Biogenic carbon quantum dots with tunable surface charge for biocompatible antibacterial applications

Abstract

Aim: Antimicrobial resistance poses a major global health crisis, with some bacterial strains now resistant to nearly all available antibiotics. Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have emerged as promising nanomaterials for broad-spectrum infection prevention owing to their multiple antibacterial mechanisms, biocompatibility, and cost-effectiveness. Many reported CQD fabrication methods rely on synthetic chemicals, which increase production costs and potentially compromise the biocompatibility of the resulting CQDs. Although green-synthesized CQDs have attracted considerable attention for antibacterial applications, limited studies have investigated the use of natural, food-derived components to tune CQD surface charge and its influence on antibacterial activity and mammalian cell compatibility. This study aims to develop CQDs with tunable surface charges from natural food-derived carbon sources for broad-spectrum antibacterial applications. Methods: Whole-meal bread and soybean flour were used as biogenic precursors to synthesize negatively charged CQDs via a simple hydrothermal method. Surface charge was adjusted to neutral and positive by incorporating lemon juice and chitosan during synthesis. Antibacterial activity and mammalian cell viability were evaluated. Results: Bread- and soybean-derived CQDs exhibited negative surface charges (–15 mV) due to abundant carboxyl and hydroxyl groups formed during precursor decomposition. Addition of lemon juice altered the surface chemistry by introducing balanced protonated and deprotonated species, producing zwitterionic CQDs with near-neutral charge (–0.1 mV). Further incorporation of chitosan introduced protonated amine groups (–NH₃⁺), yielding positively charged CQDs (+10 mV). At an optimal concentration of 10 µg/mL, both neutral and positively charged CQDs demonstrated moderate broad-spectrum antibacterial activity (30–40% inhibition) against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Their antibacterial effect was attributed to favorable electrostatic interactions with negatively charged bacterial cell envelopes, causing membrane disruption, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced damage, and intracellular interference. In contrast, mammalian cells maintained 100% viability, likely due to their flexible cholesterol-rich membranes, stronger antioxidant defense systems, and intracellular compartmentalization. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a reagent-free and sustainable approach for producing CQDs with controlled surface charges from natural precursors. The resulting CQDs show strong potential as safe and effective antibacterial nanomaterials for biomedical applications.

Keywords

carbon quantum dots / surface charge / biogenic precursors / antibacterial activity / biocompatibility

References

[1] Ozyurt D, Kobaisi MA, Hocking RK, Fox B. Properties, synthesis, and applications of carbon dots: A review. Carbon Trends. 2023; 12: 100276.

[2] Wang S, Wang D, Wang G, Zhang M, Sun Y, Ding J. Antibacterial carbon dots. Mater Today Bio. 2025; 30: 101383.

[3] Magalhães CM, Ribeiro E, Fernandes S, Esteves da Silva J, Vale N, Pinto da Silva L. Safety Evaluation of Carbon Dots in UM-UC-5 and A549 Cells for Biomedical Applications. Cancers. 2024; 16: 3332.

[4] Li P, Sun L, Xue S, Qu D, An L, Wang X, et al. Recent advances of carbon dots as new antimicrobial agents. SmartMat. 2022; 3: 226-48.

[5] An Y, Wang Z, Wu FG. Fluorescent carbon dots for discriminating cell types: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 416: 3945-62.

[6] Zhao WB, Liu KK, Wang Y, Li FK, Guo R, Song SY, et al. Antibacterial Carbon Dots: Mechanisms, Design, and Applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023; 12: e2300324.

[7] Lysenko V, Kuznietsova H, Dziubenko N, Byelinska I, Zaderko A, Lysenko T, et al. Application of Carbon Dots as Antibacterial Agents: A Mini Review. BioNanoScience. 2024; 14: 1819-31.

[8] Sun B, Wu F, Zhang Q, Chu X, Wang Z, Huang X, et al. Insight into the effect of particle size distribution differences on the antibacterial activity of carbon dots. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021; 584: 505-19.

[9] Dong C, Wang Y, Chen T, Ren W, Gao C, Ma X, et al. Carbon Dots in the Pathological Microenvironment: ROS Producers or Scavengers? Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; 13: e2402108.

[10] Amal NM, Shiddiq M, Armynah B, Tahir D. High reactive oxygen species produced from fluorescence carbon dots for anticancer and photodynamic therapies: A review. Luminescence. 2022; 37: 2006-17.

[11] Sun L, Zhao Y, Peng H, Zhou J, Zhang Q, Yan J, et al. Carbon dots as a novel photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy of cancer and bacterial infectious diseases: recent advances. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22: 210.

[12] Balou S, Shandilya P, Priye A. Carbon dots for photothermal applications. Front Chem. 2022; 10: 1023602.

[13] He L, Li Z, Gu M, Li Y, Yi C, Jiang M, et al. Intelligent Carbon Dots with Switchable Photo-Activated Oxidase-Mimicking Activity and pH Responsive Antioxidant Activity Adaptive to the Wound Microenvironment for Selective Antibacterial Therapy. Adv Sci. 2024; 11: e2406681.

[14] Liang J, Li W, Chen J, Huang X, Liu Y, Zhang X, et al. Antibacterial Activity and Synergetic Mechanism of Carbon Dots against Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021; 4: 6937-45.

[15] Li RW, Alzaanin S, Yin Z, Smith PN. Quantum Osteoimmunology: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding and Influencing Bone-Immune Crosstalk. ChemMedChem. 2025; 20: e202500307.

[16] Hao X, Huang L, Zhao C, Chen S, Lin W, Lin Y, et al. Antibacterial activity of positively charged carbon quantum dots without detectable resistance for wound healing with mixed bacteria infection. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2021; 123: 111971.

[17] Zhao D, Zhang R, Liu X, Li X, Xu M, Huang X, et al. Screening of Chitosan Derivatives-Carbon Dots Based on Antibacterial Activity and Application in Anti-Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm. Int J Nanomed. 2022; 17: 937-52.

[18] Chen W, Yin H, Cole I, Houshyar S, Wang L. Carbon Dots Derived from Non-Biomass Waste: Methods, Applications, and Future Perspectives. Molecules. 2024; 29: 2441.

[19] Gholipour A, Rahmani S. The Green Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots through One-step Hydrothermal Approach by Orange Juice for Rapid, and Accurate Detection of Dopamine. J Fluoresc. 2023; 34: 2665-77.

[20] Jin H, Gui R, Wang Y, Sun J. Carrot-derived carbon dots modified with polyethyleneimine and nile blue for ratiometric two-photon fluorescence turn-on sensing of sulfide anion in biological fluids. Talanta. 2017; 169: 141-8.

[21] Lai Z, Guo X, Cheng Z, Ruan G, Du F. Green Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Cherry Tomatoes for Highly Effective Detection of Trifluralin Herbicide in Soil Samples. ChemistrySelect. 2020; 5: 1956-60.

[22] Tyagi A, Tripathi KM, Singh N, Choudhary S, Gupta RK. Green synthesis of carbon quantum dots from lemon peel waste: applications in sensing and photocatalysis. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 72423-32.

[23] Bandi R, Gangapuram BR, Dadigala R, Eslavath R, Singh SS, Guttena V. Facile and green synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from onion waste and their potential applications as sensor and multicolour imaging agents. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 28633-9.

[24] Boruah A, Saikia M, Das T, Goswamee RL, Saikia BK. Blue-emitting fluorescent carbon quantum dots from waste biomass sources and their application in fluoride ion detection in water. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol. 2020; 209: 111940.

[25] Zhou J, Sheng Z, Han H, Zou M, Li C. Facile synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots using watermelon peel as a carbon source. Mater Lett. 2012; 66: 222-4.

[26] Atchudan R, Jebakumar Immanuel Edison TN, Shanmugam M, Perumal S, Somanathan T, Lee YR. Sustainable synthesis of carbon quantum dots from banana peel waste using hydrothermal process for in vivo bioimaging. Phys E: Low-dimens Syst Nanostructures. 2021; 126: 114417.

[27] Cui L, Ren X, Sun M, Liu H, Xia L. Carbon Dots: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11: 3419.

[28] Gholipour A, Rahmani S. The synthesis of fluorescent carbon quantum dots for tartrazine detection in food: a novel one-step microwave heating approach. Fuller Nanotub Carbon Nanostructures. 2023; 31: 743-51.

[29] Gokul Eswaran S, Thiruppathi D, Vasimalai N. Synthesis of highly fluorescent carbon dots from bread waste and their nanomolar lead ions sensor application. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag. 2022; 18: 100748.

[30] Anpalagan K, Yin H, Cole I, Zhang T, Lai DTH. Quantum Yield Enhancement of Carbon Quantum Dots Using Chemical-Free Precursors for Sensing Cr (VI) Ions. Inorganics. 2024; 12: 96.

[31] Yin H, Chen W, Bratovic A, Li RW, Cole I. Carbon Quantum Dots as Emerging Antibacterial Nanomaterials: Strategies to Enhance Their Activity. C. 2026; 12: 46.

[32] Anpalagan K, Karakkat JV, Truskewycz A, Saedi AA, Joseph P, Apostolopoulos V, et al. Bioimaging of C2C12 Muscle Myoblasts Using Fluorescent Carbon Quantum Dots Synthesized from Bread. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10: 1575.

[33] Radchanka A, Hrybouskaya V, Iodchik A, Achtstein AW, Artemyev M. Zeta Potential-Based Control of CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dot Photoluminescence. J Phys Chem Lett. 2022; 13: 4912-7.

[34] Liao J, Cheng Z, Zhou L. Nitrogen-Doping Enhanced Fluorescent Carbon Dots: Green Synthesis and Their Applications for Bioimaging and Label-Free Detection of Au³⁺ Ions . ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016; 4: 3053-61.

[35] Wang Y, Hu A. Carbon quantum dots: synthesis, properties and applications. J Mater Chem C. 2014; 2: 6921.

[36] Usman M, Zaheer Y, Younis MR, Demirdogen RE, Hussain SZ, Sarwar Y, et al. The effect of surface charge on cellular uptake and inflammatory behavior of carbon dots. Colloid Interface Sci Commun. 2020; 35: 100243.

[37] Tang H, Lu C, Kodra O, Zhang J. Precursor effects on surface functionalization, photoluminescence, and cytotoxicity of carbon dots synthesized via microwave-assisted methods. Carbon Trends. 2025; 21: 100579.

[38] Wu Y, Li C, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ren Y. Carbon Quantum Dots Derived from Different Carbon Sources for Antibacterial Applications. Antibiotics. 2021; 10: 623.

[39] Makvandi P, Wang C, Zare EN, Borzacchiello A, Niu L, Tay FR. Metal-Based Nanomaterials in Biomedical Applications: Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity Aspects. Adv Funct Mater. 2020; 30: e30.

[40] Doolan JA, Williams GT, Hilton KLF, Chaudhari R, Fossey JS, Goult BT, et al. Advancements in antimicrobial nanoscale materials and self-assembling systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2022; 51: 8696-755.

[41] Cui T, Fan Y, Liu Y, Fan X, Sun Y, Cheng G, et al. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Self-Assembly Spermidine-Capped Carbon Dots against Staphylococcus aureus. Foods. 2023; 13: 67.

[42] Du X, Zhang M, Ma Y, Wang X, Liu Y, Huang H, et al. Size-dependent antibacterial of carbon dots by selective absorption and differential oxidative stress of bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2023; 634: 44-53.

[43] Borisov VB, Siletsky SA, Nastasi MR, Forte E. ROS Defense Systems and Terminal Oxidases in Bacteria. Antioxidants. 2021; 10: 839.

[44] Jomova K, Alomar SY, Alwasel SH, Nepovimova E, Kuca K, Valko M. Several lines of antioxidant defense against oxidative stress: antioxidant enzymes, nanomaterials with multiple enzyme-mimicking activities, and low-molecular-weight antioxidants. Arch Toxicol. 2024; 98: 1323-67.

[45] Wang H, Song Z, Gu J, Li S, Wu Y, Han H. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots for Preventing Biofilm Formation and Eradicating Drug-Resistant Bacteria Infection. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019; 5: 4739-49.

[46] Yadav P, Shah K, Kansara K, Kumar A, Rawal R, Bhatia D. Tissue-Derived Primary Cell Type Dictates the Endocytic Uptake Route of Carbon Quantum Dots and In Vivo Uptake . ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2023; 6: 1629-38.

[47] Surovtsev IV, Jacobs-Wagner C. Subcellular Organization: A Critical Feature of Bacterial Cell Replication. Cell. 2018; 172: 1271-93.

[48] Havrdová M, Urbančič I, Bartoň Tománková K, Malina L, Štrancar J, Bourlinos AB. Self-Targeting of Carbon Dots into the Cell Nucleus: Diverse Mechanisms of Toxicity in NIH/3T3 and L929 Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 5608.