Temporomandibular joint reconstruction via computer-assisted surgery simulation

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the precision of computer-assisted surgery simulation in mandibular condyle reconstruction using a costochondral graft. Methods: Ten patients (mean age: 14.5 years) with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology and associated pain were included in the study. All patients underwent TMJ reconstruction using costochondral grafts planned through computer-assisted surgical simulation. Preoperative assessment included mouth opening, facial asymmetry, and the differences between planned and actual mandibular positioning. Results: Postoperative mouth opening was significantly improved in all patients, and facial profile modifications were enhanced. The site of the costochondral graft relative to the glenoid fossa was found to be satisfactory in postoperative radiographs, computed tomography images, and quantitative analysis. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that virtual surgical planning combined with 3D-printed guiding templates enhanced treatment planning, provided precise osteotomy guidance, facilitated accurate repositioning of bony segments, and improved the contouring of mandibular anatomy in the management of TMJ deformities (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06811415).

Keywords

computer-assisted surgical simulation / costochondral graft / surgical guide / temporomandibular joint

References

[1] Wolford LM, Cassano DS, Goncalves JR. Common TMJ disorders: Orthodontic and surgical management. In: McNamara JA Jr., Kapila SD, VanRiper KY, editors. Temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain: separating controversy from consensus. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; 2009. pp. 159-98.

[2] Rashid M, Tamimy MS, Ehtesham-Ul-Haq, Sarwar SU, Rizvi ST. Benign paediatric mandibular tumours: experience in reconstruction using vascularised fibula. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65: e325-31.

[3] Shan XF, Cai ZG, Zhang J, Zhang JG. Bimaxillary reconstruction with vascularised and non-vascularised fibula. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: e474-6.

[4] Cope MR, Moos KF, Hammersley N. The compressible silicone rubber prosthesis in temporomandibular joint disease. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 31: 376-84.

[5] Saeed NR, Kent JN. A retrospective study of the costochondral graft in TMJ reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32: 606-9.

[6] Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ. Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 597-604.

[7] Katsuragi Y, Kayano S, Akazawa S, Nagamatsu S, Koizumi T, Matsui T, et al. Mandible reconstruction using the calcium-sulphate three-dimensional model and rubber stick: a new method, ‘mould technique’, for more accurate, efficient and simplified fabrication. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64: 614-22.

[8] Rotaru H, Stan H, Florian IS, Schumacher R, Park YT, Kim SG, et al. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: e169-76.

[9] Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF, Christensen AM, Lemoine JJ, Liebschner MA, et al. Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 728-34.

[10] Xia J, Ip HH, Samman N, Wang D, Kot CS, Yeung RW, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 29: 11-7.

[11] Zheng J, Fan B, Zhong X, Qu P, Liu P, Guo K, et al. Application of computer-assisted surgical simulation for temporomandibular joint reconstruction with costochondral graft. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016; 9: 17650-6.

[12] Bai G, He D, Yang C, Chen M, Yuan J, Wilson JJ. Application of digital templates to guide total alloplastic joint replacement surgery with biomet standard replacement system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72: 2440-52.

[13] Tepper O, Hirsch D, Levine J, Garfein E. The new age of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning in reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 192e-4e.

[14] Zheng G, Su Y, Liao G, Jiao P, Liang L, Zhang S, et al. Mandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative simulation and transferring templates: cadaveric study of accuracy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: 1480-5.

[15] Harsha G, Reddy SG, Talasila S, Salaam SA, Srinivasulu M, Reddy VS. Mandibular reconstruction using AO/ASIF stainless steel reconstruction plate: a retrospective study of 36 cases. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13: 75-9.

[16] Yamanaka Y, Yajima H, Kirita T, Shimomura H, Tamaki S, Aoki K, et al. Mandibular reconstruction with vascularised fibular osteocutaneous flaps using prefabricated stereolithographic mandibular model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: 1751-3.

[17] Saeed N, Hensher R, McLeod N, Kent J. Reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint autogenous compared with alloplastic. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 40: 296-9.

[18] Khadka A, Hu J. Autogenous grafts for condylar reconstruction in treatment of TMJ ankylosis: current concepts and considerations for the future. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41: 94-102.

[19] Sidebottom AJ. Alloplastic or autogenous reconstruction of the TMJ. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res. 2013; 51: 135-9.

[20] Sharma H, Chowdhury S, Navaneetham A, Upadhyay S, Alam S. Costochondral Graft as Interpositional material for TMJ Ankylosis in Children: A Clinical Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015; 14: 565-72.

[21] Aagaard E, Thygesen T. A prospective, single-centre study on patient outcomes following temporomandibular joint replacement using a custom-made Biomet TMJ prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43: 1229-35.

[22] Lu C, He D, Yang C, Wilson JJ. Use of computer-assisted templates for placement of osteotomies in lateral gap arthroplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73: 30-8.