Advocacy inquiry and circular questioning to maintain psychological safety in training, feedback, and conversations with residents

Fatimah Lateef

Emergency and Critical Care Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 35 -38.

PDF (150KB)
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :35 -38. DOI: 10.1097/EC9.0000000000000117
Communication
research-article

Advocacy inquiry and circular questioning to maintain psychological safety in training, feedback, and conversations with residents

Author information +
History +
PDF (150KB)

Abstract

Training of emergency physicians through an emergency medicine residency program takes 5 years, that is, 3 years in junior residency and 2 years in senior residency. Throughout this period, residents will be exposed to a variety of educational methodologies and meet a spectrum of faculty, supervisors, and teachers, who will have different personalities, styles, and approaches to teaching and nurturing them. It is important to ensure the maintenance of psychological safety for these residents throughout their training journey and into the future years of practice s an emergency physician.

Keywords

Advocacy / Circular questions / Emergency medicine / Inquiry / Residents

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Fatimah Lateef. Advocacy inquiry and circular questioning to maintain psychological safety in training, feedback, and conversations with residents. Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, 2024, 4(1): 35-38 DOI:10.1097/EC9.0000000000000117

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Lateef F wrote this paper.

Funding

None.

Ethical approval of studies and informed consent

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

None.

References

[1]

Lateef F. Culture of psychological safety in the emergency department: don’t forget the hidden curriculum. Arch Emerg Med Intensive Care. 2021; 4(1):18-26. doi:10.22259/2638-5007.0401004

[2]

Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N. Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature. Hum Resource Manag Rev. 2017; 27(3):521-535. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001

[3]

Lateef F. Maximizing learning and creativity: understanding psychological safety in simulation-based learning. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020; 13(1):5-14. doi:10.4103/JETS.JETS_96_19

[4]

Singapore Residency Programmes. About Residency. Accessed September 21, 2023. https://www.physician.mohh.com.sg/medicine/residency/about-residency

[5]

Lateef F, Too XY.The 2019 WACEM expert document on hybrid simulation for transforming health-care simulation through “mixing and matching”. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2019; 12(4):243-247. doi:10.4103/JETS.JETS_112_19

[6]

Hunkins FP. Effects of analysis and evaluative questions on various levels of achievement. J Exp Educ. 1969; 38(2):45-58. doi:10.1080/00220973.1969.11011179

[7]

Collins LC, Gablasova D, Pill J. “Doing questioning” in the emergency department. Health Commun. 2023; 38(12):2721-2729. doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2111630

[8]

Heritage J, Raymond CW. Preference and polarity: epistemic stance in question design. Res Lang Soc Interac. 2021; 54(1):39-59. doi:10.1080/08351813.2020.1864155

[9]

Pylma S, Ward A. 12 tips for effective questioning in medical education. Med Teach. 2020; 42(12):1330-1336. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1749583

[10]

Kost A, Chen FM. Socrates was not a pimp: changing the paradigm of questioning in medical education. Acad Med. 2015; 90(1):20-24. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000446

[11]

Tomm K. Interventive interviewing: part III. Intending to ask linear, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions?. Fam Process. 1988; 27(1):1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00001.x

[12]

Akdeniz R. Karl Tomm’s Internalized other Interviewing. From Theory to Practice. 2021. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dft_etd. Accessed December 14, 2023.

[13]

Lateef F. Transition from junior to senior residency in emergency medicine: requirements, challenges and recommendations. Curr Trends Clin Med Sci. 2021; 2(3):1-5. doi:10.33552/ctcms.2020.01.000537

[14]

Lateef F. The new norm in an academic medical centre in the post-COVID-19 world: finding opportunities in challenges; How to adapt, innovate and thrive. Int J Clin Med Med Case Rep. 2020; 7(01):001. doi:10.46998/IJCMCR.2020.07.000160

[15]

The Systems Thinker. Productive conversations: using advocacy and inquiry effectively.

[16]

Tompkins TC. Using advocacy and inquiry to improve the thinking process of future managers. J Manag Educ. 2001; 25(5):553-571. doi:10.1177/105256290102500506

[17]

Lateef F. Face to face with coronavirus disease 19: maintaining motivation, psychological safety and wellness. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020; 13:116-123. doi:10.4103/JETS.JETS_27_20

[18]

Lateef F. Remediation in emergency medicine: what are the issues? Emerg Med Inves. 2016; 4:118. doi:10.29011/2475-5605.000018

[19]

Evans N, Whitcombe S. Using circular questions as a tool in qualitative research. Nurse Res. 2016; 23(3):26-29. doi:10.7748/nr.23.3.26.s6

[20]

Kauffeld S, Meyers RA. Complaints and solution-oriented circles: interaction patterns in work group discussions. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2009; 18:267-294. doi:10.1080/13594320701693209

[21]

Brow J.Circular questioning: an introductory guide. ANZ J Fam Therapy. 1997; 18(2):109-114.

[22]

Chenail RJ. Commentary on studying circular questioning “in situ”. J Marital Fam Ther. 2014; 40(1):122-124. doi:10.1111/jmft.12003

[23]

Cronen VE, Lag S. Circular questions and coordinated management of learning theory. Hum Syst J Therapy Cons Train. 2009; 20(1):7-34.

[24]

Weaver SJ, Dy SM, Rosen MA. Team-training in healthcare: a narrative synthesis of the literature. BMJ Qua Saf. 2014; 23(5):359-372. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001848

[25]

Scheel MJ, Conoley CW. Circular questions and neutrality: an investigation of the process relationship. Contemp Fam Ther. 1998; 20(2):221-235.

PDF (150KB)

87

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/