Exploring study materials and data sharing practices in traditional, complementary and integrative medicine research: a protocol for a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Introduction Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) therapies include those typically considered outside of the purview of conventional medicine. Sharing study materials and data is crucial for enhancing transparency, reproducibility, and data use for secondary data analyses in TCIM research. This cross-sectional study aims to assess the extent to which TCIM study materials and data are made publicly available. Methods We will analyze a sample of 400 published TCIM research articles including primary studies (e.g. clinical trials, observational studies, and qualitative research), as well as evidence synthesis studies (e.g., systematic reviews and scoping reviews), which are informed by systematic searches. In analyzing these studies, we aim to assess whether and how researchers shared the data and materials they generated or used in their work, including details on how to access them. This study will be conducted by searching the MEDLINE database using the “Complementary Therapies” medical subject heading; records will be screened for eligibility then a sample of eligible articles will be selected at random. Discussion The findings and observations from this analysis will provide insights into current practices and highlight areas for improvement in the transparency and accessibility of TCIM research.

Keywords

complementary medicine / data sharing / integrative medicine / materials sharing / study materials and data / traditional medicine

References

[1] Traditional, complementary and integrative medicine. World Health Organization Web site. https://www.who.int/health-topics/traditional-complementary-and-integrative-medicine#tab=tab_1. Accessed August 12, 2025. 2025.

[2] Ng JY, Boon HS, Thompson AK, Whitehead CR. ” “complementary, Making sense of “alternative, ” “unconventional” and “integrative” medicine: exploring the terms and meanings through a textual analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016; 16(1):134.

[3] Ng JY, Dhawan T, Dogadova E, et al. Operational definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine derived from a systematic search. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022; 22(1):104.

[4] National health interview survey 2022. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Web site. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/research/national-health-interview-survey-2022. Accessed August 12, 2025.

[5] World Health Organization. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/312342/9789241515436-eng.pdf sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed August 12, 2025.

[6] Park HL, Lee HS, Shin BC, et al. Traditional medicine in China, Korea, and Japan: a brief introduction and comparison. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012; 2012:429103.

[7] Veziari Y, Leach MJ, Kumar S. Barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017; 17(1):166.

[8] Raja M, Cramer H, Lee MS, Wieland LS, Ng JY. Addressing the challenges of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research: an international perspective and proposed strategies moving forward. Perspect Integr Med. 2024; 3(2):86-97.

[9] Veziari Y, Kumar S, Leach M. Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021; 21(1):201.

[10] Leach MJ, Veziari Y. Enablers and barriers to evidence implementation in complementary medicine: a systematic review. Integr Med Res. 2022; 11(4):100899.

[11] Choi S, Kunwor SK, Im H, et al. Traditional and complementary medicine use among cancer patients in Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers. 2024; 16(18):3130.

[12] DeVito NJ, Morton C, Cashin AG, Richards GC, Lee H. Sharing study materials in health and medical research. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023; 28(4):255-259.

[13] Ng JY, Wieland LS, Lee MS, et al. Open science practices in traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research: a path to enhanced transparency and collaboration. Integr Med Res. 2024; 13(2):101047.

[14] Sharing and reuse of health-related data for research purposes: WHO policy and implementation guidance. World Health Organization Web site.

[15] 2023 NIH data management and sharing policy. National Institutes of Health Office of Intramural Research Web site. https://oir.nih.gov/sourcebook/intramural-program-oversight/intramural-data-sharing/2023-nih-data-management-sharing-policy. Accessed August 16, 2025.

[16] Vasilevsky NA, Minnier J, Haendel MA, Champieux RE. Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark. PeerJ. 2017; 5:e3208.

[17] Ng JY, Lin B, Parikh T, Cramer H, Moher D. Investigating the nature of open science practices across complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: an audit. PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302655.

[18] Data sharing. National Library of Medicine Network of the National Library of Medicine Web site. https://www.nnlm.gov/guides/data-glossary/data-sharing. Accessed August 12, 2025.

[19] Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Discussion Framework for Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Guiding Principles, Elements, and Activities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014.

[20] Ijaz N, Rioux J, Elder C, Weeks J. Whole systems research methods in health care: a scoping review. J Altern Complement Med. 2019; 25(S1):S21-S51.

[21] Open Science Framework. OSFHOME Web site.

[22] Enhancing the Quality and transparency of health research. Equator network Web site. https://www.equator-network.org/. Accessed August 12, 2025.

[23] Webb R. 7.3: Sample Size Calculation for a Proportion. Statistics LibreTexts; 2023. LibreTexts Statistics Web site. https://stats.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Statistics/Mostly_Harmless_Statistics_(Webb)/07%3A_Confidence_Intervals_for_One_Population/7.03%3A_Sample_Size_Calculation_for_a_Proportion. Accessed August 12, 2025.

[24] RAND function. Microsoft Support Web site. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/rand-function-4cbfa695-8869-4788-8d90-021ea9f5be73. Accessed August 12, 2025.

[25] Complementary and Alternative Medicine. National Cancer Institute Web site. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam. Accessed August 14, 2025.

[26] Ng JY, Santoro LJ, Cobey KD, Steel A, Cramer H, Moher D. Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: an international, cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0301251.

[27] McKeever L, Nguyen V, Peterson SJ, Gomez-Perez S, Braunschweig C. Demystifying the search button. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015; 39(6):622-635.