cr-destroyed/amp_articleshow/126070618.cms?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 August 2026).

[15]

Sati VP.Sustainable Forest Management in the Himalaya; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023.

[16]

Kavuri T. The Constitutional Scheme of Animal Rights in India; Animal Legal & Historical Centre, Michigan State University College of Law: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2020.

[17]

Nyhus PJ . Human-Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2016, 41, 143-171. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085634

[18]

König HJ, Kiffner C, Kramer-Schadt S, Fürst C, Keuling O, Ford AT. Human-wildlife coexistence in a changing world. Conserv. Biol. 2020, 34, 786-794. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13513

[19]

Anand S, Radhakrishna S. Investigating trends in human-wildlife conflict: Is conflict escalation real or imagined? J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 2017, 10, 154-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.japb.2017.02.003

[20]

Manral U, Sengupta S, Hussain SA, Rana S, Badola R . Human-wildlife conflict in India: A review of economic implications of loss and preventive measures. Indian For. 2016, 142, 10.

[21]

Bhatia S, Redpath SM, Suryawanshi K, Mishra C. The Relationship Between Religion and Attitudes Toward Large Carnivores in Northern India? Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2017, 22, 30-42. DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2016.1220034

[22]

Oommen MA . Beasts in the Garden: Human-Wildlife Coexistence in India’s Past and Present. Front. Conserv. Sci. 2021, 2, 703432. DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.703432

[23]

Sati VP. Out-migration in Uttarakhand Himalaya: Its types, reasons, and consequences. Migrat. Lett. 2021, 18, 281-295. DOI: 10.33182/ml.v18i3.957

[24]

Pooley S, Bhatia S, Vasava A. Rethinking the study of human-wildlife coexistence. Conserv. Biol. 2021, 35, 784-793. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13653

[25]

Sati VP.Uttarakhand: Society, Culture, and Pilgrimages; Today and Tomorrow: New Delhi, India, 2022.

[26]

Singh N. Introduction: Affective Ecologies and Conservation. Conservat. Soc. 2018, 16, 1-7. DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_18_33

[27]

Gulati S, Karanth KK, Le NA, Noack F. Human casualties are the dominant cost of human-wildlife conflict in India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e1921338118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921338118

[28]

Barua M, Bhagwat SA, Jadhav S . The hidden dimensions of human-wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 157, 309-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.014

[29]

Agrawal A, Redford K. Conservation and Displacement: An Overview. Conservat. Soc. 2009, 7, 1-10. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.54790

[30]

Gadgil M, Guha R. This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India; Oxford University Press: New Delhi, India, 2012.

[31]

Rai ND, Benjaminsen TA, Krishnan S, Madegowda C. Political ecology of tiger conservation in India: Adverse effects of banning customary practices in a protected area. Singapore J. Trop. Geogr. 2019, 40, 124-139. DOI: 10.1111/sjtg.12259

[32]

Saravanan V.Colonialism and Wildlife: An Environmental History of Modern India; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2023.

[33]

Sati VP.Forest fires in the Indian Central Himalaya: Major drivers, implications, and mitigation measures. Environ. Hazards 2024, 23, 390-404. DOI: 10.1080/17477891.2024.2304211

[34]

Sati VP, Kumar K. Uttaranchal: Dilemma of Plenties and Scarcities; Mittal Publications: New Delhi, India, 2004.

PDF (1780KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉