Comparison of fluid bolus and fluid bolus plus low dose noradrenaline infusion on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults before tracheal intubation: a randomized trial

Syed Masarrat Jahan , Madhulika Dubey , Mohammad Mustahsin , Sanjay Choubey , Supriya Singh , Mohammad Amir

Emergency and Critical Care Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 117 -122.

PDF (605KB)
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) :117 -122. DOI: 10.1097/EC9.0000000000000191
Original Article
research-article
Comparison of fluid bolus and fluid bolus plus low dose noradrenaline infusion on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults before tracheal intubation: a randomized trial
Author information +
History +
PDF (605KB)

Abstract

Background:Endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients is associated with various complications, mainly hypotension. The administration of an intravenous fluid bolus before induction of anesthesia has been used to prevent hypotension during endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, some patients still experience hemodynamic instability. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the effect of a fluid bolus alone and a fluid bolus plus low-dose noradrenaline infusion on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults before tracheal intubation.

Methods:The randomized trial enrolled 136 critically ill patients who required endotracheal intubation. Patients were allocated to the intravenous fluid (group A) and the intravenous fluid plus low-dose noradrenaline group (group B). Cardiovascular collapse, hypotension, and other secondary outcomes were recorded.

Results:Vasopressor requirement at 2 minutes postinduction was lower in group B (39.7%) than in group A (44.1%). Cardiac arrest within 1 hour occurred in 2.9% of patients in group A. Death within 1 hour occurred in 2.9% patients of group A and 1.5% of group B. The requirement for renal replacement therapy, duration of vasopressor requirement and inhospital mortality were higher in group B. The duration of ICU stay and the duration of ventilator requirement were higher in group A. All these differences were statistically insignificant except for the total duration of hospital stay, which was longer in group A than in group B (P = 0.036).

Conclusion:Among critically ill patients undergoing tracheal intubation, the administration of intravenous fluid bolus plus low-dose noradrenaline, compared with a fluid bolus alone, did not significantly reduce the incidence of cardiovascular collapse.

Keywords

Cardiovascular collapse / Critically ill patients / Endotracheal intubation / Fluid bolus / Low-dose noradrenaline

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Syed Masarrat Jahan, Madhulika Dubey, Mohammad Mustahsin, Sanjay Choubey, Supriya Singh, Mohammad Amir. Comparison of fluid bolus and fluid bolus plus low dose noradrenaline infusion on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults before tracheal intubation: a randomized trial. Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, 2026, 6 (2) : 117-122 DOI:10.1097/EC9.0000000000000191

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Jahan SM contributed to concept and design of study; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; drafting the manuscript; and final approval of the version to be published. Dubey M contributed to concept and design of study; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; manuscript preparation, manuscript editing and review, and final approval of the version to be published. Mustahsin M contributed to concept of study, data interpretation, manuscript preparation, manuscript review, and final approval of the version to be published. Choubey S contributed to concept of study, manuscript editing, manuscript review, and final approval of the version to be published. Singh S contributed to data interpretation, manuscript review, and final approval of the version to be published. Amir M contributed to Data interpretation, manuscript editing and review, and final approval of the version to be published.

Funding

None.

Ethical approval of studies and informed consent

The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2013. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Era University (reference number: ELMC&H/R-Cell/2023/37 on February 28, 2023), and written informed consent was obtained from the patient or their next kin. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI number: CTRI/2023/07/054773, URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/main1.php?EncHid=99458.25924, date of registry: July 5, 2023). Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants or their next kin included in the study.

Acknowledgments

None.

References

[1]

Simpson GD, Ross MJ, McKeown DW, Ray DC . Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and complications. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 108(5): 792-799. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer504.

[2]

Martin LD, Mhyre JM, Shanks AM, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S . 3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: airway outcomes and complications. Anesthesiology. 2011; 114(1): 42-48. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201c415.

[3]

Leibowitz AB . Tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: extremely hazardous even in the best of hands. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(9): 2497-2498. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000235993.47514.8F.

[4]

Green R, Hutton B, Lorette J, Bleskie D, McIntyre L, Fergusson D . Incidence of postintubation hemodynamic instability associated with emergent intubations performed outside the operating room: a systematic review. CJEM. 2014; 16(1): 69-79. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.131004.

[5]

Walls RM, Brown CA 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ ; NEAR II Investigators. Emergency airway management: a multi-center report of 8937 emergency department intubations. J Emerg Med. 2011; 41(4): 347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.02.024.

[6]

Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, et al; INTUBE Study Investigators. Intubation practices and adverse peri-intubation events in critically ill patients from 29 countries. JAMA. 2021; 325(12): 1164-1172. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1727.

[7]

Perbet S, De Jong A, Delmas J, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for severe cardiovascular collapse after endotracheal intubation in the ICU: a multicenter observational study. Crit Care. 2015; 19(1): 257. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0975-9.

[8]

Ergün B, Ergan B, Yakar MN, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for postintubation hypotension in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022; 34(1): 131-140. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220007-pt.

[9]

Smischney NJ, Demirci O, Ricter BD, et al. Vasopressor use as a surrogate for post-intubation hemodynamic instability is associated with in-hospital and 90-day mortality: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8: 445. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1410-7.

[10]

Janz DR, Casey JD, Semler MW, et al; PrePARE Investigators. Effect of a fluid bolus on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation (PrePARE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019; 7(12): 1039-1047. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30246-2.

[11]

Russell DW, Casey JD, Gibbs KW, et al; PREPARE II Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Effect of fluid bolus administration on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill patients undergoing tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022; 328(3): 270-279. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.9792.

[12]

Green RS, Turgeon AF, McIntyre LA, et al; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CCCTG). Postintubation hypotension in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter cohort study. J Crit Care. 2015; 30(5): 1055-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.06.007.

[13]

Heffner AC, Swords DS, Nussbaum ML, Kline JA, Jones AE . Predictors of the complication of postintubation hypotension during emergency airway management. J Crit Care. 2012; 27(6): 587-593. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.04.022.

[14]

Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P, et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36(2): 248-255. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1717-8.

[15]

Umobong EU, Mayo PH . Critical care airway management. Crit Care Clin. 2018; 34(3): 313-324. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2018.03.006.

[16]

Myatra SN, Ahmed SM, Kundra P, et al. The all India difficult airway association 2016 guidelines for tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit. Indian J Anaesth. 2016; 60(12): 922-930. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.195485.

[17]

Reynolds SF, Heffner J . Airway management of the critically ill patient: rapid-sequence intubation. Chest. 2005; 127(4): 1397-1412. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.4.1397.

[18]

Sherren PB, Tricklebank S, Glover G . Development of a standard operating procedure and checklist for rapid sequence induction in the critically ill. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014; 22: 41. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0041-7.

[19]

Fuchita M, Pattee J, Russell DW, et al. Prophylactic administration of vasopressors prior to emergency intubation in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of two multicenter clinical trials. Crit Care Explor. 2023; 5(7): e0946. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000946.

[20]

Levy B, Collin S, Sennoun N, et al. Vascular hyporesponsiveness to vasopressors in septic shock: from bench to bedside. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36(12): 2019-2029. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2045-8.

[21]

Shrieaswari S, Sujatha MP . Comparison of efficacy of low-dose norepinephrine infusion with low-dose boluses of norepinephrine in managing hypotension among parturients undergoing caesarean section under the subarachnoid block. IJCA. 2023; 10(2): 130-136. doi: 10.18231/j.ijca.2023.027.

[22]

Shi R, Hamzaoui O, De Vita N, Monnet X, Teboul JL . Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much?. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(12): 794. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.04.24.

[23]

Carlos Sanchez E, Pinsky MR, Sinha S, Mishra RC, Lopa AJ, Chatterjee R . Fluids and early vasopressors in the management of septic shock: do we have the right answers yet? J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2023; 9(3): 138-147. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2023-0022.

PDF (605KB)

11

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/