Unveiling the Remarkable Catalytic Performance of Al₂O₃@Cu-Ce Core–Shell Nanofiber Catalyst for Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolysis at Low Temperature

Abstract

Carbonyl sulfide represents a significant organic sulfur impurity in furnace gas, and its removal can enhance the economic value of furnace gas. In this study, a series of Al-based core–shell nanofiber catalysts were synthesized and employed for the catalytic hydrolysis of COS. The Al₂O₃@Cu-Ce catalyst demonstrated a 100% COS conversion efficiency at a gas hourly space velocity of 15 000 h⁻¹ at 70°C. The interaction of Cu and Ce can enhance their dispersion and facilitate the formation of micropores. The formation of Cu₂Al₄O₇ and CeAlO₃ resulted in a reduction in the number of micropores and effective active components on the catalyst surface. The primary catalytic roles were played by Cu²⁺ and Ce³⁺. The high content of adsorbed state oxygen O_β and suitable water resistance resulted in enhanced hydrolysis performance. The Al₂O₃ shell layer is capable of effectively protecting the Cu and Ce components from being covered and consumed, thereby prolonging the lifetime of the catalyst. The addition of Cu resulted in alterations to both the weakly and moderately basic sites, whereas the addition of Ce primarily affected the weakly basic sites. The formation of Cu-O-Ce increased the percentage of CuO in the Cu fraction, thereby enhancing the COS removal performance. There is a competitive adsorption relationship between COS and H₂S on the CuO (002) surface. COS, H₂O, and H₂S compete for adsorption on the O_v-CeO₂ (111) surface. O_v-CeO₂ (111) promotes the dissociation of H₂O and the generation of -SH groups. The hydrolysis process of COS occurs in steps on CuO (002) and O_v-CeO₂ (111).

Keywords

Al-based catalyst / carbonyl sulfide / catalytic hydrolysis / core–shell / nanofiber

References

[1] X. Li, X. Wang, L. Yuan, et al., “COS and H₂S Simultaneous Removal From Blast Furnace Gas Over a Tailored Cu/Zr Co-Doped K@TiO₂ Bifunctional Catalyst Under Low Temperature,” Chemical Engineering Journal 471 (2023): 144573.

[2] D. Wei, X. Wu, L. Guo, et al., “Research Progress of Carbonyl Sulfide Removal From Blast Furnace Gas by Porous Materials,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 11, no. 3 (2023): 109606.

[3] J. Gu, J. Liang, S. Hu, et al., “Enhanced Removal of COS From Blast Furnace Gas Via Catalytic Hydrolysis Over Al₂O₃-Based Catalysts: Insight Into the Role of Alkali Metal Hydroxide,” Separation and Purification Technology 295 (2022): 121356.

[4] T. Zhu, X. Song, T. Li, et al., “Simultaneous Catalytic Removal of Complex Sulfur-Containing VOCs Over Mn-Based Hydrotalcite-Like Compounds: Active Sites and Oxidation Mechanism,” Separation and Purification Technology 339 (2024): 126694.

[5] B. N. R. Winayu, Y. S. Chang, and H. Chu, “Efficiency, Characterization, and Kinetics During Removal of COS and H₂S in Gasified Syngas by Red Soil,” Fuel 379 (2025): 133116.

[6] S. Lee, J. E. Lee, S. J. Lee, et al., “Synergistic Desulfurization Performance of Industrial Waste Red Mud: A Comprehensive Experimental and Computational Study for COS Removal and CO(g) Production,” Applied Surface Science 649 (2024): 159132.

[7] Z. Gu, W. Bai, J. Chen, J. Yu, and F. Liu, “Insight of Intensified Absorption and Hydrolysis of COS in Ternary System of TBEE and PEG200 and H₂O,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 11, no. 3 (2023): 109886.

[8] S. Zhao, H. Yi, X. Tang, et al., “The Regulatory Effect of Al Atomic-Scale Doping in NiAlO for COS Removal,” Catalysis Today 355 (2020): 415–421.

[9] X. Kan, G. Zhang, Y. Luo, et al., “Efficient Catalytic Removal of COS and H₂S Over Graphitized 2D Micro-Meso-Macroporous Carbons Endowed With Ample Nitrogen Sites Synthesized Via Mechanochemical Carbonization,” Green Energy & Environment 7, no. 5 (2022): 983–995.

[10] M. Xu, Y. Lu, L. Chen, et al., “Catalytic Hydrolysis of Carbonyl Sulfide Over Ce-Ox@ZrO₂ Catalyst at Low Temperature,” Journal of Materials Science 58, no. 43 (2023): 16651–16668.

[11] S. Gao, S. Zhao, X. Tang, Y. Wang, and H. Yi, “Mechanics of COS Removal by Adsorption and Catalytic Hydrolysis: Recent Developments,” Fuel 359 (2024): 130394.

[12] X. Song, P. Ning, C. Wang, et al., “Research on the Low Temperature Catalytic Hydrolysis of COS and CS₂ Over Walnut Shell Biochar Modified by Fe–Cu Mixed Metal Oxides and Basic Functional Groups,” Chemical Engineering Journal 314 (2017): 418–433.

[13] Y. Xie, Y. Li, Z. Zeng, et al., “Mechanism Study of Organic Sulfur Hydrogenation Over Pt- and Pd-Loaded Alumina-Based Catalysts,” Environmental Science and Technology 57, no. 45 (2023): 17553–17565.

[14] S. Zhao, H. Yi, X. Tang, et al., “The Hydrolysis of Carbonyl Sulfide at Low Temperature: A Review,” The Scientific World Journal 2013, no. 1 (2013): 739501.

[15] S. Renda, D. Barba, and V. Palma, “Recent Solutions for Efficient Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolysis: A Review,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 61, no. 17 (2022): 5685–5697.

[16] X. Zhang, X. Qiu, and R. Wang, “Enabling Catalysts for Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolysis,” Catalysts 14, no. 12 (2024): 952.

[17] T. U. Yoon, M. J. Kim, A. R. Kim, J. H. Kang, D. Ji, and Y. S. Bae, “Cu-Impregnated Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separation and Recovery of CO From Blast Furnace Gas,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 87 (2020): 102–109.

[18] H. Wang, C. Liu, Z. Gong, et al., “CuY@NiAl-Layered Double Oxides Bi-functional Composites for ‘Catalytic–Adsorptive’ Removal of Carbonyl Sulfide,” Chemical Engineering Journal 493 (2024): 151992.

[19] X. Li, X. Wang, L. Yuan, et al., “Cu/Biochar Bifunctional Catalytic Removal of COS and H₂S: H₂O Dissociation and CuO Anchoring Enhanced by Pyridine N,” Environmental Science and Technology 58, no. 10 (2024): 4802–4811.

[20] P. Wu, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, et al., “Revelation of HCl Poisoning and Enhancement Mechanism on N-Modified Al₂O₃ Catalysts for COS and CS₂ Hydrolysis,” Fuel 363 (2024): 130785.

[21] X. Song, X. Chen, L. Sun, et al., “Synergistic Effect of Fe₂O₃ and CuO on Simultaneous Catalytic Hydrolysis of COS and CS₂: Experimental and Theoretical Studies,” Chemical Engineering Journal 399 (2020): 125764.

[22] P. Wu, K. Shen, B. Wang, S. Ding, S. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “Nanorod Al₂O₃ Catalysts for Simultaneous Hydrolytic Removal of COS and CS₂ Via Crystal Surface Modulation: Experimental and Theoretical Studies,” Separation and Purification Technology 341 (2024): 126790.

[23] X. Zheng, R. Huang, B. Li, et al., “Oxygen Vacancies-Promoted Removal of COS Via Catalytic Hydrolysis Over CuTiO_2-δ Nanoflowers,” Chemical Engineering Journal 492 (2024): 152322.

[24] T. Liu, S. Deng, Z. Li, et al., “Deep Removal of COS by Carbon Aerogel in Natural Gas: Performance and Regeneration on K₂O-Cu/CA Adsorbent at Room Temperature,” Fuel 369 (2024): 131791.

[25] P. Wu, Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, et al., “Experimental and Theoretical Research on Pore-Modified and K-Doped Al₂O₃ Catalysts for COS Hydrolysis: The Role of Oxygen Vacancies and Basicity,” Chemical Engineering Journal 450 (2022): 138091.

[26] X. Song, P. Ning, C. Wang, K. Li, L. Tang, and X. Sun, “Catalytic Hydrolysis of COS Over CeO₂ (110) Surface: A Density Functional Theory Study,” Applied Surface Science 414 (2017): 345–352.

[27] R. Cao, P. Ning, X. Wang, et al., “Low-Temperature Hydrolysis of Carbonyl Sulfide in Blast Furnace Gas Using Al₂O₃-Based Catalysts With High Oxidation Resistance,” Fuel 310 (2022): 122295.

[28] L. Shen, G. Wang, X. Zheng, et al., “Tuning the Growth of Cu-MOFs for Efficient Catalytic Hydrolysis of Carbonyl Sulfide,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis 38, no. 8 (2017): 1373–1381.

[29] S. Deng, T. Liu, Y. Li, et al., “Deep Removal of COS by Carbon Aerogel in Natural Gas: A 3D Network Structure of Nitrogen Doped and Cu Based Adsorbent,” Separation and Purification Technology 342 (2024): 126907.

[30] X. Song, L. Sun, H. Guo, et al., “Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Influence of Carrier Gas for COS Catalytic Hydrolysis Over MgAlCe Composite Oxides,” ACS Omega 4 (2019): 7122–7127.

[31] D. Yang, F. Dong, J. Wang, Z. Tang, and J. Zhang, “Constructing a Core-Shell Pt@MnOx/SiO₂ Catalyst for Benzene Catalytic Combustion With Excellent SO₂ Resistance: New Insights Into Active Sites,” Environmental Science: Nano 11, no. 5 (2024): 1926–1947.

[32] T. Zhao, X. Huang, R. Cui, X. Song, and Z. Tang, “Design the Confinement Structure Mn-TNTs@Ce Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides With Superior SO₂ Resistance Over a Wider Operation Window,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 358 (2024): 124353.

[33] A. Didehban, M. Zabihi, and J. R. Shahrouzi, “Experimental Studies on the Catalytic Behavior of Alloy and Core-Shell Supported Co-ni Bimetallic Nano-Catalysts for Hydrogen Generation by Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43, no. 45 (2018): 20645–20660.

[34] L. Xu, T. Yu, S. Li, J. Xu, B. Shen, and Z. Zhang, “Fabrication of Core-Shell Fe₃O₄@SiO₂/Graphite Catalyst to Improve the Charge Separation for Enhanced Photocatalytic Toluene Oxidation,” Applied Surface Science 679 (2025): 161294.

[35] M. Soltani and M. Zabihi, “Hydrogen Generation by Catalytic Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride Using the Nano-Bimetallic Catalysts Supported on the Core-Shell Magnetic Nanocomposite of Activated Carbon,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45, no. 22 (2020): 12331–12346.

[36] M. J. Ran, M. Wang, Z. Y. Hu, et al., “A Hollow Core-Shell TiO₂/NiCo₂S₄ Z-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution,” Journal of Materials Science and Technology 212 (2025): 182–191.

[37] W. Zhao, Y. Xu, Y. Qiao, et al., “The Design of Core-Shell ZSM-5@NiAl-LDH Composites for Efficient Adsorption of VOCs Under High Humidity,” Separation and Purification Technology 355 (2025): 129729.

[38] B. Delley, “From Molecules to Solids With the DMol³ Approach,” Journal of Chemical Physics 113, no. 18 (2000): 7756–7764.

[39] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple,” Physical Review Letters 77, no. 18 (1996): 3865–3868.

[40] L. Sun, P. Ning, X. Zhao, et al., “Competitive Adsorption and Reaction Mechanism on Simultaneous Catalytic Removal of SO₂, NO and Hg⁰ Over CuO: Experimental and Theoretical Studies,” Chemical Engineering Journal 412 (2021): 128752.

[41] X. Zhao, K. Li, P. Ning, et al., “Theoretical Study on Simultaneous Removal of SO₂, NO, and Hg⁰ Over Graphene: Competitive Adsorption and Adsorption Type Change,” Journal of Molecular Modeling 25, no. 12 (2019): 364.

[42] X. Kong, J. Ding, L. Xie, J. Qin, and J. Wang, “Lanthanum–bismuth Mixed Oxide Catalyst With Improved Activity for Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolysis,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 11, no. 3 (2023): 109830.

[43] C. Li, S. Zhao, X. Yao, et al., “The Catalytic Mechanism of Intercalated Chlorine Anions as Active Basic Sites in MgAl-Layered Double Hydroxide for Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolysis,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research 29, no. 7 (2022): 10605–10616.

[44] P. Gao, Y. Li, Y. Lin, L. Chang, and T. Zhu, “Promoting Effect of Fe/La Loading on γ-Al₂O₃ Catalyst for Hydrolysis of Carbonyl Sulfur,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research 29, no. 56 (2022): 84166–84179.

[45] L. Zhang, H. Wang, Z. Lei, Y. Jia, and Q. Wang, “A Study on the Catalytic Performance of the ZrO₂@γ-Al₂O₃ Hollow Sphere Catalyst for COS Hydrolysis,” New Journal of Chemistry 47, no. 15 (2023): 7070–7083.

[46] H. Jin, Z. An, Q. Li, et al., “Catalysts of Ordered Mesoporous Alumina With a Large Pore Size for Low-Temperature Hydrolysis of Carbonyl Sulfide,” Energy and Fuels 35, no. 10 (2021): 8895–8908.

[47] S. Ahn, M. Oh, J. Shim, and H. Roh, “Advancing Ce–Cu–Al₂O₃ Catalysts for Waste-To-Energy Through Strategic Surface Coordination Modulation,” Chemical Engineering Journal 505 (2025): 159015.

[48] X. Yan, L. Zhao, Y. Huang, J. Zhang, and S. Jiang, “Three-Dimensional Porous CuO-Modified CeO₂-Al₂O₃ Catalysts With Chlorine Resistance for Simultaneous Catalytic Oxidation of Chlorobenzene and Mercury: Cu-Ce Interaction and Structure,” Materials 455 (2023): 131585.

[49] A. A. B. Kirali, S. Sreekantan, and B. Marimuthu, “Ce Promoted Cu/γ-Al₂O₃ Catalysts for the Enhanced Selectivity of 1,2-propanediol From Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Glucose,” Catalysis Communications 165 (2022): 106447.

[50] H. Na, S. Ahn, Y. Lee, et al., “The Role of Additives (Ba, Zr, and Nd) on Ce/Cu/Al₂O₃ Catalyst for Water-Gas Shift Reaction,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45, no. 46 (2020): 24726–24737.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). EcoEnergy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China Chemical Safety Association.