Challenges to environmental litigation posed by emerging contaminants and possible strategies

Abstract

Emerging contaminants (ECs), with continuously expanding list, exert a significant impact on the environment and are increasingly becoming a subject of environmental litigation. They present various challenges to the environmental damage assessment processes involved in such litigation. Based on several typical cases, this work identifies the challenges encountered at each stage of environmental damage assessment and proposes potential strategies to address them. The strategies are categorized into four types: (i) conducting fundamental research to produce accurate data and establish background knowledge regarding sources and potential targets; (ii) sharing publicly recognized datasets, models, and other information, with regular updates; (iii) standardizing advanced technical methods, including the screening, identification, and quantification of ECs in the environment; and (iv) providing specific regulations and financial support for typical case studies while facilitating information sharing.

Keywords

Environmental litigation / emerging contaminants / typical cases / challenges / possible strategies

References

[1] Andreotti F.,Montanaro D.,Calcagni L.. A new approach for environmental damage assessment pursuant to the European Union Environmental Liability Directive Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2024 20 2050 9

[2] Petrisor I. G.. Emerging contaminants - the growing problem Environ. Forensics 2004 5 183 4

[3] China sees improved judicial appraisal of environmental damage: ministry. 2024. https://govt.chinadaily.com.cn/s/202402/08/WS65c443df498ed2d7b7ea784b/china-sees-improved-judicial-appraisal-of-environmental-damage-ministry.html. (accessed 2026-03-26)

[4] Hollaender K.,Kaminsky M. A.. The past, present, and future of environmental insurance including a case study of MTBE litigation Environ. Forensics 2000 1 205 11

[5] van der Donk L. L.,Llavero-Pasquina M.. PFAS and the pollution trap: contested knowledge in environmental justice struggles Environ. Sci. Policy 2025 174 104281

[6] Department of Environmental Protection. DuPont/Chemours PFAS settlement. 2025. https://dep.nj.gov/dupont/. (accessed 2026-03-26)

[7] Erickson, B, E. 3M agrees to $10.3 billion PFAS settlement C&EN Global Enterp. 2023 101 9

[8] Tokranov A. K.,Ransom K. M.,Bexfield L. M..et al. Predictions of groundwater PFAS occurrence at drinking water supply depths in the United States Science 2024 386 748 55

[9] Manaadiar H.. Sri Lankan supreme court orders USD 1 billion payout for X-Press Pearl disaster. 2025. https://www.shippingandfreightresource.com/sri-lankan-supreme-court-orders-usd-1-billion-payout-for-x-press-pearl-disaster/#:~:text=On 24 July 2025%2C the Court ordered the,billion in compensation to the Sri Lankan state. (accessed 2026-03-26)

[10] UN Environment Programme. Oil, acid, plastic: Inside the shipping disaster gripping Sri Lanka. 2022. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/oil-acid-plastic-inside-shipping-disaster-gripping-sri-lanka. (accessed 2026-03-26)

[11] Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. China Judgements Online (in Chinese). https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/. (accessed 2026-03-26)

[12] The intermediate people’s court of Quzhou city of Zhejiang province. Civil judgment of first instance on Zhang Bobo’s environmental pollution liability dispute [(2019) Zhejiang No. 08 Civil First Instance Case No. 546]. China Judgements Online (in Chinese).

[13] United States court of appeals for the sixth circuit. In Re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and company C-8 personal injury litigation. 2023. https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/23a0256p-06.pdf. (accessed 2026-03-26)

[14] Saliba M.,Frantzi S.,van Beukering P.. Shipping spills and plastic pollution: a review of maritime governance in the North Sea Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022 181 113939

[15] Liu X.,Wang R.,Xie C.,Liu Y.. Wildfires mobilize soil pollutants Science 2025 390 1238

[16] Alonso-Magdalena P.. The hidden health effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2026 22 70 1

[17] Chen J.,Song P.,Li C..et al. Endocrine disrupting chemicals exposure and health: an umbrella review Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025 302 118574

[18] Zhang X.,Jiang M.,Zhu Y.,Li B.,Wells M.. The X-Press Pearl disaster underscores gross neglect in the environmental management of shipping: review of future data needs Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023 189 114728

[19] USEPA. Estimation programs interface suite^TM for microsoft® windows v4.11. https://www.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/download-epi-suitetm-estimation-program-interface-v411. (accessed 2026-03-26)

[20] Liang W.,Li J.,Wang X.,Giesy J. P.,Zhao X.. Machine learning-driven cross-species toxicity prediction for advancing ecologically relevant PFAS water quality criteria Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025 59 25688 702

[21] Seal S.,Mahale M.,García-Ortegón M..et al. Machine learning for toxicity prediction using chemical structures: pillars for success in the real world Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2025 38 759 807 PMC12093382

[22] Kim D.,Choi J.. AI-based toxicity prediction models using ToxCast data: current status and future directions for explainable models Toxicology 2025 517 154230

[23] Advanced environmental forensics in emerging contaminant detection and site remediation. 2024. https://eecma.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/J-CSI-EECMA-Advanced-Environmental-Forensics-in-Emerging-Contaminant-Detection_FINAL.pdf. (accessed 2026-03-26)