General anesthesia is an independent predictor for worse maternal outcome in pregnant pulmonary arterial hypertension patients without cardiac shunt but not for those with shunt

Weida Lu , Min Li , Fuqing Ji , Hua Feng , Liangyi Qie , Guo Li , Qiushang Ji , Mingying Ling , Fan Jiang , Xiaopei Cui

Emergency and Critical Care Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 3 -8.

PDF (207KB)
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 3 -8. DOI: 10.1097/EC9.0000000000000104
Original Articles

General anesthesia is an independent predictor for worse maternal outcome in pregnant pulmonary arterial hypertension patients without cardiac shunt but not for those with shunt

Author information +
History +
PDF (207KB)

Abstract

Background: Although pregnancy imposes extra risk in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), hemodynamic characteristics vary between PAH patients with and without cardiac shunts. However, previous studies did not take hemodynamic differences in PAH patients into consideration for pregnancy outcome analysis. We aimed to identify predictors for peripartum outcome of PAH patients without/with cardiac shunt.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of PAH gravidae parturiated by cesarean delivery (C-section) from 4 hospitals. Maternal death and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) occurring during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum were defined as composite end points. Risk factors for end points were analyzed separately in patients with and without cardiac shunt. The effect of general anesthesia on MACEs and maternal death was analyzed considering cardiac shunts.

Results: One hundred and eighty-one PAH gravidae were included, of whom 85 had PAH without cardiac shunt and 96 with shunt. Patients who met combined end points were 19/85 in those without shunt compared with 23/96 in those with shunt. The mortality rates were 11.8% and 9.4%, respectively. Both World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC) III/IV and general anesthesia were predictors for gravidae without shunt, whereas only WHO-FC III/IV was a predictor for gravidae with shunt. General anesthesia increased the MACE risk (odds ratio, 9.000; 95% confidence interval, 2.628-30.820) and maternal mortality (odds ratio, 11.000; 95% confidence interval, 2.595-46.622; P = 0.039) in patients without cardiac shunt but not in those with shunt during C-section.

Conclusion: All PAH gravidae with WHO-FC III/IV are at high risk and should receive intensive care. General anesthesia should be avoided during C-section for PAH gravidae without a cardiac shunt.

Keywords

Cardiac shunt / Composite end points / Mortality / General anesthesia / Pregnancy / Pulmonary hypertension

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Weida Lu, Min Li, Fuqing Ji, Hua Feng, Liangyi Qie, Guo Li, Qiushang Ji, Mingying Ling, Fan Jiang, Xiaopei Cui. General anesthesia is an independent predictor for worse maternal outcome in pregnant pulmonary arterial hypertension patients without cardiac shunt but not for those with shunt. Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, 2025, 5(1): 3-8 DOI:10.1097/EC9.0000000000000104

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Cui X was involved in study conceptualization, data curation and interpretation, and manuscript writing, revision, and final approval; Li M, Ji F, and Li G were involved in data collection and interpretation; Feng H, Qie L, and Ling M were involved in data interpretation and formal analysis; Ji Q was involved in data collection, interpretation, validation, and formal analysis; Jiang F was involved in data interpretation, data validation, formal analysis, and manuscript writing; Lu W was involved in study conceptualization, data collection, formal analysis, manuscript writing, and final approval.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2021MH111 for Cui X), the Science and Technology Foundation of Jinan City (201805057 for Ling M), and Doctoral Program of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2017BH047 for Lu W).

Ethical approval of studies and informed consent

This study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2013. The ethics approval of the study was approved by the steering committee of Institutional Human Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital (reference no. 2018-155; September 11, 2018) and was approved by the ethics committee at each participating center. Written informed consent was waived by the steering committee of Institutional Human Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital owing to the anonymized retrospective nature of the analysis.

Acknowledgments

None.

References

[1]

Galiè N, HumbertM, Vachiery JL, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J.2016; 37(1):67-119. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317

[2]

Hytten FE, Paintin DB. Increase in plasma volume during normal pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1963; 70:402-407. doi:10. 1111/j.1471-0528.1963.tb04922.x

[3]

Armstrong S, Fernando R, Columb M, Jones T. Cardiac index in term pregnant women in the sitting, lateral, and supine positions: an observational, crossover study. Anesth Analg. 2011; 113(2):318-322.doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821f125c

[4]

Knotts RJ, Garan H. Cardiac arrhythmias in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2014; 38(5):285-288. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2014.04.017

[5]

Bader RA, BaderME, Rose DF, Braunwald E. Hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in normal pregnancy as studies by cardiac catheterization. J Clin Invest. 1955; 34(10):1524-1536. doi:10.1172/JCI103205

[6]

Clark SL, Cotton DB, Lee W, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161(6 pt 1): 1439-1442. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90900-9

[7]

Hemnes AR, Kiely DG, Cockrill BA, et al. Statement on pregnancy in pulmonary hypertension from the pulmonary vascular research institute. Pulm Circ. 2015; 5(3):435-465. doi:10.1086/682230

[8]

OlssonKM,Channick R. Pregnancy in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev. 2016; 25(142):431-437. doi:10.1183/16000617.0079-2016

[9]

Martin SR, Edwards A. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 134(5):974-987. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003549

[10]

Li Q, Dimopoulos K, Liu T, et al. Peripartum outcomes in a large population of women with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019; 26(10):1067-1076. doi:10.1177/2047487318821246

[11]

Sun X, Feng J, Shi J. Pregnancy and pulmonary hypertension: an exploratory analysis of risk factors and outcomes. Medicine. 2018; 97(44):e13035. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000013035

[12]

Pillutla P, Nguyen T, Markovic D, Canobbio M, Koos BJ, Aboulhosn JA. Cardiovascular and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with high-risk congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117(10):1672-1677. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.045

[13]

Galie N, HumbertM, Vachiery JL, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015; 46(4):903-975. doi:10.1183/13993003.01032-2015

[14]

Weiss BM, Zemp L, Seifert B, Hess OM. Outcome of pulmonary vascular disease in pregnancy: a systematic overview from 1978 through 1996. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31(7):1650-1657. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00162-4

[15]

DolgunZN, InanC, SayinNC. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with pulmonary hypertension: experience of a tertiary center. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 57(1):13-17. doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2017.10.032

[16]

Thomas E, Yang J, Xu J, Lima FV, Stergiopoulos K. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: insights from the national inpatient sample. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(10):e006144. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006144

[17]

Sliwa K, van Hagen IM, Budts W, et al. Pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: data from the Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC) of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18(9):1119-1128. doi:10.1002/ejhf.594

[18]

Zhang J, Lu J, Zhou X, et al. Perioperative management of pregnant women with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: an observational case series study from China. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018; 32(6): 2547-2559. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.043

[19]

Duarte AG, Thomas S, Safdar Z, et al. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension during pregnancy: a retrospective, multicenter experience. Chest. 2013; 143(5):1330-1336. doi:10.1378/chest.12-0528

[20]

Canobbio MM, Warnes CA, Aboulhosn J, et al. Management of pregnancy in patients with complex congenital heart disease: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017; 135(8):e50-e87. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000458

[21]

Bedard E, Dimopoulos K, GatzoulisMA. Hasthere been any progressmade on pregnancy outcomes among women with pulmonary arterial hypertension?. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30(3):256-265. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn597

[22]

Zhang J, LuWD, Li M, et al. Risk factors of perinatal complications in patients with pulmonary hypertension underwent cesarean section in 4 Chinese centers. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022; 50(1): 43-48. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20211202-01041

[23]

Vaidya A, Oliveros E, Mulla W, Feinstein D, Hart L, Forfia P. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in pregnancy: experience from a nationally accredited center. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022; 9(6):195. doi:10.3390/jcdd9060195

[24]

CorbachN, Berlier C, LichtblauM, et al. Favorable pregnancy outcomes in women with well-controlled pulmonary arterial hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:689764. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.689764

[25]

Ekici H, ImamogluM, Okmen F, Ogultarhan R, Yeniel AO. Pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy: experience from 45 cases at a tertiary care center. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(9):1769-1774. doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1770216

[26]

Lim K, Chang SA, Oh SY, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension and pregnancy: single center experience in current era of targeted therapy. Korean Circ J. 2019; 49(6):545-554. doi:10.4070/kcj.2018.0350

[27]

Kiely DG, Condliffe R, Webster V, et al. Improved survival in pregnancy and pulmonary hypertension using amultiprofessional approach. BJOG. 2010; 117(5):565-574. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02492.x

[28]

Luo J, Shi H, Xu L, Su W, Li J. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective study. Medicine. 2020; 99(23):e20285. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000020285

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (207KB)

321

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/