Shades of Grey: A Continuum of Biodiversity Understanding from Dark to Bright Diversity

Abstract

This commentary introduces a conceptual framework that reinterprets biodiversity assessment as a continuum, spanning from Dark diversity, representing the unobserved or uncolonized potential of species ecologically suited to a system, to Bright diversity, conceived as an aspirational, fully integrated upper bound of biodiversity knowledge. Bright diversity encompasses not only observed components and their intricate interactions, but also a profound understanding of the reasons for species' presence or absence, including the inferred insights from Dark diversity across taxonomic, functional, phylogenetic, and genetic facets. Situated in between is Grey diversity, which characterizes the predominant state of partial knowledge and inherent uncertainty in real-world ecological assessments as an epistemic gradient. By delineating this epistemological gradient, the framework offers a heuristic tool for ecologists and conservationists to critically evaluate the clarity, completeness, and uncertainty embedded in biodiversity data, and an operational basis for “epistemic cartography”, i.e., the spatial mapping of knowledge sufficiency and uncertainty. It facilitates the identification of knowledge gaps, guides research priorities, and informs conservation actions, especially under conditions of incomplete information, through a compact workflow and transparent indicators. This conceptual spectrum serves as both an epistemological reflection and a practical guide for advancing biodiversity science, while outlining a forward-looking agenda that leverages multi-faceted “bands of biodiversity knowledge” to support robust biodiversity planning.

Keywords

Bands of biodiversity knowledge / Biodiversity / Bright diversity / Dark diversity / Ecological knowledge / Epistemological gradient / Grey diversity / Uncertainty mapping

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The author declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1] Chiarucci A, Bacaro G, Scheiner SM. Old and New Challenges in Using Species Diversity for Assessing Biodiversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 2426-2437. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0065.

[2] Olmo V, Petruzzellis F, Alberti G, Sigura M, Balbi S, Bacaro G. Assessing Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Trade-Offs and Hotspots in Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Northeastern Italy). Biodiversity 2025, 26, 143-156. doi:10.1080/14888386.2025.2460759.

[3] Ricotta C. A Semantic Taxonomy for Diversity Measures. Acta Biotheor. 2007, 55, 23-33. doi:10.1007/s10441-007-9008-7.

[4] Magurran AE. Measuring Biological Diversity. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, R1174-R1177. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.049.

[5] Kissling WD, Ahumada JA, Bowser A, Fernandez M, Fernández N, García EA, et al. Building Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) of Species Distribution and Abundance at a Global Scale. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2018, 93, 600-625. doi:10.1111/brv.12359.

[6] Correia AM, Lopes LF. Revisiting Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning through the Lens of Complex Adaptive Systems. Diversity 2023, 15, 895. doi:10.3390/d15080895.

[7] Botella C, Joly A, Monestiez P, Bonnet P, Munoz F. Bias in Presence-Only Niche Models Related to Sampling Effort and Species Niches: Lessons for Background Point Selection. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232078. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232078.

[8] Kühl HS, Bowler DE, Bösch L, Bruelheide H, Dauber J, Eichenberg D, et al. Effective Biodiversity Monitoring Needs a Culture of Integration. One Earth 2020, 3, 462-474. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.010.

[9] Hillebrand H, Blasius B, Borer ET, Chase JM, Downing JA, Eriksson BK, et al. Biodiversity Change Is Uncoupled from Species Richness Trends: Consequences for Conservation and Monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 55, 169-184. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12959.

[10] Gaüzère P, O’Connor L, Botella C, Poggiato G, Münkemüller T, Pollock LJ, et al. The Diversity of Biotic Interactions Complements Functional and Phylogenetic Facets of Biodiversity. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, 2093-2100.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.009.

[11] Paz A, Crowther TW, Maynard DS. Functional and Phylogenetic Dimensions of Tree Biodiversity Reveal Unique Geographic Patterns. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2024, 33, e13877. doi:10.1111/geb.13877.

[12] Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Soliveres S, Gross N, Torices R, Berdugo M, Maestre FT. Phylogenetic, Functional, and Taxonomic Richness Have Both Positive and Negative Effects on Ecosystem Multifunctionality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 8419-8424. doi:10.1073/pnas.1815727116.

[13] Pollock LJ, O'Connor LMJ, Mokany K, Rosauer DF, Talluto L, Thuiller W. Protecting Biodiversity (in All Its Complexity): New Models and Methods. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2020, 35, 1119-1128. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2020.08.015.

[14] Tordoni E, Carmona CP, Toussaint A, Tamme R, Pärtel M. Global Patterns and Determinants of Multiple Facets of Plant Diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2024, 33, e13823. doi:10.1111/geb.13823.

[15] Rocchini D, Hortal J, Lengyel S, Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Ricotta C, et al. Accounting for Uncertainty When Mapping Species Distributions: The Need for Maps of Ignorance. Progress. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 2011, 35, 211-226. doi:10.1177/0309133311399491.

[16] Hortal J, de Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ. Seven Shortfalls That Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2015, 46, 523-549. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400.

[17] Pärtel M, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M. Dark Diversity: Shedding Light on Absent Species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 124-128. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.004.

[18] Pärtel M, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M. Community Completeness: Linking Local and Dark Diversity within the Species Pool Concept. Folia Geobot. 2013, 48, 307-317. doi:10.1007/s12224-013-9169-x.

[19] Carmona CP, Pärtel M. Estimating Probabilistic Site-Specific Species Pools and Dark Diversity from Co-Occurrence Data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2021, 30, 316-326. doi:10.1111/geb.13203.

[20] Gavriel T, Azzurro E, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Bertocci I, Cai LL, Claudet J, et al. Using Dark Diversity to Disentangle the Effects of Protection and Habitat Quality on Species Diversity. Biol. Conserv. 2025, 305, 111096. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111096.

[21] Trindade DPF, Carmona CP, Reitalu T, Pärtel M. Observed and Dark Diversity Dynamics over Millennial Time Scales: Fast Life-History Traits Linked to Expansion Lags of Plants in Northern Europe. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2023, 290, 20221904. doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.1904.

[22] Fujinuma J, Pärtel M. Decomposing Dark Diversity Affinities of Species and Sites Using Bayesian Method: What Accounts for Absences of Species at Suitable Sites? Methods Ecol. Evol. 2023, 14, 1796-1807. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.14109.

[23] Paganeli B, Fujinuma J, Trindade DPF, Carmona CP, Pärtel M. A Roadmap to Carefully Select Methods for Dark-Diversity Studies. J. Veg. Sci. 2024, 35, e13264. doi:10.1111/jvs.13264.

[24] Riibak K, Ronk A, Kattge J, Pärtel M. Dispersal Limitation Determines Large-Scale Dark Diversity in Central and Northern Europe. J. Biogeogr. 2017, 44, 1770-1780. doi:10.1111/jbi.13000.

[25] Riibak K, Reitalu T, Tamme R, Helm A, Gerhold P, Znamenskiy S, et al. Dark Diversity in Dry Calcareous Grasslands Is Determined by Dispersal Ability and Stress-Tolerance. Ecography 2015, 38, 713-721. doi:10.1111/ecog.01312.

[26] Fløjgaard C, Valdez JW, Dalby L, Moeslund JE, Clausen KK, Ejrnæs R, et al. Dark Diversity Reveals Importance of Biotic Resources and Competition for Plant Diversity across Habitats. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 6078-6088. doi:10.1002/ece3.6351.

[27] Paganeli B, Toussaint A, Bueno CG, Fujinuma J, Reier Ü Pärtel M. Dark Diversity at Home Describes the Success of Cross-Continent Tree Invasions. Divers. Distrib. 2022, 28, 1202-1213. doi:10.1111/ddi.13522.

[28] de Oliveira Gonçalves-Araújo MD, de Carvalho CE, Pequeno PACL, Trindade DPF, Hughes F, de Araújo FS, et al. Observed and Dark Diversity of Plants’ Life-Forms Are Driven by Climate and Human Impacts in a Tropical Dry Forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 2024, 33, 759-773. doi:10.1007/s10531-023-02771-z.

[29] Lewis RJ, de Bello F, Bennett JA, Fibich P, Finerty GE, Götzenberger L, et al. Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation. Conserv Biol. 2017, 31, 40-47. doi:10.1111/cobi.12723.

[30] Moeslund JE, Brunbjerg AK, Clausen KK, Dalby L, Fløjgaard C, Juel A, et al. Using Dark Diversity and Plant Characteristics to Guide Conservation and Restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 54, 1730-1741. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12867.

[31] Pärtel M, Tamme R, Carmona CP, Riibak K, Moora M, Bennett JA, et al. Global Impoverishment of Natural Vegetation Revealed by Dark Diversity. Nature 2025, 641, 917-924. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08814-5.

[32] Heuertz M, Carvalho SB, Galindo J, Rinkevich B, Robakowski P, Aavik T, et al. The Application Gap: Genomics for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Management. Biol. Conserv. 2023, 278, 109883. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109883.

[33] Bascompte J, Jordano P. Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity. Annu. Rev.Ecol.Evol. Syst. 2007, 38, 567-593. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818.

[34] Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Lenton TM, Bascompte J, Brock W, Dakos V, et al. Anticipating Critical Transitions. Science 2012, 338, 344-348. doi:10.1126/science.1225244.

[35] Torresani M, Rossi C, Perrone M, Hauser LT, Féret J-B, Moudrý V, et al. Reviewing the Spectral Variation Hypothesis: Twenty Years in the Tumultuous Sea of Biodiversity Estimation by Remote Sensing. Ecol. Inform. 2024, 82, 102702. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102702.

[36] Beccari E, Pérez Carmona C, Tordoni E, Petruzzellis F, Martinucci D, Casagrande G, et al. Plant Spectral Diversity from High-Resolution Multispectral Imagery Detects Functional Diversity Patterns in Coastal Dune Communities. J. Veg. Sci. 2024, 35, e13239. doi:10.1111/jvs.13239.

[37] Gillespie TW, Rogers M, Robinson C, Rocchini D. Biodiversity of the World:A Study from Space. In Remote Sensing Handbook, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA, 2024; Volume 4, p. 16. ISBN 978-1-003-54117-2.

[38] Çevik T, Çevik N. Environmental DNA (eDNA): A Review of Ecosystem Biodiversity Detection and Applications. Biodivers Conserv. 2025, 34, 2999-3035. doi:10.1007/s10531-025-03112-y.

[39] Schuwirth N, Borgwardt F, Domisch S, Friedrichs M, Kattwinkel M, Kneis D, et al. How to Make Ecological Models Useful for Environmental Management. Ecol. Model. 2019, 411, 108784. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108784.

[40] Keck F, Peller T, Alther R, Barouillet C, Blackman R, Capo E, et al. The Global Human Impact on Biodiversity. Nature 2025, 641, 395-400. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08752-2.

[41] Reidsma P, Tekelenburg T, van den Berg M, Alkemade R. Impacts of Land-Use Change on Biodiversity: An Assessment of Agricultural Biodiversity in the European Union. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114, 86-102. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.026.

[42] Wu J, Guo Y, Zhou J. Nexus between Ecological Conservation and Socio-Economic Development and Its Dynamics: Insights from a Case in China. Water 2020, 12, 663. doi:10.3390/w12030663.

[43] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253-260. doi:10.1038/387253a0.

[44] Truchy A, Angeler DG, Sponseller RA, Johnson RK, McKie BG. andChapter Two - Linking Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning and Services, Ecological Resilience: Towards an Integrative Framework for Improved Management. In Advances in Ecological Research; Woodward G, Bohan DA,Eds.; Ecosystem Services; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 53, pp. 55-96.

[45] Mitchell RJ, Auld MHD, Le Duc MG, Robert MH. Ecosystem Stability and Resilience: A Review of Their Relevance for the Conservation Management of Lowland Heaths. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2000, 3, 142-160. doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00009.

[46] Zinchenko TD, Shitikov VK, Rosenberg GS. Assessment of Bottom River Communities in Considering the “Dark and Gray Diversity” of Species: Approaches to a Solution. Arid Ecosyst. 2023, 13, 527-534. doi:10.1134/S2079096123040200.

[47] Jensen JR. Biophysical Remote Sensing. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1983, 73, 111-132. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1983.tb01399.x.

[48] Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL. Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 893-903. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007.

[49] Fairbairn D, Gartner G, Peterson MP. Epistemological Thoughts on the Success of Maps and the Role of Cartography. Int. J. Cartogr. 2021, 7, 317-331. doi:10.1080/23729333.2021.1972909.

[50] Heisenberg W. The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. 1930. Dover Publication Inc.: Chicago, USA. Available online: https://www.hlevkin.com/hlevkin/90MathPhysBioBooks/Physics/Physics/Heizenberg/2015.166273.The-Physical-Principles-Of-The-Quantum-Theory.pdf. (accessed on 12 July 2025).

[51] Kangas A, Korhonen KT, Packalen T, Vauhkonen J. Sources and Types of Uncertainties in the Information on Forest-Related Ecosystem Services. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 427, 7-16. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.056.

[52] Bacaro G, Baragatti E, Chiarucci A. Using Taxonomic Data to Assess and Monitor Biodiversity: Are the Tribes Still Fighting? J. Environ. Monit. 2009, 11, 798-801. doi:10.1039/b818171n.

[53] Bernardo-Madrid R, González-Suárez M, Rosvall M, Rueda M, Revilla E, Carrete M, et al. A General Rule on the Organization of Biodiversity in Earth’s Biogeographical Regions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 9, 1193-1204. doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02724-5.

[54] Pulliam HR, Dunning JB, Jr., Liu J. Population Dynamics in Complex Landscapes: A Case Study. Ecol. Appl. 1992, 2, 165-177. doi:10.2307/1941773.

[55] Münkemüller T, Travis MJ, Burton OJ, Schiffers K, Johst K. Density-Regulated Population Dynamics and Conditional Dispersal Alter the Fate of Mutations Occurring at the Front of an Expanding Population. Heredity 2011, 106, 678-689. doi:10.1038/hdy.2010.107.

[56] Block S, Levine JM. How Dispersal Evolution and Local Adaptation Affect the Range Dynamics of Species Lagging Behind Climate Change. Am. Nat. 2021, 197, E173-E187. doi:10.1086/714130.

[57] Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C, Lindenschmidt KE, Janssen JAEB, Filatova T, Mouton A, et al. Chapter Four Complexity and Uncertainty:Rethinking the Modelling Activity. In Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment; Jakeman AJ, Voinov AA, Rizzoli AE, Chen SH,Eds.; Environmental Modelling, Software and Decision Support; Elsevier Ltd: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 3, pp. 49-68.

[58] Sastre P, Lobo JM. Taxonomist Survey Biases and the Unveiling of Biodiversity Patterns. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 462-467. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.002.

[59] Rocchini D, Tordoni E, Marchetto E, Marcantonio M, Barbosa AM, Bazzichetto M, et al. A Quixotic View of Spatial Bias in Modelling the Distribution of Species and Their Diversity. NPJ Biodivers. 2023, 2, 10. doi:10.1038/s44185-023-00014-6.

[60] Wetzel FT, Bingham HC, Groom Q, Haase P, Kõljalg U, Kuhlmann M, et al. Unlocking Biodiversity Data: Prioritization and Filling the Gaps in Biodiversity Observation Data in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2018, 221, 78-85. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.024.

[61] Ronquillo C, Alves-Martins F, Mazimpaka V, Sobral-Souza T, Vilela-Silva B, Medina NG, et al. Assessing Spatial and Temporal Biases and Gaps in the Publicly Available Distributional Information of Iberian Mosses. Biodivers. Data J. 2020, 8, e53474. doi:10.3897/BDJ.8.e53474.

[62] Ensing DJ, Moffat CE, Pither J. Taxonomic Identification Errors Generate Misleading Ecological Niche Model Predictions of an Invasive Hawkweed. Botany 2013, 91, 137-147. doi:10.1139/cjb-2012-0205.

[63] Tessarolo G, Ladle RJ, Lobo JM, Rangel TF, Hortal J. Using Maps of Biogeographical Ignorance to Reveal the Uncertainty in Distributional Data Hidden in Species Distribution Models. Ecography 2021, 44, 1743-1755. doi:10.1111/ecog.05793.

[64] Geldmann J, Heilmann-Clausen J, Holm TE, Levinsky I, Markussen B, Olsen K, et al. What Determines Spatial Bias in Citizen Science? Exploring Four Recording Schemes with Different Proficiency Requirements. Diversity Distrib. 2016, 22, 1139-1149. doi:10.1111/ddi.12477.

[65] Ladle R, Hortal J. Mapping Species Distributions: Living with Uncertainty. Front. Biogeogr. 2013, 5. doi:10.21425/F5FBG12942.

[66] Sigler K, Warren D, Tracy B, Forrestel E, Hogue G, Dornburg A. Assessing Temporal Biases across Aggregated Historical Spatial Data: A Case Study of North Carolina’s Freshwater Fishes. Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03878. doi:10.1002/ecs2.3878.

[67] Schmidt BR, Cruickshank SS, Bühler C, Bergamini A. Observers Are a Key Source of Detection Heterogeneity and Biased Occupancy Estimates in Species Monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 2023, 283, 110102. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110102.

[68] Łopucki R, Kiersztyn A, Pitucha G, Kitowski I. Handling Missing Data in Ecological Studies: Ignoring Gaps in the Dataset Can Distort the Inference. Ecol. Model. 2022, 468, 109964. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109964.

[69] Turner W, Spector S, Gardiner N, Fladeland M, Sterling E, Steininger M. Remote Sensing for Biodiversity Science and Conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 306-314. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00070-3.

[70] Zhang K, Zhang F, Wan W, Yu H, Sun J, Del Ser J, et al. Panchromatic and Multispectral Image Fusion for Remote Sensing and Earth Observation: Concepts, Taxonomy, Literature Review, Evaluation Methodologies and Challenges Ahead. Inf. Fusion 2023, 93, 227-242. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.12.026.

[71] Bacaro G, Fonda F. Towards the Full Operationalization of the Dark Diversity Concept in Environmental Impact Assessments: A Call to Revise International EIA Standards. Conserv. Lett. 2025, under review.