Ecological Risk and Public Perception of Pinctada radiata Invasion in the Mediterranean: An Integrated SDM, SEM and Sentiment Analysis Framework

Dimitris Pafras , Dimitris Klaoudatos

Ecol. Divers. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 10011

PDF (5255KB)
Ecol. Divers. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) :10011 DOI: 10.70322/ecoldivers.2026.10011
Article
research-article
Ecological Risk and Public Perception of Pinctada radiata Invasion in the Mediterranean: An Integrated SDM, SEM and Sentiment Analysis Framework
Author information +
History +
PDF (5255KB)

Abstract

The rayed pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) was the first Indo-Pacific bivalve documented in the Mediterranean Sea and is now among the basin’s most widespread non-indigenous bivalves. Despite its long invasion history, basin-scale assessments integrating habitat suitability, anthropogenic exposure, and public perception remain limited. Here, we developed an integrated Mediterranean risk-screening framework that combines ensemble Species Distribution Modelling (SDM), Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), an Invasion Risk Index (IRI), and multilingual sentiment analysis for P. radiata. Occurrence data comprised 866 georeferenced records from five Mediterranean countries, of which 133 spatially thinned records were retained for SDM calibration. The ensemble SDM demonstrated high predictive performance (AUC = 0.934 ± 0.021, TSS = 0.812 ± 0.033, CBI = 0.883 ± 0.041) and identified mean annual sea-surface temperature, substrate type, and chlorophyll-a as the principal predictors of baseline habitat suitability. More than 81% of dated occurrence records originated from 2020–2026, and the spatially thinned dataset showed a significant westward redistribution through time (Spearman’s ρ = −0.241, p = 0.0059), although this pattern was interpreted cautiously because the dataset was dominated by opportunistic human observations and uneven reporting effort. Structural equation modelling supported consistent spatial associations among environmental suitability, anthropogenic exposure, and the observed distribution of P. radiata, while recognising that these relationships represent statistical associations rather than causal ecological mechanisms. The Invasion Risk Index identified High and Very High priority coastal sectors for surveillance, particularly where elevated environmental suitability coincided with intense maritime activity and relatively low current record density. Multilingual sentiment analysis of 1247 text units revealed predominantly neutral-to-positive public and stakeholder discourse, reflecting the species’ dual perception as both a non-indigenous organism and a commercially recognised resource. Collectively, these findings provide a spatially explicit framework for supporting surveillance, biosecurity planning, and risk communication for P. radiata and other marine non-indigenous species across the Mediterranean.

Keywords

Lessepsian migration / Non-indigenous species / Mediterranean Sea / Species distribution model / Structural equation modelling / Invasion risk / Sentiment analysis / Pinctada radiata

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dimitris Pafras, Dimitris Klaoudatos. Ecological Risk and Public Perception of Pinctada radiata Invasion in the Mediterranean: An Integrated SDM, SEM and Sentiment Analysis Framework. Ecol. Divers., 2026, 3 (3) : 10011 DOI:10.70322/ecoldivers.2026.10011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Molnar JL, Gamboa RL, Revenga C, Spalding MD. Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 485-492. DOI: 10.1890/070064

[2]

Gallardo B, Clavero M,Sánchez MI, Vilà M. Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016, 22, 151-163. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13004

[3]

Zenetos A, Gofas S, Verlaque M, Cinar ME, Garcia Raso JE, Bianchi CN, et al. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2010. A contribution to the application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part I. Spatial distribution. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2010, 11, 381-493. DOI: 10.12681/mms.87

[4]

Galil BS, Marchini A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A . Mare Nostrum, Mare Quod Invaditur-The history of bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea. In Biological Invasions in Changing Ecosystems; Mack J, Lach J, Eds.; De Gruyter Open: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 43-82.

[5]

Aurelle D, Thomas S, Albert C, Bally M, Bondeau A, Boudouresque CF, et al. Biodiversity, climate change, and adaptation in the Mediterranean. Ecosphere 2022, 13, e3915. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3915

[6]

Pastor F, Valiente JA,Khodayar S. A warming Mediterranean: 38 years of increasing sea surface temperature. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2687. DOI: 10.3390/rs12172687

[7]

Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S).European State of the Climate 2025. ECMWF, 2025. Available online: https://climate.copernicus.eu/esotc/2025 (accessed on 15 June 2026).

[8]

Monterosato TA.Enumerazione e sinonimia delle conchiglie mediterranee. Giorn. Sci. Nat. Econ. 1878, 13, 61-115. Available online: https://documentatiecentrum.watlab.be/imis.php?module=ref&refid=248203 (accessed on 15 June 2026).

[9]

Streftaris N, Zenetos A. Alien marine species in the Mediterranean-The 100 ‘worst invasives’ and their impact. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2006, 7, 87-118. DOI: 10.12681/mms.180

[10]

Barbieri MC, Deidun A, Maltagliati F, Zenetos A, Tlig-Zouari S, Gianni F, et al. First data on genetic diversity of the small pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) in Mediterranean populations by means of the mitochondrial COX1 marker. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Médit. 2013, 40, 711. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263751973_First_data_on_genetic_diversity_of_the_small_pearl_oyster_Pinctada_radiata_Leach_1814_in_Mediterranean_populations_by_means_of_the_mitochondrial_COX1_marker (accessed on 15 June 2026).

[11]

Barbieri M, Deidun A, Maltagliati F, Castelli A. A contribution to the phylogeography of Pinctada imbricata radiata (Leach, 1814) (Bivalvia: Pteriidae) from the Eastern Mediterranean Sea by means of the mitochondrial COI marker. Ital. J. Zool. 2016, 83, 113-120. DOI: 10.1080/11250003.2015.1106012

[12]

D’Iglio C, Capillo G, Di Fresco D, Famulari S, Albano M, Valić D, et al. Not All Aliens Come to Harm (Maybe): Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) Population and Habitat From a Coastal Lagoon (Central Mediterranean Sea). Mar. Ecol. 2025, 46, e70062. DOI: 10.1111/maec.70062

[13]

Png-Gonzalez L, Aguilo-Arce J, Vázquez-Luis M, Carbonell A . New occurrence of Pinctada imbricata radiata in the Balearic Archipelago (NW Mediterranean Sea). BioInvasions Rec. 2021, 10, 853-858. DOI: 10.3391/bir.2021.10.4.09

[14]

Pafras D, Theocharis A, Kondylatos G, Conides A, Klaoudatos D. Population biology of the non-indigenous rayed pearl oyster (Pinctada radiata) in the South Evoikos Gulf, Greece. Diversity 2024, 16, 460. DOI: 10.3390/d16080460

[15]

Pafras D, Apostologamvrou C, Balatsou A, Theocharis A, Lolas A, Hatziioannou M, et al. Reproductive biology of pearl oyster (Pinctada radiata, Leach 1814) in the Eastern Mediterranean (South Evia Island). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1259. DOI: 10.3390/jmse12081259

[16]

Pafras D, Conides A, Vafidis D, Kapranas G, Klaoudatos D . Integrating Copernicus Earth Observation and Artificial Intelligence for Habitat Suitability Modeling of Pinctada radiata in Semi-Enclosed Coastal Watersheds of Central Greece. J. Watershed Ecol. 2026, 1, 10003. DOI: 10.70322/jwe.2026.10003

[17]

Theodorou JA, Bekiari V, Douvi X, Ramfos A, Tzovenis I . Analysis of Nutritional Composition of the Pearl Oyster Pinctada radiata as a New Mediterranean “Bioresource” for Human Consumption. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9757. DOI: 10.3390/app14219757

[18]

Ladle RJ, Correia RA, Do Y, Joo GJ, Malhado AC, Proulx R, et al. Conservation culturomics. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2016, 14, 269-275. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1260

[19]

Williams DR, Clark M, Buchanan GM, Ficetola GF, Rondinini C, Tilman D. Proactive conservation to prevent habitat losses to agricultural expansion. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 314-322. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5

[20]

Elith J, Leathwick JR. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40, 677-697. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159

[21]

Robinson NM, Nelson WA, Costello MJ, Sutherland JE, Lundquist CJ . A systematic review of marine-based species distribution models with recommendations for best practice. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 421. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00421

[22]

Araujo MB, New M . Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 42-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010

[23]

Valavi R, Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Elith J . Predictive performance of presence-only species distribution models: A benchmark study with reproducible code. Ecol. Monogr. 2022, 92, e01486. DOI: 10.1002/ecm.1486

[24]

Grace JB. Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006.

[25]

Thorson JT, Andrews AG, Essington TE, Large SI. Dynamic structural equation models synthesize ecosystem dynamics constrained by ecological mechanisms. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2024, 15, 744-755. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.14289

[26]

Dimitris P, Alexis C, Alexandros T, Dimitris V, Dimitris K . Stakeholder mental models for sustainable management of the invasive pearl oyster Pinctada radiata in the Eastern Mediterranean. Hydroecol. Eng. 2025, 2, 10016. DOI: 10.70322/hee.2025.10016

[27]

Assis J, Fernández Bejarano SJ, Salazar VW, Schepers L, Gouvêa L, Fragkopoulou E, et al. Bio-ORACLE v3.0: Pushing marine data layers to the CMIP6 Earth System Models of climate change research. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2024, 33, e13813. DOI: 10.1111/geb.13813

[28]

GBIF.org. GBIF Occurrence Download. Dataset Key: 0063413-260519110011954; GBIF Secretariat: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2026.

[29]

Aiello-Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A, Vilela B, Anderson RP . spThin: An R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 2015, 38, 541-545. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01132

[30]

Thuiller W, Georges D, Guéguen M, Engler R, Breiner F, Lafourcade B, et al. biomod2: Ensemble Platform for Species Distribution Modeling. R package version 4.2.5, 2024. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=biomod2 (accessed on 15 June 2026).

[31]

Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

[32]

Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5-32. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010933404324

[33]

Ridgeway G. The state of boosting. Comput. Sci. Stat. 1999, 31, 172-181. Available online: https://www.ressources-actuarielles.net/EXT/ISFA/1226.nsf/0/a29acbd26d902d6fc125822a0031c09b/$FILE/boosting.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2026).

[34]

Kass JM, Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Bohl CL, Pinilla-Buitrago GE, Boria RA, et al. ENMeval 2.0: Redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species’ niches and distributions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 1602-1608. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13628

[35]

Valavi R, Elith J, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Guillera-Arroita G. blockCV: An R package for generating spatially or environmentally separated folds for k-fold cross-validation of species distribution models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019, 10, 225-232. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13107

[36]

Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A . Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol. Model. 2006, 199, 142-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017

[37]

Rosseel Y.lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012, 48, 1-36. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02

[38]

Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 1999, 6, 1-55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118

[39]

Kline RB.Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016.

[40]

Hutto CJ, Gilbert E. VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 2014, 8, 216-225. DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550

[41]

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[42]

Khalifa R, Hamadou RB, Giraldes BW, Joaquim S, Hizam Z, Hamza S, et al. The Impact of Increasing Seawater Temperatures over the Last 30 Years on the Reproductive Cycle of the Pearl Oyster Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) in the Arabian Gulf. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 2180. DOI: 10.3390/jmse12122180

[43]

Tukey JW. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 1949, 5, 99-114. DOI: 10.2307/3001913

[44]

Calabrese C, Giangrande A, Quarta E, Arduini D, Acquaviva MI, Biandolino F, et al. The Mediterranean introduced pearl oyster Pinctada radiata: Can an invasion be changed into a gain in a climate change scenario? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2026, 222, 118736. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118736

[45]

Tempesti J, Langeneck J, Maltagliati F, Castelli A, Lardicci C . Monitoring non-indigenous species in port habitats: First application of a standardized North American protocol in the Mediterranean Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 8, 700730. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.700730

[46]

Galanidi M, Aissi M, Ali M, Bakalem A, Bariche M, Bartolo AG, et al. Validated Inventories of Non-Indigenous Species (NIS) for the Mediterranean Sea as Tools for Regional Policy and Patterns of NIS Spread. Diversity 2023, 15, 962. DOI: 10.3390/d15090962

[47]

Gavrilović A, Piria M, Guo XZ, Jug-Dujaković J, Ljubučić A, Krkić A, et al. First evidence of establishment of the rayed pearl oyster, Pinctada imbricata radiata (Leach, 1814), in the eastern Adriatic Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 125, 556-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.045

[48]

Shackleton RT, Richardson DM, Shackleton CM, Bennett B, Crowley SL, Dehnen-Schmutz K, et al. Explaining people’s perceptions of invasive alien species: A conceptual framework. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 229, 10-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045

[49]

Kapitza K, Zimmermann H, Martín-López B, von Wehrden H. Research on the social perception of invasive species: A systematic literature review. NeoBiota 2019, 43, 47-68. DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.43.31619

[50]

García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, González JA, Alcorlo P, Montes C . Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 2969-2983. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003

[51]

Verbrugge LNH, Van den Born RJG, Lenders HJR. Exploring public perception of non-native species from a visions of nature perspective. Environ. Manag. 2013, 52, 1562-1573. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0170-1

[52]

Giakoumi S, Katsanevakis S, Albano PG, Azzurro E, Cardoso AC, Cebrian E, et al. Management priorities for marine invasive species. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 688, 976-982. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.282

[53]

Correia RA, Ladle R, Jarić I, Malhado ACM, Mittermeier JC, Roll U, et al. Digital data sources and methods for conservation culturomics. Conserv. Biol. 2021, 35, 398-411. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13706

[54]

Jarić I, Bellard C, Correia RA, Courchamp F, Douda K, Essl F, et al. Invasion Culturomics and iEcology. Conserv. Biol. 2021, 35, 447-451. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13707

PDF (5255KB)

Supplementary files

10011-suppl.

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉