Dynamics of estrogenic activity in an urban river receiving wastewater effluents: effect-based measurements with CALUX

Marc Elskens , Kersten Van Langenhove , Vincent Carbonnel , Natacha Brion , Steven J. Eisenreich

Emerging Contaminants and Environmental Health ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) : 9

PDF
Emerging Contaminants and Environmental Health ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) :9 DOI: 10.20517/wecn.2023.15
review-article

Dynamics of estrogenic activity in an urban river receiving wastewater effluents: effect-based measurements with CALUX

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Estrogenic substances (ES) in an urban river Zenne (BE) dominated by wastewater effluents were assessed over the course of one year. To measure the bioequivalent (BEQ) 17 β-estradiol (E2) concentrations of ES, the biological effect-based methodology - the Chemical-Activated LUciferase gene eXpression (CALUX) bioassay was used. Daily water discharges were collected from January 2015 to February 2016 at or near the sampling stations in the Brussels Capital Region. An annual water budget shows that approximately 50% of the Zenne River flow downstream is from wastewater effluent. The estrogenic activity and yearly average ES load in influents and effluents of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) located in the North and South, combined sewer overflows (CSOs) and the Zenne River, were assessed for upstream and downstream of two WWTPs of Brussels. Both WWTPs with activated sludge treatment remove more than 90% of the ES. The influent concentrations of ES at the South and North WWTPs ranged from 30-359 and 18-55 ng E2 eq./L, respectively. The effluent concentrations of ES ranged from 1.0-2.1 and 1.1-6.6 ng E2 eq./L at WWTP-S and -N, respectively. The yearly average ES loads were 0.05-0.14 and 0.39-1.5 g E2 eq./d for WWTP-S and -N, respectively. The temporal variation of E2-eq concentrations at the river stations Z3 and Z5 (upstream) ranged from 1 to 2 ng E2 eq./L, while the ES activity at sites Z9 and Z11 (downstream) varied from 2-17 ng E2 eq./L and from 1-8 ng/L ng E2 eq./L, respectively. The relative ES loads to the Zenne River are as follows: WWTPs (31%), CSOs (27%), upstream Zenne (15%), a missing source (14%), and local tributaries (13%). ES in the Zenne River behave in a pseudo-persistent manner because of continuous input from the WWTPs and slow degradation in the 18 km river stretch. The BEQ concentration of E2 exceeds the EU environmental quality standards (EQS) of 0.4 ng E2/L throughout the Zenne River.

Keywords

estrogenic activity in water / CALUX / estrogenic activity in WWTP discharges / estrogen activity budget / Zenne River / E2 EU-EQS

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Marc Elskens, Kersten Van Langenhove, Vincent Carbonnel, Natacha Brion, Steven J. Eisenreich. Dynamics of estrogenic activity in an urban river receiving wastewater effluents: effect-based measurements with CALUX. Emerging Contaminants and Environmental Health, 2023, 2(2): 9 DOI:10.20517/wecn.2023.15

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Schwarzenbach RP,Fenner K.The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems.Science2006;313:1072-7

[2]

Dachs J.Organic pollutants in coastal waters, sediments, and biota: a relevant driver for ecosystems during the anthropocene?.Estuaries Coasts2010;33:1-14

[3]

ATSDR. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and your health. 2023. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-effects/index.html. [Last accessed on 16 May 2023]

[4]

Cousins IT,Salter ME,Scheringer M.Outside the safe operating space of a new planetary boundary for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).Environ Sci Technol2022;56:11172-9 PMCID:PMC9387091

[5]

Eisenreich SJ,Robbins JA.Accumulation and diagenesis of chlorinated hydrocarbons in lacustrine sediments.Environ Sci Technol1989;23:1116-26

[6]

Stockhom convention of persistent organic pollutants 2011. UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/27. Available from: http://www.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/AllPOPs/tabid/2509/Default.aspx. [Last accessed on 16 May 2023]

[7]

Ankley GT,Gross M.A critical review of the environmental occurrence and potential effects in aquatic vertebrates of the potent androgen receptor agonist 17β-trenbolone.Environ Toxicol Chem2018;37:2064-78 PMCID:PMC6129983

[8]

Masset T,Piot C,Naffrechoux E.PCB mass budget in a perialpine lake undergoing natural decontamination in a context of global change.Sci Total Environ2019;693:133590

[9]

Mudgal S,Lockwood S,Backhaus T. Study on the environmental risks of medicinal products. Final report, 308 p. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/study_environment_0.pdf. [Last accessed on 16 May 2023]

[10]

Ankley GT,Huggett DB.Repeating history: pharmaceuticals in the environment.Environ Sci Technol2007;41:8211-7

[11]

Jobling S,Thorpe K,Tyler C.Statistical modeling suggests that antiandrogens in effluents from wastewater treatment works contribute to widespread sexual disruption in fish living in English rivers.Environ Health Perspect2009;117:797-802 PMCID:PMC2685844

[12]

Novak PJ,Blazer VS.On the need for a National (U.S.) research program to elucidate the potential risks to human health and the environment posed by contaminants of emerging concern.Environ Sci Technol2011;45:3829-30

[13]

Richardson SD.Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues.Anal Chem2014;86:2813-48

[14]

Patel N,Shahane S.Emerging pollutants in aquatic environment: source, effect, and challenges in biomonitoring and bioremediation - a review.Pollution2020 6, 99 - 113

[15]

Loos R,Locoro G,Contini S.EU-wide survey of polar organic persistent pollutants in European river waters.Environ Pollut2009;157:561-8

[16]

Silva BF, Jelic A, López-Serna R, Mozeto AA, Petrovic M, Barceló D. Occurrence and distribution of pharmaceuticals in surface water, suspended solids and sediments of the Ebro river basin, Spain.Chemosphere2011;85:1331-9

[17]

Hartmann J,Ohana D.The effective design of sampling campaigns for emerging chemical and microbial contaminants in drinking water and its resources based on literature mining.Sci Total Environ2020;742:140546

[18]

Sauvé S.A review of what is an emerging contaminant.Chem Cent J2014;8:15 PMCID:PMC3938815

[19]

Tang JY,Glenn E,Warne MS.Mixture effects of organic micropollutants present in water: towards the development of effect-based water quality trigger values for baseline toxicity.Water Res2013;47:3300-14

[20]

Kunz PY,Carere M,Kase R.In vitro bioassays to screen for endocrine active pharmaceuticals in surface and waste waters.J Pharm Biomed Anal2015;106:107-15

[21]

Kunz PY,Creusot N.Effect-based tools for monitoring estrogenic mixtures: Evaluation of five in vitro bioassays.Water Res2017;110:378-88

[22]

Loos R,António DC.EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents.Water Res2013;47:6475-87

[23]

Sumpter JP.The occurrence, causes, and consequences of estrogens in the aquatic environment.Environ Toxicol Chem2013;32:249-51

[24]

Sumpter JP,Williams RJ,Scholze M.Modeling effects of mixtures of endocrine disrupting chemicals at the river catchment scale.Environ Sci Technol2006;40:5478-89

[25]

Jarošová B,Hilscherová K.Europe-wide survey of estrogenicity in wastewater treatment plant effluents: the need for the effect-based monitoring.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2014;21:10970-82

[26]

Petrie B,Kasprzyk-Hordern B.A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring.Water Res2015;72:3-27

[27]

Kase R,Simon E.Screening and risk management solutions for steroidal estrogens in surface and wastewater.TrAC Trends Anal Chem2018;102:343-58

[28]

Könemann S,Simon E.Effect-based and chemical analytical methods to monitor estrogens under the European Water Framework Directive.TrAC Trends Anal Chem2018;102:225-35

[29]

Sonavane M,Hidasi AO.An integrative approach combining passive sampling, bioassays, and effect-directed analysis to assess the impact of wastewater effluent.Environ Toxicol Chem2018;37:2079-88

[30]

Kortenkamp A.Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters: implications for risk assessment and epidemiology.Int J Androl2008;31:233-40

[31]

Carvalho RN,Ippolito A. Development of the first watch list under the environmental quality standards directive (Science and policy reports No. EUR 27142 EN). Available from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC95018. [Last accessed on 16 May 2023]

[32]

Liney KE,Tyler CR,Galloway TS.Health effects in fish of long-term exposure to effluents from wastewater treatment works.Environ Health Perspect2006;114 Suppl 1:81-9 PMCID:PMC1874182

[33]

Caldwell DJ,Anderson PD,Sumpter JP.Predicted-no-effect concentrations for the steroid estrogens estrone, 17β-estradiol, estriol, and 17α-ethinylestradiol.Environ Toxicol Chem2012;31:1396-406

[34]

Brown AC,Leonard HM,Clotfelter ED.Phytoestrogens β -sitosterol and genistein have limited effects on reproductive endpoints in a female fish, Betta splendens.Biomed Res Int2014;2014:681396 PMCID:PMC3953504

[35]

Bhandari RK,Saal FSV.Transcriptome analysis of testis reveals the effects of developmental exposure to bisphenol a or 17α-ethinylestradiol in medaka (Oryzias latipes).Aquat Toxicol2020;225:105553 PMCID:PMC7387123

[36]

Anderson PD,Pfeiffer D.Endocrine disruption due to estrogens derived from humans predicted to be low in the majority of U.S. surface waters.Environ Toxicol Chem2012;31:1407-15

[37]

Tang Z,Wang H.Trace determination of eleven natural estrogens and insights from their occurrence in a municipal wastewater treatment plant and river water.Water Res2020;182:115976

[38]

Vandermarken T,Van Langenhove K.Endocrine activity in an urban river system and the biodegradation of estrogen-like endocrine disrupting chemicals through a bio-analytical approach using DRE- and ERE-CALUX bioassays.Chemosphere2018;201:540-9

[39]

Johnson AC,Williams RJ,Cisowska I.Do concentrations of ethinylestradiol, estradiol, and diclofenac in European rivers exceed proposed EU environmental quality standards?.Environ Sci Technol2013;47:12297-304

[40]

Connon RE,Werner I.Effect-based tools for monitoring and predicting the ecotoxicological effects of chemicals in the aquatic environment.Sensors2012;12:12741-71 PMCID:PMC3478868

[41]

Escher BI,Dutt M,Altenburger R.Most oxidative stress response in water samples comes from unknown chemicals: the need for effect-based water quality trigger values.Environ Sci Technol2013;47:7002-11

[42]

Altenburger R,Antczak P.Future water quality monitoring-adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management.Sci Total Environ2015;512-513:540-51

[43]

Wernersson A,Maggi C.The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive.Environ Sci Eur2015;27

[44]

European Commission, Fitness check of the water framework directive and floods directive. 2019. Available from: http://eeac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020-01-13_Council_Fitness-Check-Water_HS.pdf. [Last accessed on 22 May 2023]

[45]

European Commission, Technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools. 2017. Available from: https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/0d78bbf7-76f0-43c1-8af2-6230436d759d/Effectbased%20tools%20CMEP%20report%20main%2028%20April%202014.pdf. [Last accessed on 16 May 2023]

[46]

Campbell CG,Green FB,Wozei E.Biologically directed environmental monitoring, fate, and transport of estrogenic endocrine disrupting compounds in water: A review.Chemosphere2006;65:1265-80.

[47]

Guo W,Vandermarken T.In situ measurement of estrogenic activity in various aquatic systems using organic diffusive gradients in thin-film coupled with ERE-CALUX bioassay.Environ Int2019;127:13-20

[48]

Brion N,Bauwens W,Chen M.Assessing the impacts of wastewater treatment implementation on the water quality of a small urban river over the past 40 years.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2015;22:12720-36

[49]

Pfannkuche J.Determination of suspended particulate matter concentration from turbidity measurements: particle size effects and calibration procedures.Hydrol Process2003;17:1951-63

[50]

Rogers JM.Recombinant cell bioassays for endocrine disruptors: development of a stably transfected human ovarian cell line for the detection of estrogenic and anti-estrogenic chemicals.In vitr Mol Toxicol2000 13:67-82.

[51]

Brennan JC,He G.Development of a recombinant human ovarian (BG1) cell line containing estrogen receptor α and β for improved detection of estrogenic/antiestrogenic chemicals.Environ Toxicol Chem2016;35:91-100 PMCID:PMC4772679

[52]

Elskens M,Stumpf C.CALUX measurements: statistical inferences for the dose-response curve.Talanta2011;85:1966-73

[53]

Elwan A,Patterson M.Influence of sampling frequency and load calculation methods on quantification of annual river nutrient and suspended solids loads.Environ Monit Assess2018;190:78

[54]

Miège C,Ribeiro L,Coquery M.Fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment plants--conception of a database and first results.Environ Pollut2009;157:1721-6

[55]

Zhou Y,Wang Z.Occurrence and fate of steroid estrogens in the largest wastewater treatment plant in Beijing, China.Environ Monit Assess2012;184:6799-813

[56]

Snyder SA,Yoon Y.Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and endocrine disruptors in water: implications for the water industry.Environ Eng Sci2003;20:449-69

[57]

Liu YF,Yin H,Rittmann B.Removal of natural estrogens and their conjugates in municipal wastewater treatment plants: A critical review.Environ Sci Tech2015 49, 5288-5300

[58]

Ting YF.Sources, mechanisms, and fate of steroid estrogens in wastewater treatment plants: a mini review.Environ Monit Assess2017;189:178

[59]

Díaz-cruz M,Guerra P.Analysis of selected emerging contaminants in sewage sludge.TrAC Trends Anal Chem2009;28:1263-75

[60]

Nieto A,Pocurull E.Occurrence of pharmaceuticals and hormones in sewage sludge.Environ Toxicol Chem2010;29:1484-9

[61]

Avberšek M,Filipič M.Integration of GC-MSD and ER-Calux® assay into a single protocol for determining steroid estrogens in environmental samples.Sci Total Environ2011;409:5069-75

[62]

Altenburger R,Burgess RM.Future water quality monitoring: improving the balance between exposure and toxicity assessments of real-world pollutant mixtures.Environ Sci Eur2019;31

[63]

Simon E,Stahl C.Biological effect and chemical monitoring of Watch List substances in European surface waters: Steroidal estrogens and diclofenac- Effect-based methods for monitoring frameworks.Environ Int2022;159:107033

[64]

Vajda AM,Gray JL,Woodling JD.Reproductive disruption in fish downstream from an estrogenic wastewater effluent.Environ Sci Technol2008;42:3407-14

[65]

Barber LB,Kandel C.Integrated assessment of wastewater reuse, exposure risk, and fish endocrine disruption in the shenandoah river watershed.Environ Sci Technol2019;53:3429-40

[66]

Harraka GT,Du B,Maruya K.Evaluating the estrogenicity of an effluent-dominated river in California, USA: Comparisons of in vitro and in vivo bioassays.Sci Total Environ2021;758:143965

[67]

Neale PA,de Baat ML.Application of effect-based methods to water quality monitoring: answering frequently asked questions by water quality managers, regulators, and policy makers.Environ Sci Technol2023;57:6023-32

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

75

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/