Titanium-Doped Hematite Homojunction Photoanodes Based on Nanorod/Nanobowl Arrays for Efficient Solar Water Splitting

Kexin Ren , Zihao Wu , Simin Zhang , Limin Qi

EcoEnergy ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : e70005

PDF
EcoEnergy ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : e70005 DOI: 10.1002/ece2.70005
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Titanium-Doped Hematite Homojunction Photoanodes Based on Nanorod/Nanobowl Arrays for Efficient Solar Water Splitting

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Hematite is a promising candidate material for photoanodes, but the efficiency of the state-of-the-art hematite photoanodes is limited by the low absorption coefficient, short hole diffusion length, and slow water oxidation kinetics. In this work, a high-efficiency hematite photoanode was designed and fabricated by introducing titanium-doped hematite (Ti:Fe2O3) homojunction with different doping contents and a hierarchical nanorod/nanobowl array structure. The homojuction consisted of low Ti doping nanorods grown on high Ti doping nanobowl arrays, leading to the formation of a broad built-in electric field, significantly enhancing the charge separation and transfer within the bulk. Furthermore, the nanorods radially grown inside the bowls and on the bowl edges enabled enhanced light absorption through multiple light scattering while offering a larger electrode–electrolyte contact area and providing more reaction sites. Compared to the Ti:Fe2O3 nanorod arrays, the Ti:Fe2O3 nanorod/nanobowl array photoanode exhibited an increase in photocurrent density from 1.6 mA cm−2 to 3.0 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V versus RHE, maintaining long-term stability over 100 h at 1.23 V versus RHE. This study not only achieved a high-performance hematite photoanode but also provided a new perspective on the design of differently doping homojunction photoanodes with desired nanostructures.

Keywords

hematite / homojunction photoanode / nanobowl array / photoelectrochemical water splitting / Ti doping

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kexin Ren, Zihao Wu, Simin Zhang, Limin Qi. Titanium-Doped Hematite Homojunction Photoanodes Based on Nanorod/Nanobowl Arrays for Efficient Solar Water Splitting. EcoEnergy, 2025, 3(3): e70005 DOI:10.1002/ece2.70005

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

J. H. Kim, D. Hansora, P. Sharma, J.-W. Jang, and J. S. Lee, “Toward Practical Solar Hydrogen Production – an Artificial Photosynthetic Leaf-To-Farm Challenge,” Chemical Society Reviews 48, no. 7 (2019): 1908–1971.

[2]

S. Chu, Y. Cui, and N. Liu, “The Path towards Sustainable Energy,” Nature Materials 16, no. 1 (2017): 16–22.

[3]

M. Z. Rahman, T. Edvinsson, and J. G. Rahman, Nature Reviews Chemistry 6 (2022): 243–258.

[4]

D. K. Lee, D. Lee, M. A. Lumley, and K.-S. Choi, “Progress on Ternary Oxide-Based Photoanodes for Use in Photoelectrochemical Cells for Solar Water Splitting,” Chemical Society Reviews 48, no. 7 (2019): 2126–2157.

[5]

J. Li, H. Chen, C. A. Triana, and G. R. Patzke, “Hematite Photoanodes for Water Oxidation: Electronic Transitions, Carrier Dynamics, and Surface Energetics,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, no. 34 (2021): 18380–18396.

[6]

C. Hu, X. Li, C. Dong, et al., “Key Modification Strategies for the Rational Design of Hematite to Promote Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation: A Review of Recent Advances,” Materials Chemistry Frontiers 7, no. 21 (2023): 5333–5354.

[7]

J. Park, J. Kang, S. Chaule, and J.-H. Jang, “Recent Progress and Perspectives on Heteroatom Doping of Hematite Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 11, no. 45 (2023): 24551–24565.

[8]

B. Kumar Jha, S. Chaule, and J.-H. Jang, “Enhancing Photocatalytic Efficiency With Hematite Photoanodes: Principles, Properties, and Strategies for Surface, Bulk, and Interface Charge Transfer Improvement,” Materials Chemistry Frontiers 8, no. 10 (2024): 2197–2226.

[9]

H. Zhao and Y. Lei, “3D Nanostructures for the Next Generation of High-Performance Nanodevices for Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage,” Advanced Energy Materials 10, no. 28 (2020): 2001460.

[10]

Y. Wang, S. Cui, Z. Tian, M. Han, T. Zhao, and W. Li, “Ge-Doped Hematite With FeCoNi-Bi As Cocatalyst for High-Performing Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Small 20, no. 36 (2024): 2400316.

[11]

K.-Y. Yoon, J. Park, H. Lee, et al., “Unveiling the Role of the Ti Dopant and Viable Si Doping of Hematite for Practically Efficient Solar Water Splitting,” ACS Catalysis 12, no. 9 (2022): 5112–5122.

[12]

M. Li, K.-H. Ye, W. Qiu, Y. Wang, and H. Ren, “HeterogeneityBetween and Within Single Hematite Nanorods as Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 12 (2022): 5247–5252.

[13]

X. Ye, Q. Xu, T. Nie, X. Luo, S. Jiang, and L. Guo, “Study on Bubble Dynamics in Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting With Low-Rate Flow Fields,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 127, no. 45 (2023): 22085–22096.

[14]

C. Xu, H. Wang, K. Liang, Y. Zhang, W. Li, and H. Zhang, “Inducing Hollow and Porous Hematite Nanorod Photoanodes by Rare Earth and Transition Metal Doping for Enhanced Solar Water Splitting,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 12, no. 20 (2024): 11831–11840.

[15]

J. Park, K.-Y. Yoon, B. G. Ghule, H. Kim, and J.-H. Jang, “Morphology-Engineered Hematite Photoanode for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” ACS Energy Letters 9, no. 6 (2024): 3169–3176.

[16]

R. Yang, S. Xiao, J. Zhang, S. Tang, R. Xu, and Y. Tong, “Hematite Hollow-Sphere-Array Photoanodes for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Small 20, no. 28 (2024): 2310752.

[17]

S. Tang, M. Li, D. Huang, et al., “Water Splitting: 3D Hierarchical Nanorod@Nanobowl Array Photoanode With a Tunable Light-Trapping Cutoff and Bottom-Selective Field Enhancement for Efficient Solar Water Splitting (Small 14/2019),” Small 15, no. 14 (2019): 1804976.

[18]

J. Miao, Y. Yang, P. Cui, C. Ru, and K. Zhang, “Improving Charge Transfer Beyond Conventional Heterojunction Photoelectrodes: Fundamentals, Strategies and Applications,” Advanced Functional Materials 34, no. 46 (2024): 2406443.

[19]

F. Li, J. Jian, S. Wang, et al., “TiO2 Passivation Layers With Laser Derived P-N Heterojunctions Enable Boosted Photoelectrochemical Performance of α-Fe2O3 Photoanodes,” Chemical Engineering Journal 461 (2023): 141872.

[20]

K. Kim, I.-H. Kim, K.-Y. Yoon, J. Lee, and J.-H. Jang, “α-Fe2O3 on Patterned Fluorine Doped Tin Oxide for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 3, no. 15 (2015): 7706–7709.

[21]

F. Li, J. Jian, J. Zou, et al., “Bulk Embedding of Ti-Defected TiO2 Nano-Heterointerfaces in Hematite Photoanode for Boosted Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Chemical Engineering Journal 473 (2023): 145254.

[22]

Y. Xiao, C. Feng, J. Fu, et al., “Band Structure Engineering and Defect Control of Ta3N5 for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation,” Nature catalysis 3, no. 11 (2020): 932–940.

[23]

Y. Zhang, Y. Huang, S.-S. Zhu, et al., “Water Splitting: Covalent S—O Bonding Enables Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance of Cu2S/Fe2O3 Heterojunction for Water Splitting (Small 30/2021),” Small 17, no. 30 (2021): 2100320.

[24]

K.-H. Ye, H. Li, D. Huang, et al., “Enhancing Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting by Combining Work Function Tuning and Heterojunction Engineering,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 3687.

[25]

Z. Luo, C. Li, S. Liu, T. Wang, and J. Gong, “Gradient Doping of Phosphorus in Fe2O3 Nanoarray Photoanodes for Enhanced Charge Separation,” Chemical Science 8, no. 1 (2017): 91–100.

[26]

H. Zhang, D. Li, W. J. Byun, et al., “Gradient Tantalum-Doped Hematite Homojunction Photoanode Improves Both Photocurrents and Turn-On Voltage for Solar Water Splitting,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 4622.

[27]

J. Bai, R.-T. Gao, X. Guo, et al., “Reduction of Charge Carrier Recombination by Ce Gradient Doping and Surface Polarization for Solar Water Splitting,” Chemical Engineering Journal 448 (2022): 137602.

[28]

Z. Yu, L. Chen, L. Luo, et al., “Combining Bulk Charge Transport and Surface Charge Transfer to Design Titanium-Doped Hematite Homojunction Photoanodes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 126, no. 9 (2022): 4296–4305.

[29]

H.-C. Wang, H.-M. Li, T. Yang, et al., “Enhanced Water Oxidation of Hematite Photoanodes via Localized n-p Homojunctions Induced by Gradient Zn Doping,” Advanced Functional Materials 34, (2024): 2406545.

[30]

K. Ren, J. Zhou, Z. Wu, Q. Sun, and L. Qi, “Dual Heterojunctions and Nanobowl Morphology Engineered BiVO4 Photoanodes for Enhanced Solar Water Splitting (Small 1/2024),” Small 20, no. 1 (2024): 2304835.

[31]

W. H. Wang, J. Y. Dong, X. Z. Ye, Y. Li, Y. R. Ma, and L. Qi, “Heterostructured TiO2 Nanorod@Nanobowl Arrays for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Small 12, no. 11 (2016): 1469–1478.

[32]

W. Wang, C. Jin, and L. Qi, “Hierarchical CdS Nanorod@SnO2 Nanobowl Arrays for Efficient and Stable Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Generation,” Small 14, no. 33 (2018): 1801352.

[33]

X. Lv, G. Zhang, M. Wang, G. Li, J. Deng, and J. Zhong, “How Titanium and Iron Are Integrated Into Hematite to Enhance the Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation: A Review,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 25, no. 3 (2023): 1406–1420.

[34]

C. X. Kronawitter, I. Zegkinoglou, S.-H. Shen, et al., “Titanium Incorporation into Hematite Photoelectrodes: Theoretical Considerations and Experimental Observations,” Energy & Environmental Science 7, no. 10 (2014): 3100–3121.

[35]

Y. Xiao, Z. Fan, M. Nakabayashi, et al., “Decoupling Light Absorption and Carrier Transport via Heterogeneous Doping in Ta3N5 Thin Film Photoanode,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 7769.

[36]

J. Fu, Z. Fan, M. Nakabayashi, et al., “Interface Engineering of Ta3N5 Thin Film Photoanode for Highly Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 729.

[37]

L. K. Putri, B.-J. Ng, W.-J. Ong, S.-P. Chai, and A. R. Mohamed, “Toward Excellence in Photocathode Engineering for Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction: Design Rationales and Current Progress,” Advanced Energy Materials 12, no. 41 (2022): 2201093.

[38]

J. Bai, R.-T. Gao, N. T. Nguyen, X. Liu, X. Zhang, and L. Wang, “Heterogeneous Doping via Charge Carrier Transport Improves Photoelectrochemical H2O Oxidative H2O2 Synthesis,” Chemical Engineering Journal 466 (2023): 142984.

[39]

W. Wang and L. Qi, “Light Management With Patterned Micro- and Nanostructure Arrays for Photocatalysis, Photovoltaics, and Optoelectronic and Optical Devices,” Advanced Functional Materials 29 no. 25 (2019): 1807275.

[40]

Y. M. Choi, B. W. Lee, M. S. Jung, et al., “Retarded Charge–Carrier Recombination in Photoelectrochemical Cells From Plasmon-Induced Resonance Energy Transfer,” Advanced Energy Materials 10, no. 22 (2020): 2000570.

[41]

J. Li, S. K. Cushing, P. Zheng, F. Meng, D. Chu, and N. Wu, “Plasmon-induced Photonic and Energy-Transfer Enhancement of Solar Water Splitting by a Hematite Nanorod Array,” Nature Communications 4, no. 1 (2013): 2651.

[42]

R. Tang, S. Zhou, Z. Zhang, R. Zheng, and J. Huang, “Engineering Nanostructure–Interface of Photoanode Materials toward Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation,” Advanced Materials 33, no. 17 (2021): 2005389.

[43]

S. Kment, F. Riboni, S. Pausova, et al., “Photoanodes Based on TiO2and α-Fe2O3for Solar Water Splitting – Superior Role of 1D Nanoarchitectures and of Combined Heterostructures,” Chemical Society Reviews 46, no. 12 (2017): 3716–3769.

[44]

V. B. Llorente, K. J. Jenewein, M. Bierling, et al., “Photocorrosion of Hematite Photoanodes in Neutral and Alkaline Electrolytes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 127, no. 39 (2023): 19687–19697.

[45]

F. D. Speck, K. E. Dettelbach, R. S. Sherbo, D. A. Salvatore, A. Huang, and C. P. Berlinguette, “On the Electrolytic Stability of Iron-Nickel Oxides,” Chem 2, no. 4 (2017): 590–597.

[46]

Z.-Y. Wang, H.-M. Li, S.-S. Yi, et al., “In-situ Coating of Multifunctional FeCo-Bimetal Organic Framework Nanolayers on Hematite Photoanode for Superior Oxygen Evolution,” Applied Catalysis B 297 (2021): 120406.

[47]

H. Chai, S. Wang, X. Wang, J. Ma, and J. Jin, “Modulation of the Chemical Microenvironment at the Hematite-Based Photoanode Interface With a Covalent Triazine Framework for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation,” ACS Catalysis 12, no. 6 (2022): 3700–3709.

[48]

H. Chai, L. Gao, P. Wang, F. Li, G. Hu, and J. Jin, “In2S3/F-Fe2O3 Type-II Heterojunction Bonded by Interfacial S-O for Enhanced Charge Separation and Transport in Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation,” Applied Catalysis B 305 (2022): 121011.

[49]

Q. Sun, K. Ren, and L. Qi, “Boosting the Performance of BiVO4 Photoanodes by the Simultaneous Introduction of Oxygen Vacancies and Cocatalyst via Photoelectrodeposition,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 14, no. 33 (2022): 37833–37842.

[50]

Q. Sun, T. Cheng, Z. Liu, and L. Qi, “A Cobalt Silicate Modified BiVO4 Photoanode for Efficient Solar Water Oxidation,” Applied Catalysis B 277 (2020): 119189.

[51]

X. Ning, D. Yin, Y. Fan, et al., “Plasmon-Enhanced Charge Separation and Surface Reactions Based on Ag-Loaded Transition-Metal Hydroxide for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation,” Advanced Energy Materials 11, no. 17 (2021): 2100405.

[52]

T.-K. Liu, G. Y. Jang, S. Kim, K. Zhang, X. Zheng, and J. H. Park, “Organic Upgrading through Photoelectrochemical Reactions: Toward Higher Profits,” Small Methods 8, no. 2 (2024): 2300315.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). EcoEnergy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China Chemical Safety Association.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

22

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/