Fabrication of self-supported catalysts via electrodeposition for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis: Emphasizing on the porous transport layers

Abstract

The potential of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is enormous in tackling worldwide environmental and energy issues in the face of increasing risks associated with climate change and energy scarcity. Nevertheless, the economic competitiveness of hydrogen production is hindered by the challenging operating conditions in acidic environments, resulting in a lower unit cost compared to alternative energy sources. Hence, numerous global research endeavors persist in enhancing the efficiency of essential components in PEMWE systems, specifically the porous transport layer (PTL). Additionally, investigating the interface between catalyst layer (CL) and PTL, which is directly associated with system performance, is imperative for future sustainability and cost reduction. This review focuses on the analysis of fabrication techniques, materials, and structural configurations to enhance the performance of PTLs. Additionally, we suggest the use of self-supported catalysts as potential solutions to enhance mass and charge transfer at the interface between CLs and PTLs, hence facilitating the production of hydrogen on a wide scale. In the last section we provide an overview of the future trajectory and potential of next-generation PEMWE in the context of efficient hydrogen production.

Keywords

hydrogen evolution reaction(HER) / oxygen evolution reaction(OER) / porous transport layer / proton exchange membrane water electrolysis(PEMWE) / self-supported catalyst / water splitting

References

[1] Yoro KO, Daramola MO. Advances in carbon capture. Elsevier;2020:3.

[2] Hoel M, Kverndokk S. Depletion of fossil fuels and the impacts of global warming. Resour Energy Econ. 1996;18(2):115-136.

[3] Gahlawat IN, Lakra P. Global climate change and its effects. Integrated J Soc Sci. 2020;7(1):14.

[4] Keller F, Lee RP, Meyer B. Life cycle assessment of global warming potential, resource depletion and acidification potential of fossil, renewable and secondary feedstock for olefin production in Germany. J Clean Prod. 2020;250:119484.

[5] Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR. Global Warming of 1.5 C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 C above Pre-industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Cambridge University Press;2022.

[6] Du C, Yang L, Yang F, Cheng G, Luo W. Nest-like NiCoP for highly efficient overall water splitting. ACS Catal. 2017;7(6):4131-4137.

[7] Ciarreta A, Espinosa MP, Pizarro-Irizar C. Is green energy expensive? Empirical evidence from the Spanish electricity market. Energy Pol. 2014;69:205-215.

[8] Stram BN. Key challenges to expanding renewable energy. Energy Pol. 2016;96:728-734.

[9] Blazquez J, Fuentes-Bracamontes R, Bollino CA, Nezamuddin N. The renewable energy policy Paradox. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;82:1-5.

[10] Oliveira AM, Beswick RR, Yan Y. A green hydrogen economy for a renewable energy society. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2021;33:100701.

[11] Li A, Kong S, Adachi K, et al. Atomically dispersed hexavalent iridium oxide from MnO₂ reduction for oxygen evolution catalysis. Science. 2024;384(6696):666-670.

[12] Lv F, Zhang W, Yang W, et al. Ir-based alloy nanoflowers with optimized hydrogen binding energy as bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Small Methods. 2020;4(6):1900129.

[13] Wang C, Schechter A, Feng L. Iridium-based catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media: mechanism, catalytic promotion effects and recent progress. Nano Res Energy. 2023;2:e9120056.

[14] Yoro KO, Daramola MO. Advances in carbon capture. Elsevier;2020:3.

[15] Green I. Renewables 2020 global status report. Int Renew Energy Agency. 2020. ISBN 978-3-948393-00-7.

[16] Pham CV, Escalera-López D, Mayrhofer K, Cherevko S, Thiele S. Essentials of high performance water electrolyzers – from catalyst layer materials to electrode engineering. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11(44):2101998.

[17] Vesborg PC, Jaramillo TF. Addressing the terawatt challenge: scalability in the supply of chemical elements for renewable energy. RSC Adv. 2012;2(21):7933.

[18] Lettenmeier P, Wang L, Golla-Schindler U, et al. Nanosized IrO_x-Ir catalyst with relevant activity for anodes of proton exchange membrane electrolysis produced by a cost-effective procedure. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55(2):742-746.

[19] Wang L, Lettenmeier P, Golla-Schindler U, et al. Nanostructured Ir-supported on Ti₄O₇ as a cost-effective anode for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18(6):4487-4495.

[20] Reier T, Oezaslan M, Strasser P. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt catalysts: a comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials. ACS Catal. 2012;2(8):1765-1772.

[21] Cherevko S, Reier T, Zeradjanin AR, Pawolek Z, Strasser P, Mayrhofer KJ. Stability of nanostructured iridium oxide electrocatalysts during oxygen evolution reaction in acidic environment. Electrochem Commun. 2014;48:81-85.

[22] Nong HN, Oh HS, Reier T, et al. Oxide-supported IrNiO_x core–shell particles as efficient, cost-effective, and stable catalysts for electrochemical water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54(10):2975-2979.

[23] Reier T, Pawolek Z, Cherevko S, et al. Molecular insight in structure and activity of highly efficient, low-Ir Ir–Ni oxide catalysts for electrochemical water splitting (OER). J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(40):13031-13040.

[24] Kadakia KS, Jampani PH, Velikokhatnyi OI, et al. Nanostructured F doped IrO₂ electro-catalyst powders for PEM based water electrolysis. J Power Sources. 2014;269:855-865.

[25] Hoel M, Kverndokk S. Depletion of fossil fuels and the impacts of global warming. Resour Energy Econ. 1996;18(2):115-136.

[26] Wang L, Song F, Ozouf G, et al. Improving the activity and stability of Ir catalysts for PEM electrolyzer anodes by SnO₂: Sb aerogel supports: does V addition play an active role in electrocatalysis? J Mater Chem A. 2017;5(7):3172-3178.

[27] Wang L, Saveleva VA, Zafeiratos S, et al. Highly active anode electrocatalysts derived from electrochemical leaching of Ru from metallic Ir_0.7Ru_0.3 for proton exchange membrane electrolyzers. Nano Energy. 2017;34:385-391.

[28] Bühler M, Holzapfel P, McLaughlin D, Thiele S. From catalyst coated membranes to porous transport electrode based configurations in PEM water electrolyzers. J Electrochem Soc. 2019;166(14): F1070-F1078.

[29] Qin J, Lv Y, Han G, et al. Integrated ultra-low PtIr catalyst coated membrane toward efficient proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Chem Eng J. 2024;479:147913.

[30] Feng J, Lv F, Zhang W, et al. Iridium-based multimetallic porous hollow nanocrystals for efficient overall-water-splitting catalysis. Adv Mater. 2017;29(47):1703798.

[31] Pi Y, Shao Q, Wang P, Guo J, Huang X. General formation of monodisperse IrM (M =Ni, Co, Fe) bimetallic nanoclusters as bifunctional electrocatalysts for acidic overall water splitting. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27:1700886.

[32] Shan X, Liu J, Mu H, et al. An engineered superhydrophilic/superaerophobic electrocatalyst composed of the supported CoMoS_x chalcogel for overall water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(4):1659-1665.

[33] Chandrasekaran S, Choi WM, Chung JS, Hur SH, Kim EJ. 3D crumpled RGO-CO₃O₄ photocatalysts for UV-induced hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater Lett. 2014;136:118-121.

[34] Zhang K, Liang X, Wang L, et al. Status and perspectives of key materials for PEM electrolyzer. Nano Res Energy. 2022;1:e9120032.

[35] Zhang W, Zhong X, Qin H, et al. Efficient and robust IrW/WO_3-x@NC/CP self-standing electrode with low Ir-loading for overall water electrolysis in acidic medium. Electrochim Acta. 2024;482:144000.

[36] Jeong H-Y, Oh J, Yi GS, et al. High–performance water electrolyzer with minimum platinum group metal usage: iron nitride–iridium oxide core–shell nanostructures for stable and efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Appl Catal B Environ. 2023;330:122596.

[37] Lee JK, Anderson G, Tricker AW, et al. Ionomer-free and recyclable porous-transport electrode for high-performing proton-exchange-membrane water electrolysis. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4592.

[38] Yuan X-Z, Shaigan N, Song C, et al. The porous transport layer in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis: perspectives on a complex component. Sustain Energy Fuels. 2022;6(8):1824-1853.

[39] Yasutake M, Noda Z, Matsuda J, et al. Ru-core Ir-shell electrocatalysts deposited on a surface-modified Ti-based porous transport layer for polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;49:169-183.

[40] Chen P, McCreery RL. Control of electron transfer kinetics at glassy carbon electrodes by specific surface modification. Anal Chem. 1996;68(22):3958-3965.

[41] Xu J, Chen Q, Swain GM. Anthraquinonedisulfonate electrochemistry: a comparison of glassy carbon, hydrogenated glassy carbon, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, and diamond electrodes. Anal Chem. 1998;70(15):3146-3154.

[42] Chandrasekaran S, Khandelwal M, Dayong F, et al. Development and perspective on robust nano-and microstructured binder-free electrodes for bifunctional water electrolysis and beyond. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12(23):2200409.

[43] Ramadoss M, Chen Y, Chen X, et al. Iron-modulated three-dimensional CoNiP vertical nanoarrays: an exploratory binder-free bifunctional electrocatalyst for efficient overall water splitting. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125(38):20972-20979.

[44] Wang Y, Pang Y, Xu H, Martinez A, Chen KS. PEM fuel cell and electrolysis cell technologies and hydrogen infrastructure development–a review. Energy Environ Sci. 2022;15(6):2288-2328.

[45] Doan TL, Lee HE, Shah SSH, et al. A review of the porous transport layer in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. Int J Energy Res. 2021;45(10):14207-14220.

[46] Keller F, Lee RP, Meyer B. Life cycle assessment of global warming potential, resource depletion and acidification potential of fossil, renewable and secondary feedstock for olefin production in Germany. J Clean Prod. 2020;250:119484.

[47] Zhang H, Liao X, Guan Y, et al. Lithiophilic-lithiophobic gradient interfacial layer for a highly stable lithium metal anode. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3729.

[48] Choi S, Kucharczyk CJ, Liang Y, et al. Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells. Nat Energy. 2018;3:202-210.

[49] De Las Heras N, Roberts E, Langton R, Hodgson D. A review of metal separator plate materials suitable for automotive PEM fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci. 2009;2:206-214.

[50] Walter A, Kamino BA, Moon S-J, et al. Rear textured p-type high temperature passivating contacts and their implementation in perovskite/silicon tandem cells. Energy Adv. 2023;2(11):1818-1822.

[51] Allen TG, Bullock J, Yang X, Javey A, De Wolf S. Passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells. Nat Energy. 2019;4(11):914-928.

[52] Schuler T, Ciccone JM, Krentscher B, et al. Hierarchically structured porous transport layers for polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. Adv Energy Mater. 2020;10(2):1903216.

[53] Bühler M, Hegge F, Holzapfel P, et al. Optimization of anodic porous transport electrodes for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(47):26984-26995.

[54] Lettenmeier P, Kolb S, Sata N, et al. Comprehensive investigation of novel pore-graded gas diffusion layers for high-performance and cost-effective proton exchange membrane electrolyzers. Energy Environ Sci. 2017;10(12):2521-2533.

[55] Lettenmeier P, Kolb S, Sata N, et al. Comprehensive investigation of novel pore-graded gas diffusion layers for high-performance and cost-effective proton exchange membrane electrolyzers. Energy Environ Sci. 2017;10(12):2521-2533.

[56] Zheng L, Xu Y, Jin D, Xie Y. Well-aligned molybdenum oxidenanorods on metal substrates: solution-based synthesis and their electrochemical capacitor application. J Mater Chem. 2010;20(34):7135.

[57] Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR. Global Warming of 1.5 C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 C above Pre-industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Cambridge University Press; 2022.

[58] Qiu C, Xu Z, Chen F-Y, Wang H. Anode engineering for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. ACS Catal. 2024;14(2):921-954.

[59] Kang Z, Mo J, Yang G, et al. Investigation of thin/well-tunable liquid/gas diffusion layers exhibiting superior multifunctional performance in low-temperature electrolytic water splitting. Energy Environ Sci. 2017;10(1):166-175.

[60] Stiber S, Balzer H, Wierhake A, et al. Porous transport layers for proton exchange membrane electrolysis under extreme conditions of current density, temperature, and pressure. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11(33):2100630.

[61] Kang Z, Alia SM, Young JL, Bender G. Effects of various parameters of different porous transport layers in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Electrochim Acta. 2020;354:136641.

[62] Liu C, Carmo M, Bender G, et al. Performance enhancement of PEM electrolyzers through iridium-coated titanium porous transport layers. Electrochem Commun. 2018;97:96-99.

[63] Rakousky C, Keeley GP, Wippermann K, Carmo M, Stolten D. The stability challenge on the pathway to high-current-density polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzers. Electrochim Acta. 2018;278:324-331.

[64] Mo J, Kang Z, Retterer ST, et al. Discovery of true electrochemical reactions for ultrahigh catalyst mass activity in water splitting. Sci Adv. 2016;2(11):e1600690.

[65] Liu C, Shviro M, Gago AS, et al. Exploring the interface of skin-layered titanium fibers for electrochemical water splitting. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11(8):2002926.

[66] Stiber S, Sata N, Morawietz T, et al. A high-performance, durable and low-cost proton exchange membrane electrolyser with stainless steel components. Energy Environ Sci. 2022;15(1):109-122.

[67] Park SH, Koo J, Park Y-J, et al. Uniformly scalable and stackable porous transport layer manufactured by tape casting and calendering for efficient water electrolysis. Chem Eng J. 2024;481:148276.

[68] Du C, Yang L, Yang F, Cheng G, Luo W. Nest-like NiCoP for highly efficient overall water splitting. ACS Catal. 2017;7(6):4131-4137.

[69] Carmo M, Fritz DL, Mergel J, Stolten D. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(12):4901-4934.

[70] Li J, Zheng G, Chi C, Shan H, Fang Z. Plasmonics of 2D nanomaterials: properties and applications. Adv Sci. 2017;4(8):1600380.

[71] Suen N-T, Hung S-F, Quan Q, Zhang N, Xu Y-J. Chen HM. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46(2):337-365.

[72] Spöri C, Kwan JTH, Bonakdarpour A, Wilkinson DP, Strasser P. The stability challenges of oxygen evolving catalysts: towards a common fundamental understanding and mitigation of catalyst degradation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(22):5994-6021.

[73] Wang J, Han L, Huang B, Shao Q, Xin HL, Huang X. Amorphization activated ruthenium-tellurium nanorods for efficient water splitting. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5692.

[74] Higareda A, Hernández-Arellano DL, Ordoñez LC, Barbosa R, Alonso-Vante N. Advanced electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction: from single-to multielement materials. Catalysts. 2023;13(10):1346.

[75] Liu S, Chang Y, He N, Zhu S, Wang L, Liu X. Competition between lattice oxygen and adsorbate evolving mechanisms in rutile Ru-based oxide for the oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(16):20563-20570.

[76] Hu C, Dong H, Li Y, et al. Self-Reconstruction of single-atom-thick A layers in nanolaminated MAX phases for enhanced oxygen evolution. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(7):2211530.

[77] Thao NTT, Jang JU, Nayak AK, Han H. Current trends of iridium-based catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in acidic water electrolysis. Small Science. 2024;4(1):2300109.

[78] Peng M, Huang J, Zhu Y, et al. Structural anisotropy determining the oxygen evolution mechanism of strongly correlated perovskite nickelate electrocatalyst. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2021;9(11):4262-4270.

[79] Binninger T, Mohamed R, Waltar K, et al. Thermodynamic explanation of the universal correlation between oxygen evolution activity and corrosion of oxide catalysts. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):12167.

[80] Rutavi G, Tarimo DJ, Maphiri VM, Manyala N. Two-step electrodeposition of Hausmannite sulphur reduced graphene oxide and cobalt-nickel layered double hydroxide heterostructure for high-performance supercapacitor. Int J Energy Res. 2022;46(8):11214-11227.

[81] Kale MB, Borse RA, Gomaa Abdelkader Mohamed A, Wang Y. Electrocatalysts by electrodeposition: recent advances, synthesis methods, and applications in energy conversion. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(25):2101313.

[82] Zhao R, Yang Y, Liu G, et al. Redirected Zn electrodeposition by an anti-corrosion elastic constraint for highly reversible Zn anodes. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(2):2001867.

[83] Liu J, Li P, Bi J, Zhu Q, Han B. Design and preparation of electrocatalysts by electrodeposition for CO₂Reduction. Chem—Eur J. 2022;28(31):e202200242.

[84] Yeo K-R, Lee K-S, Kim H, Lee J, Kim S-K. A highly active and stable 3D dandelion spore-structured self-supporting Ir-based electrocatalyst for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis fabricated using structural reconstruction. Energy Environ Sci. 2022;15(8):3449-3461.

[85] Weber CC, Wrubel JA, Gubler L, Bender G, De Angelis S, Büchi FN. How the porous transport layer interface affects catalyst utilization and performance in polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(29):34750-34763.

[86] Kim H, Kim J, Kim J, et al. Dendritic gold-supported iridium/iridium oxide ultra-low loading electrodes for high-performance proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer. Appl Catal B Environ. 2021;283:119596.

[87] Wang Z, Ren X, Luo Y, et al. An ultrafine platinum–cobalt alloy decorated cobalt nanowire array with superb activity toward alkaline hydrogen evolution. Nanoscale. 2018;10(26):12302-12307.

[88] Cao Z, Chen Q, Zhang J, et al. Platinum-nickel alloy excavated nano-multipods with hexagonal close-packed structure and superior activity towards hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):15131.

[89] Stamenkovic VR, Mun BS, Arenz M, et al. Trends in electrocatalysis on extended and nanoscale Pt-bimetallic alloy surfaces. Nat Mater. 2007;6(3):241-247.

[90] Yeo K-R, Kim H, Lee K-S, et al. Controlled doping of ultralow amounts Ru on Ni cathode for PEMWE: experimental and theoretical elucidation of enhanced performance. Appl Catal, B: Environment and Energy. 2024;346:123738.

[91] Wan C, Regmi YN, Leonard BM. Multiple phases of molybdenum carbide as electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew Chem. 2014;126(25):6525-6528.

[92] Liao L, Wang S, Xiao J, et al. A nanoporous molybdenum carbide nanowire as an electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ Sci. 2014;7(1):387-392.

[93] Tian J, Liu Q, Asiri AM, Sun X. Self-supported nanoporous cobalt phosphide nanowire arrays: an efficient 3D hydrogen-evolving cathode over the wide range of pH 0–14. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(21):7587-7590.

[94] Xiao P, Sk MA, Thia L, et al. Molybdenum phosphide as an efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ Sci. 2014;7(8):2624-2629.

[95] Popczun EJ, McKone JR, Read CG, et al. Nanostructured nickel phosphide as an electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(25):9267-9270.

[96] Long X, Li G, Wang Z, et al. Metallic iron–nickel sulfide ultrathin nanosheets as a highly active electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in acidic media. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(37):11900-11903.

[97] Merki D, Hu X. Recent developments of molybdenum and tungsten sulfides as hydrogen evolution catalysts. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4(10):3878.

[98] Lukowski MA, Daniel AS, English CR, et al. Highly active hydrogen evolution catalysis from metallic WS₂ nanosheets. Energy Environ Sci. 2014;7(8):2608-2613.

[99] Wang Y, Zhao Y, Ding X, Qiao L. Recent advances in the electrochemistry of layered post-transition metal chalcogenide nanomaterials for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Energy Chem. 2021;60:451-479.

[100] Theerthagiri J, Lee SJ, Murthy AP, Madhavan J, Choi MY. Fundamental aspects and recent advances in transition metal nitrides as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction: a review. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2020;24(1):100805.

[101] Wang H, Yang P, Sun X, et al. Co-Ru alloy nanoparticles decorated onto two-dimensional nitrogen doped carbon nanosheets towards hydrogen/oxygen evolution reaction and oxygen reduction reaction. J Energy Chem. 2023;87:286-294.

[102] Kim JH, Kim H, Kim J, Lee HJ, Jang JH, Ahn SH. Electrodeposited molybdenum sulfide as a cathode for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer. J Power Sources. 2018;392:69-78.

[103] Lee B-S, Ahn SH, Park H-Y, et al. Development of electrodeposited IrO₂ electrodes as anodes in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. Appl Catal B Environ. 2015;179:285-291.

[104] Lee T, Park Y, Kim H, et al. Restructured Co-Ru alloys via electrodeposition for efficient hydrogen production in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Int J Energy Res. 2022;46(6):7975-7987.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). EcoEnergy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China Chemical Safety Association.